Ukraine

Leave a comment Posted on September 30, 2022October 1, 2022 by mrflagg47 Analysis, Gaming, Opinion, Politics

The Third Word War (Sega CD, 1994, Residual From The War Games Series, Cheat Post)

I assume the reason the words are curved at the bottom is that this is on a flatscreen CRT TV but the video input signal is either being output or processed like it’s for the convex-screen models. It happens on other games too, you may have noted it in my Doom post.

As I said 4 years ago…

As we watch the Democrats peddle their warmongering interventionist and laissez-faire let’s-wait-for-war attitudes, ie as they play their war games on their way to the fall brawl known as the midterm elections, where voters will probably vote Democrat to bring us nookular annihilation, I’ll take a look at some literal war games. Cold War video games, anyway.

That “let’s-wait-for-war attitude” remark is more reflective of the time I originally wrote it, at which point Democrats had briefly softened their warmongering from its 2017 levels (where Democrats wanted a nuclear war with Russia because they lost an election and blamed it on Russia… so protesting in the Capitol on January 6 because you thought an election was stolen is worse than trying to trigger a nuclear war because you thought an election was stolen- which Democrats STILL believe (despite scandal-free Obama and members of his team debunking it) while saying Republicans are terrorist Nazis who believe “the big lie” if they think 2020 was stolen).

Anyway, today we’ll look at a game I had wanted to do 4 years ago but didn’t get around to.

The Game

Imagine the game Civilization but you choose who to attack with a drop-down menu and the only time you get to move units on a map is when you start a battle and enter the Real-Time Strategy part of the game. Also you don’t even have to attack if you have enough money to buy out the foe.

I first tried to play as Russia, thinking I could mimic the moves that led to the Ukraine crisis. Instead, it turned out the world was totally bananas so that wasn’t going to work. Then the video output glitched *(already here you can see it’s darker than usual)* so I had to shutoff the console and try again.

It looks like something you’d play on a computer: you have a cursor and drop-down menus where you select what you want to do, and then the chance for some numerical inputs. You have a set amount of money in each turn, and can only take a couple of actions before you’re not allowed to act anymore (there’s a counter for it). You can invest the money in yourself or other countries. The benefit of foreign investment is you can either make them friendly or conquer their economies.

Now comes the “Third World War” part. You have military units you can send out, plus you can launch different types of attacks on a foreign country without invading. Surprisingly for a game named “Third World War”, your nuclear strikes are limited and don’t escalate to the world blowing itself apart. Maybe Putin played this before making his nuclear threats?

What’s interesting is some of the mechanics at play. You have unrealistic elements like increasing tax audits causing a rise in the morale of your population, or Canada developing chemical and nuclear weapons. But then there are some very realistic mechanics, like the fact that other countries can bomb cities and maim civilians without a care in the world but then America is condemned and loses allies if they do the same thing (same also goes for if you play as Israel where liberals really do want to “drive the Jews into the sea” I guess because they DON’T use human shields like Palestine does, yet strangely if you’re NOT playing as Israel they can invade at will with no condemnation), even if the country they’re doing it to just invaded somebody. Really, that applies to anyone you play as, and I’m sure idiots sucking propaganda worldwide can sympathize with how their special slice of Hell is always persecuted just like when you play as them in this game.

This is a very loooooong game to play, so have a few hours on hand. I went for an hour and the status quo was the same an hour in as it was at the start. Luckily there is a save feature. You can also play different scenarios, whether it’s erupting the Cold War into a nuclear conflict, starting a Third World War in the 1990s, or a free-for-all (though the Third World War scenario seems like that too). It definitely has a lot of replay value if this is your kind of thing.

Now for the combat- at times, you can get caught in a land war where you get to command military units. You’re shown the battlefield, but not all at the same time, and the camera starts over the enemy’s units. You hover the cursor over one of your units, and upon selecting it you can direct them to destinations and tell them who/what to attack. Once per battle you can also call in an air strike either from the air force or navy or both depending on who you have available. Just be careful with that- it takes them 20-30 seconds to get there, so enemy troops could easily have moved out of range of their attack. You can’t target specific units with them, rather you can only call for a strike at a general area and hope the enemy is still there when the attack comes. This is the Real-Time Strategy part I described earlier, for the casual reader not hip on game terms. Given the use of a cursor to point and click on things, this part too seems designed for a PC (I so dislike using controllers instead of a mouse for RTS games that I surrendered my copy of Command And Conquer on the Sega Saturn, which is not compatible with the mouse released for the Saturn… but I traded it for a Hogan’s Heroes boxset so while I was disappointed I had to trade it off it wasn’t a total loss).

Getting a ground battle started is not as easy as just picking a target. You also can control what each of those 16 armies have in them, a super level of micromanaging. Also- if you want to weaken the enemy with an air strike before starting combat *(as opposed to during combat)*, you have to do the air strike in one turn and then combat the next turn because it will always start combat before doing an air strike if you try to do them in the same turn *(air strikes outside of combat don’t effect your ability to do air strikes during combat)*.

Overall I have to say this high-level involved game isn’t really my style unless I plan to dedicate a day to it, but I’d probably get too bored after hour 2 of no progress. It’s a little… dry. You don’t exactly see how your economic moves affect your country and the world, and how they’re countered. There’s a lot of numbers and graphs too. Plus you’re not exactly seeing everything all at once, you have to scroll through pages of data every turn to make an informed decision. Also in between turns you get a news ticker at the bottom of the screen telling you what countries gained what weapons or what economic crisis or disaster affected which country, and you need to pay attention to that and take it into account in your turn. A lot of detail goes into this, it’s a very immersive and time-consuming experience, and it’s not fast-paced in the least bit. Even the ground combat portion takes a while- your units move slowly.

Then you remember it’s the Sega CD in 1994 and realize it’s a pretty good game given the circumstances, and usually can be found pretty cheap… or at least it used to be. In 2018 I got it complete in box for $5, but today that’d be $40 on eBay, or $15 for the game by itself. I’m planning a series on games that are inexplicably expensive and get the feeling I should’ve saved this one for that.

The Real World War III Is About To Begin!

Yes, this is also a cheat post.

Earlier this week I interviewed someone about Putin’s nuclear threats, how with his mentality he might not be bluffing, and how we’re not paying attention to the warning signs and just assume some sort of moral shield will protect us and we don’t have to understand how the enemy thinks, nor should we try to give the bad guy a little of what he wants in order to avoid a situation where precious liberal cities get nuked (the same liberals who say in all cases we should send unarmed, powerless, counselors to stop a crazy man with a gun who’s killing people because the nutcase just needs to be understood (as if social workers were infallible, as if victims had no rights and the killers should just be given a lecture and sent on their way… and rapists too, for you liberals who say there’s an epidemic and then vote to increase it) also say we should continually provoke and eventually fight a crazy man with nuclear weapons and that we shouldn’t even try to understand him, except to understand how we can attack first. They say you’re a traitor if you don’t shut up and obey Democrats’ calls to war without examining the bigger picture- just look at the Left’s McCarthy-era reaction to Tucker Carlson’s nuanced view on staying out of the war, in some cases the same Left that said we should not have tried to stop Russia-backed North Vietnam from invading South Vietnam).

Since the interview was conducted, America seems to have decided to up the ante and sabotage Europe’s principle source of energy. If it turns out America is the culprit, then we pretty much cut off our nose to spite our face by royally screwing over our European allies. Remember how you Lefties said Trump was evil because he wanted other NATO nations to do their fair share of the work (ironic that you communists were AGAINST someone pulling their weight instead of mooching off others like a billionaire)? Well, I’d say making sure their citizens freeze to death in the winter is a bit worse, this coming after (as mentioned in the last post) the Biden Administration begged them not to evacuate their people from Afghanistan and leave them to be used as hostages or killed by the Taliban. Again, Trump saying NATO countries should put in equal effort according to their abilities is way different than the Biden Administration outright trying to kill citizens of NATO countries, but I guess that major difference is lost on the “orange man bad” crowd.

Of course it didn’t have to be this way, this proxy war Democrats are pushing (it could’ve been over in April but the Biden Administration teamed up with England to sabotage a peace deal) in Ukraine that leads to billions of taxpayer dollars going to Ukraine and defense contractors only to end up in the pockets of corrupt politicians over there and over here with defense contractors spending our money to put warmongers in office so the money keeps coming (I thought Democrats opposed the military–industrial complex?). America is pretty much the reason the war hasn’t ended yet (this war is NOT about “protecting Democracy in Ukraine” as liberals chant, since Zelensky has shown himself to be one execution away from being as anti-Democratic as Putin), as you heard in the interview and saw in my last post. So anything that happens, such as Europe’s power being cut, is on the Leftist Biden Administration. Worse, it looks like that might be a permanent cut given the damage to the pipelines (granted, the whole reason Europe got hooked on Russian power is because of Leftists believing Russian propaganda… which is ironic since they tried to blame Russia for Trump getting elected yet they believed everything Russia said about the climate that led to dependence on Russian energy).

And it really looks like the Biden Administration is responsible for the pipeline sabotage. Consider this- as recorded in the last post they had no problem trying to say Russia would launch a false flag to start a war, yet when NATO all but accused Russia of launching a false flag with its pipelines suddenly the Biden Administration came to Russia’s defense while at the same time telling Americans to evacuate Russia (ostensibly because Russia might conscript them, which actually has been grounds for war in the past… a war that left the White House as a pile of ash just as one with Russia would). It’s like they knew they screwed up and are trying to limit the damage.

Anyway, this definite provocation will just make Putin more likely to lash out irrationally, with a nuclear reprisal still on the table. Anyone else remember how Leftists wanted to disarm our nuclear arsenal (and as recently as a month before the invasion wanted to reduce it)? Hey Lefties, quick question: how would we deter Putin from escalating already in this crisis if we didn’t have weapons of mass destruction on the table?

For that matter, remember that Democrats consistently are anti-military (check out that link to a Salon piece in that post I linked to- hey Lefties, if you don’t need the military to protect your freedoms how come you keep sending military weapons designed for our military to a foreign military and say it’s to protect your freedom from Putin?). They’ve been very open about wanting to dissolve the institution, and under their current regime we’ve seen recruitment numbers drop while the military releases perfectly fit soldiers by the thousands who love this country while keeping/promoting soldiers they train to hate this country and love terrorists, and hate the race that constitutes the majority of the American public (not that the ones left are trained to be competent, they might make the Russians look competent by comparison. And let’s not forget that the folks in charge of the military think America shouldn’t exist.). So why would these people who hate America fight Russia to protect it? These people, taught through CRT that America is irredeemably racist and the majority population is the cause of it, would sooner take Russia’s side if we were invaded- why WOULDN’T they? Russia just has to claim to be the woke liberator and that the Leftists in the military are being lied to by evil white fascists about who the real enemy is, and like all good civil rights warriors they want to be on the right side of history don’t they?

On the one hand Democrats want a nuclear war with Russia and are doing everything they can to recklessly plough forward into it, but on the other hand they spent decades trying to disarm us and are STILL working to do so. What conclusion can we draw about them (and any ex-military who join the party) from this?

Yes I know I railed on Democrats a lot while most Republicans are aiding and abetting this (when looking for that article on Rand Paul, I saw that Leftwing Rolling Stone magazine said he was working for Putin because he dared pause funding to Ukraine), but this is the sort of thing the MAGA movement in the Republican Party was against; it’s those the “extremist” “clear and present danger” faction of the Republican Party believes. If you Lefties hadn’t welcomed the ejected warmongers like Liz Cheney with open arms and embraced their violent worldview, hadn’t embraced those you said were liars who tricked us into invading Iraq, then they’d be even less relevant and the RINOs too cowardly to jump ship would be more inclined to work for peace or at least not work against it just to keep their checks coming.

What Do You Think?

You voted Democrat, so I guess you wanted World War III after all. Whether it was 62 million or 81 million who voted for Biden, this is what at least a third of the country seems to want. Vote Democrat again this fall to make sure we all die.

Well… not all of us. Wealthy executives at our defense companies, a few billionaires, and the leaders of the Democratic Party will survive a nuclear war because they’re for the people and for equity, and equity means the royalty and nobility in society survive in luxury while the serfs die in nuclear hellfire or struggle to live in post-apocalyptic hellscapes, but that’s what you vote for and defend so ardently on the internet, in social media, and in the real world with your protests/riots so I guess that’s how you feel. It’s convenient that I live near a prime target so I’ll be vaporized in an instant, but I regert that I won’t get to see radiation poisoning dole out karma to you while you continue to praise your Democrat leaders for their bravery in forcing this situation on you.

Leave a comment Posted on September 12, 2022September 11, 2022 by mrflagg47 Analysis, Atari, Gaming, News, Opinion, Politics

Missile Command (Atari 400/800, 1981, Residual From The War Games Series)

Hmmm… as will be made apparent later, I think my original leading paragraph from exactly 4 years ago still applies:

As we watch the Democrats peddle their warmongering interventionist and laissez-faire let’s-wait-for-war attitudes, ie as they play their war games on their way to the fall brawl known as the midterm elections, where voters will probably vote Democrat to bring us nookular annihilation, I’ll take a look at some literal war games. Cold War video games, anyway.

Today, we’ll look at a game I had wanted to do 4 years ago with the rest of the Missile Command games that were part of the War Games series, but I never got around to buying the hardware. Ironically enough at that time I had the disposable income to do so but thought it’d be too expensive, but now that I finally bought it I financially shouldn’t have!

The Game

I still say it looks like you’re shooting down American strategic bombers.

I played this on a contemporary TV that’s about the right size for a contemporary computer monitor.

Not much to say here that wasn’t said in the last one. This is pretty much the Atari 5200 version, though I’m wanting to say the cursor movements felt as smooth as the Game Boy Advance version, and looking at a comparison video of the 400/800 and 5200 versions I’m wanting to say that the 400/800 is faster, though the graphics are the same. That much struck me immediately about it.

Spotlight On The Atari 400

It blew my mind that this machine came out in 1979. I thought for sure it was later than that. Just look at the quality of the games on it and its computing power, and compare that with its competitors at the time (and note that for the TI-99 the games start looking better when they’re ports of Atari 400/800 games- but not like the originals!). The keyboard keys though… those were very interesting, and I enjoyed playing with them. Too bad I’m giving this one to my cousin and keeping the 800XL I bought, but he’d want this one because it came with the box and manuals whereas the 800XL was a PAL model that didn’t even come with connection or power cables… just a copy of Pac Man that was missing its back half for some bizarre reason.

