Setting The Barr Low; or, The ABC’s Of Bigotry

abc-logo

from wikimedia commons

Yes, it’s a little late, but time has no meaning to me. Playing DKC on the GBC does that to you.

Oddly enough (to the thinking of some of you in the audience), I do believe Roseanne’s remarks are a little racist. Spot on about the Muslim Brotherhood part, but racist with the “Planet of the Apes” reference. Not that I’m condemning her for anything except lacking awareness about the reprisal such remarks would bring. As I will outline in a moment, we all are entitled to our opinions, to condemn others would be to condemn ourselves (yourselves, liberal, as you will read if you dare).

I should clarify- I meant the reprisal that statements like Roseanne’s SHOULD bring. You see, ABC is lacking some awareness itself. Here are some folks ABC still supported wholeheartedly, fervently, and partisanly despite similar remarks to Roseanne’s- or worse, real attitudes they hold (which should always be the measure).

  • The Presidential Candidate that they lobbied very hard for, that they were disappointed lost, once made a racist joke about Indians and participated in a faux pas related to the African American community… make that TWO (and it’s amazing how forgiving media outlets such as ABC and Democrats were over Hillary’s superpredator remark when and how they voted for her- and don’t say too much time passed, ABC went after Steve Scalise with the rest of the media wolves over a fake racist incident that would have been 12 years old if it had really happened- yet when President Trump refers to MS-13 gang members as animals Democrats and media outlets like ABC suddenly decide that all gang members are divine creatures who cast down bullets of love upon us, who are merely filling women with love when they rape them, who merely are spreading the word of peace when they put a knife into us a hundred times, as opposed to VOTING FOR Hillary Clinton when she said much the same thing about African Americans) (ALSO, listen again to the Gandhi clip. You hear the people laughing at Hillary’s remark? It’s clearly a racist joke, yet your party of tolerance that has called Trump a racist more times than a pulsar will emit a beam of EM radiation in its lifetime is sitting there LAUGHING at a racist joke!)
  • ABC’s buddy Joe Biden once said Obama was the first mainstream African American candidate who was “clean” and “articulate”. Joe Biden ALSO picked on folks of the Indian persuasion, so I guess since he became Vice President after he said that and Hillary Clinton was almost President after mocking Gandhi, that means Democrats are perfectly ok with being racist towards Indians. That kinda takes the wind out of the sails of their anti-Apu movement.
  • ABC’s buddy Harry Reid once said Obama had “no Negro dialect” (something ABC didn’t let others get away with) and made an Asian joke that ABC decided wasn’t even newsworthy. (ABC also failed to mention when Harry Reid said “why would I want to do that” in response to being asked if he’d fund children’s cancer research, so there you go.)
  • ABC’s buddy DNC Deputy Chair Keith Ellison was/maybe is an anti-semite (note how he had issued a statement as Wolf noted saying his association with Farrakhan is long ended, admits to being associated with Farrakhan in that clip, but says he has always forever and ever opposed anti-Semitism despite his admitted association with Farrakhan)
  • ABC’s party of choice, the Democrats, standing behind anti-Semitic hate-monger Farrakhan (Hillary Clinton allegedly called her husband’s campaign manager a “Jew bastard” so in its love for Hillary, ABC already established its forgiveness of anti-Semiticism if it comes from a Democrat. Because as we know from the Associated Press still claiming Steve Scalise spoke at a white supremacist rally 16 years ago when that is factually untrue and was disproven 3 years ago, journalists like you’d find at ABC won’t let the truth get in the way of a good slur if it’s against a Republican)

Why so many Democrats listed? What do they have to do with ABC you ask despite the links linking them? Read the chart.

journalists-wiki-tw

ABC is well-represented on this list of journalists working with someone who has a history of making racist remarks, who is involved with a Party that has a history of racism, one which still appears today as evidenced throughout this piece.

And of course, ABC itself currently has, or had, other racists/bigots/misogynists/folks of ill-repute in their employ who were not canned. ABC’s choices of news and programming arguably support much the same thing.

  • ABC’s Joy Behar dressed as a black woman for Halloween, and shared the picture with the cast of ABC’s The View on ABC one morning, saying she looked cute when dressed in blackface. (so while Roseanne simply made a throwaway remark on Twitter to her relatively small following, Behar was proud of having dressed in blackface and showed millions how happy she was about it on ABC’s network, and yet Behar kept her job)
  • ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel (and Joy Behar) smearing Christians (without at least equal time to other religions, not one joke or attack directed at Islam has passed their lips, what do you call it when you single out a group because of certain stereotypes about them but let another arguably worse group get a pass?)
  • ABC ignoring Farrakhan’s history while praising an event featuring him (he praised Hitler, for example, but that was never mentioned by ABC)
  • ABC supporting sexism by not exposing links between sexual assaulters and Democrats
  • ABC’s very feminist act of ignoring an alleged rape because the accused were illegal immigrants rather than white frat boys
  • And then of course ABC’s programming consists mostly of hateful diatribes, keeping in line with the personalities it hires. (guess I shouldn’t be surprised about some of this, after all, ABC news folks were happy to call America sexist and seemingly agree with Hillary’s ‘deplorables’ remark)
  • Don’t forget to consider just about any time ABC airs anything by Spike Lee, whose least-racist quirk is glaring at interracial couples

It’s perfectly fine, if you are a liberal, to be bigoted or to support bigots (we’ll even throw the Left’s favorite playbook at them- why didn’t ABC denounce Farrakhan 55 times while praising his rally? Why has ABC never denounced the New York Times or Esquire over their association with a racist?) is perfectly acceptable. Party of tolerance indeed!

Maybe They Just Didn’t Like Her

It’s readily apparent that ABC simply hated Roseanne. Her show was a ratings smash, but not with the right regions (New York, Los Angeles. You’ll notice that the networks tend to promote shows that resonate with them, as they’re the top ad markets in the country. Suburbs of a big city, apartments in a big city, nerd scientists in a big city, singing a pure propaganda song about your big city on New Year’s with millions watching while said songworthy big city makes cesspools look like mountain springs, crimes in a big city. Big city nights! The suburbs and rural areas are full of crooked rednecks and people killing each other. What’s the backdrop painting for the late shows? A cityscape. And by the way, where do all the journalists live?).

ABC was champing at the bit to find an excuse to cancel this politically toxic (to them) show, like with Tim Allen’s “Last Man Standing”. Tim Allen’s show was ABC’s second-highest rated series, but the first excuse they found (production costs) they dumped it because they hate anything that appeals to anyone who is not already waving a Soviet flag from their Brooklyn apartment window. Want more evidence for this? What does ABC replace the Trump-country appeal of the Roseanne revival with? A spinoff that takes it to the Left.

Or to put it simply- Roseanne didn’t embody “New York Values”.

Boss_Tweed_Nast

Just one example of New York Values, from wikimedia commons

The Big Apple Didn’t Fall Far From The Tree

  • ABC’s parent company hiring misogynist Keith Olbermann.
  • ABC’s parent company not bothering to release Jemele Hill over her racially charged remarks (which tended to be anti-White, and tended to be almost anything she said)
  • ABC’s parent company not even punishing Bomani Jones after he said all American sports fans were racists

Just To Be Clear…

I’m not saying ABC doesn’t have the right to hire and fire who they want, if they want 24/7 bigotry and misogyny that’s their business. I’m saying it’d be nice if they weren’t so openly biased and applied their rules equally. Oh well, what do you expect from liberals? Typical. They can’t even play by their own rules because they know they’d lose. You know, their “rule” that says we should all be tolerant and open-minded. Their other rule that states such things as were said by the above folks are racist/sexist/bigoted/etc. Clearly, that only applies to people they hate, not to themselves.

