In The News – How ABC News Presented Tyre Nichols, Paul Pelosi, and Palestinian Mass Shooters

Sometimes when I visit some folks I know they watch ABC Evening News. They don’t believe much of what they hear and recognize the slant, but they still watch it. So what did I see the night of January 27, 2023?

Prologue

They preview what stories they will cover. Tonight for the first segment they were discussing the then-impending release of police bodycam footage of Tyre Nichols’ death. Segment 2 was discussing bodycam footage of the attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband. They tried to make the two sound equal. Segment 3 was about a Palestinian mass shooter who chose Holocaust Remembrance Day for his killing spree in Israel.

Segment 1 – Riot But Don’t Riot

ABC News was sure to play footage of people saying don’t riot (then they interrupted Jeopardy! to show footage of Tyre Nichols being pepper-sprayed and screaming for his mother), followed by a sermon from the civil rights equivalent of an ambulance chaser Ben Crump rallying the crowd to irrational action against the police.

I’m thinking Ben Crump just heard that a black adult was killed by 5 police officers and assumed that they were white, because he made sure to make race a part of his message. Upon learning they were Black, he probably slightly modified rehearsed speeches when insisting that systemic racism was what led to this, saying that Tyre Nichols would have been killed no matter what the color of the officers’ skins was (all five were black) because our system is designed to kill blacks (so all police are evil, this “racism” idea was repeated by CNN). Again, that’s not true. There is no racial disparity in police shootings (except when it comes to media coverage because dead Blacks are more profitable for the media and its civil rights allies like BLM), it is true that more blacks have interactions with police, but it’s not true they are dying unjustly by the hundreds or thousands as Democrats believe. And to say all police are evil because of these few officers we saw is like saying all Blacks are evil because for decades they’ve commited murder more than any other race, so much so even Obama spoke out about it. I will acknowledge that after seeing the video, the only possible justification for what the police did is if Tyre Nichols somehow raped one of their relatives or something horrific like that and this was street justice, but even if that was the case the officers were rightly fired, and if there is no extreme justification like that then the officers are simply evil people.

As to the “culture” that Ben Crump mentioned, that’s called being human. Any enforcers of power can become abusive (literally they just took a bunch of random people for these two experiments and found the heights humans would go to when allowed or asked. Random people, Check here for some other relevant experiments… plus some other ones that aren’t related.). So what is it that Ben Crump, BLM, and Democrats want? More power of course, and more people in power. Abolish the police, but we saw in 2020 they plan to replace the police with roving armed mobs of murderous (and vaguely segregationist) Brown Shirts. Their little experiment in Seattle was the perfect microcosm of what their world would be. Then again, as noted in the second sentence we’ve seen experiments in liberal havens (I suppose some smartass in the comments will try to say that colleges aren’t liberal, in total contradiction to every liberal out there who proudly touts their college degree and insist college causes people to become liberal (yes, even liberals say college makes you liberal, they claim it’s because you are educated and exposed to more cultures)). Part 2 of the equation is that, it is a fact, Black neighborhoods tend to be higher crime areas so that is where police will be. Police go where the crime is. Regardless of why, the police are there to respond to what happened today, not over generations (or as Joe Biden put it, “It doesn’t matter whether or not they are victims of society… So I don’t want to ask, ‘What made them do this?’ They must be taken off the streets!”). Politicians like Joe Biden who gave us that quote are supposed to be working on systems to handle what led to the crime problem. Something made people grab a gun and start shooting, grab a knife and start stabbing, and at that point the only reason you’d demand to abolish police and send in psychologists is if you have the stomach for a high body count. Though, when the Left has its anarchy, they beat people the way Tyre Nichols was beaten by armed thugs (and while they want to ban you from having guns, they are happy to use them. While they demand gun control, they violate laws by handing guns to people who legally should not have them and then Democrat politicians praise them after they violate gun control laws those Democrats demanded). So you’d think they’d be the FIRST to scapegoat humanity’s immaturity when it comes to being in power.

(another note- ABC’s supplemental coverage that they interrupted Jeopardy! for was sure to point out that EVERY police officer was evil. So they say that all cops are bad, even have an expert who agrees that police will be seen as “occupiers” rather than legitimate law enforcement, but please don’t riot.)