Throw-Away Warfare

This post underwent many changes. I started this in the fall of 2021, then worked on it in the days right before the Ukraine conflict when it looked like the Biden Administration was lying about Russia’s intentions (I thought I was wrong for a few months because the Biden Admin made it sound like they were lying when they said Russia would invade, but then the Biden team freely admitted to a loving media that they really WERE lying and Russia’s invasion was just a coincidence- this wouldn’t be the last time they lied about Ukraine.). I added more stuff about Democrats provoking a war, then over the first month of the Ukrainian conflict I added all sorts to it, then abandoned it because it just got too messy.

It wouldn’t be part of the War Games series if I didn’t talk about war, and boy are Democrats into that this year! Remember how I predicted a conflict with Russia 4 years ago if Democrats had their way? Well here we are, and Democrats started it- in 2014! I’ll get to that in a moment, but first I need to go over the Left’s attitude towards war.

Today’s trend can be traced back to just after World War II. China could’ve gone communist or not, it was up to America to decide. The non-communists in China had helped us during World War II. Democrats- whose party had been infiltrated by communist spies– decided to abandon our Chinese allies to the genocidal ferocity of the Chinese Communists who still maintain that practice to this day. Democrats didn’t care then, they didn’t care when China wiped out millions of its own people (in fact, I’ve seen Leftists in various forums deny that anyone was killed), and we see it today with the Leftist love of China’s genocidal history, where alleged civil rights activists ally themselves with the racist/genocidal Chinese regime (and the liberal/Democrat-ran media and allies in Big Tech cover it up- indeed they believe America is worse than China), where BLM civil rights allies defect to the racist/genocidal Chinese government. A police officer can’t even shoot someone attempting to murder people without BLM pouncing on them (well… not unless the one killed is white, then BLM doesn’t care about alleged police brutality), yet the Chinese police can arrest people for no crime at all and harvest their organs and BLM sees them as a friend. Kind of makes you suspicious on what BLM really wants.

But the point of the above is that Democrats/Leftists/Liberals/whatever you want to call them used the anti-communist Chinese in World War II and then threw them away once they outlived their usefulness. This happened again in Vietnam. The Leftists started that war. We are taught that Nixon was eeeeeevil and corrupt and the most rotten thing ever to be in the White House (before Trump of course), but as I posted about in the link above, Nixon actually ended the Vietnam War on terms that allowed South Vietnam to exist. All we had to do was keep money coming to the South. A quick side note- yes we did need to pay the South Vietnamese because we were the reason they existed in the state they were in, it was our responsibility (the Democrat-ran American government had its CIA remove a stable leader who didn’t want American soldiers there and may have brokered an agreement with the North, a move that led to the war’s outbreak and the North’s mass-murdering ways being inflicted on the South) because actions taken by Democrats in Power (D.I.P.s) led directly to the threat faced by innocent civilians.

Anyway, once Gerald Ford finished what Nixon started that made Democrats so mad they impeached him (let’s not kid ourselves, Democrats cheated against Nixon in both 1960 and 1968, so the only reason they went after Nixon over doing exactly what they did is political, probably because Nixon ended their little war) the Democrats- who owned Congress- decided that they’d no longer protect the civilians their reckless policies endangered and withdrew funding for the South Vietnamese (again, as referenced in my post linked earlier). Done with their South Vietnamese allies, they tossed them to the wolves, just like they did with the Chinese. It gets better though- Democrats refused to take in refugees from South Vietnam.

And no, these aren’t the mythical Democrats that switched over to make the Republican Party racist in some sort of secular retelling of Lucifer being cast out of paradise (you atheist Lefties like to substitute government for religion in your war against religion (and you atheists don’t mind mass murder), so I see why you needed to have a creation story like this to explain where your devil came from), unless you think Jerry Brown and Joe Biden are Republicans.

This brings us to the modern age- Iraq and Afghanistan. Republicans started those, yes, but there was bipartisan support. Then Democrats took over and destroyed all progress in Iraq, even ignoring President Bush’s prescient statement that if we left too soon a new terror cell would rise. He didn’t know at the time that this would be called ISIS, and didn’t know that the next Democrat President would aid ISIS in addition to creating circumstances allowing ISIS to rise while tossing aside our friends in the region and deliberately abandoning efforts to create a democracy. Next came Afghanistan, where the well-organized withdrawal that the Republican Trump scheduled was thrown away by Democrats along with every ally we had in Afghanistan (barring the occasional political stunt, but also for fear of a failed rescue attempt making them look bad politically, so better not to try at all was their reasoning). Democrats didn’t bother consulting with allies for days after the withdrawal started, in fact they said on August 13th they weren’t closing the embassy in Kabul down and the city wasn’t in any danger, but even while they spoke the staff was getting ready to evacuate and by the 15th the building was empty as the Taliban took the city. They lied a lot about the withdrawal as it happened- they bribed the Afghan President (Didn’t Democrats say quid pro quo deals were impeachable? Or is that only when it’s not a Democrat making them?) to lie that Afghanistan was in no danger thus making people think they didn’t need to leave the country, during the evacuation they told people NOT to evacuate and that they wouldn’t bother coming for them, then to top it all off they lied about people being stuck there (and Biden thought it was a joke)! And all that chaos and death just because Biden wanted to meet a political goal, and you Democrats would vote for him again in a heartbeat after that.

As you read in the links above America made a commitment to get our Afghan allies out and Trump’s plan allowed that to happen. But then Democrats showed up and threw away our allies once again. What else do you call it when the Democrats in charge tell other NATO countries to stop withdrawing their friends and forces because it exposes the Democrats’ lies about why we abandoned everyone (worse- Biden withdrew the military before the civilians yet with less than a month until the 9/11 deadline he didn’t even have a plan for getting our civilians and allies out, caring more about the political victory than bodies on the ground)? Democrats didn’t just throw away our Afghani allies that time, they tried to throw our NATO allies out too and demanded they stay in the trashcan just so Democrats could look good! (Speaking of, Democrats were happy with how the disaster went and insisted that all the women they threw away in Afghanistan are better off now than they were before the withdrawal. No, no they are not, but even though Democrats are becoming aware of the problem they’re still happy to campaign on what happened as if it were great.)

I guess in a sick way that’s to the Democrats’ credit that they finally realized after 80 years how unpopular their policy of throwing away allies after they’ve outlived their usefulness is to folks outside their party. They tried to hide their usual scheme of ditching our Afghan allies by telling lies about how we couldn’t evacuate them even as our NATO allies easily evacuated their Afghan friends- and even telling our NATO allies not to evacuate their people so that the Democrats’ lie would look better. They also actively interfered in civilian efforts to get people out. trying to stop that from happening. They tried to hide their abandonment of our Afghan allies and violations of our promises to them by just shoving as many random people onto the evacuation craft as they could and hoping the public would be fooled into thinking that taking a bunch of strangers was the same as fulfilling promises to friends, friends who were hunted down and brutalized by the Taliban using the billions of dollars of equipment the Democrats left for them.

Oh and we still have Americans trapped in Afghanistan. You know how they just let anyone on the planes? They STOPPED Americans with papers from boarding the planes. They stopped women and orphans from boarding the planes in favor of fighting-age males who might be tied to terror cells. I hope at least the Americans left behind were all Democrats, because that would be the only bit of justice we’ll see in this world for the Democratic Party.

What We See In Ukraine

I predict the same thing in Ukraine. Democrats started this conflict in 2014, and they’ll abandon their allies there too. I promised an explanation so here it is.

Democrat God-King Barack Obama who had a flawless, scandal-free Presidency that represents the golden era of America (because creating ISIS, saying that America will never again have a good economy, and creating racial strife made him a deity for Democrats) decided to overthrow Ukraine’s government. No real reason for it, he just didn’t like how a foreign election went so he overthrew that government and installed one that he did like. This adds a layer of irony to the Democrats’ complaints about Russia interfering in our elections, as if Democrats would never do such a thing despite doing it to our allies- and it wasn’t a practice confined just to Ukraine. Democrats attempted it in Israel by using taxpayer money to fund the Prime Minister’s opponent in an election, and (while still President) Obama campaigned in England to oppose Brexit as if it was his personal business what a foreign country did with its own internal affairs. As if any of these incidents weren’t foreign interference, as if what Obama did in Ukraine wasn’t an “attempt to overthrow Democracy” as Democrats like to say these days, as if what Obama did in Ukraine wasn’t the same regime toppling that Democrats (repeating here that Democrat/Leftist/Liberal are being treated as synonyms) condemned Republicans like Reagan and Bush for doing.

Naturally, when you “overthrow democracy” like Democrats did, that leads to instability and factions. Some factions would want to reunite with Russia. Ukraine was part of Russia for a couple of centuries, so the broad-minded among you might understand how some Ukrainians would want to help Russia regain power over their country, or at least understand how heavily Russian some parts were. At the same time that Obama was destabilizing the Ukrainian government and helping some Neo Nazis gain power (every member of their party who is now saying Republicans are fascist, that has been lying about Trump saying Neo Nazis were fine people just to smear him as a sympathizer, are silent about their scandal-free Democrat President ensuring Neo Nazis ran a country), he was showing weakness to Russia while creating a fascist puppet state on their border so they decided to seize Crimea. While ethically not the right thing to do, strategically it totally was the right thing at the right time.

Look at it from Russia’s perspective- for centuries, they have been invaded over and over again by European powers. That is why they want buffer states. Centuries of valid paranoia led to this attitude of mistrust that the Russians have. Yes, NATO never wanted Ukraine, but how is Russia supposed to believe that when you topple Ukraine’s government and install a NATO-friendly one full of Neo-Nazis (y’know, the heirs to the most recent guys who invaded Russia)? So they took Crimea, which wasn’t much because a lot of folks there were friendly towards Russia anyway because of that centuries-long relation I mentioned.

Russia did want more, but a ceasefire that no one adhered to was reached and a very violent peace ensued up until February 2022. During this time, Russia took advantage of the big open border and friendly ethnic Russians to arm separatists. See Democrats, this is one of the downfalls of an open border policy… then again, you hate America so I guess you’d be happy if any power- including Russia- took advantage of your open borders policy to do the same thing to America. Strangely, under the anti-Russian Democrat rule, there’s been a nearly 2000% increase in Russians coming illegally into the U.S. over the border as compared to the election year for the alleged Pro-Russia-Putin-Puppet-President where you Democrats warned that the Putin Puppet might win if Russia was able to interfere. Kinda weird then that Russians didn’t start crossing until after the Putin Puppet lost, unless the current President and his political party had strong ties to Russia and would be seen begging Russia for oil… nah, how likely is any of that, Democrat?

Back to the history lesson- put aside the 6 years of being told Russia is the enemy and consider Russia’s point of view. Suddenly, as I talked about in 2018, this world power with nuclear missiles who was your best friend after you invaded a sovereign nation (Hillary Clinton wanted to make Russia a technological competitor to the U.S. and Obama wanted to be their friend while the bodies of their victims in Georgia were still warm), and still a friend after you seized part of another sovereign nation, is saying they hate you and want a war with you. Worse, they’re lying about you in order to get their citizens to support this war. Reread the 2018 War Games posts- Democrats openly said they wanted war with Russia! And this power that wants war with Russia had just “overthrown Democracy” in a country on Russia’s border to install confirmed Neo Nazis. And like I said, Russia has been invaded many times in its past, including by Nazis.

Now we come to the end of 2021. The Biden Administration is begging Russia for oil to lower our gas prices. Democrats lied to the world that we invaded Iraq for oil, and now those same Democrats who voted for that oil invasion are in charge and want Russia’s oil- the same Democrats who overthrew a government on Russia’s border and suddenly love George W. Bush whom they previously accused of invading Iraq for oil. The same Democrats who are now saying Russia will invade Ukraine, which is at this time a lie as I mentioned earlier, as much of a lie as Democrats say the WMD pretext for invading Iraq for its oil was- Democrats even admitted after the Ukraine war started that they were just lying about Russia invading, that they really had no idea it was going to happen. Oh, and suddenly those folks who were accused of lying about WMDs in Iraq are saying Russia is a threat (and lying about things being Russian efforts to interfere in elections) and are treated with love by the Democrats. Hmmmmm…

At this point, Russia has several options on the table, the worst of which is invading Ukraine. But their government is horribly corrupt and ran by a monster so they choose invasion. Since Russia has hardly changed in anything except labels (ie. monarchy, communist, democracy, oligarchy, but all still just as corrupt and imperialist as the other) it used its 19th century mentality to conclude invasion is what should be done. In today’s world with today’s morals it’s awful, but Russia isn’t from today’s world. So while it’s horrible and brutal, it shouldn’t have been unexpected that Russia would do the (morally) exact worst possible thing they could do in their situation.

Throwing Away Ukraine

Democrats had a lot of money tied-up in crooked Ukraine. Some biowarfare labs too, I guess getting around our various treaties on such things by outsourcing the work. That may be why Obama overthrew Ukraine’s government in the first place, “overthrew democracy” to use a Democrat phrase in vogue now- to ensure the Biden family and other such families could profit from the place (and use their puppets there to interfere in future elections), much as what America did to Cuba in the leadup to its communist revolution (ironic how those kids in the Che Guevara shirts and the Castro-loving media created the same corruption in Ukraine that led to their rise, but instead call you a traitor if you have a problem with it. I guess it’s ok to “overthrow democracy” everywhere else, and it’s not “overthrowing democracy” to assassinate their political opponents according to them). It shouldn’t be unexpected they’d do stuff like this- remember that Nancy Pelosi risked World War III just to help the family business in Taiwan, and saw an immediate profit from it. So with Democrats and their globalist friends financially tied to Ukraine it’s no wonder they’d play up this invasion the way they did.

Even if the conflict in Ukraine was not capping off 6 years of anti-Russian histrionics and lies, they’d still have overplayed Ukraine’s importance. Look at what they have tied-up.

Neo Nazis that Obama supported. They lost a bit of power since Obama was in charge, but they’re still a force. The Democrat-owned media in the U.S. even ran fluff pieces talking about how awesome these Neo Nazis are, and the Democrat-owned fact checkers and mobs of Democrat liars on the internet try to deny that these Neo Nazis exist.
Money.
Biowarfare labs. The Biden Administration admitted these places existed in Ukraine. Really, Russia should’ve used them as a pretext for invading, because bioweapons are considered WMDs. It wouldn’t justify Russia’s brutality, but it would justify invading, as all the Democrats who voted for invading Iraq would tell you.