Just For Fun…

Let’s end with some more bigoted liberal quotes (Liberal leader Al Sharpton sure didn’t seem like an LGBTQ buddy in the one at that link!). A quick glance into the world that ABC wholeheartedly supports, the world of Democrats. Maybe Roseanne was just a token sacrifice so that no one will question ABC’s liberal ethos when it supports the below intolerance. (NOTE: ABC has yet to apologize for or denounce or otherwise distance themselves from the below remarks, nor from the above incidents, aside from Roseanne’s statement… whereas if even one Trump supporter is shown as a racist the President must answer for that individual’s beliefs as if they were his own according to ABC and the media’s playbook, interesting how when a Muslim jihadist attacks it’s never Islam’s fault yet every indication of racism from a Trump supporter reflects that entire side of the aisle)

  • “Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them.” – Mary Frances Berry, former Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights, someone thinks this is an inspiring quote. So is her quote about accusing Republicans of racism to distract from real issues.
  • “(I get to) kill all the white people… How great is that?” – Jamie Foxx discussing his Django Unchanged role on NBC’s Saturday Night Live, a statement made to a cheering crowd.
  • “(Blacks and Hispanics) are too busy eating watermelons and tacos to learn how to read and write.” – Mike Wallace, CBS News 1982
  • “White people shouldn’t be allowed to vote. It’s for the good of the country and for those who’re bitter for a reason and armed because they’re scared.” – Left-wing journalist Jonathan Valania
  • “I want to go up to the closest white person and say: ‘You can’t understand this, it’s a black thing’ and then slap him, just for my mental health.” – New York City Councilman, Charles Barron (who also said we attacked Libya for oil… just like Iraq I suppose because we never got any from Libya either!). His full quote was about him saying that blacks needed reparations in part because they paid for facilities under segregation they never could use. So did whites. And yet he was happy to impose Obamacare on people so that people who object to abortion would be forced to pay for it. Typical. Also, Barron, I have a question: if a white person can’t understand certain aspects of being black, how the hell does a black understand what being white means? Does your race have this magic ability to see beyond its skin color simply because you think it’s superior?
  • “We got to do something about these Asians coming in and opening up businesses and dirty shops. They ought to go.” – Former DC Mayor Marion Barry who was busted smoking crack with a prostitute
  • “The point I was making was not that Grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn’t. But she is a typical white person…” – Barack Obama, who is known for not being a fan of whites.
  • (Obama’s) a nice person, he’s very articulate this is what’s been used against him, but he couldn’t sell watermelons if it, you gave him the state troopers to flag down the traffic.” – Dan Rather, CBS Evening News
  • “A few years ago, (Barack Obama) would have been getting us coffee.” – Bill Clinton to Ted Kennedy
  • “Hymies.” And “Hymietown.” — Jesse Jackson’s description of New York City while on the 1984 presidential campaign trail (Jesse used “Hymie” as an anti-Semitic slur. Hey, remember when the Left went after Ted Cruz for being an anti-Semite because he said “New York values”? Why does the Left still love Jesse Jackson after his Jew-hatred was revealed like a mushroom cloud over the Nevada desert?)

And of course, the patron saint of welfare himself-

wp-1473803210459.jpg

Advertisements

Climate Of Fear

Editors Note: At the time of this articles posting I was unable to fully verify or disprove the information of this article. I must say this does not fully reflect the views of C-Gaymer on Climate change. I can, however, verify these claims made in the article and confirm they are in line with my own views:
1. Many Climate Change Scientists have manipulated data, they are a disgrace to the scientific community and damage the cause of raising awareness about and combatting manmade climate change.
2. Under the Obama Regime government agencies like the EPA routinely engaged in dishonest and destructive behavior for various reasons from keeping their budgets to attacking the political opponents of the regime. The EPA is no exception and Mr. F.L.A.G. convincingly makes the case that the Colorado mine disaster was intentional.
3. I fully agree and support the Presidents decision to pull out of the Paris Climate Accord. Having actually looked into the accord after the fact, I can confirm it was a useless attempt to look like leftist governments were combatting climate change. In reality, they only restricted the economies of western governments like the United States while giving a free pass to dictatorial regimes like China to pollute and destroy the Earth. It is a worthless document much like the Iran Nuclear Deal. Another part of Obama’s Failed Legacy.

Here at C-Gaymer, we are Eco-Conservatives. This means we acknowledge Manmade Climate Change and the need to combat it. Unlike our dishonest and ignorant Liberal Counterparts, however, Eco Conservatives believe in the power of the free market and believe in incentivizing companies to seek green solutions and alternatives to things such as plastic waste or Energy. It is more effective than lies, witchhunts, and petty rhetoric. To learn more about being an
Eco Conservative, visit http://www.republicen.org. Know that this website does not fully reflect our views either, but they are a great place to start learning about being an Eco-Conservative, and we need to take the reigns of that movement. Thank you for your time.

 

volcano-closeup-you-only-live-twice

Not Hawaii but you get the point. From You Only Live Twice

Isn’t this interesting. For April, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reached its highest point ever, as recorded in Hawaii. Right before a volcano erupted near the observation site. Except instead of linking those two, scientists said this carbon dioxide came from the burning of fossil fuels. Maybe I’m too much of a cynic, but if these scientists don’t issue a correction or at least explain why A: Al Gore was only saying last year that CO2 emissions were on the decline and B: why CO2 from a volcano does not affect CO2 readings in the atmosphere near said volcano, I’m pretty sure they’re abusing the fact that we can’t distinguish CO2 that came from a volcano from CO2 that came from humans, in order to promote their climate change agenda.

Maybe what I said is totally impossible because of altitude (but then how did CO2 reach that section of the atmosphere for them to read such high levels in the first place?), maybe it’s exactly what happened. We don’t know, so advantage liberals because guess what: most scientists are liberal. Scientists have a monopoly on knowledge, and they use that to their political advantage to shove through whatever agenda suits them, claiming that if you oppose them then you oppose reality. Though reality comes along and bites them in the ass (as we saw with the liberal scientists of the Soviet Union) even when scientists hide from the truth behind their iron curtains of “knowledge”, the fact that opponents like me don’t have so wide a knowledge base still leaves the scientist with enough ethos/ego to dismiss any criticism.

It Was Supposed To Save The World

Let’s run with the scientists’ assessment though. Hawaii is quite a long ways from anywhere that didn’t sign the Paris Climate Agreement (the unenforceable agreement that anyone could cheat on, but was supposed to save the world) or abide by it. In fact, you’d have to go all the way to Idaho or Arizona or Alaska before you hit a spot that doesn’t abide by the Agreement that’s supposed to have saved our planet. The way air currents travel though, none of the air from those states would be reaching Hawaii in an

so-very-polluted

As you can see from this photograph taken 20 miles from DC, all of the pollution from the rest of the backward business-loving Republican strongholds has left a layer of smog so thick that it causes anyone looking at it to hallucinate so vividly they think they actually see a pretty wooded path.

unfiltered form (especially after passing through the lush green paradises of treaty signatories India, Russia, and China). They WOULD, however, be reaching me here in the nation’s capital in their purest, most CO2-laden form. The Left has already made the atmosphere quite toxic here, sans pollution. Now, for there to be enough CO2 in Hawaii from the mainland USA’s horrid pollution that Hawaii would still record the highest CO2 levels ever after the rest of the world greened itself, that would mean that the East Coast would look like Beijing or something.

So explain it to me liberal- you contend that the U.S. is the largest and only producer of CO2, as the restrictions present in the Paris Climate Agreement indicate (the treaty allowed every nation except the U.S. to increase its fossil fuel use, while the U.S. must keep reducing its use. For example, China, that pollutes much more than the U.S., with double the CO2 emissions of America, is allowed to indiscriminately pollute for 13 more years before the treaty restrictions start. Maybe the framers of the treaty read the fake news in the NYT, AJC, and Ecowatch that claims somehow the pollution stats are way off and the U.S. is worse than China. Remember, these science deniers are the ones telling us global warming exists, to begin with, the ones who say China with acid rain covering way more than a third of it and with lethal pollution in its waterways and crippling smog covering its cities is somehow less polluting than America with its swimmable rivers, distinct lack of acid rain, and clear-aired cities. Think I’m exaggerating on how much these liberals and scientists who warn us about global warming love China? A major politician involved in planning

China-public-execution-the-sun

Public executions are popular events where thousands attend, in the country that the UN believes has the best government for fighting climate change. As if the pictures didn’t make it obvious, their rationale for why they think China is the best government does (especially given what was presented in the “California Attacks Muslims” piece and what will be discussed here later). And all this time I thought liberals were against the death penalty, but I guess they only oppose it if the murderer in question is black and shot a cop. image from thesun.co.uk

how we stop polluting, the UN Climate Chief, said that China has the ideal model for action on global warming, despite as you may have read in the above links how China’s provinces simply ignore climate initiatives, and despite its failures. There is no clearer example of how distanced the climate change scientists/activists/politicians are from reality than what I have just outlined). Given your belief that the U.S. is the only cause of pollution, then how does liberal Hawaii with all it’s anti-global warming measures which only receives air from nations that signed the treaty, nations that had such low pollution that they were encouraged to BUILD polluting structures, record the highest amounts of CO2 ever in history? Surely after 24 months, the treaty would be showing some impact, yes? And remember- 9 of those months still had Obama in office. But I guess if you believe Obama winning the Democratic nomination was the day the seas stopped rising, you’d believe Trump’s inauguration is the day the sky caught fire.