I guess they got tired of people talking about Biden’s classified documents so they created the Atlanta Antifa riots, and some of their sister riots within which a Democrat leader’s son got arrested for assaulting police. Spread hate for the police so everyone will agree with the Antifa cause- overthrowing democracy (y’know, that stuff they accuse Republicans of). Or maybe this is to distract from Project Veritas revealing that Pfizer thought about creating new COVID variants so they can make new vaccines while acknowledging COVID will be profitable for years… and while assaulting Project Veritas journalists (but as you know from the Omicron variant, the vaccines Pfizer makes for their variants would only really work on their own variants, so they would be useless and unprofitable… and Pfizer doesn’t do anything that isn’t profitable).

Segment 2 – Is It Really The Same?

They went out of their way to try and build the Pelosi attack video as being the same as the Tyre Nichols video. Getting hit with a hammer and being beaten to death by five armed people are very different. I don’t know what kind of sick mind would try to equate the two (they said both videos were equally as disturbing).

Speaking of Paulie, this video was the fakest thing I have ever seen. I have been in fights and struggles over objects, this was not one of those. It was like Paul and the attacker were just standing around waiting for police to show up. Paul clearly wasn’t struggling, had a free hand the whole time while the attacker had two hands on the hammer, so why didn’t Paul grab an object and wallop the attacker? And the story behind it? Bogus. The attacker spent several minutes trying to beat their way into the house before body slamming their way through the glass. No neighbors heard this, Paul didn’t hear it. Have YOU ever heard glass being pounded on or shattering? It is LOUD. And look at where they say the guy broke-in: if it happened as alleged, why does it look like it was blown outward? Why is the hole too small for someone to fit through and too distant from the door to be of any use except to Reed Richards? And then the guy catches Paul in his bed, but lets Paul get out of bed, grab his phone, and lock himself in the bathroom? What kind of idiot is this attacker? Oh but it gets better- Paul decides to leave the safety of his bathroom after calling police. He didn’t call the security for the gated community who’d have a faster response time; he called the police. Then left the bathroom. We know Paul isn’t that dumb, as he keeps making stock trades at the exact right moment as if he had the inside track, but that would be illegal so Paul must just be smart and quick-witted.

The story concludes with what we see on the bodycamera footage. Paulie and his buddy made their way to the front door, where they were just kind of chillin’ with the hammer limply dangling between them, with Paul grabbing casually with one hand while the intruder had both hands on it, with the attacker laconically letting Paul open the door for police and Paul nonchalantly welcoming the police. Then when police say put the hammer down, now that the attacker is on camera and the item has been identified he attacks. Let me remind you that this man is half of Paul’s age, Paul is not particularly in-shape, yet we are supposed to believe that he singlehandedly (literally, as he only used one hand) kept the attacker from using his hammer until the police were there to witness events.

Did I mention the attacker is described by those who know him as a leftwinger living with a BLM supporter, and that the alleged blogs he maintained that showed him as a rightwinger only existed the day he was arrested (keep in mind he was arrested in the morning).

This phony, fabricated, staged sideshow that makes amateur actors on public television acting out a child’s script look believable is what ABC News says is equal to the brutal death of Tyre Nichols.

Segment 3- Whose Fault?

They started presenting this story as neutral, told everything relevant to it, but then they shoehorned in a reference to how Israel has “its most rightwing government in history” (that is either exactly what the anchor said or almost exactly what they said, I did not write it down as I was eating at the time) in such a way that it seemed to be their attempt to justify the shooting.

Conclusion

Out of this (and other) randomly selected news broadcasts from ABC, there’s huge bias to their reporting. Too much to just be coincidence, and it taints how the public sees the story. Fox News or Newsmax or somebody needs to get on these broadcast stations. As more and more people cut their cords and switch back to antennas, this is a growing market and should be entered.

The Third Word War (Sega CD, 1994, Residual From The War Games Series, Cheat Post)

I assume the reason the words are curved at the bottom is that this is on a flatscreen CRT TV but the video input signal is either being output or processed like it’s for the convex-screen models. It happens on other games too, you may have noted it in my Doom post.