But now that it looks like Ukraine is losing while we send them billions of dollars (that disappear with the weapons we send) at a time when we are facing Democrat–induced destruction of our economy (once again), the Democrats’ media friends are starting to admit the truth that Ukraine could lose. This is very significant. You were a traitor if you even thought such a thing, the media/Democrat narrative had been Russia will lose if we just keep sending money to Ukraine. Now the truth that this never was true is being allowed to be expressed. Too late for the people the Democrats tried to cancel for saying this months ago. It won’t be long before support for Ukraine collapses, and they become just another cause Democrats tossed aside.

Ukraine’s offenses are few, far between, and failed moves for the sake of political optics rather than winning a battle. Russian planes fly free over the country. Ukraine’s benevolent, uncorrupt leadership just voted to give themselves a pay raise that’s funded by YOUR taxpayer dollars. Their military is quitting. They warned US citizens to evacuate.

Unfortunately, like with South Vietnam, Democrats made this situation much worse than it needed to be. How much of the barbarism would’ve been ended sooner had the Democrats not promised Ukrainian leadership support (and who knows what else) in their struggle? Russia has offered Ukraine terms. Would they have been taken more seriously, indeed would negotiations towards a favorable outcome for both sides, have happened already if Democrats weren’t encouraging the Ukrainian people to keep up the fight? By the way, guess which politicians the people manufacturing the weapons we send to Ukraine are donating to. The Republicans aren’t the only ones in the military-industrial complex. Consider this- days before Russia invaded, CBS’ 60 Minutes reported on February 20 that in response to Russia hurting Ukraine economically the U.S. was shipping WEAPONS to Ukraine. Not economic aid, WEAPONS. At the same time the Biden Administration was lying (as cited earlier) about Russia being aggressive.

Speaking of weapons, I noticed that the Russian Collussionists try to say Trump is a Putin puppet and delayed aid to Ukraine for political reasons that he needed to be impeached over (he actually delayed it because 1. he noticed the corruption that has now led to aid disappearing during a war and wanted something done about it BEFORE people would die from it and 2. he was hoping his refusal would pressure other European countries to do something instead of making us do all the work). He was actually the first to ship them- after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, and for the next 2 years, Obama sent money and a few items that couldn’t be used as weapons. Trump sent actual weapons. Biden was the one who cut out the weapon shipments in 2021, right after Biden was paid by Russia to allow them to finish their pipeline (between this and Biden’s aforementioned quid pro quo with the Afghan President that cost lives, how has HE not been impeached?).

Think about that- in 2015 Democrats refused to provide weapons to Ukraine and threatened to withhold a billion dollars in non-lethal aid a year after Russia invaded, threatening to withhold the aid unless they fired a prosecutor investigating businesses tied to Democrat Joe Biden’s son. They had just praised that prosecutor too, but then Democrats threw him under the bus. Some friends they are! They overthrow Democracy in Ukraine and then when Russia invades they refuse to provide weapons and threaten to withhold all aid unless they let the Democrat Vice President’s son’s friends get away with corruption, and they demand the head of a friendly prosecutor they praised because he dared investigate a Biden. Then they accuse TRUMP of trying to bribe Ukraine with aid and impeach him over allegedly doing what Joe Biden actually did.

What a tale of hypocrisy and total disregard for lives, ethics, and Democracy that the Democratic Party has created here. As I opened this section with- are you really surprised Pelosi risked a war just for money? And again- they don’t seem to care about the Ukrainians who could’ve been saved if peace had been declared, nor about the Europeans facing an economic and humanitarian disaster with their own citizens because liberals over there obeyed green-groups backed by Russia and became dependent on Russia’s energy (in other words, they pulled a California. And just like with California you can bet the elites in society and lawmakers who advocated for this misery won’t be impacted by it. They’ll just pretend they care about the damage they did, win an election by hook or by crook, and go on doing what they’ve always done).

What Do You Think?

Looks like such a fun game, vote Democrat and make it happen! Oh wait- you already did, because this is what you wanted! And now Putin has threatened nuclear war and your vaunted Democrat leader of Congress almost started a war with China so that she could make a quick buck, except we don’t have any defenses against nuclear weapons like what were shown in the video game this post covered. As mentioned in the original post about this game- Democrats mocked the very notion and instead focused on making sure America could never launch a nuke, while allowing Russia and China (and even helping them) to build their arsenals. Democrats actually reduced our nuclear defenses in exchange for nothing from Russia. The same Russia they said we should hate.

Like say for example when the Biden Administration lied about having evidence Russia was about to invade Ukraine- the Biden Administration said it, the journalists and think tanks and intellectuals said it was true and cited their friends in the Biden Administration, then it turned out to be a lie and their response was “so what? It made the public do what we wanted them to do so it was a good thing”, as if following a blind path of propaganda towards nuclear Armageddon was good for humanity. But these lies are what those in power say to each other and to you, so it must be true! And if you look back, this is how World War I started, how we got “the lost generation”, millions dead, because the societal elites who thought war would be fun on paper aren’t, as with Ukraine today and nuclear war in the future, the ones doing the fighting and dying.

1 Comment Posted on January 26, 2022January 26, 2022 by mrflagg47 Analysis, News, Opinion, Politics

Headline Roundup 5

Part I
Part II
Part III

Part IV

All of these were supposed to go in the last one, but I didn’t think I’d ever get to them.

Liberals love using fear to control people. Remember how they accused Republicans of doing that, then smugly said they never would, then they used fear of COVID to try and legalize fascist vaccine mandates as mentioned in Headline Roundup 3? Well, now this writer here puts the pieces together on what liberals have been doing with domestic terrorism. They’re trying to say that their political enemies want a bloody civil war, the same ones they said wouldn’t stand a chance against the government, and the FBI and DOJ are helping to deliver with their false flag operations. How long before the FBI’s Patriot Front group decides to start something, and then have the Right blamed for it, and then the government uses that as justification to clamp down on the Right? Already, the DOJ has an outfit dedicated to persecuting people who disagree with the Biden Administration. It would not surprised me if this unit was the one that targeted a Democrat Congressman who opposed Biden. When 45% of Democrats want their political opponents in concentration camps and over 50% want them fined or in prison, is it really so hard to believe that the Democrat-ran Federal Government would do stuff like this? Just look at the January 6 Committee, it’s been invested with totally unconstitutional powers, it’s illegal, but Democrats are power-hungry and don’t care.

January 6, Legal Troubles

Ray Epps, the apparent FBI plant who ginned up a riot for his bosses to use as justification for political persecutions, has been acknowledged kinda sorta in that he’s the only “insurrectionist” the government defends and protects.

The Biden Administration continues to cover for the FBI’s role in January 6.

The DC Gitmo people are preventing January 6 inmates from contacting their lawyers. This is what justice looks like to liberals- in their hearts they believe you are guilty, so you need to suffer. Why bother with a trial or legal system when their lynch mob knows what justice looks like?

While unarmed protesters were shot dead and locked in solitary confinement for peacefully walking through the Capitol like many liberal protesters did in the past, the government allowed an Antifa bomber to go on bond. Because the FBI (who does not monitor Antifa) believes a bomber and violent rioting Democrats are less of a threat than a peaceful demonstrator. Meanwhile, a rapist was released after less than 6 months while January 6 folks have been imprisoned much longer for peacefully walking through a building. This is liberal justice at work.

A business owner who was robbed complained about policing in Democrat cities. His Democrat mayor paid him a visit, insulted him, and then her staff fined him. Like I said in the last Headline Roundup, the worst thing you could do to a Democrat is point out that they are wrong. They become Democrats just so they have a club to act smug and self-assured around and reinforce their fragile little snowflake egos.

At the Synagogue terror attack (Facebook’s Muslim community mourned his death after the attack by the way, more tolerance from the religion of peace as mentioned in Headline Roundup 3), the FBI violated its own protocol in an action that led to the death of the terrorist (and the FBI lied about their role, taking credit for freeing hostages even though they had nothing to do with that). As mentioned in the last Headline Roundup, since the FBI sees everyone the Democrats hate as terrorists and they’ve sent armed raiders to go after people who committed the misdemeanor of trespassing, how long before they kill someone who isn’t a terrorist because they decided to act unprofessionally? And wasn’t the whole George Floyd thing all about making sure law enforcement acted professionally? I guess Democrats are ok with them being disorganized thugs if they aren’t affected by it.

As expected, the January 6 committee is just to release hit jobs on Republicans as the midterms approach. Democrats are very open about wanting to use it and the legal system to prevent their opponents from running, I guess especially now that their voter fraud legislation was beaten multiple times.

While trying to say that January 6 was an attempt to overthrow the government by overturning elections, Democrats are still saying (I mentioned it in Headline Roundup 4 where none other than Joe Biden agreed) that the Midterms will not be legitimate if their pro-fraud voting reforms are not passed.

Very few have actually been indicted for sedition with the Capitol Riot, certainly none of the people still locked in prison merely for trespassing who have been denied their right to a trial (even the terrorist who ran over people in Waukesha was given a trial faster, but then again he didn’t make Democrats feel scared, in fact he is a Democrat according to his rantings). Further, the indictments for sedition came the day after the Associated Press pointed out that no one had been indicted yet, thus implying there was no evidence for it.

The FBI removed a January 6 rioter who had a gun and an earpiece from their most wanted list. I’m disappointed, I was hoping the FBI would arrest a fellow false flagging government agent again.

The governor of Michigan, a Democrat who the FBI created a fake kidnap plot around in order to discredit the Democrats’ political enemies, was an insurrectionist. One of the Democrat-approved insurrections though, I mentioned that there’s been a few.

A January 6 protester who peacefully entered the Capitol after police let him in is being tortured by the prison guards, because this is what liberal justice looks like. What do you expect from the party of concentration camps?

The FBI insisted that an Islamic terrorist seizing hostages at a synagogue had unclear motives. Maybe they had focused too much on parents opposed to the Democratic Party rather than terrorists.

In a city with a Soros-funded Democrat prosecutor who themselves is a criminal- the ideal liberal setup and you are racist if you disagree- it turns out that the leading cause of “unexpected” death of kids was murder. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice saw these numbers and decided there should be more of it, so they gave grant money to billionaire Soros’ anti-police groups in the name of stopping crime. I thought you anti-billionaire folks would’ve steered the money towards a grassroots organization, not a billionaire’s plaything.

Another Soros-funded prosecutor is racked with criminal charges after a political persecution of a Republican governor. The average citizen does not have the same power to withstand this that a governor does.

Like I said in Headline Roundup 4- DOJ setup an anti-extremist group, the military wants to root out extremists, and those in power defined “extremist” to mean their political opponents. The same people who want prison and concentration camps for the unvaccinated, with no science backing their idea, say that anyone who disagrees is the extremist.

A Democrat congressman was arrested for protesting outside the Capitol, but he is not an insurrectionist unlike other protesters we mentioned here. Because Democrats are allowed to do these things, that’s why.

Democrats are so soft on crime that they apologize to criminals for using words that might have the wrong connotation.

Biden’s energy secretary violated a stock disclosure law 9 times, but no one cares, whereas anyone out of power would be arrested by now.

It looks like Deep Staters told Trump some stuff, Trump readied an executive order based on that stuff but never issued it, and now those same Deep Staters are using his order based on their info as grounds to smear him. Much like the origins of the Mueller Probe, where the Deep State told Trump to fire somebody, and then they used that firing as grounds to start an investigation. Oh, and the Deep State’s favorite way to leak stuff seems to be a British Leftist at the Washington Post.

Democrats are sending a purple-heart decorated veteran who peacefully walked through the Capitol to a gulag where he will be tortured. Why? Because he asked about bail, something which Antifa bombers get, something which armed robbers and rapists in New York City don’t even have to worry about thanks to Democrat reforms (it also seems that child rapists get pardoned if their victim marries them, another precedent from the religion of peace). The legal system is only to punish their political enemies, not even criminals. In fact, they fabricated charges against at least one January 6 rioter… but it’s not the first time the Leftist Feds fabricated charges and made a very public statement about what they’d do to their political enemies.

Illegal aliens can use their arrest warrant as ID when boarding airplanes. The government is endangering the lives of passengers by allowing criminals who show proof they are fugitives to board a flight.

The DOJ decided not to prosecute a corrupt FBI agent who abused their position and power. I guess because they all do that, because they are all fascists it seems.

While the corrupt FBI ignores Antifa, Antifa threatened to blow up an event focused on describing Antifa terrorism.

A January 6 protester who did not enter the Capitol was charged with two felonies and Liberal judges and prosecutors tried to force him to turn against Trump in exchange for lesser charges.

Democrats arrested a woman in a wheelchair for not presenting her identification papers to enter a restaurant, yet it’s racist to expect people to show ID to vote.

Ashli Babbitt was actually trying to stop protesters from entering Pelosi’s office, and seemed to have been cornered by these folks when she was shot. Interesting how we have the people she tried to stop on camera, yet the FBI doesn’t want any of them, and it was Babbit who was shot, not any of the people she tried to stop… and this was the group that the liberal John Sullivan was with.

More evidence of fascism from the FBI- they are working with a corporation to target a news outlet. And yet the socialist, Anti-Fascist Left wants concentration camps for people who really are anti-fascist. I have been pointing out for years about how fascist liberals are.

January 6 “protesters” were flashing their badges to local police, who also appear to have killed one of their own members.

Democrats outright say that if they lose in the midterms, then it is time for an armed insurrection because the results would not be legitimate unless Democrats win. But no, the unarmed January 6 folks who thought 2020 was stolen were the real threat, according to the Democrats who believe in concentration camps. Liberals seem to be taking up the call, at least that group who wants concentration camps is.

The White House Press Secretary finally admitted that defunding police led to a crime surge.

Pelosi is using Capitol police to gather data on fellow lawmakers and citizens who meet with them. She is using police a her personal surveillance arm/dirt-gathering force. She politicized the police, turned them into the Democrats’ tool.

Democrats insist the Right is the terrorist group to the point the DOJ created a division to investigate them, yet how many times has the Left had to cancel a rally or event (including genuine anti-fascist events) because of threats of violence from the Right? Seems that the only extremists out there with any teeth are the liberal ones, and despite what the January 6 committee wants you to believe the only politicians who wanted uprisings were liberal ones. And at this point we can count the FBI-sponsored conservative extremists as liberals.