Come to think of it, on the one hand the Left claims global warming is instant (No Arctic ice by summer 2008 as predicted earlier that year despite the fact polar ice has stayed about the same since 1979, Prince Charles said in 2009 there were only 96 months left to save the planet, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said in 2009 there were only 50 days left to stop terrible climate catastrophe, the head of Canada’s Green Party said in 2009 there were only hours left to save the world) and there are points of no return that we’ve passed in date but not passed in damage to the climate (the Paris Climate Agreement was signed only at the end of 2015. 2015 was 26 years after the UN warned we had only 10 years- a warning which we followed with increased CO2 production. 2015 was 6 years after NASA warned that Obama had only 4 years to save the Earth. 2015 was 2 years after when Al Gore predicted that the polar ice caps would be gone by. 2015 was the same year the UN said the temperature would rise 2 degrees Celsius, the same year climate chaos was supposed to be unleashed on the world as predicted by France’s foreign minister, and the same year a bunch of other deadly predictions outlined later in this piece did not happen. You will find a lot of failed predictions by these alleged scientists and politicians), but they also claim that any solutions to global warming will take a while to be effective. So CO2 works instantly, but its sudden absence does not? And surely with all of the climate measures you’ve put into place while you ran the government and all of the climate measures the rest of the smarter, more liberal world has instilled we must see at least some reduction in CO2/climate change/temperature increase? (Vox summarized the party of scientists and climate warriors’ actions from 2009-2016 best with its headline “Obama had a chance to really fight climate change. He blew it.”)

trigglypuff-urban-dictionary

Let’s be honest- with this as the face of the Left, we can pretty confidently say they never have to explain away any errors to their followers. Image from Urban Dictionary

They have a way of explaining away why the things they implement will have no measurable impact (much the same way as apocalypse predictors can always explain why the date they pick is wrong once it’s past, or buy themselves time by pushing it into the future… much to the chagrin of scientists that want to advance the date by 50 years to 2050 instead of 2100)– they say the CO2 emitted in previous generations is still there, so whatever we do now won’t be felt because of that earlier pollution.

So… if you can’t even distinguish CO2 from a volcano vs. CO2 from a car if ancient CO2 is still hurting us, how can you distinguish CO2 emitted 250 years ago from CO2 emitted 250 seconds ago? How do you know it’s still there? How do you even know what we’re adding to it? Do you count how many CO2 sources there are (meaning count factory by the factory) and update every day in case one or more shuts down? And if it takes so damn long to shrug off the effects of CO2 emissions, what if we’re ALREADY at the point of sustainable CO2 output, but we just can’t tell yet?

Seriously, where are the experiments on how long it takes CO2 from source A to infect the atmosphere across the globe? Because if the U.S. is the only polluter as the Paris Climate Agreement’s punitive anti-American measures indicate, then obviously everything we do here has a worldwide impact. (I’m not disputing that one nation’s pollution can have a global impact; folks in San Francisco import some of their smog from China… but that can’t be since as I said according to liberals China pollutes so little that it has the ideal model for fighting climate change and can, under the Paris Climate Agreement, increase its polluting!).

Scientists Would Tell Us!

Scientists say the Paris agreement will drop the world’s temperature increase by half a degree at the end of the century (instead of rising 2 degrees Celsius over 100 years, it will rise 1.5 degrees… assuming the science behind it works, but fake data and bad conclusions throw shade on that, with signatories such as China outright lying about their data despite being the best people at fighting climate change as we have been told… plus, climate warriors thought the Paris Agreement was crap until Trump decided he hated it, at which point its Lefty critics found true love with it) Yet at the same time, in only 15 years of polluting enough damage will be done to kill off 250,000 more people on average per year. In fact, according to the IPCC, in the last 40 years disasters have been caused by mother nature alone without man’s help (and they said there was a stall in the increase in temperatures, at least until the Obama Admin faked some data) despite also believing that human-induced global warming impacted EVERYTHING over that period.

Let’s not forget- these are the people who tell us we will never see snow again because of global warming, and then a year after a blazing headline carrying that info these people brazenly tell us we’re entering into an ice age because of global warming, after spending decades ridiculing the notion of a new ice age, which came after spending a decade promoting the idea of a new ice age. “The people” being the whole freakin’ scientific community if we are to believe that 97% buy into climate change. Oh wait, turns out that’s fake news. The Left thinks it’s settled science that global warming will end snow/cause an ice age/be limited by a treaty/not be affected at all by our actions so far. And skeptics are either stupid or evil for not simultaneously believing all four of these are true and all four are false.

You would have to be either at the peak of stupidity to have a head so empty that yesterday’s talking points are so readily and unquestioningly swapped for today’s (like believing simultaneously that Antarctica is affected by global warming less and more than the rest of the world… and ignoring that it was waaaaaay warmer anyway, before humans could even pollute), OR you are some kind of super genius that both can co-exist in your mind at the same time. This DOES explain why the Left gets oh so violent when faced with someone outside their belief bubble– violence is the action of the unthinking beasts in the jungle, and if the Left actually analyzed what they believe for consistency and accuracy they might stop believing it. Can’t have that now, can we?

You’ve Been Misled In Other Ways Too

Neon-Genesis-Antarctica-polar-ice-caps-2015

Polar Ice Cap circa 2015, according to Al Gore. Image from evangelion.wikia.com

Remember the repeated instances where leading climate scientists were caught faking data (I love this urgent CBS headline: “Mistakes in Climate Report Fuel Skepticism“. Ya THINK?! Let’s summarize it- “people who are lied to become skeptical of claims made by the liars”)? Remember how gas was supposed to be $9 per gallon, and milk was supposed to be $13 per gallon as wildfires raged across the U.S. and New York is submerged, in the far-off year of 2015? Remember how the North polar ice cap was supposed to have disappeared by 2013, yet here we are 5 years on and it’s GROWING? You CAN’T say it’s because Democrats came into office. Mother Earth doesn’t CARE what party controls the government (no matter how many times liberals tell you reality favors them) if said party does nothing except ram through a healthcare bill! The only climate initiatives Democrats undertook were the Paris Climate Agreement and to make it so that if you spat on the ground the EPA could regulate it as a protected waterway! I guess Solyndra too, though the only thing green about that was the money that Obama’s wealthy friends made at the expense of taxpayers.

If You Can’t Handle The Heat, Then Get The Hell Outta My Ozone! AAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

Neon-Genesis-Second_impact

Granted, the Second Impact was a slight setback for the ozone layer. Image from evangelion.wikia.com

The ozone layer is another bundle of fun. First, we’re given the wonderful news that scientists say the ozone layer will heal by 2050. But wait! Turns out a year later scientists want to horrify us into a coma by saying that all along global warming has been stopping the ozone layer from healing… although it’d be nice if they told other scientists about that too, because they’re looking very disorganized, especially when they say a warming climate is healing the hole instead of destroying it. Doesn’t matter I guess, since one of the eco-friendly saviors who signed the Paris Climate Agreement is destroying the ozone layer.  Oh yeah, and humans can and can’t take credit for the ozone layer healing, and they even say some holes in the ozone layer have nothing to do with humans.

What Do They Gain By Fearmongering?

Solyndra is an example- they get money! Politicians get power. Then there are treaties like the Paris Climate Agreement which, if obeyed, ensure that one of Europe and China’s

patent-medicine-ad-yesterday's papers

Snake Oil?! I thought this was an add for the Paris Climate Agreement! Image from yesterday’s papers

largest economic competitors (America) is crippled while the aforementioned countries flourish. It was supposed to be a “major leap for mankind” that ends pollution (except from the statesmen who polluted in order to travel and meet for the deal when skyping or something would have worked, so its no coincidence the leaders omitted their means of travel), ends ALL hurricanes, and probably give every millennial a check for going to school like they do in Australia (which seems a bit classist to me- why would kids who can afford to go to college need extra money? Give it to the indigenous peoples of Australia or minorities, or at least give more money to the folks that can’t afford college. Geez, I thought Australia was supposed to be liberal!). I guess it’s not surprising this agreement was about inflicting economic damage since an IPCC co-chair once revealed that all their climate plans were about redistributing wealth rather than saving the planet, that they had “almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore”.

Of course, scientists get influence and money too, and thus a license to act recklessly. The aforementioned data fakery is an example. But we also get new examples. Would you believe that the wildfires in California are the direct results of their liberal climate policies? The drought in California is because that liberal state’s government is squandering its resources while farmers are growing food that’s best suited to Florida’s climate, or at least Vietnam’s, whereas California is largely desert and mountains? And then they hide their utter stupidity and irresponsibility by filling the pockets of some scientists with nice taxpayer-funded efforts to say that global warming is to blame.

United-Nations-Flag-wikimedia

UN stands for “Unlimited Nickels”, at least as far as scientists are concerned. The UN doesn’t have a clever acronym for “scientist”, they’re just wondering how long before scientists and their blunders thoroughly discredit the scientific community, so that the UN can avoid paying expensive grants and hire cheap aspiring novelists like Ben Rhodes, given the amount of fiction in the climate reports anyway. Image from wikimedia commons

Seriously, as liberals love to say, FOLLOW THE MONEY! If research by institutes that get funding from oil companies or the Koch brothers is automatically tainted, what about funding to scientists that A: comes from a government with an interest in proving climate change exists (like say the Obama Administration, or the liberal California administration), a government that would withdraw said funding if it disagreed with the conclusion and B: goes to scientists who already believe climate change exists despite major incidents of faked data that should have left them with the least little scintilla of skepticism (based on the claim that 97% of scientists believe in global warming despite the severe credibility gap). Is that not also tainted? (It’s pretty much a given that the funding source will bias a scientist or pick biased scientists no matter what the research is about.)

