In The News – How ABC News Presented Tyre Nichols, Paul Pelosi, and Palestinian Mass Shooters

Sometimes when I visit some folks I know they watch ABC Evening News. They don’t believe much of what they hear and recognize the slant, but they still watch it. So what did I see the night of January 27, 2023?

Prologue

They preview what stories they will cover. Tonight for the first segment they were discussing the then-impending release of police bodycam footage of Tyre Nichols’ death. Segment 2 was discussing bodycam footage of the attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband. They tried to make the two sound equal. Segment 3 was about a Palestinian mass shooter who chose Holocaust Remembrance Day for his killing spree in Israel.

Segment 1 – Riot But Don’t Riot

ABC News was sure to play footage of people saying don’t riot (then they interrupted Jeopardy! to show footage of Tyre Nichols being pepper-sprayed and screaming for his mother), followed by a sermon from the civil rights equivalent of an ambulance chaser Ben Crump rallying the crowd to irrational action against the police.

I’m thinking Ben Crump just heard that a black adult was killed by 5 police officers and assumed that they were white, because he made sure to make race a part of his message. Upon learning they were Black, he probably slightly modified rehearsed speeches when insisting that systemic racism was what led to this, saying that Tyre Nichols would have been killed no matter what the color of the officers’ skins was (all five were black) because our system is designed to kill blacks (so all police are evil, this “racism” idea was repeated by CNN). Again, that’s not true. There is no racial disparity in police shootings (except when it comes to media coverage because dead Blacks are more profitable for the media and its civil rights allies like BLM), it is true that more blacks have interactions with police, but it’s not true they are dying unjustly by the hundreds or thousands as Democrats believe. And to say all police are evil because of these few officers we saw is like saying all Blacks are evil because for decades they’ve commited murder more than any other race, so much so even Obama spoke out about it. I will acknowledge that after seeing the video, the only possible justification for what the police did is if Tyre Nichols somehow raped one of their relatives or something horrific like that and this was street justice, but even if that was the case the officers were rightly fired, and if there is no extreme justification like that then the officers are simply evil people.

As to the “culture” that Ben Crump mentioned, that’s called being human. Any enforcers of power can become abusive (literally they just took a bunch of random people for these two experiments and found the heights humans would go to when allowed or asked. Random people, Check here for some other relevant experiments… plus some other ones that aren’t related.). So what is it that Ben Crump, BLM, and Democrats want? More power of course, and more people in power. Abolish the police, but we saw in 2020 they plan to replace the police with roving armed mobs of murderous (and vaguely segregationist) Brown Shirts. Their little experiment in Seattle was the perfect microcosm of what their world would be. Then again, as noted in the second sentence we’ve seen experiments in liberal havens (I suppose some smartass in the comments will try to say that colleges aren’t liberal, in total contradiction to every liberal out there who proudly touts their college degree and insist college causes people to become liberal (yes, even liberals say college makes you liberal, they claim it’s because you are educated and exposed to more cultures)). Part 2 of the equation is that, it is a fact, Black neighborhoods tend to be higher crime areas so that is where police will be. Police go where the crime is. Regardless of why, the police are there to respond to what happened today, not over generations (or as Joe Biden put it, “It doesn’t matter whether or not they are victims of society… So I don’t want to ask, ‘What made them do this?’ They must be taken off the streets!”). Politicians like Joe Biden who gave us that quote are supposed to be working on systems to handle what led to the crime problem. Something made people grab a gun and start shooting, grab a knife and start stabbing, and at that point the only reason you’d demand to abolish police and send in psychologists is if you have the stomach for a high body count. Though, when the Left has its anarchy, they beat people the way Tyre Nichols was beaten by armed thugs (and while they want to ban you from having guns, they are happy to use them. While they demand gun control, they violate laws by handing guns to people who legally should not have them and then Democrat politicians praise them after they violate gun control laws those Democrats demanded). So you’d think they’d be the FIRST to scapegoat humanity’s immaturity when it comes to being in power.