By the way, liberals are ok with this. See, the imaginary threat of rightwing violence (they have only two instances they can point at: Charlottesville where a mentally ill dude ran over someone and the January 6 riot that was orchestrated by the FBI and didn’t cause any fatalities except among the Right, whereas by the time of Charlottesville already in addition to the above Antifa violence, a liberal with no mental illness had shot at multiple Republican Congressmen just weeks prior while liberals and their leaders had issued death threats against Republicans and the ACLU even justified killing Republicans.) is enough to justify any method they choose to employ to counter it. Their imaginary fears about Trump justified stopping him by any means, meanwhile Biden has been way worse for everything than Trump turned out to be (particularly with regards to Russia, something Democrats made a big deal about to the point they wanted war, but I’ll get to Biden’s pro-Russia stance later).

Should you be surprised? This is the group where their anti-science COVID fears lead them to want concentration camps for no scientific reason, just pure fear and hatred of their political opponents. These are the “smart” ones remember? If they’re so smart as they say, then they know that being unvaccinated is only a political thing and not a real health threat to them, which means the only reason they want concentration camps for the unvaccinated is to get rid of their political opponents. Now, if they want to admit stupidity then that means those in charge of the stupid herd that thinks the unvaccinated are a threat are the ones who want to be rid of their political opponents. Up and down the intelligence spectrum, they don’t see this as a simple disagreement over what’s best for people, they see you as the enemy, you are the devil, you are a NAZI to them, you must be EXTERMINATED in their worldview. There’s no cooperation or mercy, they want you GONE. You committed the crime of saying they were wrong about something, you must be terminated for their worldview to continue! Theirs is a worldview where they are in the absolute right at all times. They genuinely believe that anyone who claims they are wrong MUST be evil and MUST be eliminated. Their fragile little egos and need to feel right are more important than whether they truly are right, more important than your right to live. I’ve watched these nuts on TV news, watched the Hollywood propaganda they spew about themselves, and saw them as the dominant voice on the internet anywhere from social media to forums for over a decade now, this is their true form. This poll I keep mentioning reflects exactly what I’ve seen for years.

While Democrats investigate imaginary white supremacist threats, criminals are hunting police officers across the country at historically high rates. Democrats said police are evil so I guess that made it ok (my tenant has even triggered Democrats by saying “Blue Lives Matter”), and makes the soaring murder rates ok, Democrats hate the police except when they’re killing Rightwing protesters. It’s funny too when liberals say crime overall decreases, because A. the most important crime is increasing and B. crime is decreasing because you stopped prosecuting it. People are still committing what are considered crimes elsewhere such as theft and assault, it’s just that Democrats stopped caring so they consider their apathy as meaning a decrease in crime.

COVID and Health

The world’s nobility who gave us a pandemic, who say they trust each other and the genocidal Chinese regime when China lied about the pandemic (and then lied to us about China’s role, and just about everything really, and then complain not about their misinformation but about the truth getting out despite their lies), are upset people don’t trust them. These are also the ones who say they want to take away all of your property (YOUR property, no one will touch theirs of course).

A warning about the COVID vaccines and how they will lead to chronic disease, though you’ll see plenty more later, and maybe even learn how. The World Health Organization has made similar warnings, as discussed below.

Should it really be surprising in the wake of the poll reported on in Headline Roundup 4 showing that liberals want their opponents in concentration camps that the Democrat-ran FDA would stop Republican Florida from getting lifesaving treatments for patients in that state? For liberals who think they deserve it because of their lax protocols, I will note 1. your liberal leaders vacationed maskless in Florida because it was open, 2. a country with one of the most vaccinated population on the planet still has a COVID surge and still is locking down their vaccinated population because the vaccines did nothing, 3. the average mask is worthless at stopping COVID, 4. vaccinated and unvaccinated alike carry and transmit COVID (as reported in Headline Roundup 4, half of Democrats polled want fines or prison for people who say that the vaccinated can spread COVID, with Twitter even blocking that scientifically accurate fact from being shared), 5. lockdowns don’t work as reported by your scientists, so why do Floridians need to suffer and die if the science says fascism doesn’t work anyway?

This is one of two things: either it’s Leftists killing their political opponents (spoiler alert: I discuss this later, but here’s two examples I keep bringing up), or Leftists denying treatment in order to manufacture a crisis, like how they fired their healthcare workers so that the crisis of overflowing hospitals would finally happen simply from staff reductions.

Too many COVID boosters too often will destroy your immune system, according to government regulators in Europe and the World Health Organization.

Liberals not only want to put people into concentration camps for anti-science reasons, they also believe that actual adherents to science are insane- they removed a doctor’s license and demanded he receive psychiatric help for recommending Ivermectin (a drug deployed successfully elsewhere) to his patients (a physician’s assistant is facing a similar issue, and he came out saying that basically the CDC-sponsored treatment of COVID patients was to drug ’em up with one drug that doesn’t do much, tube ’em up with a procedure that kills most people it’s done to, isolate them and let them die. The fact that he tried to treat the patients instead of kill them was what led to his medical license being removed), the same drug that over 100 Congressmen got, the same drug that DC elites had evidence was effective but worked to hide that from the public because Big Pharma is the biggest lobbying group. Get that? The elite get the real working treatments and aren’t hospitalized, while for the rest of us you are labelled insane and kicked out of the workforce if you disagree with the pharmaceutical companies. And how chilling is this- you are forced to see a psychiatrist because you disagree with a corporation and its fascist supporters? This is the start of every totalitarian nightmare, except for liberals and Democrats this is a wet dream. Oh, and Republicans are happy to help in the tyranny.

You’d think I’d be opposed to schools only letting kids eat and take their masks off outside in below freezing temperatures for limited periods, but actually I’m all for it. Those kids need to learn what living under a Democrat government feels like.

People in our vaccinated world keep developing severe and fatal problems.

Democrat politicians that favor masks and lockdowns for their own voters are happy to vacation to maskless destinations (and violate their rules in general, because COVID only affects the little people I guess, is it science that says COVID does not attack the rich and famous and powerful?). Their voters of course are happy that the government is oppressing them.

The party that wants prison and concentration camps for the unvaccinated also says you need to mock their deaths.

EcoHealth Alliance, who funded COVID research that led to the pandemic, who tried to suppress knowledge about it, and who “officially” lied to the government about all this and “officially” abused its grants, is now receiving more money from the government. Oh, and the folks who work at the Wuhan Lab we’ve been funding are required to be working to advance the Chinese government.

The government-owned CDC is lying about the side effects of catching COVID in order to scare you into helping pharmaceutical companies profit. In other words, pure fascism. Oh, and the survival rate for COVID for those under 20 is 99.978%, while for those over 70 not in nursing homes it’s 97.1%.

It’s ok to parade your kid on the web for internet clout after lying to them about biology (spoiler: it matters very much what’s in your pants, because A. some people like certain parts more than others and B. some people actually want to make a kid with you and if you lied your entire relationship about whether you could or not, that is a BIG deal because you just wasted a significant hunk of someone’s life because of your own selfish need for affirmation, and C. people who might want a safe space from the other gender in their locker rooms are going to see that you are the other gender but again your selfishness trumps their feelings), except why does an 8 year old need to worry about gender? Is the parent letting the kid be sexually active? Does the parent intend to turn the kid over to someone who is? Does the parent want to the internet to know their kid is sexually active? Our school systems produce kids that can’t read or do math, but they’re able to define at an adult level what their gender is? And while this 8yo gets to lie to the world to win their dad woke points (if it’s no one’s business why is your dad making you tell the world?), people are being banned for giving life-saving information on COVID because the pharmaceutical companies might not profit as much… which is why we have 8 year olds talking about gender, they are the sales team for Big Pharma’s hormone pills. Hey kid, you want to be popular like me right? Look at all the likes on the video, look at all my friends, look at everyone saying I’m awesome, you want this right? Well just take Moderna or Pfizer’s latest hormone blocker.

Lliberals say the reason we should ignore this is that it might make someone sad. Ignore that two people were raped because they didn’t want a trans person to feel “sad”. Sorry women, but Big Pharma has a lifelong customer in that trans person and you guys are nothing to its bottom line.

Liberals, who want to put the unvaccinated into concentration camps and deny medical treatment to the unvaccinated out of fear they can spread COVID as mentioned in the last Headline Roundup, want COVID-positive healthcare workers to keep working because there is a shortage. Why is there a shortage? Because they fired the unvaccinated ones, worried that they might spread COVID. Now liberal, to understand the problem here, you need to understand what I’ve been reporting all along and what the CDC and Fauci acknowledge- vaccines do not stop you from spreading or receiving COVID.

One of the downsides to mask mandates- filthy masks that make you sick and leave you vulnerable to COVID, hence why Biden’s 400 million masks mentioned in Headline Roundup 4 would be so worthless in the longterm, except as pollutants.

COVID vaccines can cause brain damage in kids, not that it matters because liberals would ensure they graduated high school anyway.

The Federal Government is keeping a database on people who, for religious reasons, object to using a corporation’s product.

Democrats say that Florida, where all schools are open, has done nothing to open schools.

How can you say it’s about the science when you demand that employees working from home get vaccinated or lose their jobs? Do you liberals believe COVID is a computer virus too?

While 45% of Democrats want concentration camps and over 50% want imprisonment for the unvaccinated, Washington State has a bill for creating a Gestapo to send the unvaccinated to concentration camps.

The U.K. repeatedly shows that the vaccinated are worse off, dying more, than the unvaccinated.

Schools ran by Democrats who think the unvaccinated should be in concentration camps are denying the use of their chairs and restrooms to unvaccinated students. And teachers tape masks to faces.

Make no mistake- this is how all liberals see you (and they think you enjoy being a disease vector), hence the concentration camps they want for you.

Even though the vaccine has been banned for kids in several countries because it hurts them, in Canada a Ronald McDonald house kicked out kids with cancer because they were unvaccinated. Remember- liberals in America think you should be locked in prison for even mentioning that other countries, our NATO allies, banned the vaccine for kids. Liberals in America think you should be put into a concentration camp if you are unvaccinated. I broke these numbers down in the last Headline Roundup. So, liberals are supremely anti-science, want to arrest you if you speak against their propaganda (against any of their propaganda, because it’s ok for liberals to lie about elections but they want their opponents to be arrested when liberals decide they are lying), and want to put people in concentration camps, so it’s no wonder they’d pursue this anti-science policy that will hurt children. This is the abortion crowd though, literally the only times they care about kids is when they need to do an anti-gun statement or some pro-pedophilia trans thing like I talked about earlier.

Democrats want the CDC director removed because she keeps telling the truth. Not surprising, since they want anyone who tells the truth fined or imprisoned as mentioned in the last Headline Roundup.

As mentioned in Headline Roundup 3, liberals are saying it’s great to be fat in the middle of a pandemic where the leading risk factor is being fat.

Fauci says we still have plenty of pandemic left to go, that after two years we are only in the first stage.

The CDC admits that natural immunity is better than the vaccine. But they still demand you get vaccinated, and natural immunity does not allow you to bypass vaccine mandates.

Laughably, the same liberals where 45% want concentration camps for the unvaccinated and over 50% want prison for the unvaccinated and have legislation in Washington State for this are claiming that it’s a conspiracy theory that they want those things.

A doctor with the U.K. government’s NHS warns patients not to take the vaccine, saying it will be pulled soon for being dangerous.

Triple-vaxxed does not protect you from COVID and its symptoms.

New papers show that the government knows COVID was a bioweapon that our scientists paid for and covered-up.

A mother stuffed her child into her car’s trunk to prevent herself from being exposed to COVID. These are the people who want concentration camps for the unvaccinated. It’s no wonder that a study found those who wear masks to be meaner than normal people.

Democrats keep inflating COVID numbers by conflating people hospitalized with COVID with people hospitalized for COVID. It’s not just liberals domestically doing this. About the only COVID death numbers they downplay are the ones they cause.

Democrat policies have destroyed our hospitals, plus just about any other service you can think of. This Leftist stupidity is not confined to the U.S., and as they destroy themselves they blame the unvaccinated, scapegoating them, and demand they be put in concentration camps and denied medical services because Leftists left the system unable to support even the average day’s worth of medical problems in pre-pandemic times. Liberals destroyed our healthcare, and then demand that non-liberals be put in concentration camps because like I said in Headline Roundup 4 you become a liberal to avoid taking responsibility for your own actions, you become a liberal to deny reality. Science said as early as August that the unvaccinated transmit COVID the same as the vaccinated, there is no scientific reason for the concentration camps, the only reason is hatred and the need to scapegoat somebody for the Left’s failures.

It would not surprise me if these allegations of depopulation were true, just look at how evil the Left is, but I just don’t get why their own people were targeted.

So that poll that I mentioned in Headline Roundup 4 that said Democrats wanted people to be imprisoned for spreading misinformation about the COVID vaccine, well those same Democrats don’t mind it when their own people spread COVID and vaccine misinformation (when researching earlier posts, I found liberals praising them for spreading that misinformation). Like I said- this is not about truth or science, this is about persecuting their political opponents and protecting their worldview that they are always right (their spokespeople are scared to debate intelligent opponents). This public health thing is just an effort to bypass our Constitutional safeguards, a farce to get around the law.

Liberals want concentration camps for the unvaccinated for fear that the unvaccinated are public health hazards, yet the CEO of Pfizer said that most of those liberals are public health hazards themselves (though he once said that they were 100% safe, and like good liberals they cling to whatever talking point makes them feel the most comfortable).

Your risk of contracting a heart condition from the COVID vaccine doubles after each jab, and you now need three jabs to be considered vaccinated, with room for more jabs in the future. How many can your heart take?

Death from the COVID vaccine is many times higher than that from all other vaccines combined.

Democrats seem to be fond of letters signed by “experts” who don’t know jack about the topic. There were the 500 “experts” who lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop, and then there’s the “270 doctors” who said Joe Rogan should be banned for not toeing Big Pharma’s line on COVID. The trouble is that even though the mainstream liberal media says those people were doctors, in reality a majority had no medical degrees, and of the ones who did a lot of them did not practice medicine. But liberals want you in prison or a concentration camp if you point out their lies.

After the vaccine rolled out, a mysterious 40%-average spike in deaths among 18-49 year olds happened.

Democrats are working on databases of people who are unvaccinated that violate several federal laws.

The CDC has been very quiet about what disease its monkeys were carrying that ended up spread across the Pennsylvania countryside, with one person already sick.

Democrats are vaccinating kids without parents’ consent, and lying about the practice. Keep in mind all that you read about problems the vaccines cause, and keep in mind that the kids may be allergic to the ingredients yet you have school officials with no knowledge of this providing medical treatments without even asking people who would know. But it’s not really about health otherwise you wouldn’t have school officials doing this, it’s really about selling more of Big Pharma’s product.