And what if these climate treaty meetings receive money from fossil fuel companies and then decide that certain fossil fuel-consuming means of transport are exempt? Doesn’t that mean, by your standard, that the Paris Climate Agreement was tainted? And let’s not forget- while the oil company scientists and Koch scientists have yet to be caught faking data (you only claim it’s faked because you disagree, not because you have internal emails talking about faking it, unlike us climate skeptics who have the dark secrets of your scientists’ private thoughts spread on the internet for all to see in their own words), the global warming scientists have been caught faking it MANY TIMES. Does this not warrant any skepticism? Oh yeah, like I said in the article “California Attacks Muslims” (it was only unposted for like a few days, I just wrote like crazy in that time, hence why I never link to it) liberals will easily believe their side simply because it’s what they want to hear. Scientists too, apparently.

When Reality Is Not On The Side Of Liberals…

I mentioned the wildfires and droughts that the Left are trying to paper over with their bogus scientists. Probably some of the same scientists that said the very policies that caused the drought and wildfires were sound. But let’s also not forget when the EPA polluted an entire river basin. The corrupt liberals with their corrupt scientists and corrupt research wanted to steal some land from the folks in Silverton, CO. So these liberals and scientists schemed together and ended up polluting a river, which led to the residents deciding to vacate as the government wanted, only at the marginal expense of an ecological disaster of massive proportions. And yet we are still supposed to TRUST these people who just destroyed the environment over a land battle when they say they want to PROTECT it?!

…They Craft A New One

Voyage-To-The-Bottom-Of-The-Sea-vttbots

In the Left’s reality, New York City really was flooded by 2015 and temperatures had risen to create extreme heat, just as the Left predicted. But the Paris Climate Agreement reversed this. Image from vttbots.com

Here’s another callback to the “California” piece- the Left wants us to put MORE trust in them! Their version of climate denial has been responsible for wildfires, massive pollution, and a neverending drought. Now they want us to trust them with even more power to fight the climate change that they cause and other climate change that they’ve been faking data about. Liberals like Bill Nye, instead of debating their farce, are demanding that people like me be jailed for mentioning the flaws in the Left’s climate ideology. Like I said- unthinking beasts. What these animators did in jest the Left did with deadly conviction- invented a lie, they believed in it and acted on it, and now wish to punish anyone that DOESN’T believe this lie. Climate scientists, instead of arguing their point or disproving their opposition, are now suing to stop anyone from opposing them. How scientific. Attorney Generals of liberal states even now are using their power to attack anyone that publishes data against climate change. If the science is settled, why can’t you argue your positions? Why are you suing to shut up anyone with data you don’t like if it’s so easy to contradict? What is it you are trying to hide?

What else does the Left intend to do because of their “reality”? Well, of course, there’s the population control mentioned in the omnipresent “California” piece, in which the Left would pretty much decide that only liberals have children. Now we break into UN Agenda 21 (alias “smart growth”). Simply put: to fight global warming, every citizen in the United States will be confined to one of several super-cities (no suburbs because single-family homes are a no-no), leaving most of the country empty. You wonder how the Left will arrest climate deniers, how they’ll make sure you have only one kid, how they’ll execute any number of their measures? Well here’s one answer that they had for it, under the guise of environmentalism.

By the way- the good folks at the UN when discussing this were kind enough to mention that it has occurred to them to instill worldwide communism, destroy the middle class, and revert the world to a pre-industrial state (well, let’s be honest, everyone in the world except for them). So before you dismiss this Agenda 21 tangent as a conspiracy like a few Leftwing outlets have done (picking some of the more absurd claims, like the Jews being behind it, to make their case that ALL of it is a conspiracy theory) why don’t you actually read the statements from the people who you gave the power to implement this? And why don’t you take a look at my “California” piece for the references to current, respected liberals that demand such population control?  Motive, opportunity, and a history of such remarks are already established. Oh, and concurrent with Agenda 21’s introduction, we also have the Wildlands Project being introduced, which suggests 50% of the U.S. be depopulated (“rewilded“).

Remind Me Who’s Anti-Science?

A UN consultant gave us a statement to the effect that the UN believes wealth inequality causes global warming. SCIENCE!

Earth-chan-eurokeks

But Earth-chan is so sick! Please help make her better by throwing all logic, reason, common sense, and really any brain functions that separate us from a herd of cows out the window. Speaking of a herd of cows, when I get to Agenda 21 you’ll see just how primitive of a state scientists want us to revert to. Propaganda image from Eurokeks

The ones who fake data supporting climate change, call upon state Attorney Generals to intimidate climate change deniers, and want to imprison anyone with a dissenting point of view? THESE are scientists? That’s what the Left has done, that’s what “scientists” have cheered, you want me to think that they are IN FAVOR of science? You want me to seriously believe that the majority of “scientists” who buy into this crap can credibly be called scientists? If your idea is so indefensible that you must protest against opposition, invent fictitious data because there’s no evidence supporting your assertion, and imprison dissenters then it’s readily apparent to anyone with an IQ above a potato that your idea can’t credibly be considered part of “science”, unless we tack a “pseudo” in front of the word.

It’s ironic too- as mentioned in the “California” piece, the Left attributes all sorts of oppression to religion. Including repression of scientific discovery. Yet here we have the Left doing its best Spanish Inquisition impression, with climate change deniers as latter-day Galileos. I guess the moral is this: no matter how ignorant you are, so long as you have a mind open to learning and discovery you’re more of a scientist than 97% of our scientific community.

But you’ll never get a paper published because it’s now all just a contest to get funding from liberal institutions and the people deciding what gets published are all a bunch of liberals hellbent on shoving their agenda down everyone’s throat, while the rest of the scientific community that might later claim to be sheep in this mess are openly abandoning the idea of scientific inquiry in favor of unswerving devotion to dogma. Scientific awards and academic journals are now on par with the Oscars- just forums for liberals to pat themselves on the back about how liberal they are while taking shots at nonbelievers. “Nonbelievers” is a very polite term- based on the Left’s utter contempt for people they deem inferior, ie people that don’t believe propaganda, and based on the Left’s drive for control of population (and the Left thinking that they’ve cured Down’s Syndrome by killing all babies born with it), I fervently believe that “nonbeliever” is more accurately replaced with “Lebensunwertes Leben”. Why don’t you ask a liberal and find out?

Illegal Dumping

Scientists want it to be illegal for me to insult them. But when they decide to attack countries that have cleaned-up their act, to punish a country that has done quite a lot to cut down on pollution, and to put on a pedestal the country which is the biggest example of anthropogenic climate change/government not caring about it and say they’re the one whose example we must follow, these scientists open themselves up to insult for such a backward, self-defeating, contradictory response that is in defiance not only of the urgent reality these scientists have imagined but in fact of reality itself. This can’t be considered libel because my statements are factually correct- liberals and the scientific community (more liberals) say we have very few hours/days/weeks/months/years to stop man-made climate change, and they tell us the best way to do this is to follow the example of the one country that, if it were to suddenly vanish, would cause the temperature increase to drop .5 degrees Celsius just as the Paris Climate Agreement aimed for.

Before you start ranting on about how anti-science I am for opposing scientists that wouldn’t know real science if it walked up and started throwing Erlenmeyer flasks at them, let me make my position even more clear: man-made climate change happens (otherwise my criticism against China would be bizarre). The problem is that A: the Left is blaming only the United States despite our fairly unpolluted countryside, B: the Left demands a worldwide totalitarian regime be installed to save us from their hyperbolic predictions of fiery death that have never come true, and C: the Left wants to silence opponents of their lies by jailing people/totally controlling the rest of the people right down to deciding if they’re worthy enough to reproduce (as established in the “California” piece). Their Final Solution to the Climate Question.

Hedorah_land_1971_wikimedia

The UN’s new climate chief indicated in a recent interview that he too thought China was the best model for how to fight climate change. Image from wikimedia commons

And unfortunately, because of liberals, man-made climate change will doubtless continue and even reach the levels they are warning against. Not because of the U.S. which they target, we’re doing alright at least compared to where we used to be (except in liberal cities like smog-covered LA or NYC in which just one sip of the Hudson will probably give you cancer). Rather, it’s because of the countries the liberals are giving a free pass to pollute as they like (as established above with the description of what the Paris Climate Agreement allows, which makes this CNN piece saying China is near a point of no-return hilarious as the Climate Agreement lets China DRAMATICALLY INCREASE its polluting) while forcing the U.S. to make up the difference. As point of fact, while the U.S. is forced to withstand punitive, economy-damaging measures, we also are forced to PAY other countries (and Palestinian terrorists) so that they can keep polluting (the treaty is non-binding and there is no enforcement measure such as cutting off funds to a country that abuses them or ignores the agreement; the only reason America is forced to do anything is because of the Leftwing political leadership that brought us this agreement). But then again, as mentioned above, liberals have admitted at least twice that this is not about fixing the environment. It’s not about fairness or equal enforcement. It’s about wealth redistribution and ending capitalism. And even if we don’t believe the Left’s 97% claim, as seen at a Forbes link above we still have 80-90% of the scientific community on board with this radical ideology and inevitable genocide of political opposition.