(another note- ABC’s supplemental coverage that they interrupted Jeopardy! for was sure to point out that EVERY police officer was evil. So they say that all cops are bad, even have an expert who agrees that police will be seen as “occupiers” rather than legitimate law enforcement, but please don’t riot.)

I guess they got tired of people talking about Biden’s classified documents so they created the Atlanta Antifa riots, and some of their sister riots within which a Democrat leader’s son got arrested for assaulting police. Spread hate for the police so everyone will agree with the Antifa cause- overthrowing democracy (y’know, that stuff they accuse Republicans of). Or maybe this is to distract from Project Veritas revealing that Pfizer thought about creating new COVID variants so they can make new vaccines while acknowledging COVID will be profitable for years… and while assaulting Project Veritas journalists (but as you know from the Omicron variant, the vaccines Pfizer makes for their variants would only really work on their own variants, so they would be useless and unprofitable… and Pfizer doesn’t do anything that isn’t profitable).

Segment 2 – Is It Really The Same?

They went out of their way to try and build the Pelosi attack video as being the same as the Tyre Nichols video. Getting hit with a hammer and being beaten to death by five armed people are very different. I don’t know what kind of sick mind would try to equate the two (they said both videos were equally as disturbing).

Speaking of Paulie, this video was the fakest thing I have ever seen. I have been in fights and struggles over objects, this was not one of those. It was like Paul and the attacker were just standing around waiting for police to show up. Paul clearly wasn’t struggling, had a free hand the whole time while the attacker had two hands on the hammer, so why didn’t Paul grab an object and wallop the attacker? And the story behind it? Bogus. The attacker spent several minutes trying to beat their way into the house before body slamming their way through the glass. No neighbors heard this, Paul didn’t hear it. Have YOU ever heard glass being pounded on or shattering? It is LOUD. And look at where they say the guy broke-in: if it happened as alleged, why does it look like it was blown outward? Why is the hole too small for someone to fit through and too distant from the door to be of any use except to Reed Richards? And then the guy catches Paul in his bed, but lets Paul get out of bed, grab his phone, and lock himself in the bathroom? What kind of idiot is this attacker? Oh but it gets better- Paul decides to leave the safety of his bathroom after calling police. He didn’t call the security for the gated community who’d have a faster response time; he called the police. Then left the bathroom. We know Paul isn’t that dumb, as he keeps making stock trades at the exact right moment as if he had the inside track, but that would be illegal so Paul must just be smart and quick-witted.

The story concludes with what we see on the bodycamera footage. Paulie and his buddy made their way to the front door, where they were just kind of chillin’ with the hammer limply dangling between them, with Paul grabbing casually with one hand while the intruder had both hands on it, with the attacker laconically letting Paul open the door for police and Paul nonchalantly welcoming the police. Then when police say put the hammer down, now that the attacker is on camera and the item has been identified he attacks. Let me remind you that this man is half of Paul’s age, Paul is not particularly in-shape, yet we are supposed to believe that he singlehandedly (literally, as he only used one hand) kept the attacker from using his hammer until the police were there to witness events.

Did I mention the attacker is described by those who know him as a leftwinger living with a BLM supporter, and that the alleged blogs he maintained that showed him as a rightwinger only existed the day he was arrested (keep in mind he was arrested in the morning).

This phony, fabricated, staged sideshow that makes amateur actors on public television acting out a child’s script look believable is what ABC News says is equal to the brutal death of Tyre Nichols.

Segment 3- Whose Fault?

They started presenting this story as neutral, told everything relevant to it, but then they shoehorned in a reference to how Israel has “its most rightwing government in history” (that is either exactly what the anchor said or almost exactly what they said, I did not write it down as I was eating at the time) in such a way that it seemed to be their attempt to justify the shooting.

Conclusion

Out of this (and other) randomly selected news broadcasts from ABC, there’s huge bias to their reporting. Too much to just be coincidence, and it taints how the public sees the story. Fox News or Newsmax or somebody needs to get on these broadcast stations. As more and more people cut their cords and switch back to antennas, this is a growing market and should be entered.