Racism

Schools are teaching kids that they should judge each other by race alone, and that white people are superior (that’s the “privilege” thing).

Liberals from the concentration camp party screamed “Black Lives Matter” while attacking a Black man (they demanded that he leave the elevator even though he was there first because he was unmasked, and then one of the white Democrats briefly removed her mask while demanding that the Black man put his on. No wonder Democrats talk about white privilege, that’s what the whites in their party are full of.). Do liberals believe that saying that is some kind of incantation that rids their actions of racism? That would explain a few things…

Liberals are acting very racist and abusive towards a Hispanic January 6 prisoner, while the press insists only whites participated in the alleged white supremacist event. If a Hispanic Democrat reported receiving racist treatment in a prison, do you think the anti-cop Left would hesitate to start a riot? But this Hispanic is not a Democrat, so they hesitate to care.

Democrats believe that race should determine whether you receive medical treatment. It’s ironic too- these same people they wish to prioritize for medical treatment are part of the group they wish would not receive medical treatment at all- the unvaccinated, as discussed in the last Headline Roundup.

Democrats, and Joe Biden particularly, keep saying that anyone who opposes their voter fraud enabling legislation is a racist, and specifically compare them to segregationist George Wallace. Joe Biden once praised Wallace and touted Wallace’s compliments of him. But Democrats totally aren’t racist, just look at what I noted in the last Headline Roundup about the stricter voting laws Democrat states have and the COVID policies that ban most Blacks from public spaces. I wonder if Democrats will demand sanctions on our racist European allies (that liberals say are progressive leaders) for their voting laws?

The BLM liberals don’t actually care about civil rights, either that or they think genocide is ok as long as someone pays them to think that.

Dovetailing with the above, this is why they’re declaring racism to be a public health crisis. As mentioned in Headline Roundup 4, they label everyone who disagrees with them as a racist, and now in the name of public health they get to shut up their opponents. Democrats want concentration camps in the name of public health, so why not to fight the health crisis of racism too? And look, at a time when Democrats want prison and concentration camps for their opponents, their media is telling them their opponents want the same thing. They have no evidence, they are aren’t citing polls, they just made it up, whereas we have hard evidence on the Left’s intentions. Look at this– they say that Republicans will become violent if they lose the midterms this year, and that the January 6 committee will somehow stop Republicans from winning. They don’t even have to have their statements make sense (well… unless the committee plans to arrest Republican candidates), and liberal voters just gulp it down and believe. No wonder they want to murder their opponents.

Liberals want to wipe Israel off the map.

Democrats believe you are racist if you want non-white judges to actually respect the law, ie pay their fines and not have their driver’s license suspended for refusing to comply with the law.

Democrats say this is a racist country as white men who killed a black man are sentenced to life in prison.

Denver schools (they weren’t the first) are teaching kids to hate their families, teaching them that it’s wrong to have parents, teaching them that the Democratic Party (who else would they want in charge of their “village” concept?) is who should be raising them. Teachers are “excited” about this. Also, they commit racism by saying that the nuclear family is a white concept and stereotyping Blacks as naturally not being part of families. Science on the other hand says something way different. In fact, the lack of a nuclear family has kept Blacks oppressed and dependent on the government… so I guess it’s no wonder Leftwing fascists want to teach kids this, and enforce it by saying they are racist if they disagree. Ironically enough, the idea to abolish the nuclear family originated from some white Eurotrash. In fact, liberals see it as an ADVANTAGE, see it as part of your white privilege, if you come from a nuclear family.

So on the one hand they admit it’s an advantage, but on the other hand they want to destroy it. Why? The explanation is in the replacement- as mentioned above, the government ran by Democrats replaces the parents. These are not teachers or educators, they are power-mad psychopaths trying to turn your children against you, and it’s no wonder they campaigned on keeping parents out of the classroom, making sure parents stayed ignorant and helpless as liberals stole their kids. Probably to rape them, judging by where liberals get their news from and who liberals elected… and judging by how the same Federal government that acted instantly on January 6 waited 17 months to arrest a known child predator who worked for their liberal media benefactors. This is the same FBI that routinely ignores child sex crimes while persecuting parents and political opponents.

Police are persecuting a Black man under the KKK act, accusing a man who raises money for fatherless Blacks of being a white supremacist, but Democrats are fine with it because it’s not one of theirs.

Democrat policies led to police trying to kick a black woman out of a restaurant because she did not present her identification papers, something which Democrats insist that it is racist to expect Blacks to have.

White supremacy is why a Pakistani terrorist targeted Jews, according to Democrats.

Elections

Democrats want it to be legal to stuff ballot dropboxes, that’s what their voting rights legislation does.

Democrats actually are arguing that equipment for voting should NOT be tested before use.

The Associated Press, who was happy to smear Trump with COVID case counts, will not be providing one as the 2022 midterms approach because this allegedly unbiased news organ wants Democrats to win and doesn’t care who their policies kill.

As mentioned in Headline Roundup 4, not only did Biden say that Blacks would vote no matter how hard, but polls show most Americans- most Blacks- think it is TOO easy to vote, and most Blacks are in favor of measures that the Democrats’ voter laws would remove. Yet you have the liberal media bringing forth wealthy and privileged Blacks who insist that not only can they not vote easily, but it’s by a racist design that they can’t vote easily. They are inventing a problem and saying it’s a racist problem. Whereas Biden actually contradicted them, saying that this battle has nothing at all to do with whether people are stopped from voting.

Meanwhile, as liberals seek to criminalize anyone presenting evidence that they stole elections, more evidence emerges that they did. The public may be catching on.

Democrats admit their voting bill is inspired by a dictator who rigged his elections (where even after his death, elections are rigged for his successors). I’ll also take the time to point out some misinformation I saw from USA Today, The Daily Beast, and other liberal outlets. Trump’s legal team did not allege that Venezuela rigged the election or that Hugo Chavez rigged it, what they said was that the kind of voting machines designed specifically to rig elections for Chavez were deployed in the U.S. Of course liberals aren’t even capable of thinking about a story truthfully, let alone reporting the truth, so it’s no surprise they screwed the details up. Even if Trump’s people were wrong, you could still have reported the truth about what they said, liberal. Instead you keep lying, you keep being terrible people, and justify being worse than anything you say your opponents are by saying that you’re just trying to stop them so that makes becoming worse than what you accuse them of ok.

Misc

Democrats, who say you are a conspiracy theorist if you believe Biden is unfit and his Administration is being ran by someone else, say that the entire Supreme Court is ran by Clarence Thomas’ wife. Is she a reptilian in disguise too?

The military had to lower its standards so that a woman could keep trying to enter the Air Force’s special forces program. While the military might be inclusive by lowering standards, the enemy will still hold her to the same high standard everyone else is held to. But it’s better to score a woke point now and lose lives later than it is to keep everyone alive, right?

As the liberal media lies about it, the economy is in really terrible shape.

Democrats continue to insist that they know better than parents what their kids should be taught. These are the same Democrats that send their kids to private schools and say Blacks are too ignorant to learn math so don’t bother teaching it.

House Speaker Pelosi thinks that the best person to head their transportation committee is someone who can’t drive and doesn’t leave notes or notify police of accidents. This is hit and run by the way- she left the scene.

NPR goes so far as to accuse liberal Supreme Court Justices of lying after NPR’s story about conservative Justice Gorsuch turns out to be false.

One of Hillary Clinton’s cronies earned a million dollars from China to lobby the White House to allow Chinese infiltration of our infrastructure.

DirecTV cancelled a news network because Democrats told them to. Much like with cancelling people’s bank accounts for political reasons mentioned in Headline Roundup 4 and Headline Roundup 3, Democrats don’t care about the chilling effect this has on free speech because they want their enemies destroyed. They don’t believe, or care, that this could be used against them later if they don’t stay woke enough. This is the group that wants prison and concentration camps for its opponents, they are way beyond thinking rationally. They’re exactly where the corporate elite and politicians want them- unthinking followers begging their rulers to destroy the rulers’ enemies.

It’s no wonder Fauci wanted to hide is financial records and lie about how accessible they are- he is a very, very rich man.

Remember when a Democrat Congressman wanted to impeach Trump for calling someone a “son of a bitch”? Well, guess what Biden just referred to a reporter as such (remember when insulting the press was an attack on the First Amendment and Democracy?) while that Congressman remains a strong Biden supporter.

Biden backers have buyer’s remorse… but still want to put you into a concentration camp if you vote different from them.

One of the members of the party that wants prison and concentration camps for its opponents accused Republicans of being Nazis at a rally held by his party’s Brown Shirts.

One of the judges in a 2020-related case donated to Trump’s opponents, but did not recuse themselves, and further they ordered a company to release private information to a Leftist newspaper under penalty of exorbitant fines.

YouTube removed a video that criticized Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan that left thousands trapped plus millions of dollars of advanced equipment- including communications tools still logged into our networks. YouTube is of course fine with all of this, come on these people support genocidal regimes so of course they’d support Biden no matter what he did. And how many folks at YouTube’s HQ do you think would support concentration camps for their political opponents? At least 45%!

Like I mentioned before, the Swamp is very deep. Trump’s CIA Director was part of it, and obviously his FBI was too (no one has been fired yet, it’s still the same FBI guys as under Trump who are targeting parents and doing false flag operations).

Democrats’ solution to their policies that cause higher energy costs is an inflation-inducing handout that’ll just drive prices higher (and then raise taxes on the poor who can’t afford any of this). But, their solutions to their self-generated problems usually only make things worse.

The just-an-idea Antifa is pretty well organized.

One of the Biden family’s corrupt business partners is a traitor. Do I really need to say how big a storm the media would create if this were a Trump business associate? At what point do liberals stop saying “anyone is better than Trump, even if the person is worse”?

Microsoft introduced a new woke spell-checking apparatus into its software suites. If you don’t use woke language (presumably it will be updated every day, much as woke language is) then it will tell you that there is a typo.

A piece pointing out the absurdity in trying to make your company or government look exactly like the demographics it represents. Of course the Left’s wokeness isn’t about that, it’s about pushing white males out of the workforce by any means necessary. They don’t really care about equal representation, just look at the goals they lay out- they want minority-owned businesses to outnumber white owned, they want minorities to outnumber whites on corporate boards, they see a “diverse” workforce as one that has a majority-minority. Yet that oxymoronic phrase “majority-minority” shows the problem- what happens to the rest of the “majority”? Whites make up 60% of the population, so how do you get a “diverse” workplace without 10% of whites being permanently unemployed? Worse, given how many non-whites are not in the workforce or can’t be competitive in it because Democrats decided they are too stupid to learn and all they’re good for is crime and welfare and voting Democrat, does that mean that 25% or more of the white population should be banned from the workforce to achieve your “equity”? Obviously they have white privilege so you wouldn’t pay them welfare, that’s already happening in Democrat-controlled areas. Then again, this is the party of concentration camps so maybe you’ll send the excess whites there?

I hate to say it, but in all my experience browsing forums and comments sections, I think the numbers are way off, that way more Democrats want concentration camps for their enemies, for white people in particular from what I’ve read from them.

A nice little piece where to get liberals to practice empathy, what they are doing to Conservatives is put in terms liberals can understand. The problem is that this is the concentration camp party, they are way beyond wanting to understand their political foes, or science hence why they use anti-science reasons to support their camps.

The star witness that liberals dug up against Trump to support their lies about him colluding with Russia is in prison for child sex crimes and illegally moved money between the United Arab Emirates and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign- REAL foreign interference in the election, which liberals are ok with. The party that insisted Trump was a traitor because he said something sorta nice about Putin, the party who insists Russia needs to be punished for altering the outcome of the 2016 election, the party that says the filibuster is a tool for oppressing Blacks and is white supremacist and a relic of Jim Crow, the party that said Trump weakened NATO because he is a Russian asset, the party that says pipelines will destroy the environment, that same party just used the filibuster to protect Putin’s pipeline that will give him control of the energy sectors of our NATO allies while that party’s leader imports oil from Putin at historic levels, effectively giving him control of our energy sector after attacking our energy indepedence. So which party is the real Russian asset?

Democrats openly state they are concerned that the Supreme Court is being used to stop one branch of government from becoming too powerful and violate the law. I mean they actually said that was the reason.

House Speaker Pelosi’s son is as corrupt as Democrats wished that Trump’s kids were so that they could arrest them.

57% of Democrats favor social media giants censoring posts that someone might find offensive. Of course, the only people defining “offensive” are the Democrats, 45% of whom want concentration camps for their political opponents.

Remember in Headline Roundup 4 how I wondered if you’d ever be woke enough to not fear for your bank account? Well, according to Democrat elites, even right now you are not woke enough. If you aren’t out there mobbing your political opponents then you are a terrible Democrat voter, according to the leadership. They are blaming you for their failure to get their agenda done. You sent them to work on your behalf, and they blame you for their lack of success. How long before your fellow Democrat voters agree that you haven’t been putting in enough effort to help the team and should be penalized?

The Democrats in charge keep saying that Biden is really working for Obama.

American colleges want the Chinese government to have control of our campuses, and the FBI does not track Chinese spies. The FBI doesn’t track Antifa either (you know, the folks who seized part of a city and seceded from the United States after attacking police and National Guard members). In fact, the FBI and DOJ only go after opponents to the Democratic Party, with the DOJ creating a new division dedicated to attacking their political opponents. But not the Chinese, or terrorists who take hostages at synagogues.

Democrats are sweeping their supply chain crisis under the rug by having ships wait somewhere out of sight, and then claiming they solved the problem.

Leftists in Canada are using anti-science ideas to outlaw Christianity. Got news for you- I know as mentioned in Headline Roundup 4 you think evolution is white supremacist, but you still based your theology on it and it definitely shows heterosexuality is the norm and anything else is the deviation. Now, if you want to be a science denier then go ahead, being anti-science sure doesn’t stop your concentration camp policies. And just look at the hypocrisy here- if someone wants to be a Christian they are banned from converting, but there is no ban on becoming part of what science says is the deviation, this coming from the people who say they stand for science and tolerance.

Another reason why someone might plead the 5th: they don’t know the answer or aren’t confident in their knowledge and want to avoid perjury charges. So instead of saying “not to my knowledge” (which can always be disproven later, even if just by saying you must have seen a news report even though you may not have) they just don’t answer.