 

All this just so that China and India can keep exemplifying the ills of man-made climate change or even accelerate their pace of polluting, as the Paris Climate Agreement permits. By the way, if China has the ideal form of government for fighting man-made Climate Change, would that also mean the USSR was ideal? Because you might want to rethink that assessment too… just as the UN has been rethinking its assessment of how effective the Paris Climate Agreement was. Doesn’t matter, it never was about the climate anyway, as stated before.

Why is it that I, the allegedly anti-science knuckle-dragging Cro-Magnon guy blasting scientists and environmentalists for hyping man-made climate change, am the one who seems to know more about real man-made climate change than they do? I assume I do, otherwise, the Paris Climate Agreement which scientists marched in support of would look a lot different, and they certainly wouldn’t support bad actors/major polluters like China being given free reign to pollute as they please. Maybe I’m the only one mentioned here that actually believes in man-made climate change, maybe the scientists are just rallying behind it in a cynical attempt to usher in worldwide communism and destruction to their political opposition (their opposition is easy to identify- whoever believes their contradictory statements unquestioningly is with them, whoever doubts them is the enemy). Wouldn’t be the first time someone used an ostensibly laudable cause as a Trojan Horse, and scientists already have a pretty bad reputation morallyspeaking (something also cynical, aside from my outlook, but I noticed I had a very hard time finding info on Soviet and Chinese human experiments, with most of the search results for both countries being links to American experiments, and any search for China had Unit 731 listed near the top. I wouldn’t be surprised if either A: Google didn’t want their favorite governments to look bad so they hid results, B: academics didn’t want their favorite governments to look bad so they didn’t study it, C: journalists didn’t want their favorite governments to look bad so they never reported on it, or D: all of the above).

I Leave You With One Last Smear Of The Scientific Community

They’re idiots (and yes, these folks who claim that people who rape/behead/burn people alive are the real victims DO represent the scientific community). This is the state of our scientific community… and explains why we’re still such a primitive species, technologically. But you liberals reading this probably believe we’re still primitive because science itself is sexist because it deals in absolutes, ie. sexist because 2+2 will always equal 4. Whatever.

Phony Comey Wants You To Give His Book A Look

James-Comey-CNN

An appropriate picture, as for both sides of the aisle Comey is the face of the DOJ and FBI. Except if you look at the reasons you’d wonder what universe the other side of the aisle was in. Image from CNN

Former FBI Director James Comey either lied to Congress or the American people, so naturally he’d call Trump a liar and say “facts really do matter”.

Ironically, his statement on facts was when discussing a leak he executed, one of his memos to a friend. He said that since it was an unclassified conversation it wasn’t a leak. Facts matter Mr. Comey, as you said. Maybe that one incident you spoke of was unclassified, but at least two of the memos you leaked to your buddy contained classified information. On top of that, the FBI claims that your little “diary” as you called it is really government property. And remember when you tried to punish your agent who leaked details of the unclassified meeting between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton? So while you’re free to promote your book, others have been jailed for similar crimes, and the FBI itself UNDER YOUR WATCH tried to punish an agent for a similar leak.

Then again, facts also didn’t matter with Comey when he told Congress that Trump said “I hope” the investigation into Flynn would be dropped. Comey decided that this statement meant that Trump was ordering him to drop the investigation, thus committing obstruction of justice, but under examination Comey denied that Trump ordered him to drop the investigation and couldn’t come up with any instances where someone was charged for obstruction for hoping something. Of course Comey forgot about this embarrassing examination and sticks to his obstruction story.

So Comey is saying that because of how he chose to interpret a statement Trump made, an interpretation not based on any words Trump used as mentioned in Comey’s testimony, Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice, because facts matter or something. Ok, fine. If that’s the measure for a crime, then I say Obama is just as guilty of obstruction of justice for when he said Hillary was innocent of any charges before the investigation had even interviewed her!

Oh, by the way, Comey also lied about Lt. Gen. Flynn. Because facts matter. As it turns out, the agents that interviewed Flynn did not believe that Flynn was lying. Comey overrode them and went after Flynn. Flynn of course had to plea guilty because he didn’t have the money to defend himself. Since we know Comey lied multiple times already, including about Flynn to the point Flynn was in legal jeopardy over it, and since Mueller seems inclined to believe Comey’s account as you’ll see below, it’s no wonder Trump’s legal team believes the Mueller Probe’s desire to interview him is a perjury trap, like what happened to Flynn.

Peas And Carrots

georgewbush

Certain other events also led the media to believe that George was lying when he told them about the rabbits after they’d done a bad thing.

What Comey did here is a typical liberal argument tactic, so it’s no wonder he’s now a media darling. Someone says x. You decide that they really mean y even if they never said it. Then when enough time passes and everyone forgets that x was said, or if someone never knows x was said, you say that particular someone said y. This is what liberals did to the Bush Administration when they claimed the Bush Administration said the invasion of Iraq was connected to 9/11 (a fallacy which some liberals still believe). NO ONE in the Bush Administration said anything like that. But after enough time passed, the mainstream media started attacking the Bush Administration for tricking the American people into supporting the invasion of Iraq in part by saying Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. When the media were confronted by the fact that they invented that narrative, their reaction was to say it’s what the Bush Administration wanted them to think. MIND TAKING! BOOOOOOWEEEEEOOOOO!

So the media claims that their own stupidity and rabid partisan fervor was in fact a deliberate manipulation by the Bush Administration. And after lying about this, they continue to lie about WMDs being found in Iraq because guess what, THEY WERE according to the New York Times itself (and for you hair splitters who say that these weren’t the active WMDs we were promised, Obama’s intelligence chief believes those went to Syria, so what are you going to do, criticize Obama?)!

And of course by pointing all of this out, the Left will say I’m attacking the First Amendment (because an attack on the press is only an attack on the First Amendment when a liberal is the victim, none of these Lefty journalists attacking Trump complained about Obama’s crusade against Fox News) and don’t want a free press. A free press would be nice, yes, and it’s too bad we don’t have one in this country.

This is about Comey though.

Ball-less little lyin’ pansies like Comey, who was never an FBI agent in his life but was chosen by Obama to lead the organization, don’t have any respect for rule of law, nor do they have the guts to actually confront their opponents (without the security of a court room and government protection anyway). It’s ironic that Comey prosecuted the Gambino crime family, they actually HAD integrity and honor when compared to Comey. Can it be declared a mistrial if the prosecutor is more of a scumbag than the defendants?

obama_stern-face

Comey’s next book will be a romance novel about his… “intimate” knowledge that rumors of Obama’s sexuality are true. Image from evil.news

So you ask why Comey would leak his memos? Comey said he did so because he wanted a Special Counsel to investigate Trump for collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice or pretty much anything. Probably because Hillary lost, since Comey’s family was all over her (and protesting Trump) and Comey himself was in love with Obama. Comey even happily went along when then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch told him to refer to the Clinton investigation as a “matter”, and did not even think of looking into whether that tarmac meeting constituted collusion or obstruction or whatever as evidenced by the lack of followup to it and Comey himself said his only response was to make his July announcement about the investigation.

The pattern around the Comey memo leaks goes like this: the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired, Trump fires Comey, Comey then leaked his memos to his friend with the hopes of triggering a Special Counsel investigation, then the Deputy Attorney General obliges and appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel, with Mueller being tasked with looking into if Trump’s firing of Comey at the recommendation of the Deputy Attorney General was obstruction of justice. So based on this pattern of facts it’s very hard not to conclude (unless you’re Newsweek, who want to dismiss this and the Clinton campaign/DNC paying money to Russia for the Fusion GPS dossier as a conspiracy theory, ie dismissing FACTS, thus indicating the folks at Newsweak aren’t even reliable enough to spell their own name right) that Rosenstein tried to set Trump up for an obstruction of justice charge by suggesting Comey be fired. It’s icing on the cake that Trump refused to hire Robert Mueller again as FBI Director, that Rosenstein knew of this bias but appointed Mueller, and that Mueller did not recuse himself.

What Else Has Comey Done For Us?

Of course leaking isn’t the first issue Comey’s been a hypocrite on. Naturally I can point out that Comey DID NOT take notes on any meetings with Barack Obama or even Loretta Lynch after he stated he would’ve been suspicious of her motives. Gee, I wonder why he only took notes on Trump?

He attacked Former New York Mayor Giuliani, saying he was a terrible leader. But under Comey, the FBI was decimated as a legitimate institution. Comey and his number two man Andrew McCabe became leakers, and a conspiracy to hurt a Presidential candidate/sitting President was initiated. So uh… about that leadership thing? Comey ought to know that the leader sets the tone at the top. But that’s par for the course for the Obama Administration’s appointees, I guess.