As I said 4 years ago…

As we watch the Democrats peddle their warmongering interventionist and laissez-faire let’s-wait-for-war attitudes, ie as they play their war games on their way to the fall brawl known as the midterm elections, where voters will probably vote Democrat to bring us nookular annihilation, I’ll take a look at some literal war games. Cold War video games, anyway.

That “let’s-wait-for-war attitude” remark is more reflective of the time I originally wrote it, at which point Democrats had briefly softened their warmongering from its 2017 levels (where Democrats wanted a nuclear war with Russia because they lost an election and blamed it on Russia… so protesting in the Capitol on January 6 because you thought an election was stolen is worse than trying to trigger a nuclear war because you thought an election was stolen- which Democrats STILL believe (despite scandal-free Obama and members of his team debunking it) while saying Republicans are terrorist Nazis who believe “the big lie” if they think 2020 was stolen).

Anyway, today we’ll look at a game I had wanted to do 4 years ago but didn’t get around to.

The Game

Imagine the game Civilization but you choose who to attack with a drop-down menu and the only time you get to move units on a map is when you start a battle and enter the Real-Time Strategy part of the game. Also you don’t even have to attack if you have enough money to buy out the foe.

I first tried to play as Russia, thinking I could mimic the moves that led to the Ukraine crisis. Instead, it turned out the world was totally bananas so that wasn’t going to work. Then the video output glitched (already here you can see it’s darker than usual) so I had to shutoff the console and try again.

It looks like something you’d play on a computer: you have a cursor and drop-down menus where you select what you want to do, and then the chance for some numerical inputs. You have a set amount of money in each turn, and can only take a couple of actions before you’re not allowed to act anymore (there’s a counter for it). You can invest the money in yourself or other countries. The benefit of foreign investment is you can either make them friendly or conquer their economies.

Now comes the “Third World War” part. You have military units you can send out, plus you can launch different types of attacks on a foreign country without invading. Surprisingly for a game named “Third World War”, your nuclear strikes are limited and don’t escalate to the world blowing itself apart. Maybe Putin played this before making his nuclear threats?

What’s interesting is some of the mechanics at play. You have unrealistic elements like increasing tax audits causing a rise in the morale of your population, or Canada developing chemical and nuclear weapons. But then there are some very realistic mechanics, like the fact that other countries can bomb cities and maim civilians without a care in the world but then America is condemned and loses allies if they do the same thing (same also goes for if you play as Israel where liberals really do want to “drive the Jews into the sea” I guess because they DON’T use human shields like Palestine does, yet strangely if you’re NOT playing as Israel they can invade at will with no condemnation), even if the country they’re doing it to just invaded somebody. Really, that applies to anyone you play as, and I’m sure idiots sucking propaganda worldwide can sympathize with how their special slice of Hell is always persecuted just like when you play as them in this game.

This is a very loooooong game to play, so have a few hours on hand. I went for an hour and the status quo was the same an hour in as it was at the start. Luckily there is a save feature. You can also play different scenarios, whether it’s erupting the Cold War into a nuclear conflict, starting a Third World War in the 1990s, or a free-for-all (though the Third World War scenario seems like that too). It definitely has a lot of replay value if this is your kind of thing.

Now for the combat- at times, you can get caught in a land war where you get to command military units. You’re shown the battlefield, but not all at the same time, and the camera starts over the enemy’s units. You hover the cursor over one of your units, and upon selecting it you can direct them to destinations and tell them who/what to attack. Once per battle you can also call in an air strike either from the air force or navy or both depending on who you have available. Just be careful with that- it takes them 20-30 seconds to get there, so enemy troops could easily have moved out of range of their attack. You can’t target specific units with them, rather you can only call for a strike at a general area and hope the enemy is still there when the attack comes. This is the Real-Time Strategy part I described earlier, for the casual reader not hip on game terms. Given the use of a cursor to point and click on things, this part too seems designed for a PC (I so dislike using controllers instead of a mouse for RTS games that I surrendered my copy of Command And Conquer on the Sega Saturn, which is not compatible with the mouse released for the Saturn… but I traded it for a Hogan’s Heroes boxset so while I was disappointed I had to trade it off it wasn’t a total loss).

Getting a ground battle started is not as easy as just picking a target. You also can control what each of those 16 armies have in them, a super level of micromanaging. Also- if you want to weaken the enemy with an air strike before starting combat (as opposed to during combat), you have to do the air strike in one turn and then combat the next turn because it will always start combat before doing an air strike if you try to do them in the same turn (air strikes outside of combat don’t effect your ability to do air strikes during combat).

Overall I have to say this high-level involved game isn’t really my style unless I plan to dedicate a day to it, but I’d probably get too bored after hour 2 of no progress. It’s a little… dry. You don’t exactly see how your economic moves affect your country and the world, and how they’re countered. There’s a lot of numbers and graphs too. Plus you’re not exactly seeing everything all at once, you have to scroll through pages of data every turn to make an informed decision. Also in between turns you get a news ticker at the bottom of the screen telling you what countries gained what weapons or what economic crisis or disaster affected which country, and you need to pay attention to that and take it into account in your turn. A lot of detail goes into this, it’s a very immersive and time-consuming experience, and it’s not fast-paced in the least bit. Even the ground combat portion takes a while- your units move slowly.

Then you remember it’s the Sega CD in 1994 and realize it’s a pretty good game given the circumstances, and usually can be found pretty cheap… or at least it used to be. In 2018 I got it complete in box for $5, but today that’d be $40 on eBay, or $15 for the game by itself. I’m planning a series on games that are inexplicably expensive and get the feeling I should’ve saved this one for that.

The Real World War III Is About To Begin!

Yes, this is also a cheat post.

Earlier this week I interviewed someone about Putin’s nuclear threats, how with his mentality he might not be bluffing, and how we’re not paying attention to the warning signs and just assume some sort of moral shield will protect us and we don’t have to understand how the enemy thinks, nor should we try to give the bad guy a little of what he wants in order to avoid a situation where precious liberal cities get nuked (the same liberals who say in all cases we should send unarmed, powerless, counselors to stop a crazy man with a gun who’s killing people because the nutcase just needs to be understood (as if social workers were infallible, as if victims had no rights and the killers should just be given a lecture and sent on their way… and rapists too, for you liberals who say there’s an epidemic and then vote to increase it) also say we should continually provoke and eventually fight a crazy man with nuclear weapons and that we shouldn’t even try to understand him, except to understand how we can attack first. They say you’re a traitor if you don’t shut up and obey Democrats’ calls to war without examining the bigger picture- just look at the Left’s McCarthy-era reaction to Tucker Carlson’s nuanced view on staying out of the war, in some cases the same Left that said we should not have tried to stop Russia-backed North Vietnam from invading South Vietnam).

Since the interview was conducted, America seems to have decided to up the ante and sabotage Europe’s principle source of energy. If it turns out America is the culprit, then we pretty much cut off our nose to spite our face by royally screwing over our European allies. Remember how you Lefties said Trump was evil because he wanted other NATO nations to do their fair share of the work (ironic that you communists were AGAINST someone pulling their weight instead of mooching off others like a billionaire)? Well, I’d say making sure their citizens freeze to death in the winter is a bit worse, this coming after (as mentioned in the last post) the Biden Administration begged them not to evacuate their people from Afghanistan and leave them to be used as hostages or killed by the Taliban. Again, Trump saying NATO countries should put in equal effort according to their abilities is way different than the Biden Administration outright trying to kill citizens of NATO countries, but I guess that major difference is lost on the “orange man bad” crowd.

Of course it didn’t have to be this way, this proxy war Democrats are pushing (it could’ve been over in April but the Biden Administration teamed up with England to sabotage a peace deal) in Ukraine that leads to billions of taxpayer dollars going to Ukraine and defense contractors only to end up in the pockets of corrupt politicians over there and over here with defense contractors spending our money to put warmongers in office so the money keeps coming (I thought Democrats opposed the military–industrial complex?). America is pretty much the reason the war hasn’t ended yet (this war is NOT about “protecting Democracy in Ukraine” as liberals chant, since Zelensky has shown himself to be one execution away from being as anti-Democratic as Putin), as you heard in the interview and saw in my last post. So anything that happens, such as Europe’s power being cut, is on the Leftist Biden Administration. Worse, it looks like that might be a permanent cut given the damage to the pipelines (granted, the whole reason Europe got hooked on Russian power is because of Leftists believing Russian propaganda… which is ironic since they tried to blame Russia for Trump getting elected yet they believed everything Russia said about the climate that led to dependence on Russian energy).

And it really looks like the Biden Administration is responsible for the pipeline sabotage. Consider this- as recorded in the last post they had no problem trying to say Russia would launch a false flag to start a war, yet when NATO all but accused Russia of launching a false flag with its pipelines suddenly the Biden Administration came to Russia’s defense while at the same time telling Americans to evacuate Russia (ostensibly because Russia might conscript them, which actually has been grounds for war in the past… a war that left the White House as a pile of ash just as one with Russia would). It’s like they knew they screwed up and are trying to limit the damage.

Anyway, this definite provocation will just make Putin more likely to lash out irrationally, with a nuclear reprisal still on the table. Anyone else remember how Leftists wanted to disarm our nuclear arsenal (and as recently as a month before the invasion wanted to reduce it)? Hey Lefties, quick question: how would we deter Putin from escalating already in this crisis if we didn’t have weapons of mass destruction on the table?

For that matter, remember that Democrats consistently are anti-military (check out that link to a Salon piece in that post I linked to- hey Lefties, if you don’t need the military to protect your freedoms how come you keep sending military weapons designed for our military to a foreign military and say it’s to protect your freedom from Putin?). They’ve been very open about wanting to dissolve the institution, and under their current regime we’ve seen recruitment numbers drop while the military releases perfectly fit soldiers by the thousands who love this country while keeping/promoting soldiers they train to hate this country and love terrorists, and hate the race that constitutes the majority of the American public (not that the ones left are trained to be competent, they might make the Russians look competent by comparison. And let’s not forget that the folks in charge of the military think America shouldn’t exist.). So why would these people who hate America fight Russia to protect it? These people, taught through CRT that America is irredeemably racist and the majority population is the cause of it, would sooner take Russia’s side if we were invaded- why WOULDN’T they? Russia just has to claim to be the woke liberator and that the Leftists in the military are being lied to by evil white fascists about who the real enemy is, and like all good civil rights warriors they want to be on the right side of history don’t they?

On the one hand Democrats want a nuclear war with Russia and are doing everything they can to recklessly plough forward into it, but on the other hand they spent decades trying to disarm us and are STILL working to do so. What conclusion can we draw about them (and any ex-military who join the party) from this?

Yes I know I railed on Democrats a lot while most Republicans are aiding and abetting this (when looking for that article on Rand Paul, I saw that Leftwing Rolling Stone magazine said he was working for Putin because he dared pause funding to Ukraine), but this is the sort of thing the MAGA movement in the Republican Party was against; it’s those the “extremist” “clear and present danger” faction of the Republican Party believes. If you Lefties hadn’t welcomed the ejected warmongers like Liz Cheney with open arms and embraced their violent worldview, hadn’t embraced those you said were liars who tricked us into invading Iraq, then they’d be even less relevant and the RINOs too cowardly to jump ship would be more inclined to work for peace or at least not work against it just to keep their checks coming.

What Do You Think?

You voted Democrat, so I guess you wanted World War III after all. Whether it was 62 million or 81 million who voted for Biden, this is what at least a third of the country seems to want. Vote Democrat again this fall to make sure we all die.

Well… not all of us. Wealthy executives at our defense companies, a few billionaires, and the leaders of the Democratic Party will survive a nuclear war because they’re for the people and for equity, and equity means the royalty and nobility in society survive in luxury while the serfs die in nuclear hellfire or struggle to live in post-apocalyptic hellscapes, but that’s what you vote for and defend so ardently on the internet, in social media, and in the real world with your protests/riots so I guess that’s how you feel. It’s convenient that I live near a prime target so I’ll be vaporized in an instant, but I regert that I won’t get to see radiation poisoning dole out karma to you while you continue to praise your Democrat leaders for their bravery in forcing this situation on you.