The Biden Administration keeps talking about Ukraine’s right to secure borders while destroying our own. We are obligated by treaty to protect Ukraine, but the Democrats keep insisting that it’s because a foreign country deserves borders but we don’t. Our soldiers should die to protect another country’s borders while our own should be left wide open, that is what Democrats believe.

While Vice President, Biden received $31 million from Chinese intelligence assets.

Leave a comment Posted on October 18, 2019November 5, 2019 by mrflagg47 Analysis, Opinion, Politics

Impeachment Hot Air

i think I’ve mentioned before that ever since 2017 I’ve grown to hate this pencil-necked baldy. And his head looks like a balloon, befitting the hot air contained therein. Image from CSPAN.

What if I told you that during the Obama Administration, a whistleblower tied to the Republicans came forward and claimed Obama did something corrupt. The whistleblower made a specious complaint that was only accepted because of rule changes made possibly days before he filed the complaint. Then the Republican-controlled House held secret hearings to impeach Obama, where Democrats had limited power, could not even call witnesses to refute the claims of the Republican-approved witnesses!

Sounds like those evil racist Republicans and their helpers in the Intel Community really wanted to get Obama out, doesn’t it! Well guess what liberal, replace “Obama” with “Trump” and “Republican” with “Democrat”, and you have what your people are doing right now.

Before I start my tirade which may have some lack of clarity, let me just give a quick summary of the matter in chronological order.

2000– President Clinton asked EXPLICITLY for a political favor from UK PM Tony Blair, asking him to directly influence some dispute because it would help Al Gore win. There is no controversy in a President asking a foreign leader to interfere in a matter to help him politically (remember these words for when you see what Pelosi says September 24 2019)
January 2016 – Barack Obama’s Administration requests that Ukrainian prosecutors investigate a member of the Trump Campaign, claiming he is corrupt. Obama’s Admin also requests that Ukrainians drop the Burisma corruption probe (Burisma is the company Joe Biden’s son worked for).
March 2016– Joe Biden withholds aid allegedly to fight corruption in Ukraine, saying they won’t get the aid until a prosecutor is fired, and further saying there was international support for firing the prosecutor. This prosecutor happens to be investigating Biden’s son’s company, the investigation Obama asked Ukraine to drop 2 months prior, and lawyers for Burisma admitted that the prosecutor was merely smeared as corrupt by American politicians and apologized for it. Furthermore, a top diplomat testified that the prosecutor was fired solely because of the U.S. applying pressure, NOT because of the international community. Also, the new prosecutor was as corrupt as the original one allegedly was, but the Obama Administration deemed him fit enough after the Burisma matter was dropped, with Biden himself saying he approved this new corrupt prosecutor.
January 20 2017– Washington Post reports that Democrats began trying to impeach Trump while Obama is still President.
Early 2018– Ukraine begins investigating Joe Biden’s son’s company again, prompted by Joe Biden’s remarks in January of that year about withholding aid to get the original prosecutor fired.
May 2018– Democratic Senators demand Ukraine help Robert Mueller’s ~~partisan witch hunt~~ investigation into Trump’s corruption. If Democrats apply Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) interpretation of the partial transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian President to the letter their own Senators wrote (which more or less said the same thing that Trump said), it was clearly a “mafia-like shakedown“.
February-March 2019– The United States government is aware that Ukraine is investigating Joe Biden’s son’s company (Burisma) again.
May 5– Rep. Al Green (D-AL) warns Democrats- in light of a poll showing that 66% of the public did not want impeachment- that if they fail to impeach Trump, he will get re-elected, and he’ll justify it by saying Democrats couldn’t find anything wrong with him despite spending his entire term investigating him.
Sometime before July 18– Trump decides to withhold aid from Ukraine partly because Europe isn’t doing its fair share, and partly because of concerns over corruption there, and how the corrupt officials might line their pockets with it. Investigating what Ukraine did to help Democrats in 2016 is part of his idea of corruption in Ukraine. The Ukrainians are NOT made aware that the aid is withheld, let alone the reason for it, until August 28 or 29.
July 25– Trump chats with the Ukrainian President. Trump says Europe isn’t doing its share. Trump asks Ukrainian President to look into what was going on there in 2016 as it relates to our elections. Ukrainian President starts talking about corruption in his country. Trump says that as part of that corruption crackdown, the Ukrainian President should look into what happened with Joe Biden’s son. No mention was made of aid being withheld.
August– Whistleblower rules for the Democrat Swamp loyalist intel community are changed so that hearsay is accepted. The Ukraine Whistleblower submits his complaint in this month. Also in this month, one of the whistleblower’s Intel Community co-workers from the White House is hired by Adam Schiff to be part of his staff. The Ukraine Whistleblower worked with Adam Schiff’s staff to put through his complaint. Schiff himself is made aware of the complaint and its contents to an extent.
August 28 or 29– Ukraine learns aid is being withheld.
Before September 10– Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) threatens Ukraine, telling them that there will be consequences if they help Trump find dirt on Biden.
September 12– Prior to this date, Trump had decided to release the aid to Ukraine afterall, as emails obtained from this date show instructions to diplomats about the money’s release.
September 19– Anonymous sources tell the Washington Post that there is a whistleblower, saying this person heard other people talking about Trump’s Ukraine call, saying these people said that Trump threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine unless Ukraine investigated Joe Biden and his son. A “quid pro quo” arrangement. This Ukraine Whistleblower had strong ties to Adam Schiff’s office, and ties to Joe Biden.
September 24– Nancy Pelosi announces that the House will begin an impeachment inquiry into Trump, claiming it’s because he tried to force a foreign government to do something that would help him politically. She does not note that what Trump allegedly asked Ukraine to do was already known by the U.S. to have been done 5 months before the call.
September 25– Ukraine President denies there was pressure, and Trump releases the partial transcript showing that nothing happened..
September 26– Adam Schiff is selected to lead the impeachment investigation over the Ukraine Whistleblower’s allegation. The investigation is based on the alleged “quid pro quo” arrangement, under the belief that it is an impeachable offense that Trump would use his office to get a foreign country to investigate a political opponent because it interferes in an upcoming election.
October 3– By now Trump, the Ukrainian President, Ambassador Volker, and the partial transcript of the call emphatically deny that any quid pro quo took place. Adam Schiff makes a “mafia-like shakedown” threat to Volker that he is “making this much more complicated than it has to be” with his refusal to tell Schiff what Schiff wants to hear: that Trump’s actions would have been perceived by Ukraine as forcing them to investigate Biden. Liar Adam Schiff’s secret hearings, such as this Volker one, involve attempts by him to block Republicans from asking questions and denial of witness’ right to counsel. Republicans are not allowed to call witnesses for any of the hearings. Also on this day- days after Adam Schiff said his colorful dramatization of Trump’s phone call was just a parody, Nancy Pelosi claims that Schiff was directly quoting and none of it was at all a parody.
October 8– White House gets it together and sends a letter explaining why they don’t have to cooperate with Democrats’ subpoena’s. Simply put- since Democrats are not making this a full impeachment investigation (in which case Republicans would also have subpoena power), then their subpoenas are invalid since they do not have the authority to send them, lacking an investigation for which the subpoena would relate to. And a bunch of other stuff, but unlawful use of subpoenas by Democrats is the biggest takeaway.
October 15– Joe Biden’s son says that he would not have been at Burisma in the first place if his father were not Vice President Joe Biden. Thus, confirming a bit about the Ukraine-Biden corruption narrative.
October 17– We learn that the alleged “quid pro quo” that by legal standards could never have actually happened because Ukraine never knew about the aid being withheld was actually tied to investigating what happened in 2016, not Joe Biden. Democrats declare that this is an admission of Trump’s guilt and he should be impeached, forgetting that they originally wanted to impeach because Trump was allegedly forcing an investigation into Biden, and forgetting that threatening Ukrainian aid over an investigation of things a political opponent did in 2016 is exactly what multiple Democrat Senators did in 2018. Forgetting that Obama asked Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election back in 2016. Forgetting that Joe Biden claimed his threat to withhold aid was related to corruption, just like what Trump said his reason for withholding aid was about.
PREDICTION FOR THE FUTURE: Republicans won’t pester the Democrats about their hypocrisy, and if Trump is impeached Republicans won’t rightly demand Democrats be impeached for their similar behavior, and won’t rightly demand that Biden be disqualified for running for President for having done the same thing.

Got all that? Are you all up to speed? Time for my various screeds, written as news was breaking over the past three weeks.

Someone explain to me why Democrats don’t want this guy investigated anyway? Warren’s in the lead, the media loves her, and the candidates have already attacked Obama many times while Biden’s only standout qualification is that he was with Obama. Image from PJ Media

Democrats threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine if they did not investigate the 2016 election. And apparently Trump’s thing with the Ukraine aid was ALSO over the 2016 election. Apparently it’s horrible when Trump does it but it’s laudable and brave when Democrats do it. Oh right- Democrats wanted to withhold aid because they thought Ukraine had dirt on Trump, whereas Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate something that helped Democrats. That makes all the difference in the world! You’re a hero if you withhold aid to help Democrats, but you’re impeached if you withhold aid to help Republicans. I’d also like to point out that there STILL was no “quid pro quo” because as Rep. Ratcliffe points out, the Ukrainians kinda needed to be AWARE that there was something going on for it to work! To quote Ratfliffe, it is “legally impossible” for their to be a quid pro quo if the other party has no freakin’ idea it’s happening!

How do you force someone to do your bidding if they don’t even know it?! They didn’t know their aid was missing. Seriously, how many kidnappers make the ransom demand without saying someone was kidnapped? Because that’s thematically what Democrats want us to believe Trump did.

Oh, and I’m getting ahead of myself by forgetting one small detail- TRUMP NEVER FOLLOWED THROUGH ON TELLING UKRAINE THEY’D GET THE AID IF THEY COOPERATED. So now we have the kidnapper forgetting to even make the ransom demand!

I uh… I’m not comfortable with the way he’s looking at me… I think I might be on his hit list. Either a drone or my laptop would explain that strange buzzing I hear… Image from evil.news

Moreover, the investigations into 2016 that the media now cries “see? Quid pro quo even if it isn’t what we said it was!” over were actually linked to corruption in general in Ukraine- would the aid be used as it should or just to support a corrupt government? So Trump tethering the aid to fighting corruption is perfectly legitimate, because that’s what you say BIDEN did when he withheld aid to get Ukraine to fire the “corrupt” prosecutor and you say he was GREAT for doing that!!!! So again, liberal, your narrative has it the Democrats are wonderful people for doing what you want to IMPEACH Trump for doing! What next- will you demand Trump be impeached if he uses a drone to kill an American citizen without a trial or due process like Obama did?

The only difference between what Trump did and what Democrats did is that Trump’s actions hurt Democrats while Democrats’ actions helped Democrats. Thus, by your own measures, it seems simply being a Republican is an impeachable offense. That analysis is further validated by how the Washington Post reports you were plotting to impeach Trump since before he even took office. “Not a Democrat” is an impeachable offense.

Oh, but it gets even better! We also learn that “Not a Democrat” means you have no legal protections. Even House Democrats say they have an open impeachment inquiry and under House rules the Judiciary Committee has oversight over such matters, Adam Schiff prevented a Republican member of the Judiciary Committee from being involved because he was not on one of the three committees Schiff approved.

Worse, Democrats can hold these unlawful tribunals in secret where only Democrats are allowed to call witnesses, where Democrats can spread lies about what goes on behind closed doors to make it look damning to their enemy (can you really trust Schiff to be honest, he didn’t even have to lie about this but did anyway!), and where eventually they can close off their secret investigation by holding a secret impeachment vote, or perhaps hold a general vote to impeach claiming it was based on the fabricated lies from the secret hearing that the public believes are true thanks to the Left’s lies, before passing it on to the Senate. Trump will never face his accuser as you charge him with high crimes based on the secret whistleblower who was actually a Democrat operative, we now know, and who apparently lied about everything based on what we do know about the events. Schiff even tried to make it so that Republican members of the approved committees would not be allowed to ask questions! So… conducting the interrogation in secret, wanted to stop sympathetic people from asking questions, and didn’t allow a lawyer to be present. Does that really sound “Democratic”, liberal? This is what fascism looks like. But he’s supposed to be fighting it!

Mueller 2.0: This Time, He’s Handsomer (seriously- Schiff has a better face and better teeth, I’ll say that much for him).

I think it’s Mueller Probe 2.0 myself. An unstoppable investigation with unlimited funds and power, the deck clearly stacked in favor of Democrats who claimed going into it that there was ample evidence Trump colluded with Russia… and then nothing comes from the Mueller Probe. So now, Democrats are trying again. Only they get to call witnesses; the media only reports their side of what happened in the secret tribunals as the truth. They don’t even want Republicans to ask questions of the witnesses that ARE called. And yet, after over two weeks of these kinds of hearings, Democrats have NOTHING. Again.

A partisan liar claims something happened, a secret partisan witch hunt lies to the public without actually showing its proceedings, and finally they plan to impeach the legally elected President they promised to impeach pretty much the day he won the election. Does that sound “Democratic” to you? Is that the kind of people you want running your life, liberal? Look at the 2020 Democratic Debates- these are the people that want to run YOUR life. These are the people that will decide if YOU have too much wealth and pay too little in taxes. These are the limousine-riding, jet flying people YOU want telling YOU and poor minorities to starve in total darkness in order to reduce your carbon footprint. These are the people that want to send police door-to-door to YOUR homes confiscating your weapons. But as you know liberal, these are the same racist police who massacre blacks, so now you want the Party of secret tribunals and liars to be in a position to cover-up more police shootings as the officers implement their agenda. Think about that for a moment. Do you truly care about minority communities? I suppose not…

I’ve made mention of the media being in cahootz with Democrats above, how the media guarantees that only the Left’s narrative on impeachment will be heard. Well, aside from the usual “they’re all Democrats” factoid (and how some refuse to believe statements by people involved solely because those statements match what Trump says), here’s some more evidence. Parroting of Democrat talking points. The DNC issues a statement, and “trusted journalists” parrot the statement verbatim while pretending it’s their personal take on the situation. I guess when journalists say they’re trustworthy and fair and accurate, they only mean in relation to what the DNC tells them to say, that they hardly deviate from that script. In which case I concur- they are fair to the talking points, balanced to the talking points, and repeat accurately what the talking points say. They just lie about it being their own view and it being the truth.

It’s rather baffling at first, that House Speaker Pelosi would be shocked that Trump was rude to her. She spends all her time blasting him and encouraging an impeachment of him, then expects him to be nice to her and is surprised he isn’t. Yeah, right. That’s not the first time either that Pelosi lied about what happened in a meeting that she “stormed out of”. Now, for a real account of what happened, ask this guy.

I saw headlines from leftwing outlets saying that “whiny Republicans” were complaining about the Democrats violating impeachment process. Some outlets said that it was just tradition Democrats were violating, not the rules. Others say Republicans only complain about procedure because Trump is clearly guilty and they want to distract from that. If you’ve read up to here, you know that one’s way off! So Fox News analyzed how this is actually a politically good strategy for Dems, to not have an impeachment vote. That would make the hearings public, that would mean people had access to the unbiased narrative via CSPAN. People could fact check for themselves what was going on. Democrats want absolute control over the narrative.

I’ll speculate here- maybe that is the lesson they took from Mueller, that his silence and the lack of leaks from active members of his staff meant that Democrats lost the narrative war, so they decided to control everything now with the impeachment probe. Control, control, control. They plotted to overthrow Trump before he was in office, they are holding secret hearings where they control the narrative, their 2020 candidates talk about ways Democrats will control your life and your money. I suppose that’s why a majority of Democrats favor socialism- clearly they value the Stalin model, and are already implementing it with impeachment while their candidates promise more.

Amb. Volker, image from the State Department. I expect my Kurts to be bald.

Expanding on the October 3 Volker testimony: Volker kept saying that Schiff was mischaracterizing the situation. Schiff kept saying “if they learned aid was withheld, then would Trump’s investigation request get more significance” and Volker kept saying that is not what happened. Schiff kept pushing the hypothetical, because we know he’d use a “yes” for that to mean a “yes that’s what happened”. But Volker continued denying to the point where Adam Schiff, quote the man himself, gave a “mafia” type statement with “Ambassador, you’re making this much more complicated than it has to be.” Funny, just two days before I heard someone say the same thing: it was an episode of Charlie’s Angels in which some mob guys were walking a blackmailer out into the desert. Hear from someone who witnessed Volker’s testimony- it cleared Trump… again. Despite everything clearing him, Democrats still rely on the third-hand Democrat whistleblower who heard things that other people told him they heard, even though all firsthand knowledge shows nothing happened.

They want a secret impeachment hearing, no votes held, and are known for lying about what they have and what they will find (collusion with Russia that Mueller debunked but they still claim otherwise, Democrats parroting NPR lie about Ukraine call transcript, Schiff lying about the whistleblower). And they want that before the 2020 election. Democrats don’t believe anyone in the primary field can beat Trump, so they figure just impeach him.

How about an anonymous source accusing someone of a crime, followed by not allowing the accused the right to defend themselves, while demanding the accused gets the death penalty. How about THAT for a threat to Democracy? Democrats don’t even want the whistleblower to appear to Congress, they just want “written testimony”. I’m starting to wonder if there even IS a whistleblower, if it’s not just Democrat lawyers in a backroom sending out letters pretending to be whistleblowers. If Democrats have such an open and shut case against Trump, why are they opposed to voting on impeachment, to having each one of them sign their name to the idea? Why are they opposed to letting Republicans mount any kind of defense or argument? If they’re on the right side of history and have all the facts, how can the Republicans possibly win in an impeachment hearing? The only time you need secret trials sentencing people to die is when you have NO evidence for it and just want to remove someone in your way. Trump is in their way.

Egad! He looks like someone ironed Mueller’s face! From Getty Images, obviously.

Don’t let the fact that I mocked Democrat views on Republicans by my remarks in the opening let you believe I’m not annoyed with Republicans. It sounds like the NeverTrumpers are having a field day right now. Everything they’re doing right now is why I voted for Trump in the first place- they’re letting Democrats and the media get away with bullying and lying about one of them. They have less spine than an invertebrate. Maybe they’re too scared or too stupid to realize, but if they let the Democrats get away with Kavanaughing Trump then Democrats will just do that to ANYONE they don’t like. They’ll know it’s a winning strategy. So those pathetic little gutless worms squirming about media scrutiny right now will easily be stomped out of existence by the Democrats in the next elections. Part of that though will just be due to the Republican base being too busy vomiting in disgust at their pathetic leadership.

It begs the question though- what do people like Bill Kristol and Mitt Romney think they gain? It’s a term that’s gone out of favor, but they’re basically Judas Goats. A “Judas Goat” is an animal that’s used to lead other animals to the slaughter, while the Judas Goat itself is not slaughtered. As you see by the media salivating over Mitt Romney, the same media that tried to Kavanaugh him back in 2012, Mitt Romney gets to survive if he leads his party to the slaughter. Same with Bill Kristol- he lost his magazine, but he still is warmly welcomed in MSNBC’s studios. When you see your alleged shepherds dining with the wolves, you should really reconsider who you are putting your faith in.

By the way, listen to a REAL whistleblower and listen how liberal heroes Robert Mueller and Peter Strzok attacked him, as did MSNBC and CNN who called him a “CIA Leaker” (whereas Fox News protected him). Moreover, the whistleblower is being represented by a CIA establishment lawyer, exactly the opposite of what would happen if he really was a whistleblower. And note that while Democrats protect their Ukraine “whistleblower”, they were nowhere to be found when this REAL one exposed CIA misdeeds under President Obama and was JAILED for 23 months!

On Sept. 24, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump, saying, “This week, the president has admitted to asking the president of Ukraine to take actions which would benefit him politically. Therefore, today, I’m announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. I’m directing our six committees to proceed with their investigations under that umbrella.”

We have mutual legal assistance agreements with Ukraine and Russia, so even if Dems think Russiagate and Bidengate are partisan, if Trump is legitimately concerned on these issues they warrant a legitimate investigation. Or are these things only legit when Dems have an accuser who no one can backup and has a story full of holes and contradictions, like Dr. Ford and their anonymous Ukraine Whistleblower?

Millenials think they’re too smart to have to listen to their elders anyway.

Democrats used secret testimony from anonymous individuals to impeach Trump, and are denying Republicans and Trump the ability to mount a legal defense, and they are and the media have been caught straight up lying about what happened, and when they aren’t lying they’re saying you’re an evil subversive if you challenge their narrative. For all of you good communists who don’t think your party will deny you a right to defend yourself, I remind you that Nikita Khrushchev once lamented out many good communists met with a similar fate. Secret trials, no legal defense, some committee makes a judgment and you’re dead. All you’re allowed to do is sign a confession admitting to the crimes, and right on cue to make this a perfect parallel Jimmy Carter told Trump to do exactly that.

You wonder what liberals mean when they claim the Supreme Court is too Conservative, you wonder why liberal Senators write to the court ordering them to rule the way Democrats want them to rule on a case, you wonder what kind of judges Democrats would stack the court with if they get power? Look at what they’re doing to Trump. Look at what they did to Kavanaugh, or even with their “no fly no buy” list where an anonymous accusation can prevent you from buying a gun or flying on an airplane and you would not be able to challenge it. They want the kind of Supreme Court judges who would overturn the whole idea of due process. They want Supreme Court Justices who’d uphold the determination of a secret meeting by Party officials that concluded someone needed to lose their position or die. If you let this happen but find you can’t keep up with their daily changes on what is and isn’t acceptable (remember- it was acceptable for Obama to have Ukraine investigate Trump’s 2016 campaign, and acceptable for Democrat Senators to order Ukraine to help investigate) then you too might end up being sentenced by one of these secret committees, knowing an appeal to the Supreme Court would be futile.

MSNBC speculated that impeachment of Trump would lead to impeachment of Pence for the same corruption, opening the path for Pelosi to be President. Hey, didn’t I say that last year?

Bye bye 6th amednment! So Dems want to violate Due Process, have laws violating 1st Amendment (NYC) and now are in the process of violating the 6th Amendment. Also raises a good point- why did no one care about the security of Clinton’s accuser when he was impeached? Why is it only now that people say Trump is threatening violence or whatever?

Shocking poll from USA Today shows that maybe all but 4% of Democrats support impeaching Trump. The poll shows that 44% of people surveyed support impeaching the President. Assuming Democrats would get the usual 48%ish support, that means that 4% of Democrats polled do not support impeachment. I suppose that’s the real story. But as you see in the article, the survey was kinda small and the details about the Ukraine issue that USA Today provided when talking about the poll were severely flawed. So even with a mildly doctored poll, USA Today STILL can’t show all Democrats backing impeachment.

I speculated in an earlier post that Trump might’ve used this whistleblower thing as a political gotcha. I forgot to take into account the blind partisanship of Democrats. I suppose I didn’t learn my lesson from the Mueller Report, because despite what it says Democrats STILL claim Trump colluded with Russia even after they spent two years telling us that Mueller would have the final word on collusion.

If under President Obama, the laughably partisan Intel Community changed guidelines on whistleblowers so that all you had to do was say you heard an anonymous source tell you something in order to become a whistleblower, and then a registered Republican whistleblower went to a Republican Congressman with his complaint, and then the Republicans there helped the Republican whistleblower file the complaint, and then a Republican or at least anti-Obama Inspector General said that the Republican whistleblower complaint was horrifying, and then the Republican Congressman whose office helped write the complaint subpoenaed the Obama Administration for it while claiming they never saw it, and then said the Obama Admin was obstructing justice by not turning over the complaint even though Intel Community guidelines STILL had it outside the ability of the Director of National Intelligence to turn over the complaint to Congress (because the complaint was about someone not in the Intel Community), what do you think would happen? What do you think would happen if the Obama Admin released a transcript of the phone call the Republican whistleblower complained about and nothing he said about it was true?

The media would pounce on the Republicans. The media would say they’re not fit to be in office. They would say it was an assault on Democracy. There might even be demands to purge Republicans from the Intel Community, claiming they were too hyperpartisan and a threat to national security. Democrat ranks would grow from this blatant effort as Democrat politicians piled on Republicans and the media gave every last one of them a microphone and free airtime to attack Republicans.

The problem is- in that hypothetical above, it was the Trump Administration as the target, and Democrats doing the whistleblower stuff. So instead, Democrats say that what the whistleblower complained about was hidden in the transcript- you have to be as “smart” as a Democrat in order to read what was happening. And in case you weren’t that smart, Democrats like Rep. Adam Schiff (CA) and Democrat propaganda outlets like NPR LIED about what the transcript said, lied about the actual wording by claiming that when Trump explicitly asked for a favor it was to investigate Biden when really the favor, as is clear in the text and word order of the transcript, was to investigate interference in the 2016 election. It wasn’t even easily misinterpreted, basically the transcript said “Do me a favor, investigate these guys involved in 2016. Ukraine Prez and Trump babble on and on and on and then Trump finally says oh yeah, you should look into Biden ordering one of your prosecutors fired.” That’s not what NPR or Adam Schiff said though. They lied.

And after the transcript that I had predicted would vindicate Trump came out, Democrats and the media started screaming even LOUDER. With Obama, it would’ve been open and shut, not even Republicans would’ve been saying impeachment anymore.

Speaking of Obama- the general premise has been that Trump asking Ukraine to investigate a 2020 election opponent is an impeachable offense. Well, Obama in January 2016 asked Ukraine to investigate the Trump Campaign. Why was that not impeachable? Democrats STILL say Obama led a “scandal free” administration, even though in their own words Obama committed an impeachable offense!

Vince_McMahon-prowrestlingstories-Chris_Murphy-gstatic

The guy on the left is Connecticut Resident Vince McMahon. The guy on the right is either Vince McMahon cosplaying as an early-stage Gwyllm Griffiths from “The Sixth Finger” or Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy (D). I’m staying away from Connecticut. McMahon image from prowrestlingstories, Murphy image from gstatic.

As I mentioned, Democrats who aren’t lying about what the transcript says claim that just because Trump didn’t threaten action against Ukraine if they failed to investigate Biden, that doesn’t mean the threat wasn’t implicit. One such Democrat being Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT). Murphy, who seemed to feel it was a startling revelation that mass shootings involved guns, so perhaps we can forgive him for not spotting what I’m explaining, is saying that Trump implicitly threatening Ukraine is horrific and we need to impeach him now. Except that (as I said earlier) Murphy EXPLICITLY threatened Ukraine. Murphy TOLD Ukraine that Democrats would stop supporting them if they helped Trump with investigating Biden.

Think of that- the Biden corruption matter is really an internal issue in Ukraine, where they may have let their officials be influence by the Obama Administration to the detriment of their own legal system. So Chris Murphy threatens their national security by saying Democrat support for things like military aid against Russia would disappear if Ukraine continued its internal corruption probes. Then Murphy says that Trump is evil for even implying that Ukraine might face any kind of consequence. And then Politifact lies to you and says Murphy didn’t really threaten anything, even though the statement was apparently explicit, and even IF it were implicit then by Democrat’s own standards Murphy would STILL have threatened Ukraine, yet the partisans at Politifact want you to believe them (and the partisans at Google who love to make Politifact the top search result).

So, Trump did nothing wrong. Democrats are currently and in the past doing everything they accused Trump of doing and MORE. Yet, this is not blowing up in their faces. Why? Because when CBS/ABC/NBC dedicate their morning and nightly news and talk programs to impeaching Trump, when CNN and MSNBC parrot Democrat talking points 24/7, when Huffington Post, New York Times, Washington Post, Slate, Daily Beast, Daily Kos, The Root, Salon, New Republic, New York Magazine, New Yorker, National Journal, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Baltimore Sun and countless others spend their print and online issues spreading Democrat propaganda, when the majority of blogs are leftwing and seemingly the majority of forum and comment section users are leftwing, when the Right has no freely accessible TV channels and maybe like 4 actual news channels that you have to pay for and a minor blog presence and a pathetically small number of online and print news outlets, when Twitter bans people on the Right and when Google skews its searches to favor liberals and when Facebook makes sure only DNC-approved news stories are seen, well… you can see why it’s hopeless that the truth would come out in all this. Republicans need a lot more than the truth on their side. Remember: the Jews had the truth on their side too in Nazi Germany, fat lot of good it did them.

So with Democrats creating this partisan impeachment cloud, after already establishing that Trump and his supporters are racists responsible for mass shootings (bogus narrative debunked in my “of the gun” posts), do you think the truth will be of much help to you? And that’s why I should’ve realized that even though Trump is 100% clean in this latest fake scandal, it wouldn’t matter. One of the rare times I can agree with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes: Republicans have no defense, but not for the reasons that he thinks.

Why The Furor?

What a stupid question. They were mad they lost in 2016. They had money riding on Hillary winning- when Democrats win, their cronies win. Remember Solyndra? Siga Technologies? Remember the Clinton Foundation? But they also thought they had won the culture wars and won dominance; their heads were shoved far up their… uh, bubbles.

Also, it distracts from the Democratic candidates who want to tax everything whether or not the Constitution allows it- Guns, speech, travel. Their policies will keep the poor in the poor house and give them a hefty amount of middle class company down there (but socialism kinda calls for eliminating the middle class so…).

Since Democrats can’t stop the socialist wing of their party from taking over and ruining their chances at winning in 2020, they’re trying to take out Trump so that the public will have no choice but to vote for them. Or, to borrow the phrase they used to smear John McCain, “if you can’t paint yourself as someone to run towards then paint your opponent as someone to run from”.

Run. Image from Heavy.com

Leave a comment Posted on September 25, 2019September 26, 2019 by mrflagg47 Analysis, News, Opinion, Politics

Impeachment In The Air

I was going to have an image of Pelosi to start this post since it starts off talking about her, but the first word below is “hot” and I don’t want to sicken any readers by associating that word with her image. So instead, here is an image of some literal hot air as liberals burn things down because they were “sad“. Images from AP, RWC, Fox News, Quora

Hot air anyway. Amazing how times change, only 19 years ago did the Lefties at The Simpsons have Lisa say that “it’s… irresponsible to present rumors as facts”.

Of all the things to impeach over, why did Pelosi pick the whistleblower complaint? They have Mueller give them 10 points of alleged obstruction of justice they could impeach over, complete with research and all. Instead, Pelosi chooses to impeach over something Trump is alleged to have said, alleged by some guy who didn’t even hear it, alleged by some guy with a political bias against Trump according to the Inspector General, an allegation not backed by the transcript. Heck, the media has to lie about what the transcript said and selectively edit quotes from it to make it look bad! Further showing that she doesn’t know up from down on the issue, Pelosi said that the acting DNI broke the law by not referring the matter to Congress, even though the matter does not involve bad actions by intelligence officials, and might not even have been WITNESSED by an intelligence official unless that’s who the whistleblower got his second-hand information from.

In a real court the whistleblower would not be allowed to testify, anyone who went to law school would have it thrown out as hearsay, assuming the case even went to trial since both the victim (Ukraine) and accused deny that it happened, the transcript of the call shows nothing happened, and there is no other evidence contradicting this, to the point that the Washington Post even said the call “had nothing to do with a quid pro quo”. But impeachment isn’t about “facts” or even “laws”, otherwise as I’ll get into later Democrats would’ve had to impeach Obama and Biden would be polling at 0. Instead, Democrats feel impeachment is about letting a partisan rumor overturn an election you don’t like. Because the riots I started this post with pictures of failed.

You’ll also notice that once the transcript came out, the goal posts were immediately moved (or in some basket cases, the Left and NeverTrumpers just went with the tried and true “dog whistles” idea, saying that “see, we were right, but you just have to believe that these words that clearly mean something else mean what we tell you they mean, but you have to be smart like me to see it. And you’re smart, right?” Other basket cases like the New York Times wrote misleading headlines like “Trump Asks Ukraine’s Leader to ‘Do Us a Favor’ and Also Urges Inquiry of Biden” making it look at first glance like the quid pro quo was about Biden, when really the favor was about something from the foreign interference in the 2016 election that Democrats had in the past wanted investigated. They also make it sound like Trump was pressuring Ukraine on the Biden matter when the Ukrainian President was the one who brought it up in the first place. Then NPR went and outright LIED about what was said- they directly connect Trump’s “do us a favor” remark with Biden’s son, when the remark as I just said HAD NOTHING TO DO with Biden. NPR ironically says their edited remarks, the same editors behind the Charlottesville lie no doubt, provide a “kernel of truth” about the whistleblower story. I don’t know why NPR linked to the transcript right there, it DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS their reporting.). It went from being “Trump should be impeached for threatening to withhold aid unless a foreign leader interfered in the election” to “Trump should be impeached for asking a foreign leader to investigate corruption in their country involving a Democrat”. As I’ll get into shortly, their new goal post would make Joe Biden unfit for office by the Left’s standards because he did more than just ask about an investigation in that same foreign country; he outright got their prosecutor- who was going after his son’s company- fired!

Is This Their Best Shot?

Democrats have been saying since day one that Trump needs to be impeached. They tell you he obstructed justice, they tell you that despite what Mueller found he colluded with Russia, they tell you that he is violating the emoluments clause. So what do they proceed to impeachment with? Some guy says he heard through the grapevine some stuff happened, and those with direct knowledge of the event who spoke about it say what that guy said was not true and are backed by the transcript. Basically, this is the Left’s attitude on the matter (except it was not absurdly found to be true for the sake of humor and story).

For those thinking “of course Ukraine would lie since Trump was blackmailing them”, the best I can say because I’m not a mind reader is read the phone call’s transcript and that his present stated rationale matches his moves for NATO and the UN and what he was talking with the Ukrainian President about in the transcript. And kinda represents one of the reasons people like me voted for him. Ukraine hasn’t come out swinging against Biden, yet they got paid anyway a week before this whistleblower complaint hit the news. And if you think Trump faked the transcript (it sure reads like it’s verbatim as this author notes) then there’s not much I can do for you.

This story also has more potential backblast than a M72 LAW. If Democrats are asserting that Trump asking a foreign leader to provide dirt on Biden is an impeachable offense, then Obama should have been impeached when he did the same thing with the British and Italians (even if you claim the intel communities were helping Hillary not necessarily under Obama’s orders- which shows Obama’s incompetence if that’s your argument- Obama would’ve known), and Hillary should have been thrown out as a candidate once she did the same thing with the Ukrainians, Russians, and Australians. Biden shouldn’t even be showing his face in this race.

And Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) should be impeached too, because he threatened to hurt Ukraine if they helped Trump’s 2020 campaign, meaning he threatened a foreign country if they helped his party’s political opponent, which is kinda what his party wants to impeach Trump for doing. Also, Democrat Senators Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy.

Rep. Maxine Waters gets her own sentences for her statement that “when you talk about Russia, you have to bring in Ukraine”. Because if those two are so inextricably linked then how could Clinton working with Ukrainian officials not tie her in with Russia (as if she needed help being connected to them)?

Batting a thousand with the Left these days, ain’t ya? Image from Techcrunch

Aside from attacks for hypocrisy, Democrats risk calling attention to Biden’s possible misdeeds. That is what Trump was allegedly blackmailing the Ukrainians into doing, so people would be asking what it was Trump wanted the Ukrainians to look into, right? Unless you’re a Democrat in which case you feel betrayed when the New York Times mentions Biden’s potential bad conduct. You can hear and read more about the allegations elsewhere, but the story basically goes that Biden’s son was with some corrupt people and the Ukrainian government was set to prosecute until Vice President Biden stepped in and threatened to withhold aid money unless the Ukrainians fired the prosecutor. Biden admits to threatening the Ukraine over the prosecutor, but didn’t mention that his son was involved.

Anyway, if you’re saying that it warrants an impeachment inquiry that Trump merely talked about his political opponents to another foreign leader, not necessarily acknowledging that the quid pro quo part happened, I have to ask: why? He’s chewing the fat with someone who just won an election, so what? And he tells the guy he should investigate Biden’s dirty ties in his country, after that person mentions his willingness to cooperate. Ok, what’s wrong with that? Obama funded Netanyahu’s political opponent and Obama campaigned against Brexit, at rallies in the UK. Obama allowed UN poll watchers to make sure he won in 2012 or whatever (I’m intentionally hyperbolizing here) and Obama allowed our government to help Hillary by using foreigners and Obama allowed the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election because he thought Hillary would win. So… what’s your problem with what Trump did? Is it just because you don’t like him?

Forget Impeachment, Execute Him!

Excecute Trump for treason, because he chatted with a foreign leader? Or execute for treason because he asked a foreign leader to look at a potential 2020 rival? Because if that is the case, then Obama and Biden and Hillary will be next in line for the firing squad because in 2016 they had the British, Ukrainians, Italians, and Australians helping them against Trump. And Bill Clinton will be in line too, because of all that money the Chinese gave him and his delivery of our missile secrets to them. And if Democrat hero Ted Kennedy were still alive, HE’D be in line for the firing squad.

So… how many Democrats do you want to kill just to get rid of Trump? Oh wait, I see the flaw in my assumption. You’re not going to apply the laws equally. Hillary Clinton (jokingly I hope) in 2016 promised to sell off Republican districts to China; if she had actually done that you would back her 100%. When your Democratic leaders reached out to foreign countries to spy on their 2016 Republican rival, you celebrated and later buried the move. But when Trump is only RUMORED to have pressured a foreign leader to investigate some very shady Biden things that even the New York Times felt it worth mentioning, that’s worth sending Trump to the gas chamber over!

I know, I know, Weld is a Republican, but what he said was pretty welcome on the MSNBC set. Also, to those NeverTrumpers like him who think Trump should be executed, you’d have to do Mitch McConnell and Elaine Chao next because China has them wrapped around its finger.

So go ahead Weld, kill everyone who disagrees with you. Go ahead Dems, kill everyone who disagrees with you. Kill everyone who’s BETTER than you. You’ll be sending hundreds of millions to their death, but that IS what socialism’s biggest accomplishment has been so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. I thought liberals were pretty vicious, but these NeverTrumpers are just as much the psychopath. After hearing Bill Weld, I’m not sure if I should say “I’m no longer a Republican, just a Trump fan” or if I should say “NeverTrumpers are not Republicans”.

I think the former, since NeverTrumpers are just Abe Lincoln Republicans- “do what I say or I will hurt you”. I’m not talking about the Emancipation Proclamation so don’t get started on your fake outrage about racism Democrat (your website claims that protecting slavery was a civil rights cause), I’m talking about Lincoln’s and his subordinates’ liberal attacks on people/journalists who spoke fondly of the Confederates, because remember: the nation was only split for a few years. If you had family in the Confederacy that you loved, or even if you thought it ironic that the man saying he’s fighting to save the Constitution was suspending its provisions, you could be imprisoned for expressing these views under Lincoln’s laws. Of course modern liberals don’t really understand the family ties part, how could they if they want to be able to murder their own kids months after they’re born? So I don’t think they’d quite get the problem with what Lincoln did. Maybe this analogy will help: it’s like if a President Ocasio-Cortez wanted you executed for saying you still love your spouse even though they voted for white nationalist Obama with his xenophobic bigoted border policies and homophobic bigotry in 2008.

From their own website, they said (as of I think 2017 when I first saw this, or maybe 2016) that “[f]or more than 200 years” they have “led the fight for civil rights”. Included in that 200 years is the time that Democrats formed their own country to protect the institution of slavery, claiming that was protecting the civil right to own property, soooo… here they are celebrating their own racism.

What’s This Impeachment Outbreak Really About?

On Trump’s end, I think he kept the mystery going until the Democrats were ready to impeach, just to pull the rug out from under them and make them look crazy. CNN tried to do a little damage control the night before the transcript’s release, saying that it was a victory and the Trump Administration was finally crumbling to Democrat pressures. NPR flat out lied about what the transcript said, as referenced in a parenthetical in the first section of this post. NeverTrumper Mitt Romney probably got away with saying what he said simply because of all the “if trues” he put into it, but NeverTrumper Bill Kristol went farther out on the limb so hopefully he plummeted.

As for the Democrats, Trump struck too close to home. Biden is the candidate that establishment Dems like Nancy Pelosi want. If Ukraine reveals that the corruption there is true, that Biden really did force out a prosecutor in a foreign country by threatening to withhold aid because that prosecutor was going after his corrupt son, then his already tenuous lead will slip and establishment Democrats will be left with a candidate they’ve decided is unelectable. So naturally Democrats themselves are threatening the Ukraine if they do reveal any info about the Biden allegations, thus becoming guilty of the very thing they accuse Trump of doing. It’s about, in a word, “desperation”. That’s why this bit of hot air was enough to set off their impeachment dynamite, rather than the possibly lit matches from the other stuff.

This explains some other things too. Why are NeverTrump “Democrats in disguise” like Romney and Kristol talking impeachment? Why is Trump’s NeverTrump GOP challenger saying Trump needs to be executed? Because they want Biden, like they wanted Hillary in 2016. And they’re terrified too that this will put an extremist in who’ll lose the election and give us four more years of Trump.

The hope is that by hitting Trump with impeachment and having all the media talking heads stuck yabbering about that, then Biden can quietly win the Democratic Primaries since no one is talking about his corruption, with the bonus that anyone who does hear about it will merely assume it’s part of the collusion between Trump and Ukraine. Normally it’d be a problem that the closest thing to evidence they have is “this guy says these guys said Trump said it”, but as you saw in Pelosi’s statement she’s talking like it’s a fact that Trump did say this stuff, so maybe they’re hoping that if they say it happened many times people will forget that it’s a lie.

Like, what if I told you that some guy told me some guys told him that Biden is a serial rapist and Pelosi acts as a pimp to make sure he gets a lot of underage girls? I now have as much evidence as Democrats have for impeachment, more in fact because there’s nothing like a transcript refuting my allegations, and I have a slight edge since the victims are women and we’re supposed to believe all such accusations according to Democrats. See the problem here? If not, I can guess your IQ has as many digits as “IQ” has letters, and speaking of letters I can authoritatively say you only vote for people with the letter “D” appended after their names.

There are of course… other reasons why my accusation might be more believable than the High School gossip Democrats are using to impeach Trump. Image from PJ Media

	KEN MARTIN on The Affirmative Action Co…
	Leah on Headline Roundup 5
	Don F McLaughlin on Why The Election Results Will…
	James on The KKK and Antifa: They are T…
	cgaymer on Osamu Tezuka’s “Me…

C-Gaymer

C-Gaymer

A Blog for Gay Conservatives, Gamers, Inquisitive Free Thinkers, and Anybody Looking for a Fresh Perspective

Ukraine

Missile Command (Atari 400/800, 1981, Residual From The War Games Series)

The Game

Spotlight On The Atari 400

Throw-Away Warfare

What We See In Ukraine

Throwing Away Ukraine

What Do You Think?

Headline Roundup 5

January 6, Legal Troubles

COVID and Health

Racism

Elections

Misc

Impeachment Hot Air

Why The Furor?

Impeachment In The Air

Is This Their Best Shot?

Forget Impeachment, Execute Him!

What’s This Impeachment Outbreak Really About?