There are other players out right now who have no integrity, in relation to the Comey issue. You know how the Left and the media are praising Comey over his book and his integrity and stuff?  How they’re touting his pronouncements about Trump being unfit to be President because Comey believes Trump is unethical? Here’s what they used to say about Comey:

peas-and-carrots-quora

George Stephanopoulos interviews James Comey while several Democrat politicians, DOJ officials, and members of the media look on. Image from quora

Well, Democrats and I agree I guess on something afterall- that Comey sucks. Comey is a glory-seeking piece of human filth that probably decided to make the Trump memos and make his Hillary email statements so that regardless of who won he’d have a book. No wonder Jorge Estebanlos interviewed him, peas in a pod since they have the same ethical standards. And when talking with George, Comey said he hopes Trump is not impeached because that would “let the American people off the hook”. I personally feel that folks like Comey are best seen on hooks, through their mouths, maybe as some vengeful Gambinos lower him to the bottom of the Hudson with a fashionable summer ensemble consisting of a navy blue three piece suit from Savile Row, alizarin crimson silk kravat, and the latest in cement dress shoes.

Didn’t He Have A Book?

Oh right, I was supposed to touch on the book in here somewhere. Well I never read it. Its title is A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership. I wonder what that loyalty is to- he’s thrown Democrats under the bus and is attacking Trump hard, and he can’t mean higher values given that we’ve established Comey is incapable of telling the truth and lies whenever it suits him (and in general is a terrible leader). I’m not sure on what grounds Comey is declaring that he has the moral authority to attack Trump in his book, or that his book has any moral authority whatsoever. There’s an old saying about casting stones if you live in a glass house. Comey lives in a freakin’ brandy snifter. He’s already well past the point of having enough character flaws to make him an A-Team villain.

C-Gaymer Podcast Episode 6: Illegal Immigration

C-Gaymer Podcast Episode 6: Illegal Immigration from C-Gaymer on Vimeo.

Today we will talk about a huge issue facing the country, Illegal Immigration. Crime, Voter Fraud, Welfare Fraud, why doesn’t Congress act to build the wall? Who benefits from it? Mr. F.L.A.G. and I explore all of this.

How Did The Political World Become So Childish?

Don’t get me wrong, by no means is Trump the adult in the room. Honestly, he is more like the edgy teenage babysitter, but that is a stark contrast to the rest of the political world. Liberals and even some Conservatives have begun acting like petty children, name calling and virtue signaling and telling half-truths or outright lies to further their own agendas. This is a cliff-like decline of human quality that separates us from the founding fathers, who themselves had their own arguments and called names, but at the end of the day picked public service, not for their own agenda’s but because they had a genuine desire to serve the people. But today it is just personal agenda’s from men and women who are less concerned with serving every day American’s and more with serving their parties political interests at the citizen’s expense. There are still good men like Rand Paul who serve for the right reasons, but they are vastly outnumbered by odious individuals like John McCain, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi. How did we let things get to this point?

The flash point, where the bubble burst so to say, was November 8th, 2008. Establishment liberals were not emboldened by electing the first non-white president but by the method they used. This sickness had been festering a long time before the bubble broke though. When did the festering really start? When did all this plotting and hatred and planning start? The answer is 8 years earlier.

November 8th, 2000: It Begins

georgewbush

George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States

Well maybe November 8th exactly is a bit of a stretch, the Democrats made claims of voter fraud and fought tooth and nail to hand the election to Gore. They hadn’t truly accepted their loss till January 20th, 2001 when the Bush presidency became a done deal. Back then too they were sure Gore would win, after all despite policies that resulted in the mass incarceration of black people and the insult of calling them super predators, and for having stopped Bush Sr. from getting a second term, Clinton got a 2nd term for himself and the Democrats felt unstoppable. Back then the media was still slightly objective and didn’t try as hard to hide scandals for the left, but they still won despite their bad behavior. That, however, only lasted till 2000, when their bad behavior caught up to them and cost them the election because of the infidelity of Bill Clinton. At this point, the plotting really began.

There was initially not a lot they could do for the first 7 months of the Bush Presidency, but then the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 changed the world. While the media was still honest, the internet was still a largely overlooked technology which was only then becoming more prevalent with the rise in ownership of PCs. It was here the Democrats windfall originated, soon after the attacks the internet became filled with conspiracy theories blaming the attack on the administration and claiming it was just a pretext for war. Between this and the carnage in the 2 years following the attacks, an anti-war sentiment arose which the Democrats took advantage of. Members of the media and in Hollywood were becoming more polarized, and personalities like Michael Moore produced their own brand of propaganda that was tailor fit to influence people into believing the war was about profit. They then tied this to the entire Republican Party and tried to paint them as some elitist old men who were more concerned with lining their own pockets rather than making the nation a better place. With this, they set their eyes on the 2004 Elections with the hope of repeating their upset in 1992.

Seeding The Youth

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry pauses during a Reuters Newsmaker event on the nuclear agreement with Iran, in New York

John Kerry ran against George Bush Jr. in 2004

Needless to say, they failed miserably, by nominating John Kerry they alienated just enough voters to lose. His weak discourse and constant flip-flopping did not put a lot of confidence in voters who saw Bush as a better choice since we were still at war. I was 14 back then so I couldn’t vote, but I do remember not being able to take the Democrats seriously since they put this joker up against Bush. At this point, Millenials only now had begun to reach voting age, and a lot of Gen X’ers and Baby Boomers who made up the lions share of the voting public were not impressed. So their anti-war gambit hadn’t worked to get them the 2004 Election, but they had planted an important seed for them that would sprout in 4 years.

In the Millenials they had planted a seed of thought they had also successfully put in the minds of Gen X’ers, associating war and all the other bad things that were facing our country with the Republican Party. It was extremely effective on those who were more easily impressionable. I remember in this time in middle school, after Hurricane Katrina, a kid from a lesser grade claimed at lunch one day that Bush had caused Katrina on purpose. When I asked him how after pointing out it is impossible to control storms, he responded by claiming that Bush had a button under his desk that could create hurricanes. They had successfully created a larger than life boogy man, and in the 2008 Election between race-baiting, promises of change to a country weary of war, a tech savvy campaign using utilizing the developing social media, and a generation of voters who have come of age after 2004 and who spent their time hearing about how evil Republicans were responsible for all of the world’s woes, Barak Obama became the 44th President.

The Boil Bursts

obama_stern-face

Barack Obama Image from evil.news

A good analogy for this arc of development from 2000 till right this moment (2017) is that of a person with a boil who doesn’t see a doctor about. In the years of the Bush Administration the boil was festering, and by 2014 it had become fully infected because of the open wound. It was in the year 2009 that the Boil Burst. Republicans themselves were too late in trying their own propaganda by claiming Obama wasn’t born in America and such other strawmen (and it’s sickening they thought they had to). The left-wing became emboldened by their successful gambit, propaganda had worked for them and they had successfully made their enemies a Boogeyman the nation wanted to defeat.

After this, they continued their success by blaming the sudden economic depression on Republicans while trying to make it seem less serious by calling it a Recession. That gambit worked well for them as their followers blindly followed it along did the people of the Midwest who Elected him again in 2012. The Democrats largely controlled the media and had a substantial presence on social media which helped them win the last election. At this point, they thought they never had to put hard work into anything again, as now they could totally lie and do illegal things and there would be virtually no media voice to contradict them and which would smear or blame their accusers of some wrongdoing. They also had begun cultivating their foot soldiers on college campuses.

Screenshot_2017-04-28-21-17-27

This is an art collage that reflects what College Campuses became after 2012 or 2013 for students with conservative ideas.

Sadly I had to drop out of college in 2011 for financial reasons, but at the same time, I am glad I did because, after Obama’s 2nd Term colleges descended into a pit of ignorance and regression. Professors, especially those teaching the humanities (social justice, feminism, ECT.), began acting as propagandists by indoctrinating their students with a far left ideology that included loose justifications to discredit any views they did not like. Soon the very students at the school themselves became an effective thought police who even were able to intimidate professors who offended them by making them fear the loss of their job, all for simply saying something they did not like or agree with. Using a flawed and ignorant theory of thought called Intersectionality, they were able to create a fascist “Us or Them” mentality, where they can equate even words to violence and paint anybody who doesn’t 100% agree with them as a vicious mortal enemy. This, in turn, enhanced their roles as campus thought police, whose cries of “bigotry” to the administrators could get subjects they didn’t like banned, student groups they didn’t like shut down, speakers they did not like disinvited, and professors who actually taught fired. After all, to the intersectional social justice warriors, everyone who agreed with them was a saint and anybody who disagreed with them in the least big belonged to the enemy and could be labeled any sort of “ist”. To a generation who grew up getting participation trophies and were told they were special no matter what, to the point they perceived any contradiction or criticism about what they believe as violence, this new campus order suited them all too well.