Pounded Paul Pelosi

I’ll get right to the point: what happened was either a freaky sex thing gone sideways, or it’s because Nancy felt sending Paul to the doghouse just wasn’t enough after he embarrassed her earlier this year.

What Happened?

Police are refusing to release bodycam footage, and any requests for information won’t be answered until well after the Midterms. Conveniently, Democrats are using this as a campaign issue, claiming it was an average Republican that stormed the Pelosi Capitol.

Here are the events:

  • A homeless-nudist-illegal-immigrant-Black Lives Matter-supporter was found naked except for underwear in Paul Pelosi’s house, and so was Paul (of course that story changed)
  • Paul’s house and neighborhood are protected by private security, and surrounded by cameras, yet there is no footage of the assailant entering (allegedly Capitol Police weren’t watching, like Epstein’s jail guards) and there was no security guarding the house
  • The alleged entry point into the house is so small that the assailant couldn’t get in without tearing himself apart on the glass, and apparently couldn’t enter without setting off an alarm. In fact, originally it was reported that he entered the back door, and the only visible glass was OUTSIDE the house in a pattern indicating the window was broken out, not broken in.
  • When police arrived, they reported THREE people in the house, with no one injured at that time, and Paul Pelosi was the one with the hammer. But over time the story changed (much like the FBI’s tales after their bosses told them to lie)
  • Somehow, Paul and the assailant ended up injured. In fact, the government alleges that Paul was brutally beaten after police arrived.
  • The assailant is an insane drug addict, there is no footage of him espousing conservative views, and he lives in a school bus, yet it is alleged he was sane enough to start and run a website.
  • There is no record of the assailant’s website until some time after the incident took place, and it was erased from the internet shortly afterwards.
  • Federal charges were filed, ensuring the case would be treated like the Mar-A-Lago raid in that the public will only receive selective details leaked by Democrat-affiliated DOJ officials disguised as “anonymous sources”.

As you can see, there are a few questions here. In fact, taken altogether, only two conclusions are reasonable.

  1. Paul knew his attacker (as indicated in the first link, that’s what police said) and invited him in for purposes unknown, though based on them both being in their underwear and a third person present, it was probably not anything platonic. The attempt to paint a homeless Canadian illegal immigrant nudist as a Republican happened after the fact to hide yet another Pelosi embarrassment.
  2. Nancy wanted an October Surprise because no one cared about the January 6 stuff and the Mar-A-Lago raid, so she told her husband to take a dive and found some crazy guy no one would remember. Her husband owed her after she bailed him out of his DUI earlier this year.

It clearly didn’t happen the way we are told. What happened defies logic. Somehow the archetypical San Francisco liberal (illegal immigrant nudist living in a school bus) radicalized overnight (based on the only known record of his website it could not have been around long) and immediately went to attack Nancy Pelosi at her house that somehow he had the address of and somehow bypassed security to get into by I guess imploding the window so it scattered backwards and somehow entered through the resultant hole that was too small for him?

I will add- look at how quick and ready Democrats are to blame this on Republicans. They’re even trying to get Republicans to stop running ads against their Democrat opponents, in the name of some fake “civility”. This was obviously not a random Trump supporter, it was either a politically-motivated quick fix for another Paul screwup or it was a hoax from start to finish, one that Paul had to get a little bruised for.

Where Is The Real Violence?

Since Democrats are saying that anything anti-Pelosi or anything questioning the 2020 Election’s legitimacy (meanwhile most Democrats still believe Russia hacked into our computer systems to alter the election totals in 2016, and still are saying elections are being stolen) led to this violence (and that not only must people stop saying things Democrats don’t like because anything a Democrat doesn’t like hearing leads to violence against Democrats, but also anyone who DOES say something Democrats don’t like needs to be punished for saying such things), then it would seem Democrats believe that words of public figures and actions of citizens are directly linked. The court ruling against Alex Jones wherein he had to pay $965,000,000 for questioning the official narrative because a handful of his followers decided to non-violently act after hearing information he provided shows what kind of consequences Democrats have in mind. I don’t doubt they will use that precedent to go after anyone else who says things they dislike if someone acts on it (and they know that Republicans can’t do that- Republican judges know such an action is unconstitutional and garbage so they’d throw out any cases like that, while liberal judges would just throw out any case like that which didn’t help the Democratic Party). And what a coincidence it is that this thing with Paul Pelosi and the demands from major news networks and politicians to silence and punish those saying words they disagree with came right after the Alex Jones ruling which provides a precedent for just such a punishment!

If Conservative judges also tore up the Constitution and allowed a case like that to go through, here is a list of violence by Democrats this year alone, all from articles I’ve collected only since August (so I didn’t mention the communist Buffalo shooter, the NYC attempted serial killer who hated white people like the Left told him to, the mass shooter who acted based on CNN last year, and the Bernie Sanders supporter who almost murdered several Congressmen in atmosphere of intense threats by Democrats). By the way, they say violence is uniquely rightwing.

  • 82yo pro-life activist shot
  • 18yo ran over by a Democrat who wanted to kill a Republican
  • 135 pro-life activists were attacked vs 6 pro-abortion activists between May and September
  • A canvasser for Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) was beaten for being a Republican
  • A Democrat activist bit a Republican County Chair
  • Leftist man beat a woman for wearing an American flag shirt
  • Democrats are swatting conservatives (essentially using the police to attempt murder)
  • Democrats assembled a violent mob to stop a conservative from speaking at a college
  • Democrat politician murdered a reporter who was giving unfavorable coverage
  • Assassination attempt by a Democrat on a Conservative Supreme Court Justice
  • Crisis pregnancy centers firebombed by Democrats
  • Democrat activist tried to shoot a mayoral candidate
  • Democrat activist tried to stab a Republican Congressman to death
  • Teenage pro-life activist was assaulted
  • Democrats threatened a mass shooting against Republicans (which they actually did even earlier this year, and in 2017)
  • A Democrat threatened to murder a Republican poll worker at a polling place on a primary election day

Here is a list of violent rhetoric, or rhetoric leaving Democrat voters with no logical recourse except to act in violence. Remember, these are through the lenses of Leftists, through which the Left says that merely having a negative opinion of them is inciting violence, say that “fight for your rights” is tantamount to calling for physical violence, say that calling for Pelosi to lose her job or asking “where’s Pelosi” is the same as trying to murder her, and that saying “peacefully” is a dog-whistle for violence.

  • Rep. Tim Ryan (D) said they need to “kill” Trump support. He once said rhetoric like his leads to mass shootings.
  • Leftist puppet Liz Cheney said Trump supporters- 74,000,000 citizens or more- are a “clear and present danger”
  • House Speaker Pelosi was revealed to have said she wanted to physically assault Trump
  • Democrat activists expressed happiness at a Republican protester being shot dead
  • A Democrat Senator issued what she said was “literally” a “call to arms”
  • the Democrat President said anyone who disagrees with the agenda is a violent extremist who is a “clear and present danger”
  • A former FBI official told agreeing Democrats he thought the President’s threats weren’t strong enough
  • The President’s Press Secretary agreed with the President’s remarks labeling anyone disagreeing with him as so strong a threat that you’d be criminally negligent to ignore it.
  • Even rank and file Democrats believe conservatives are domestic terrorists.
  • MSNBC said Democrats are at war against their political opponents
  • All Democrats are saying their opponents are threats to Democracy
  • MSNBC says Republicans are a threat to our way of life
  • A Democrat Congressman said Republicans will engage in violence
  • MSNBC says white conservatives in particular are naturally violent
  • MSNBC says we are in a civil war already
  • CNN says Republicans are the only violent people in the country

Seems like we have a case on our hands too.