That pervasive mentality, in turn, became adopted by liberal politicians and in turn by some of their Republican counter parts trying to keep ahead of the trends and hold on to their own power. Combined with the Democrats epiphany that they could tell any lie and be believed, this became a destructive combination that made discourse worse than ever. For example, during the 2013 shut down when Republicans had enough to filibuster over Obamacare, Obama blamed the shutdown on the Republicans rather than taking responsibility for not trying to negotiate a solution with them, and then proceeded to shut down DC monuments for dramatic effect to scare Republicans into acquiescing to his absolute authority lest they be called obstructionist or racist. They also impeded the Benghazi Investigations with accusations of sexism as well as “misplacing” documents, and when Obama started a coup in Ukraine (I suspect because he was pissed with Russia getting 1st place in Sochi and wanted to hit them back by interrupting their ability to supply gas to Europe), he accused Putin of interfering in Ukraine’s politics (what irony) and called politicians who opposed the demands of the rioters “Russian Sympathizers”, and later called the rebels against the coup imposed government “Pro-Russian Rebels” who wanted to split Ukraine. Trends like this where lies were told and names were called to polarize people and discourage them from examining facts continued all through Obama’s “Lame Duck” term as a response to problems in both domestic and foreign policy.

And Now For The Real #Resistance

Unsurprisingly some Republicans, who were trying to cling to power like Smeagol clung to the one true ring, picked up this behavior too, but I’ll talk more about that in a second. First, let’s bridge the gap between 2013 and 2016. With a ton of apathetic or self-assured liberal voters and an energized conservative base, the Democrats had severe losses in the 2016 election, including their loss in the Gubernatorial race in MD to Republican Larry Hogan. This, however, did not really do much to phase the emboldened Democrats. Obama vetoed a Obamacare repeal bill that passed the House and Senate despite the systems increasing failure and the dissatisfaction over broken promises as well as many lawsuits, and in MD the Democrats passed a law to take the power of the Governor to nominate an attorney general in the event of a vacancy (giving the power to themselves instead as they were afraid since 2 Republicans had been elected Governor in less than 15 years). They were all but assured they could continue to do whatever they wanted. 2015 began to raise an alarm though when the energized and now youth filled conservative base became louder on social media than they ever had before.

Establishment Republicans too became threatened that their old order was going to crumble, as these energized and youthful Republicans began to rally around outsiders like Donald Trump and Ben Carson. They were also concerned over new voices, like the gay conservative Milo Yinnopoulos. They wanted business as usual, Jeb Bush as the nominee and the same old 90’s and 00’s era politicians, and so they felt threatened by these new faces and attacked them with claims that they were disqualified or not real conservatives. It did not work well however as Republicans young and old were sick of the business as usual. A revolution was on that was going to crush the Democrats and shake up the order of the Republican Party.

th

Example of Meme Magic

Younger conservative internet users began to spread information or jokes all over social media via memes. Attacks on Trumps campaign promises were met with positive meme jokes whose wit outclassed their left-wing counterparts. They call it Meme Magic and users from 4-Chans /pol/ were the innovators who drove it to the stars and helped win the election with humor and information (and Clinton scandals XD). This alarmed the establishment Republicans, many of whom said they would rather see Hillary win than Trump, and enraged the left-wing who saw their ability to control people slipping. They had however already become accustomed to lying and name-calling to get their way and this was not going to change.

ap_525971738662.jpg

There is more evidence that Hillary Clinton and her campaign tried to influence the election than any other groups. – Image from the Associated Press

Almost immediately after the election, the media and Democrats began spreading the lie that Russians had hacked the election to help Trump win and they called Trump a traitor. Despite a lack of evidence and even as the narrative has started falling apart, they still continue to push this falsehood in the media and pursue fruitless investigations against Trump and his associates. Their interest is of course not to investigate whether or not the election was influenced. If it was, they should be investigating the Democrats as there is a larger abundance of evidence that suggests they manipulated government agencies and colluded with the media to protect Hillary Clinton’s image while smearing Trump’s. Despite the failure of both establishment factions of the two major parties and the nearly non-existent trust for Democrats, they are pushing forward with their pervasive lies and agendas.

That’s Great, But What Does All This Mean?

Well, that is just the set up to how we got here. This is political discourse today, they can be utter fucking retards and lie their asses off because a good chunk of the population believes whatever the media tells them. Politicians and the media lie and keep telling the lie as if it will somehow become true. And it goes beyond that too, it is not just enough to be able to lie without impunity. The left feels so threatened by their loss that they have begun a dangerous and harmful tantrum.

Screenshot_2017-03-01-22-56-46

This meme wittily expresses the unchanging attitude of the Democratic Party

Why should they work on themselves and change their approach to something worthwhile to get them elected when they can just wage war on the people and things that ensured their loss? Their first victim has been free speech, taking advantage of their well-cultivated army of mentally ill social justice warriors that their campus propaganda created, they have wound them up with hysterics thus creating the Antifa thugs the sick on anybody who expresses an evidence based idea different from or contradicting their own Nazi’s. Meanwhile, they have their goons in the media ignore those incidents, wait till conservatives defend themselves, and then claim it is right-wing violence. And of course, they also claim all of this is Trump’s fault as well as the fact their Russian Collusion lie is falling apart, so they pass unconstitutional bills to reduce his power or articles of impeachment that will never pass but still get the Democrats much-needed attention. Meanwhile, as Democrats and RINOs (Ugh, never thought I would be using that term) obstruct the president’s agenda and appointments, the establishment’s trolls lurking in the white house selectively leaking information and trying to replace Trump’s advisors with loyal establishment picks who will prevent him from pursuing the policies he promised to the American people.

Trump may seem childish at times for sure. But he is generally pretty sincere about his thoughts and outrage. But right now his opponents though act like screaming pissants children who need their nappies changed. The real adults in the room are individuals like Rand, they are hopefully what we will see more of going forward. For now, though, Trump is a marked improvement over US political dynasties and manipulative monsters. I am hoping 2018 will wipe away some of their squabbling children and hopefully, Trump will be able to strip power from those in his own administration who wish to enact a Coup against Trump. If it doesn’t though, this type of discourse will lead to war and it will not be pretty for anyone, especially not the Democrats.

Good Liberal/Bad Liberal: Clearing Up Some Confusion

So I admit recently a lot of my articles have been emotionally charged. I have really been hammering down hard on the Bigoted Democrats and Antifa and other left-wing bullshit. And I have said some harsh things to say about Liberals. I have gone hard and fast but just a while ago I realized, while I am only talking about a specific set of liberals, to the outside reader I may as well be targeting anybody left of right. Totally not the case though, there is a difference between  Liberals and “Liberals”.

Allow me to elaborate, as with any group there are decent, well-meaning people who you cannot hold any fault with. I am related to quite a few good liberals. For the purposes of this article, let’s call them the Loveable Left. They can be very naive when it comes to the behavior and detrimental actions of the rest of their party, but they are otherwise reasonable and want what’s best for people. Don’t take this description to be condescending by any means, we all can be lead astray in our own way by our beliefs or interests or addictions. And if every Liberal were like this, they could be reasoned with and the world would be a better place. Heck, I would never have written this blog about anything but nerd culture then and it wouldn’t be too special.

In contrast, there is the overwhelming bad side of the left that makes up the current majority. Last time there was this much of the bad left, we were fighting to stop them from enslaving African Americans. The bad left comes in many varieties, starting with the Elitist Left at the top. Then comes the fake intellectual left. The bottom rung is the violent left and the opportunist left. In this article, I am going to try to characterize these for you. Hopefully, when all is said and done, next time I go off about the left you will know exactly who I am talking about and who I am not talking about.

 

The Loveable Left

It is hard to describe the loveable left, they are so few in number and hardly any make it to the public eye sadly. Most of them all are part of a family, so they have learned actual tolerance by learning to live with and try to understand their conservative relatives, a pursuit which is always a two-way street. Things do get heated with them, but when they do you can count on the Loveable Left to know when to back down or to back down when you have as well. They are also often local city councilors (again a small number of these) who are dedicated to actual public service, rarely getting caught up in partisanship. I am not kidding when I say that civil discourse and the world would be a lot better off if we ALL could emulate the qualities of these unsung heroes.

The Elitist Left

Here is where we begin to dig into the scum bags. The elitist left is the head of the Hydra so to speak, the multitude of mouths where the lies and hatred spew from and down all the way to the bottom. It is composed of the rich elites. By Rich elites, I of course mean the rich left-wing moguls, as well as the politicians, and the airhead celebrities. These are the top rung, the ringleaders of the scum.

0c85148519a8c243057f7ce8653cb058

KKK Grand Dragon and Mentor to Hillary Clinton, Senator Robert Bryd (D-WV). Image from pinimg.com

The first of course in my mind is the Political Elitists. These are the top politicians who hold the same bigoted ideologies the Democrats have held constantly since the 1800’s. They are manipulative and well-seasoned liars who have mastered the art of manipulation. For example, when Republicans want to tighten up the welfare system to make sure the money is going to people who are actually physically disabled and such things, Democrats claim it is racism and that Republicans hate the poor. In reality, Democrats have used welfare to continue their war on black people by destroying the African American family. This is proof that Democrats still have the same agenda of racism and oppression. The especially sick irony is that with the help of the Fake Intellectual Democrats, they have crafted a fake narrative about a party shift which allows them to claim Republicans are responsible for the crimes of the Democrats.

George-Soros-1

Billionaire and Former Nazi George Soros

Next is the Rich elites. The Biggest name in this is Nazi Collaborator George Soros, who despite being Jewish made his fortune confiscating wealth from other Jews during the German Occupation of Hungary. And if like a lot of people you are still in denial about his Nazi connections, here is another disturbing clip of him referring to that time as a happy time for him. This sick war criminal who has apparently not been pursued being a 14-year-old Nazi collaborator because of his wealth he stole from other Jewish people, is characteristic of the Rich Elite Left. And like the Political Elite Left they are master manipulators, using their cash to cover up atrocities.

Finally, there is the Celebrity Elitist Left. This is a case for why you should never give total idiots mass amounts of attention or wealth. These celebrities are total airheads who parrot whatever the “Hip” left-wing drek is circulating with their usual smug lectures. They often engage in disturbing or disgusting political stunts to get attention, always trying to outdo each other apparently with who can be the most repugnant human being. They are totally out of touch with Middle America, and they look down on them and anybody else who does not abide by their left-wing bible as if these people were ignorant peasants. These smug pieces of human garbage who view themselves as royalty represent an insidious threat as they use what little talent they have to indoctrinate people with their left wing views. Sadly people just haven’t learned how to tune out and find other sources of media entertainment.

 

The Fake Intellectual Left

 

wp-1473130395774.jpg

Former Professor Melissa Click, Fired for Threatening the Student Press

This is a two-parter. The obvious place to start is the Academia Left. Our once respectable institutions have devolved to adult daycares for rich morons where someone with credentials like this is considered qualified to teach. Instead of a focus on STEM courses and other lines of study that produce productive members of society, they now teach “feminism” and “queer studies” and other fake fields of study that not only serve to make idiots feel important but also teach them the radical leftist agenda which allows them to be perfect pawns for the left. Instead of teaching surgeons who save lives and engineers to build housing for people who need it, they feel they can better the world by teaching a bunch of empty headed loud mouths to block traffic and call people who remotely disagree with them a vulgar name of some sort.

 

Mematic_meme_20170309_211811

Samantha Bee is a moron on TBS who uses comedy to spread fake news. Earlier this year she did a segment about AIPAC where she joked about the hairstyles of those in attendance and garnered outrage when it came to light one of these men had that particular haircut which her show referred to as a “Nazi Haircut” because he was receiving treatment for brain cancer

Next, there are the peddlers of fake news, the Media Liberals. They are your typical columnist at Huffington post blogging about any far left race-bait ing thing as if it were real news or your unfunny news “comedian” who makes horrible jokes and dodges the facts. They warp facts but feel they should not be questioned and they are the anointed ones who determine what is and isn’t fact. Like a plague of nasty locusts, they have devoured and ruined what used to be a respectable news media that would inform and enlighten people to some degree and turned it into a hollowed out husk of trashy opinions and misdirection. It should make any decent human being sick, but then again we are not dealing with decent human beings.

 

The Violent Left

TRUMP_INAUGURATION_DCJM135-2017JAN20_022721_165.jpg

Antifa Terrorists on the morning of Trumps Inauguration. Over 200 people were arrested however the federal government has been slow to take action as a whole. Image from patdollard.net

There is a long history of the Democrats and violence. The most recent incarnation has been Antifa, the black masked army of the Democratic Party. This unstoppable army of far left millennials breaks windows, burns trash cans, and cannot be stopped, well except by their parents, and conservatives who fight back, and the police, and acne. From their heckler’s veto to their hair dye it is very hard to take these delusional jack-booted fascists seriously, which is why they show up in large numbers since they need em to avoid getting their asses kicked. Now hopefully they will go away when they get grounded by their parents for flunking classes and trying to nullify the 1st Amendment but let’s not count on that just yet.

 

The Opportunist Left

2ac

The Feminist “Big Red”. I forgot what the hell her victim game was but DAMN she is ugly.

Finally, there are the biggest bottom feeders, the professional victims of the opportunist left. Where there is a tragedy, they will milk it for political or financial gain. And where there is not tragedy or controversy they will create one, whether it is a myth of a wage gap that has been illegal since the 70’s or how video games are sexist because the female (and even male) characters are more attractive than they are. Sometimes all you need to do is ignore em, but most of the time when you do that they only get louder and more intrusive and make up more reasons why we should pay attention to their views with no basis in logic or reason. Here is a hint for you guys though, if you were not so shrill and ugly there might be fewer guys like me who wanna make out with Cloud Strife like I do. 😉

cloud_strife_by_noctella1427-d57dc8m

I’m sorry, he is just so fucking hot I couldn’t help myself. ❤ Thanks to noctella1427 on Devian Art for this smoking hot pic. XD

 

So anyway now that I’ve regained my breath I should wrap this up. When I walk about the left, it’s the latter example I am talking about. I hate the elites, and the false intellectuals, and the violent and opportunistic scum. And sadly they make up the majority of the left right now. But they are all I am talking about when I derisively talk about Liberals. I have nothing but love though, for those Loveable Liberals, I love them as much as I love Cloud’s sexy…..

Sorry about that, I almost went somewhere really dirty. What I mean is I have no issues with them. And I want you to realize they exist too so you can know not to have an issue with them either. They are great people. So treat them like you would treat any other decent human being you meet during life’s journey.

 

My Thoughts on the 2017 British General Election

Crazy Corbyn

Leader of the Labour Party Jeremy Corbyn

I will be completely honest, I am not very happy with the results of the UK General Election. The fact that the Tories lost their Majority has put Britain’s exit from the European Union in question by leaving room for Jeremey Corbyn to somehow seize power. This would be a disaster. Mr. Corbyn is a dangerous far left extremist with ties to terrorism, and he has made it clear that he does not want Brexit and does not respect the democratic will of the people. He should absolutely not be allowed to be in any position of actual power.

xu5qAH84

Leader of The DUP Arlene Foster

Also, a point of concern is the Tory-DUP Coalition. Besides the DUP’s questionable rhetoric, they had dragged on negotiations for a parliamentary agreement until the two parties finally reached an agreement on Monday and before this, they had been making unreasonable demands for a Supply and Confidence Agreement. Even a Tory-LibDem Coalition would be more desirable after these kinds of stalling tactics. The DUP are opportunists and were rumored to be making back door deals with Labour during the negotiation. It is all very unsavory at this point, it is very possible the DUP may not hold to their end of the agreement which would lead to the continuation of the hung parliament and another election.

JS47489459

Scottish Tory MP Ruth Davidson

Another election could lead to the disaster of Jeremy Corbyn sitting in 10 Downing Street. Labour has boosted their popularity by demanding property redistributioninciting violence and exploiting recent tragedies for political gain. It doesn’t help right now that the Tories are divided in anger over the General Election and its aftermath. First off is the calls for Theresa May to resign, fueled by anger at the losses incurred by her decision to trigger the GE. There is also a huge divide within the party, a faction of the Tories do not want Brexit and have taken issue with the proposed Tory-DUP Coalition which has yet to materialize. Party in-fighting like this is a real kick in the teeth for the Tories. While I do not exactly love the DUP, a total exit from the European Union needs to take place and splitting the party over one small group’s personal issues is childish and would no doubt kill the party off entirely.

_87786568_87786564

Prime Minister Theresa May

Of course, now I need to share my thoughts on Theresa May. She has received harsh criticism from her party of hubris and accusations from the British Public of being uncaring. I see Miss May in a different light however, she is the ideal politician who puts the wants and needs of her people above all else. For example, before the Brexit vote she was part of the Remain Camp, but after the results and when thrust into a position of leadership she put aside her own feelings and vowed to pursue a Brexit strategy that would best benefit Britain. Then she called this snap election, not just because she was ahead in polls but because there had been calls for a snap election to be held since last year. Then during her campaign, she was criticized for an unpopular tax she proposed and then accused of flip-flopping when she pedaled back on that policy, however I see it as her responding to the will of the British Public more than anything else. She has thoroughly shown, even far from an election cycle, that she wants what is best for Britain and not just for herself.

I find her to be a rarity in today’s political world, a literal public servant. It saddens me that the British Public is neglecting what they have in May. Aside from her flexibility as a leader, I applaud her for her courage in holding the General Election and still fighting to work for the British people after a disappointing result. Over here in America, we only have one or two leaders like that and none of them currently hold our highest office like Miss May does. I hold hope that she can turn this bad situation around. I truly believe she is the only person who can get the best Brexit deal for Britain in the face of threats from unhinged tyrants like Donald Tusk. The only thing I can do now is share these thoughts with the world and pray again to Bishamonten that he may bring victory, not just to Miss May but to Britain as well.

1280px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg