President Tim Kaine

1200px-Tim_Kaine,_official_113th_Congress_photo_portrait-wikimedia

My approximate reaction when I learned he would not be Vice President is linked here. Image from wikimedia.org

Hillary Clinton, the mainstream media, #NeverTrumpers, Democrats in general (except for some bitter Bernie blokes), foreign leaders with ties to the Clinton Foundation, celebrities, most of our medical and psychological professionals, and the white people in charge of our tech industry were all DESPERATE to get Hillary Clinton into office. Just how desperate? They attacked Trump with what felt like an unprecedented degree of savagery, maybe because of the internet and the Left giving more voice to nutcases or because the Left had to make up for crying wolf so many times already. But that’s not the only measure of desperation. The Left was so dedicated to getting into the White House that they were willing to kill their own candidate.

 

For those who still can’t accept that she lost, it may have been a case of the God you don’t believe in saving your messiah. Remember how she fainted in September 2016? Remember that incessant coughing that plagued her for nearly a year? Remember that book from 2015 in which from alleged anonymous sources (the same unimpeachable ones the Left is enamored with when it comes to their anti-Trump narrative) we learn that Hillary herself may have been worried about her health? Remember how as far back as 2012 she fainted and landed in a way that gave her a concussion? Nope, of course, you don’t. Your candidate was fit and virile. Why, when she collapsed and was tossed into her car “like she was a side of beef”, that was immediately followed by her doing a rolling flip out the other side like she was Willy Wonka! Or so the media and Democrats tell us in their hard-hitting interviews and insightful commentary (and you’re also sexist according to Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) -and presumably MSNBC- if you question Hillary’s health).

However, we have seen several instances post-election of failing health, most recently in India when she fractured her wrist by slipping in the bath tub and at another point had to be carried down stairs after slipping twice (you might recall this as the trip where she again said half the country were backwards racists, and those white women would have voted for her if the men in their lives had not violated a bunch of laws by forcing them to vote for Trump (but I guess if the Democrats in government won’t enforce the law and handle all the sexual abuse that Planned Parenthood covers for then women can’t expect much help from their Leftist heroes when it comes to voting either). How Presidential. If this is how her health is after a hundred day vacation followed by light duty, what would have happened if she were President? Would she be the first handicapped woman President? I doubt it; I can’t picture her with one of those cigarette holders unless she also started squawking, master of fowl play that she is.

hijab-american-getreligion

Freedom Is Slavery. image of the new face of feminism is from getreligion.com

To the feminists out there, look at the silver lining, we might have the first woman CIA Director thanks to Trump, and we have the first woman to successfully run a Presidential campaign thanks to Trump. Oh wait, they’re Republicans. That means everything they do hurts women somehow, no matter how many glass ceilings they shatter. That’s why Democrats are destroying Trump’s nominee for first female CIA Director when previously they told us just to vote for their candidate because the candidate had a uterus. That’s why it was not sexist for Democrats to vote against both the first female President (Hillary) and first female Vice-President (Sarah Palin) in 2008, instead electing Obama and his eventual boys club that did not pay women equally. Obama and his male chums were Democrats though so that trumped any Republican history-making, and Obama is black which puts him higher in the victim hierarchy so that trumped Hillary and led to a victory for progressives. Just like how accepting Islam and encouraging women to wear hijab as a show of support for Islam’s oppressive treatment of women is also progress. In fact, a current feminist is just such a person.

 

So what would have happened had President Hillary answered the phone at 3am by saying “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up”? Because everyone knows that Bubba would be too busy with the interns to be around when his wife was in trouble. Well, we’d end up with President Tim Kaine.

Who Is Tim Kaine?

wcw-oz

This WCW character is Tim Kaine’s wrestling equivalent. A (at the time) middle of the road player who was given a stunning debut and a strong push for unfathomable reasons, because I can’t believe anyone seriously thought the public would accept it (with Oz because you’re watching a character from a children’s movie wrestle, with the Dems it’s because they thought Hillary and Kaine would appeal to the Bernie children. It’s all about the kids). Image from WWE.com

A back-bencher. Those of you in the know are aware that Tim Kaine’s nomination was controversial, at least to the progressives who now seem to dominate the party. But how did this guy get the job?

It’s A Process

Obama asked Tim Kaine to step down as DNC chair and run for Senate in Virginia after he picked Kaine to become DNC chair in the first place just two years prior, while Obama appointed the much more shady and corrupt Debbie Wasserman-Schultz as DNC chair. Schultz was one of Clinton’s national campaign co-chairs in 2008. Two peas in a pod. Obama allegedly made a deal to support Hillary Clinton in the 2016 race, which he ended up doing before she had won the nomination, in fact, he pretty much endorsed her the moment she said she was running. And we all know how Obama-appointed-Clinton-crony Wasserman-Schultz rigged the DNC primary (tangential, but three months after the court ruling that the DNC rigged the primary and was well within its rights to, the Washington Post said the primary was not rigged).

Y’know, this really makes Obama sound like a political mastermind, rewarding his buddy Tim Kaine for supporting him (Kaine was on Obama’s list of VP possibilities, so maybe the DNC chairmanship was also to make up for not following through on that), while also setting the DNC up for Clinton. Well, it was his campaign that introduced the Democrats to Fusion GPS, who would go on to conjure a bogus dossier that was used to illegally get warrants for spying on Hillary’s (and Obama’s) political opponents, so maybe there’s something to that notion.

Hearsay

Anyway, this background is all well and good, but how does it lead to Tim Kaine being VP,

obama_stern-face

Under Obama’s leadership, the Democrat Republican Party flourished, though at least he managed to “fix” the DNC. Image from evil.news

you ask? Supposedly, Obama made the deal to endorse Hillary for 2016 in exchange for her not trying to run against Obama in 2012 (a possibility that was apparently a source of buzz in DC in 2010), so Obama wanted Hillary crony Schultz as DNC chair, thus he told Kaine to accept a temporary grade reduction to Senator, in exchange for the promise of being Vice President five years later (for those questioning the veracity of the Ed Klein book cited, keep in mind that he was absolutely correct about the Clintons’ intention to takeover the DNC, and as seen in the above health section Klein seems to have been on-point about the fainting spells). That does explain why minority candidates and female candidates and female minority candidates were passed over by the most diverse political party in favor of a low-ranking rich old white man.. Explains why the Democrats trotted out tired old warhorse Hillary Clinton for one last roundup when she couldn’t even beat an amateur first-term Senator in 2008 (and later an amateur first-time politician in 2016). Explains why a moderate was picked as VP in a time when the party was trying to bring in the Bernie crowd. Explains why Hillary, with an enemies list rivaling Nixon’s, picked a guy that in 2008 endorsed her opponent.

Either that or Hillary just wanted someone who’d be absolutely useless and do only as he was told. Or the party elders, as with Obama, thought that they needed to attach a rich white dude to their candidate to reassure the other racists and sexists in the party that everything was under control. Who knows. But all of this makes way more sense than the official idea that somehow Hillary forgot her animosity, an idea which she just disproved in March 2018 with her idea that half of America is still a basket of deplorables because they did not vote for her.

Snopes tried to debunk this rumor about Kaine, but A: they only went after a story alleging that Hillary arranged it all rather than Obama and B: their tenet that other candidates than Wasserman-Schultz were being considered is debatable given that Democrats have lied about candidate considerations before- the press, the Left (Snopes is totally on the Left), and Hillary herself kept saying she was debating a wide variety of VP’s well into 2016, when in fact she already settled on Kaine by July of 2015. And before the official announcement, Obama said he’d want Kaine to have the job. Certainly, I have more circumstantial evidence here for this than what Mueller’s dug up.

And yes, liberals are more than capable of these levels of cronyism. If rigging the primary so that a big lie of competition is perpetrated upon the public, just like with Hillary’s big lie that there was competition in the VP process, doesn’t convince you then look at this example I wanted to shoehorn in here because I saw it while typing this: in California, liberals are mad that Trump’s tax plan makes their rich elite pay more in taxes, so they’re setting up a loophole. You know, the same liberals who say we need to raise taxes on the rich, doing this in the most liberal, progressive, leftist state. Just how trustworthy are these people?

Alternate Facts

In keeping with every other thought piece I suppose it is expected that I speculate as to what a Tim Kaine Presidency would look like. That would be quite impossible. You see, the standards I have available to compare this to are absolutely not the standards of the Left today. Even before Trump was elected, the Left was radically different than it was when Kaine was Governor of Virginia. Case in point: the issue of mass shootings. After the Virginia Tech shooting, Governor Kaine created a commission to investigate the incident. Their findings were quite reasonable. It was not mainstream to say “ban all guns” or “ban all guns of a type not related to the attack”. The mainstream media did not call the NRA murderers. Instead, experts found that there were mental health reforms needed, and Kaine signed an executive order making it difficult for people involuntarily put in an asylum to get guns. Compare this to the legislation the Democrats wanted in 2016 in the wake of a shooting- ban people for no reason and without warning from buying guns, in a way that would be next to impossible to overturn. Legislation which Kaine supported. (Then again, Democrats are now supporting the 2nd Amendment thanks to Trump, in an “overthrow the government because we’re spoiled brats that lost” kind of way. Republicans complained all the time about lawless Democrat administrations, like what Tim Kaine would preside over, but once the Secret Service was done investigating them they’d have been thrown into a coffin of snakes if they said anything that could even be remotely interpreted as calling for the assassination of a Democrat.)

I don’t mean to pick on Kaine alone, the ENTIRE Left shifted once Obama won. Even Obama himself. When Hillary presented the idea for what became Obamacare’s individual mandate in 2008, Obama himself came out against it and said that it would never work. Yet this is exactly what he and the Democrats did when they had both houses of Congress and the Presidency, to the exclusion of other issues which only became important to them after they were out of power.

So What Hellscape Did We Dodge?

terminator-2-nuclear-nightmare

Honestly, I’m not sure if this is a picture of an American city five months into a Hillary Presidency or a picture of an American city five minutes after liberals learned that Trump won. Image from Terminator 2 (TriStar Pictures, 1991)

I imagine that Hillary would have lasted long enough to make good on her threats to shoot down Russian jets in a no-fly zone illegally established over Syria by the U.S. because Hillary likes stabbing her friends in the back or felt slighted because she thinks Putin tried to help Trump or whatever reason floated into her head, which in turn would’ve started World War III. Come to think of it, maybe THIS explains why the Left went with its “Russia committed an act of war during the elections” narrative. Hillary was already trying to push the button anyway. The Left’s dire need to start World War III was there before the collusion narrative, which became their way of both perpetuating their lust for nuclear devastation while soothing the wounds from their 2016 loss. And if Hillary went ahead with her private little war and then collapsed for the last time or coughed herself into unconsciousness because the stresses of Presidency that turn healthy young men gray overwhelmed her already failing septuagenarian health, then we’d be left with Tim Kaine trying to either fight a nuclear war or rebuild after it. The same Tim Kaine who may have merely been handed the DNC Chairmanship and Vice Presidency as a payoff, rather than a merit-based achievement. And I don’t know if his statements were made because of the Left’s post-election descent into unmedicated madness, but maybe a Kaine rebuilding/war effort would reflect his recent statements that Democrats have to fight Republicans in the streets and that whites “have to put [themselves] in a place where we are the minority” (to be fair- Democrat policies don’t really aim for the extermination of a group, but rather its subjugation, hence Jim Crow rather than open genocide, and hence their current activities against white men at the behest of feminism, however, Kaine might court whites in the wake of Armageddon since they’d be weak enough for the totalitarians to take charge). Unless he thought “ooooo, pretty” at the sight of a mushroom cloud and wandered too close to it, in which case either Nancy Pelosi (best known for probably violating some House rule of conduct by crossing the floor and interrupting a speaker because her elitist and vindictive ego was slighted) or Paul Ryan (best known for somehow reminding me of David Hedison) would’ve been left in charge of rebuilding the country.

 

Well… as I’ve said before, at least this would mean those “They Were 11” twits would never exist! Please at least grant me that much consolation!

Better-Than-Worst-Case Scenario

Assuming World War III was somehow avoided and Kaine still became President after Hillary did her show-stopping William Henry Harrison impression, what would Kaine in office be like? Imagine Obama, but inept at being willfully incompetent (I’m pretty sure he had an agenda behind the stuff he did to damage the country- in the words of vindicated Sen. McCarthy: “If liberals were merely stupid, the laws of probability would dictate that at least some of their decisions would serve America’s interest.”). He’d just be a lukewarm filler, using his pen and paper to get liberal policies enacted while being totally unable to handle Congress, if it remained dominated by Republicans. If Democrats took over then Kaine would just sign off on whatever crossed his desk. You would not have much in the way of inspiration. He’d sort of be like Gerald Ford, not in policy (as said he’d be like Obama in that area) but in the sense that you’d forget he was there or ever President. To Hillary’s credit, at least her scandals and her spoiledbratentitled attitude (which Snopes couldn’t debunk, so it cast shade on the claims instead) would serve to remind people she existed, while Kaine has none of that. Personally, I didn’t even know he was governor of Virginia until he was Hillary’s VP nominee, and I don’t think it ever registered that he was a Senator until sometime during the 2016 election cycle, although when I look back I can recall voting against him, but not much else. I’ve been a resident of Virginia all my life, by the way.

The moral here: we can forget about Kaine, and would forget about him even if he were President  (sans WWIII).

star-trek-robert-desoto-ma

Long after Hillary’s failed Presidency started World War III, Tim Kaine emerged from centuries of hiding to join Starfleet. Image from Memory Alpha

Advertisements

Midterm Machinations

800px-Joe_Kennedy_III,_115th_official_photo

“You have people putting forth the narratives and seeing whether they resonate, testing them out and seeing what we can do to build the constituencies.” – Congressman Joe Kennedy III (D-MA). discussing the 2018 midterms.

With the midterms coming up, both parties are honing their strategies for winning. The only real Republican strategy for 8 years, even after winning elections, has been “we’re not Obama” and subsets thereof (“we’re against Obamacare”, for example) so it’s safe to brush them aside and focus on Democrats. Their strategy in 2016 was “you’re sexist if you vote against us” (don’t bother disputing, the evidence is right there, and this is a charge lefties in 2008 levied against the very man who the Left would now describe as noted feminist Barack Obama) and “you’re racist if you vote against us” (a charge lefties in 2008 levied against who they are now saying is noted unracist Hillary Clinton), which led to a bizarre circumstance in 2016 where people who did not vote for

ap_525971738662.jpg

Probably the only time that you’ll be told not voting for a rich white person is a racist act. – Image from the Associated Press

old, rich, white, and racist (even according to the Left) Hillary Clinton were said to be racist against blacks. Falling from that height of absurdity, Democrats appear to be rolling out new election strategies.

What I don’t understand is why Democrats are so upset. A: this confirms their narrative that the whole country is racist. B: why would they want a candidate who appealed to all of these racist people? It’s obvious- Democrats lost because they’re more decent than the rest of the country. Run with it guys! Whatever lets you sleep at night. It’s not like this is the first issue you folks claimed to be superior to the masses on.

You Will Kill People

That’s right, if you support Republicans you will kill people. This started softly with gun control where it could be argued there was a more literal truth present (except right now they’re championing gun control in the wake of the Florida school shooting, which we’ve learned was caused by gross negligence both on the part of the school because of Obama regulations, on the part of law enforcement for not listening to tips about the guy (maybe the FBI just doesn’t like Florida?), then law enforcement again for literally standing around while the shooter killed people. The same law enforcement the Left say we should rely on instead of our own firearms. If the current system wasn’t rife with incompetence typical of liberal big government systems, then the Left wouldn’t have yet another shooting caused by government incompetence to exploit.), then expanded to healthcare reform (even though at the end of the day Democrats’ Obamacare was

cuban-firing-squad-the-real-cuba

Pictured on the left are two typical Republicans. Oh wait, this is from liberal paradise Cuba under what the Left claims was the benevolent guidance of hero Fidel Castro. Image from TheRealCuba.com

designed to kick people off their insurance plans, still gave insurance companies loopholes for discriminating against pre-existing conditions, isn’t really giving much of an increase in coverage and definitely not giving much of an increase in quality coverage, all while giving Congress a sweet savings on healthcare and giving insurance companies a big payday) where maybe it was but maybe it wasn’t true, and finally when midterm-clinching tax reform was on the table Democrats insisted that this too would kill people. Granted, thanks to the liberal love of Big Government the IRS does have a death squad, but they weren’t an aspect of the GOP’s tax plan. Besides, tax reform ended up putting money into people’s paychecks. How can giving the average person $1000 worth of crumbs as millionaire Pelosi phrased it, which the average person can’t do anything with because $1000 is worthless to struggling families according to former DNC (friend of the working class) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (granted, she was $972,000 in debt in 2014 and in 2015 was worth $106,507 so $1,000 really is a crumb to her), possibly kill them anyway? How is it any worse than the tax breaks the aforementioned friends of the working class gave the average American when they were in power, which amounted to at least -$695 last year.

 

You Are Supporting Russia

obama_stern-face

He didn’t want to put the cart before the horse, he didn’t have a strategy yet on dealing with Russian interference. Image from evil.news

This came up briefly in 2016, but really took off later on (I wonder how Democrats reconcile who they are on record calling one of the greatest Presidents ever, Obama, saying that no one seriously believes the elections can be rigged with the current Democrat party line where every liberal must seriously believe that the elections were rigged). Ever since the Left seized onto that excuse, which repeatedly has been shown to bear no weight (even assuming the Russian government was involved), the Russians have been EVERYWHERE.

They interfered in the Virginia gubernatorial elections, are preparing to interfere in the 2018 races, and are even accusing noted SJW George Takei of sexual assault. They’ve spread fear at the University of Missouri, according to Mother Jones in their item “Donald Trump Joins With Russian Bots To Trash Mark Warner On Twitter” Russian bots spread

Skull-Man-Russian-Bot

Pictured above is an example of a Russian ‘bot, constructed by one Dr. M.S. Cossack. Image from megaman.wikia.com

accusations that Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) colluded with… Russia (kind of shooting themselves in the foot there), were the major force behind the Democrat-damaging Nunes memo being released, blamed Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) for shutting down the government in January, helped back Sean Hannity in a feud with Keurig, and after the Florida shooting the Russian bots leapt to the defense of the 2nd Amendment. Russia’s been BUSY! As has been pointed out elsewhere, Russia suddenly being the enemy after 100 years of liberals supporting them is a heel-turn only rivaled by Hulk Hogan’s. I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention all of the times before and even AFTER the 2016 election that liberals and their anti-Trump friends who scream Trump is a traitor for colluding with Russia had themselves colluded with Russia. I bet the media will blame Russian bots for that too, just like the Washington Post will blame Russian bots for why the Post reports both that Russian bots did and didn’t impact the 2016 election.

Uh… if putting the interests of foreigners over the interests of the American people is treasonous according to Democrats, why are Democrats the ones refusing to enforce our laws and shutting down the government in an effort to help foreigners?

You Are Dividing The Country

Technically it’s true, but their consistent invocation of this tactic is an immediate and

2016-electoral-map-medium

Based on this map alone of the 2016 election’s outcome, I’d say that the blue guys were the ones dividing the country since there’s so few of them. Image from an article on medium.com (“The Most Disruptive Transformation in History”) in which they argue that only the blue areas should count in elections because liberals are smarter.

obvious undermining of any credibility they have when they declare themselves to be tolerant, compassionate, and open-minded. Just listen to the quotes in the links connected to “is” and “an” above: if you didn’t vote for the Democrat, you voted to divide people against each other. They characterized nearly half the voting population as being divisive, much akin to Hillary Clinton’s “deplorables” comment. Essentially, ANY form of dissension from the Leftwing narrative of the day, whatever that might be since it changes so damn often to the point of contradiction, is a malicious act aimed to divide the country. Nevermind that the same people accusing the GOP of being evil for dividing the country are the ones that say whites need to be silenced and should be hated and ostracized and are all racists anyway (it’s not just here, by the way), everyone who disagrees with the Left is deplorable, and everyone who isn’t a liberal is such a bad person that it’s ok to physically attack them. And they hope we die.

Like I said- technically it is true that thinking differently from the Left constitutes dividing the country, in an “if you oppose Stalin you are dividing the USSR” sort of way. In

gun-contol-joseph-stalin

Didn’t I just write about one of his video games?

a “not surrendering to the Nazis is dividing the world” kind of way. I had to put that second one in there because as it turns out Stalin isn’t really that bad of a guy according to the Left so they would actually agree that opposing Stalin was an evil act of division. Just ask, ironically, one of the people who was involved in accusing Trump of colluding with Russia if Stalin was such a bad dude. If you believe individuality is fine, as long as we all do it together (by law or force if needed) then you’re on the same page as the Left.

I suppose I could let my logic about liberals being the intolerant stand alone, but here’s some other reading on it. (I love this one’s opening line,  “groupthink can be harmful, regardless of how right you usually are”, a nice reassurance to the liberals reading it.)

Familiar Faces

You Are Sexist

Despite the DNC being run by men, passing over women and women of color when choosing their two leaders, despite Obama having a boys club and various liberals being caught paying women an unequal wage, and the repeated allegations of sexually-based offenses committed against women by Democrats and liberals in general, Republicans are the sexists. Despite the Left’s dedication to forcing women to wear hijab, either through pressure of political correctness or through the celebration of oppressive religious practices that they have not tolerated from other religions, we are told that Republicans are the sexists. Figure that one out.

You Are Racist

That’s still a thing, because Trump. They assure us that Trump is a racist, the GOP is racist, and thus all Republicans are racists.

You Are A Fascist

That’s still a thing, because Trump. They assure us that Trump is a fascist, the GOP is fascist, and thus all Republicans are fascists.

You Are <insert group here>phobic

That’s still a thing, because Trump. They assure us that Trump is an <insert group here>phobe, the GOP is an <insert group here>phobe, and thus all Republicans are <insert group here>phobes. (In 2014, I recall Attorney General Eric Holder saying that the GOP’s Voter ID efforts were designed to impact the young, old, and minorities, saying that these groups don’t vote for Republicans. Who the heck is left for the GOP to win elections with? In that same interview, Eric Holder also criticizes the GOP for deciding from the beginning that they’d oppose Obama… a game Holder is helping Dems play now. Just another point on the “Democrats would be praising it if they did it” graph).

Wasn’t That Fun?

There you have it. While the Left might find some real policy issues to disagree on and may even have a real solution that’s better than the Right, we’ll never know because their playbook is designed to avoid policy discussions altogether and instead supplant debate with ignorance and ad hominem attacks. Almost like they don’t really HAVE any policy ideas, just a strong visceral hatred of anyone that isn’t like them. Again, these are the leaders of tolerance. The same tolerant ones where 39% of their number say political opposition will strain a friendship, compared to the intolerant Right’s 13% rate (interestingly, the higher the liberal’s education, the more likely they feel it will be a strain, and also liberals are less likely to have close friends that are Trump supporters than Trump supporters are to have close liberal friends). What a happy indicator for this discussion to end on.

Even Happier

It seems sensible to predict what happens if Democrats win the House and Senate. They’ll never get enough votes to boot Trump out of the White House unless 12 Republican Senators defect (granted, it is likely since most of the Republican Senators were elected as warriors but turned out to be wimps once they actually took control of the Presidency, now using the filibuster as their flimsy excuse for inaction, and as we saw with Obamacare there are Republican senators more than willing to betray their base). So lacking that, what measures can we expect?

Well, in 2006 when they wanted to paint a clear path to victory in 2008, Democrats decided to set banks up to fail by forcing banks to accept subprime mortgages. They then blamed the (partly, because the Dems only took advantage of bad banking practices anyway) Democrat-created tragedy on Republicans (despite Republicans having warned about it) and swept the 2008 elections. Either that or instead of a conspiracy (conspiracy would explain why your anti-corporate saviors on the Left basically paid-off the banking industry for its cooperation. Hey look, if Trump colluded with Russia, if DC is still not a state because of racism, then the Left colluded with the banks! Don’t judge me!) the Left merely took advantage of the crisis they accidentally made. And of course, the other possibility is that Democrats will do what Republicans did under Obama- claim they can’t do anything at all until they get either all of the Senate or the Presidency, and make a bunch of token gestures that they would never follow-through on once they had power.

Pearls-Before-Swine-Stephen-Pastis-Banks-Fairy-Tale

Image from gocomics.com

Total Idiocy: Democrats and the obsession with Gun Control

I am going to start this off with a harsh truth, a very nasty but nonetheless true. Liberals like to claim groups like the NRA and legal Gun Owners are the problem with gun violence in this country. That is an egregious lie and a deflection of responsibility. And so here we go ahead with this bold statement of truth, if you support gun control it is YOU who have blood on your hands. You are responsible not just for the deaths of children in school shootings, you are responsible for the deaths of countless mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters who were killed by someone who illegally obtained a firearm because they were unable to exercise their legal right to bear arms and defend themselves.

Those of you for gun control will make your emotional arguments as to how I am wrong that just do not add up, and in the end, you will make character attacks and attempts to vilify me. And even some in the pro-second amendment crowd will say I am sinking to the level of the liberals who make these pleas to emotion. I frankly do not care, after so much death at the hands of total fucking retards who watch the same thing happen and push for more of the same policy causing it, I feel it is time to take the kiddy gloves off. You gun control supporters are remorseless murderers with your hands drenched in the blood of so many Americans who you shed crocodile tears for. And that isn’t like one of your pathetic pleas to emotion that have proven themselves to be deadlier than bullets, that is a statement of the reality of the situation backed by facts.

Gun Control Kills

Holocaust_Victims_gun-control

These are the original victims of Gun Control, the nearly 6 million people killed in the holocaust, and hardly any of them were killed by a bullet.

Gun Control is not about making people safer at all. Just look at Chicago and Baltimore, jurisdictions that have had some of the strictest gun control laws in the country and still do. I will, of course, explain later why this is, but the question now is why they still double down on these policies every time despite the fact they are clearly not working? To formulate one answer, all you have to do is look back at history and see who else touted gun control as such a glorious solution and why they did so. Look at the actual consequences of gun control and what atrocities it was used to commit and which heinous extremist groups committed them and you will begin to see reason #1 why gun control is dangerous and why we were given a right to bear arms.

 

gun-contol-joseph-stalin

Joseph Stalin and other dictators relied on new or existing Gun Control Laws to consolidate their power

In 1929 when Stalin declared all of the privately owned farms in the USSR state property he relied heavily on gun laws passed shortly after the 1917 communist revolution, laws that made it hard for anybody but party members to own firearms. And in Italy before Mussolini and his Blackshirts rise to power, the Italian government had banned Firearms and Canes to restore order, a move which left no resistance from those opposing the squads of Blackshirts and their formation of a fascist government. Most chilling of all, however, was the series of gun control laws passed by Adolf Hitler and the SS during the 1930’s. These laws placed heavy restrictions on gun ownership especially for jews and used a gun registry to identify and confiscate guns from Jews and other political opponents of the SS leaving them with no means to resist, the ultimate goal being the nearly effortless slaughter and terrorizing of Jews during the Kristallnacht incident. The moral of the story kids is that gun control is the go-to method which dictators and murders use to take control. Still feel safe calling for more restrictions? If you do then you are pretty retarded.

Just Like Weed

gun-control-pot-leaf

Even though marijuana is deemed illegal by the federal government, it is still easily obtainable and widely used across the US.

There is no coincidence that over the past 20 years as private gun ownership has risen, gun violence has been on the decline. Well there is one exception, while gun violence has been universally on the decline, there has been a sharp increase of shootings in so-called “Gun Free Zones”. This has a lot to do with the fact that only 6 percent of gun crimes are committed with guns obtained legally by the offender, an overwhelming 94 percent of the time guns used to commit mass shootings and other crimes were stolen and/or obtained through illegal channels. To put it in terms many of the jackass anti-gun hipsters can understand, it is a lot like how even though pot is illegal you dope fiends somehow get it. The law and threat of consequences did not stop you from obtaining the pot you freaks desire, it only stops the citizens who abide by the law. In the same way, gun control laws do not stop shooters like the Columbine shooters from illegally obtaining firearms and killing a ton of innocent people, it only ensures law-abiding citizens who are afraid of the consequences are easy targets for criminal psychopaths.

gun-control-NRA

The NRA promotes and protects the 2nd Amendment and encourages responsible gun ownership.

Oddly while groups that promote the legalization of pot never face criticism for drug addiction and violent drug lords (and rightly so because the connection is so loose you would have to be mentally retarded to make that connection), whenever there is a mass shooting in the US in one of those gun free zones where citizens cannot legally carry their firearms, the blame is stuck on the NRA. (Unsurprisingly that connection is always made by hysterical retards.) Much in the same way mature adults should be able to consume marijuana as long as they accept the consequences, the 2nd Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms as long as we accept the consequences that accompany it. Unlike pot, of course, the consequences of not being allowed to carry guns is a lot graver. Our 2nd Amendment exists to allow us to protect ourselves from criminals and also from the possibility of individuals like Hitler or Mussolini coming to power and committing atrocities. Thus banning guns only makes us easy victims, not only to those who do not follow the law but potentially in a worst case scenario to our own government as well.

When facts don’t work, just cry a lot

gun-control-david-hogg

Looking like a badly tanned meth addict, David Hogg has been the lefts newest “useful idiot” to throw on-air tantrums for them since the tragic Parkland Shootings.

Facts are never on the leftists side especially not with the gun control debate, so rather than having a mature discussion they routinely pick an extremely stupid and easily manipulated poster child to throw a tantrum and cry so that other equally stupid people will get whipped into a frenzy while other easily manipulated people will get pulled into their meritless arguments or back down. After the tragic Parkland school shooting in which a cowardly sheriff’s deputy even refused to enter the school and stop the massacre, The left got its newest useful idiot in the form of the cowardly, childish, and incredibly deranged David Hogg. He represents another cute face and warped personality the left uses to make the argument an emotional one, using sickeningly fact devoid lines such as “2nd Amendment advocates are going to die out” (too bad there are going to be more of them than ever though since Gen Z is set to be more conservative than even the Baby Boomers.), and “The NRA controls Washington.” As usual, there is nothing of substance, not facts and only tantrums, but this is nothing new. The left always plays stupid games like this that blow up in their face.

wguns1

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., holds a gun magazine as she calls for a debate on gun control measures during a press conference on Capitol Hill, on May 6, 1999. (AP Photo/Khue Bui)

Remeber those warm New England summers? Remeber ice cold glasses of Lemonade on the porch? Remeber when Democrats passed an “Assault Weapons Ban” in 1994 that classified weapons as assault rifles based on cosmetic features that did not really enhance the performance of the gun and in fact made some harder to use according to experts? Well Peppridge Farms remembers, and Pepperidge farms isn’t gonna keep it to Pepperidge Farms self. But then again Peppridge farms ain’t no idiot, Pepperidge farms knows the term Assult Weapon is a made up term meant to scare idiots like the boogeyman scares children. Pepperidge Farms knows liberals lie about the “AR” in AR-15 standing for Assault Rifle so they can scare idiots. Pepperidge Farms knows it stands for ArmaLite, the name of the manufacturers. Now I better stop while I am ahead before I kill this Pepperidge Farms joke, but I think I made my point here, liberals cannot actually find a legal or factual basis for attacking the 2nd amendment so they always resort to misinformation and emotional arguments made to play upon fear or outrage in place of anything of substance.

It’s a Racial thing tho….

gun-control-nat-turner

During the Nat Turner Slave Rebellion of 1831, rebel slaves in the Democrat-Held State of Virginia massacred plantation owners.

Now honestly, I really feel that it is appropriate to submit the possibility that there is a racial component to the Democrats opposition to gun ownership as we have proven it is in no way about safety. As I have covered in the past, the Democrats have a long history of racism dating back to the decades before they founded the CSA. This made me remember the famous Nat Turner Rebellion, an 1831 rebellion where Nat Turner and a group of slaves killed 55-65 people, mainly Plantation owners. In the aftermath the Democrats went into a total frenzy, they made it illegal to teach black people to read and making it illegal for them to hold religious congregations without the supervision of a white preacher. Similar laws with widespread restrictions on the Civil Rights of black people were passed across the South and held their legacy for nearly a century in the form of Jim Crow Laws and other discriminatory policies. So it is entirely possible, in fact highly probable that Democrats still have some fear of black people or other parties of oppressed Americans exercising their 2nd Amendment rights in a way similar to Nat Turner. Gun Control isn’t just about taking Guns away since these laws are most prevalent in the cities I would say Democrats are especially passionate about keeping guns out of the hands of black people more than any other Americans.

Lots of reasons, None of them safety

Whatever the reason, secret ambitions to resurrect the fascist socialist order or fear that black people will rise up and kill them for their racist past, we know for sure that Gun Control has never been about safety. Gun Control only creates a set of easy targets for psychopaths with no regard for the law. The tragedies at Parkland, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine, Charleston, Orlando, they all could have been avoided if just one teacher or churchgoer or movie usher or bartender were legally allowed to carry a firearm and could have stopped these insane shooters in their tracks. The blood of all these victims from the innocent school children to the club goers who were just there to dance, their blood is on the hands of the Democrats and their puppets who push the Gun Control policies that make easy targets for criminals and other despicable individuals. That is not what makes me angry though, what makes me angry is that these morally bankrupt monsters like David Hogg or Dianne Feinstein have no remorse for all the blood that is on their hands. They would rather blame the people looking for real solutions who promote responsibility and solutions that do not violate our civil rights. We can only hope though that they do not get their way and create a larger pile of bodies in their ignorant wakes.

The Case for the Deep State

(*Update: Even as I wrote this article, Andrew McCabe resigned from his position at the FBI.)

 

A year ago, if you told me there was some kind of Deep State within our government I would have probably laughed at you. Even with the DNC and Media trying to influence the election, the thought that there was an internal force influencing things was just too much for me to believe. A year later however, it has become clear to me that the external forces I just mentioned act in concert with an internal force within our government that is dedicated to advancing a certain agenda. The idea that a cabal of unelected officials is making decisions with no respect to the will of the American people is a scary thought, but the evidence is there. And the scariest thing is that they are seeing an unthinkable amount of success working against our president.

How Did it Start and to Whom do They Answer?

obama_stern-face

Barack Obama Image from evil.news

Make no mistake, there is no mystery as to who the Deep State works for. The Deep State really started to form in 2009, during the first term of President Barack Obama. The very nature of the Deep State itself is that it is composed of officials appointed by Barack Obama and the people they hired within multiple government agencies. As such, there is no question that the Deep State serves the political agenda of the Democratic Party, and they are willing to go as far as undermining our Republic and committing criminal acts to make sure the ill-gotten gains of the past 8 years are not undone. This includes the dismantling of their own power structure within the government agencies. The Deep State has operated with very little opposition for the past 8 years, and so like roaches that can survive a nuclear apocalypse, they are very hard to uproot.

georgewbush

George W. Bush, 43rd president of the United States

So how can I pinpoint when the Deep State was formed with such certainty? That is quite simple, looking at the 2 previous administrations as well as the current administration, one can observe the differences in resistance to the executive office’s agenda. During the Administration of George Bush, he faced average resistance, however he was able to operate a functional government and at no time were whole agencies working against him. This is typical of a presidential administration, Bush had individuals within those agencies go rouge but never an entire agency. During Barack Obamas Presidency however he did not have any agencies work against him, however they were too cooperative and acted as his cronies to attack political opposition. This is not normal at all for a Presidential Administration and it constitutes a severe breach of ethics that borders on criminal behavior. Finally, during the Trump Administration, we see whole agencies leaking partial information designed to damage the president, engaging in wasteful and clearly partisan investigations against the president, colluding against the president, dereliction of duty, all things that are so totally abnormal.

State of Unintelligence

Deep-State-Insincere-Promises

Intelligence Agencies have done a huge amount of dirty work for the Deep State.

As I mentioned before the culprits are political appointees and those hired by them, and nowhere is the behavior more brazen and more dangerous than in the intelligence communities. This first became apparent in February when reports came out that along with agents leaking information to damage the president, Intelligence agencies like the CIA were actually withholding intelligence information from President Trump. The next scandal to arise involved the fact that intelligence agencies under the Obama Administration illegally acquired FISA warrants to wiretap the phones of Trump’s Associates, using a widely discredited dossier which was paid for by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. What is really scandalous to me is that figures like FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe who knew about this and lied under oath about it are still allowed to hold onto their positions*. Even chronically dishonest Chuck Schumer Puppet James Comey was fired for his corruption.

Deep-State-Peter-Strzok-Lisa-Page

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page had exchanged a huge volume of text messages expressing their hatred of Trump before and during their involvement in the farcical Russian Collusion investigation. -Image from breitbart.com

Another big scandal involving the Deep State ridden FBI also involves the fraudulent Russia Investigation and the inadequate Clinton Email Investigation. FBI Agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page who had both worked on Robert Mullers Russia Probe were found to have expressed a clear bias against Donald Trump in messages found on their FBI Mobile Devices. This beautiful scandal has blossomed like a Bloomin Onion at Outback Steakhouse, with missing texts which were mysteriously recovered when the heat was put on the FBI. Some choice material within those texts were not just plain anti-Trump talk but also talk of a secret society to take Trump down after the election and efforts to hamper the Clinton Email investigation. Of course, predictably the Alt-Left Media continues to poo-poo the investigations and the accusations even as it blows up in their face.

Ministry of Love

Deep-State-Derrick-Watson

Derrick Watson was appointed to the Federal Bench by Barack Obama.

In George Orwell’s masterpiece about fascism “1984”, there was a so-called “Ministry of Love” that was supposed to deal out justice but instead furthered the corrupt machinations of “Big Brother”. During his 8 years in office, Obama through a series of judicial and departmental appointments managed to turn our judicial system, including the DOJ, into the Democrats own private Ministry of Love. Even now that rot exists, especially in the corrupt 9th Circut of the federal courts which have routinely tried to prevent the Trump Administration’s agenda with a series of rulings that ignored the laws of this country and served only the politics of this countries political left. Take for example the case of judge Derrick Watson, a political appointee from the Obama Regime who ruled against the Trump Travel ban 3 times based off of cases with a flimsy pretext, and has been overruled by the Supreme Court every time an appeal made it to their desk. Even after having his ruling overturned by the Supreme Court the first time, Judge Watson tried to effectively invalidate the Supreme Courts decision by presenting an opportunistic interpretation of the language of their ruling, an interpretation which also got overturned.

Deep-State-Robert-Mueller

Robert Muller was appointed to be the supposedly impartial Special Counsel into allegations of Collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russia, however, his probe has only lead to a scandal surrounding his own actions.

Next, of course, we have the phony Russian Collusion probe headed by Robert Muller, a hardcore leftist and longtime friend of James Comey. From the start of this farce, he has shown that he never intended to perform an impartial probe, opting to appoint a cavalcade of far left anti-trump judges and lawyers to his investigation team. He has also violated normal courtesies afforded to a cooperative suspect when he ordered an early morning armed raid on Paul Manaforts home where agents manhandled him and his wife, a clear attempt at intimidation. And of course, it doesn’t help that the only indictments he has filed so far are against Trump aids and their associates for alleged crimes that have no connection to the 2016 election, prompting one of them to file a lawsuit against Mueller and the DOJ. Luckily this corrupt behavior will hopefully result not just in Mueller’s Probe being ended as well as his own prosecution, we may even see other officials who have lied or contributed to the corruption going down with Mueller.

Goebbels Wet Dream

Deep-State-Mainstream-Media-Propaganda

The Mainstream media has managed to become a running joke.

“Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own will.” When Hitler’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels said this I am sure he never dreamed it would apply so well to the American Mainstream Media. Then again, due to how ridiculous they are he may have been a bit dismayed that they have undertaken the task of being the propaganda mouthpiece of the Democratic Party in such a crude manner. After all, there is no way to effectively push propaganda when your headlines revolve around how many scoops of ice cream somebody gets. When you peddle stuff like that as well as easily debunked lies, well you just aren’t peddling effective propaganda to the masses.

journalists-wiki-tw

Most “Mainstream Media” Outlets colluded with Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Election

Of course, thanks to the WikiLeaks dump of the DNC and podesta emails, only the most willfully ignorant can pretend that they are impartial agents of truth. Thanks to the WikiLeaks dumps of the DNC and Podesta emails, we know for a fact that the DNC and Hillary colluded with the Media in an inappropriate manner. Thanks to Julian Assange, we now know who colluded with the Clintons and what networks they were a part of, but sadly we also have reason never to trust the mainstream media again. Notable outlets and publications, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Hill, The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Washington Post, CNN, these supposed trustworthy scoursed were in direct contact with the Clinton Campaign to ensure coverage of her was positive and even to coordinate stories. In addition to them were biased Alt-Left outlets like The Huffington Post, The Guardian, Vox, Buzzfeed, Vice, Now This, outlets only popular with the most radical leftists and which we never expected honesty from. The additional issue though is how unprecedented it is for a political campaign to direct the media during an election year about what to report and how to report it. Then again though, Democrats resorted to Fascism for the past 8 years, it was only a matter of time before they took a page from Goebbels playbook.

Not so Private Enterprise

Deep-State-Social-Media-Hydra

Social Media and Tech Companies have shown an extreme left-wing bias for a long time now.

A new social trend has been to get news from social media as these sites have convenient features that show you “trending” stories from sites tailored to your preferences. At least that is what they say, in reality, though they have demonstrated a long-term and established bias against conservative ideas and voices. Websites like Facebook routinely ban and block conservative-leaning accounts that post offensive memes.  while turning a blind eye to left-leaning accounts that promote criminal activity. Instagram banned a conservative comedy group without giving any explanation of what rules they violated if they violated any at all. And along with banning Milo Yiannopolous on a flimsy pretext, Twitter also was caught suppressing a hashtag critical of Hillary Clinton.

Deep-State-Tech-Bias

The thought that information or things like your phone can be used to try and manipulate your opinion is terrifying.

Other tech giants have been demonstrably biased, and this should really scare us as these tech giants I mention produce the software for that phone you are likely reading this on. One example is apple, in 2016 they rejected a game poking fun at Hillary Clinton despite having an overwhelming number of Anti-Trump games. Amazon’s Alexa digital assistant has been making rounds in the news lately as it was discovered the AI is programmed with a pro-leftist political agenda. What alarms me most is the behavior of Google, the worlds largest search engine was caught burying search suggestions critical of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. Google is also currently facing a lawsuit from 2 former employees for wrongful termination, in which details highlighting googles systematic discrimination against heterosexuals, whites, men, and conservatives have come to light.

Pervers de Noblesse Oblige

George-Soros-1

Billionaire and Former Nazi George Soros

Among the outlying Deep State actors are a group of extremely rich people telling poor people what is best for them cause they are their allies and other rich people are the enemies. Shady and possibly Faustian Power Broker George Soros is a prime example. Known for his funding of the criminal “Community Activism” group A.C.O.R.N. which engaged in numerous criminal acts, he has an extensive resume of trying to influence politics worldwide. Of recent interest, he has also been caught giving funding to an ANTIFA domestic terrorist group. The DOJ is now investigating this as well and hopefully, this will lead to an indictment against Soros. He was also one of the largest campaign contributors to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential run.

Deep-State-Moby

Artist Moby Lectured the Electoral College on decency. He is one to talk right?

Soros is not the only Billionaire putting his pen in the Deep State ink, a prominent sufferer of TDS Tom Steyer has dumped millions of dollars into an ad campaign calling for Trumps Impeachment. The impeachable offense he invokes is Treason, the Treasonous act of pulling out of the Paris Climate accord which asked our country to take a hit to our economy while leaving the worlds highest polluters to go on with business as usual. Speaking of TDS, remember how a bunch of celebrities who donated millions to Clinton pleaded for Republican members of the Electoral College to ignore the choice of the people they are supposed to represent? Luckily America is sick of their hypocrisy though, especially considering their seedy underworld of rapists and perverts they shelter. The damage they have done though is innumerable as for decades they have been putting their money behind corrupt politicians and acting as mouthpieces for the agenda of the American left wing. If there were ideological diversity in Hollywood this would be a different matter entirely. Sadly this is not the case, Hollywood Conservatives often face rejection and blacklisting from the “open” and “tolerant” Hollywood Left.

How do These Dots Connect?

Deep-State-Swamp-Monster

The Deep State Runs Deep within the DC Beltway

Believe it or not, while some of these are seemingly unrelated they are connected in one way or another. From top to bottom, The rich fund the politicians who appoint the officials who work against the opposition while the media ignores the scandals and the famous instruct the masses what to think and the tech companies control the flow of information. I know it sounds convoluted. To simplify it, all of these things are connected to the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is the root of the Deep State, because as you will notice all of the actions of the Deep State benefit them from the Uranium One Deal to the bogus Russian Collusion Probe.

wp-1473130401396.png

Thanks to their hypocritical bullshit along with greater awareness, younger people have begun to reject the Democratic Party which created the deep state more and more.

How do we fix the Problem? Well first would be to purge the Government agencies of Obama Era Appointees, the elements within the government are the only part of the deep state that poses an actual threat and ties it all together. But as Mr. F.L.A.G. covered in his piece about political appointee’s, this is very hard to do. Since the Democratic Party is the real problem and since they have engaged in criminal behavior with criminal elements, a Federal RICO case resulting in arrests and their dismantlement would work. This would also take care of Deep State elements in other area’s I mentioned if they are found to have knowingly contributed to criminal behavior. The best part of this is that it does not really harm our Democracy, another party like the Green Party or Libertarians can fill in that political void. But this is all a moot point as we are a long way off before any solution is possible, but the good news is that it looks like we are winning the battle.

What The Strzok Is Going On?

original unaltered image from wikimedia.org

For those of you not paying attention during the Obama Administration, it may come as a surprise just how politicized the government itself has become. I’m not talking about the elected folks, by the very nature of their jobs it’s a given that they will be politicized, I mean the bureaucracy itself. The un-elected masses that make the government work, appointees and employees alike.

Appointees are of course going to be political, but they are in a separate class from Congressmen and Presidents and members of a President’s cabinet. All of those guys have a chance to be ousted every 2-4 years. Appointees though? Forget it! Unless they are fired (which is very hard because the Supreme Court ruled that government jobs were actually private property, belonging to the people that hold them1), die, quit, or maybe for some reach a mandatory retirement age, we’re stuck with them long after the voters have determined that they hate the Administration that put them there. This contrasts with government employees, who are basically like appointees except they advance through skill or nepotism rather than the whims of the President and Congress.

Judicial Use Of Force

     What happens when all of these people become entrenched in our system? Well, let’s focus on the Judicial Branch to see (there is a 33% chance that you have no idea what I’m talking about when I say “Judicial Branch”, based on a recent Annenburg Public Policy Center poll, so stop here and look it up or just keep nodding as though you understand). Remember earlier this year all of that hubbub over President Trump’s travel ban? Amidst legal challenges, the Supreme Court declared it Constitutional. However, the judges challenging it were all leftwing appointees. The law states clearly that Trump had the authority to do what he did, SCOTUS upheld that in a 7-2 vote, yet these judges were out there saying what Trump did was illegal.

Executive Decision

     Already you can see that the law is up for grabs because of judges that are political appointees unless you have enough money and time to take it to the Supreme Court (yes it works for both sides of the aisle, but after the Obamacare rulings11,11A it seems liberals

Supreme_Court_US_2010

Why is Ginsberg on the far right? Maybe this is a colored Daguerreotype. -image from wikimedia.org

keep winning, and liberals are a bit looser with the rules anyway10, plus there’s a lot more of them9), but now let’s cross over into the Executive Branch and see how law enforcement itself is affected. I could cite the soft takeover, as seen in Baltimore. Ever since the Freddy Gray case, police have been noticeably reticent to do their jobs, and so the murder rate shot through the roof5,5A. This is part of the so-called Ferguson Effect5A, where police are hesitant to do their jobs around minorities because of zealous prosecutors and a judgmental public, fueled by negative media coverage of the police giving their local actions national attention. I call it a ‘soft takeover’ because it matches the Left’s doctrine of giving privileged status to select minority groups, in this case by pressuring police to stop enforcing the law around them. Don’t believe me? Explain why white people need to shut up12. Explain sanctuary cities, which are blatantly in violation of the law, and how it’s always characterized as benefiting the Latino community and used for gaining Latino votes.

But that’s the more subtle takeover, let’s get to the big headliner today: the FBI. The one group that’s supposed to be above reproach. Local police might be bigoted or incompetent, as AG Eric Holder thought when he ordered the investigation of the Ferguson Police Department, but certainly not the FBI. If you’ll recall, the Left was arguing that nationalizing the police was the best way to deal with bias8. So what would that nationalized police force look like?

The First Thing We Do, Let’s Bias All The Lawyers

     It would look like Special Counsel Mueller’s investigative team, of course. Politifact6, often biased to the Left, tells us that Of the 9 prosecutors on Mueller’s team who have donated to campaigns, there’s a 15-1 ratio in favor of Democrats as to whom the donations went. Of course, Politifact isn’t a very good source, they counted 15 prosecutors when at that point there would’ve been 16 to consider7. A steadfast Democrat donor who defended Obama’s immigration action in 2014 was brought onboard. Plus, several other folks on it had ties to the Clintons too, though Politifact is quite nebulous as to how the spread looks or if those involved with the Clintons had not donated, thus bringing the bias figure from 10 to possibly 12, out of 16.

Agents Of Change

     It’s more than just the lawyers though! We also have FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who has come to symbolize the bias on the team as of late. Mueller kicked him out, though I agree with Rep. Jim Jordan2 in wondering why, since so many others on the team were clearly biased too. But Strzok is a special case. In 2016, he edited then-FBI Director Comey’s exoneration statement about Hillary Clinton- specifically, he changed the wording from “Grossly negligent” (which the law says is a crime) to “extremely careless”2. Quite a change indeed, basically going from admitting that Clinton behaved illegally to saying she did the equivalent of crossing the street without looking both ways first. Strzok’s bias was in favor of Hillary, in case it wasn’t obvious. He set up the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton so that other people involved in the alleged crime were in the room with her, an unprecedented arrangement2 which obviously shows Strzok favored her.

ap_525971738662.jpg

WaPo alleges that Strzok was using an untraceable phone merely to hide his office romance, an explanation that is clearly fake news because Strzok’s true love is not known for using secure devices. – Image from Associated Press

Now we come to his text messages, sent using an allegedly untraceable FBI phone or some such (according to the texts themselves13). Strzok mentions in them a meeting where an “insurance policy” was discussed, in case Trump won13. He also mentioned that “we”, at least meaning himself and someone else at the FBI, could not take the risk of Trump getting elected3. And shortly thereafter, in the same month, the FBI starts its investigation into Trump-Russia collusion3. What a coincidence! Strzok, by the way, at the time was deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI2.

With Liberty And Justice For… The Left

     Even under Trump, it’s clear that the Left still can do plenty of damage- biased court decisions, biased legal teams, biased FBI agents in powerful positions. The Left would love nothing more than to make opposition to it illegal. We see this incubating on college campuses right now, and those snowflakes will be the avalanche that sweeps away our government in the future. But it’s not just them, this bit of typing called to mind Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issuing a terror threat assessment that declared rightwing extremists can include returning military veterans, pro-life, and anti-illegal immigration people4. Meaning like half the country at least are potential rightwing extremist terrorists and should be watched. That was in 2009; we had 7 more years of Obama bringing in people that think like that. Mueller’s team and Peter Strzok, in particular, aren’t even the tip of the iceberg, they’re the carbon molecule that came to rest on top of it!

Sources

  1. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2002/07/what_are_civil_service_protections.html                  1A. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1978/12/24/when-a-job-becomes-property-its-hard-to-fire-a-civil-servant/d503e8c9-cdfd-4d2f-a594-c2e1912bac1a/?utm_term=.9c188944eba6
  2. https://www.c-span.org/video/?438042-1/fbi-director-responds-president-trumps-attacks-agency
  3. https://www.c-span.org/video/?438282-1/deputy-attorney-general-good-fire-special-counsel
  4. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/                    4A. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dhs-domestic-terror-warning-angers-gop/
  5. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-baltimore-police-hiring-insight/baltimore-saw-steep-fall-in-police-numbers-as-murder-rate-soared-idUSKCN0ZN0BF                                                5A. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/11/ferguson-effect-study-72-us-cops-reluctant-make-stops/96446504/
  6. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2017/nov/03/sean-duffy/how-many-democrat-campaign-donors-special-counsel-/
  7. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/16/another-obama-clinton-donor-joins-muellers-legal-team-investigating-trump-campaign.html
  8. http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/a-nationalized-police-force-would-be-a-logistical-tactical-and-ethical-nightmare
  9. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-obama/obamas-judges-leave-liberal-imprint-on-u-s-law-idUSKCN1110BC
  10. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-judiciary/344468-liberal-disregard-of-judicial-deference-undermines-faith-in
  11. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/25/john-roberts-supreme-court-obamacare-editorials-debates/29301349/                                                                                                    11A. https://cei.org/blog/supreme-court-rewrites-obamacare-again
  12. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/24/dnc_chair_candidate_my_job_is_to_tell_white_people_when_to_shut_their_mouths.html
  13. http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/senate-judiciary-chair-grassley-demands-answers-insurance-policy-trump-victory-fbi-brass-using-secret-phones-cant-traced-talk-hillary/

 

Removing Their Fangs: A Thought Exercise on how Conservatives can Turn the Tide of the Culture Wars

wp-1473130401396.png

A Typical “Tolerant” Democrat teaching us about what real bigotry looks like.

Ironically this article was inspired by a smug article from a liberal rag called The Atlantic, which I sadly have no link to. The article basically made the argument that liberals should stop resorting to using the term bigot or any or its variations cause they are winning the culture war and they are always right, and using these terms only alienates us woefully left behind conservatives and prevents us from reaching their supposed pinnacle of excellence. In short, it was a delusional piece meant to both strokes their own ego while simultaneously trying to stop the damage caused by one of their more moronic tactics. Moronic and delusional as it was though, there were some hard truths in it that one could reflect upon. The major one being that even though we have facts and rationality on our side, Liberals are winning the cultural war.

brendan-eich-firefox

Brendan Eich was CEO of Mozilla till he was ousted for donating to a charity that supports traditional marriage.

Shocking Right? Some of you will argue with me that Trump in the Whitehouse is evidence that we are turning things around, our win last November though is important but also empty. We now control the government, but liberals control our media, our schools and colleges, our corporate culture, and have too huge an influence in our courts and in the UN. We are still losing the culture war so long as even an accusation of bigotry for having a viewpoint liberals don’t approve of can cost you your career, as long as Left Wing nutjobs can cherry pick the news and spin events to fit their narrative, so long as renegade judges can halt bills and presidential orders by issuing injunctions motivated by their political views and not the interests of the law, and so long as they can tell our children any lie they want and frame it as an essential fact. In 50 years, they have drilled their roots so deep that it will be exceedingly hard, though not impossible, to cut down their poison tree.

Identifying the Problem.

Screenshot_2017-04-28-21-17-27

Liberals use emotional Ad Hominem arguments to silence people they don’t agree with.

The biggest problem we face is a disparity in tactics. Liberals have no decency, have no tact, and resort to emotional arguments rather than logic. The number one problem we face is their go-to tactic, whenever they are on the losing side of an argument they will resort to ad hominem attacks such as calling their opponent bigoted or some variation thereof. Now, this is partially losing its steam, however, there is an observable tendency of conservatives to be less open about their political beliefs for fear of facing reprisals and/or being called racist. Why is this a problem though? I mean “Sticks and Stones” right? Well as I pointed out earlier, liberals have managed to weasel their way into dominating Higher Education and Corporate Culture through lies and money, so simply being labelled one of these things even arbitrarily can result in being fired or being failed by a teacher.

Lindsey-Graham

Lindsey Graham is one of the Sanctimonious “Never Trump”ers who would rather see the country and the Republican Party go to ruin than respect the President and support his agenda.

Another problem is the moral righteousness and timidity of conservatives. Now I use moral righteousness as a pretty relative term, what I mean by this is that conservatives are so intent on maintaining the perceived moral high ground and do not practice the same cognitive dissonance that allows liberals to call themselves tolerant and yet act in a bigoted manner towards people with differing views. A clear example of this contrast is attitudes about their values. If you discuss the 2nd Amendment with a conservative, he will support 2nd Amendment rights for anybody regardless of their political beliefs or race. If you have a similar discussion with a Liberal about the 1st Amendment they will at one moment tout its importance and in the next moment claim it should not apply to Christian Business owners or to people who voice opinions they view as hateful, and it is this very appeal to the least virtuous qualities of human nature that give them an edge. Additionally, Conservatives are timider, they have a respect for authority and are less likely to vocally and aggressively stand up for themselves. Liberals, by contrast, have no respect for any authority that does not fit their exact views, they are more likely to loudly stand up for themselves, resort to violence, and even go as far as harassing anybody committing a perceived injustice.

How did it get this bad?

severed head

A major problem Republicans need to get over is that acting with decency towards an indecent opponent will end in defeat for the Conservative Movement.

As stated above, the problem is essential that conservatives are more proper and honest, while liberals are the anything-goes type. People sadly gravitate towards anything-goes. Over the past 50 years, Liberals have been on a no holds barred attack on conservatives and their achievements, most notably fabricating a falsehood attributing the achievements of the conservatives to themselves while diverting responsibility for their malicious actions onto conservatives. In that 50 Years, conservatives have been largely on the defensive, relying on the confidence invested in them during the Cold War and staying honest and decent. The “honest” is fine, the problem is the “decent”. By no means am I suggesting we sink anywhere near their level, but at the same time it is staying on so high a horse that has led to our utter defeat.

Clinton_signing_AWB

In the past, we have signed away key rights by trying to compromise with Democrats, such as the 1994 Assault Weapon ban we see here being signed by Bill Clinton.

Another problem that contributed to this is compromise. Usually, compromise is a good thing, but conservatives should have never ever tried to compromise with liberals. The reason is simple, if you compromise with someone who wants all or nothing, they will take away your everything before you know it. Our current state of gun regulation is evidence of this, some of it is essential but many of the things we compromised on such as automatic weapons and clip capacities have opened the door for more demands and even irrational policies like the 1994 Federal Assult Weapons Ban. For those of you unfamiliar with the act, it deemed many cosmetic features of certain firearms to constitute an assault weapon based on the perceptions of senators and activists rather than any fact-based assessment by experts.

How do we Fight em?

The solution to combatting all this is simple, all of us conservatives need to collectively get off of our High Horses!! There are many ways to fight them back that are so simple and are not objectively immoral. Many of these are impolite, but it is a far cry better than letting the impolite and inscrutable run society. These are some of the simple steps I suggest:

  • Be Brutally Honest

    Brutal-Honesty

    At this point, humiliating Liberals is the only way to save our country.

    Conventional Right Wing orthodoxy promotes the idea of certain manners, like “if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all.” In the past, some conservatives have been selective about when to apply this and for all the wrong reasons. We need to throw this orthodoxy out of the window entirely for the right reasons!! LEAVE NOTHING UNCHALLENGED! Any lie, any fallacy, any point of ignorance, call them out on it. Make it loud and observable. Cite facts. Crush them and overwhelm them with the Truth!!

 

  • Do Not Back Down
    The power liberals have always held is the power of irreverence outrage. Anytime they don’t get their way there are protests, lawsuits, tirades. They used it to push their evil agenda, we can use it for good though. Don’t just silently back down next time your liberal teacher shows bias in the classroom! Make a stink, sue the school. If your boss tries to fire you because he doesn’t like your opinion, sue him for everything he has got! Get a conservative advocacy group on your side and take away the most essential thing, his business holdings. When a company or celebrity makes an ignorant remark about conservatives or tells a lie to further a left-wing agenda, Boycott them or their product! And don’t stop after an apology, let them know an empty apology is not enough. And I cannot stress enough, only do these things when there is a Legitimate reason. We don’t want to become snowflakes like the left, the entire reason to do this is to make a singular effort to remove liberals influence.

 

  • Turn their Game Against them

    wp-1481405718801.jpg

    When Ben Carson ran for President as a Republican, he was called so many different names and racial slurs by the left.

    Liberals like to call people racist to shut others down because they know it works. It can be even more effective against them. Call them and their beliefs Bigoted, Racist, Sexist, and back it up with facts. When they try to lie or make excuses based off of lies, call them out on it and repeat the accusation. Why can we get away with this? Review my initial remark, “Back it up with facts.” In short, only do this if you can factually prove there is some bigoted aspect of their remark or belief. An easy example, if they brag about being a Democrat you call them racist. Back it up with the facts surrounding the Democratic Parties Racist History. They will try to throw the Party Switch lie at you. Don’t let it stand, lay down more facts disproving the lie and use the lie as confirmation of their racism. This serves a 3-fold purpose. The first aspect is that it drives them more insane and huts them with an unimaginable emotional agony, which will likely leave them speechless or provoke them into a further display of their ignorance. The next aspect is that by using facts, you turn people against them, and it is especially important to turn people against them with the truth. Last but most important, the effect it has to chill conservative speech will apply to liberals as well. By chilling their speech, we cut out their ignorant charisma that makes them popular with impressionable people

 

  • Make Yourself Present

    young-conservative-activists

    With Liberals using Universities as centres for indoctrination, it is now more important than ever for us to have College Republican groups to push back against the intellectual Hegemony

    Many conservatives are rethinking the value of Colleges. DON’T! If anything we need MORE Conservative students in College. We need more Conservatives in the teaching profession and on school boards. We need to run for every political seat that comes up and be loud. We definitely need more Conservative Advocacy groups like F.I.R.E. The point is that liberals have stuck their noses everywhere from schools to media, to even comic books. We need to spread out everywhere, be loud, and take it back from them.

 

  • Reach out to the Youth
    Liberals are indoctrinating them as young as possible, hell apparently in New York they teach the Party Switch to lie in school as if it were a fact. And that is creepy since we are letting them shape our kid’s minds considering the left wing propensity to being sexual predators. We need to get in there and start teaching as soon as middle school. And I do not simply mean as school teachers. School Assemblies, After School Programs, both educational and fun. Yes, even a sports team is good. We need to not only teach them what we believe, we need to defy the left wing boogeyman stories and show them what kind of people we are.

 

  • Don’t Close Any Doors

    wp-1481405724063.jpg

    Many “Traditional” Conservatives reject Milo Yiannopoulos. Some say it is because of his Firebrand behaviour, however, it is quite likely they reject him for being Homosexual.

    This last one should not need to be said, but sadly it is. There is a problem in the Conservative Community, consciously or unconsciously we exclude groups of people, especially the ones the Democrats exploit. Don’t get me wrong, by no means should we change our stances just to gain votes. When I talk about exclusion problems, I refer to the fact that we exclude conservatives who are already on board for who they are or because they have new ideas. I have felt many times that my thoughts have been brushed off by my states GOP because I am a gay conservative, and even though there are plenty of Black Conservatives we do not see as many as we should even at the local governmental level. Black, Gay, Straight, White, Latino, as long as they are conservatives and legal citizens we should let them in, hear their ideas, and if they obviously qualified for it, encourage them to run for office. Left Wingers claim they are tokens, that is just proof of their bigotry and possibly an attempt to discourage you to run us. But there are a lot of us out there, and as long as we share actual conservative policy beliefs then we should be welcomed. This also serves to help us turn their game against them.

Is there any hope at this point?

Gen-Z-Conservative

Gen-Z may be the Saving Grace of the nation as well as the Republican Party. Politically, Gen-Z can most closely be aligned with Moderate Republicans, rejecting the insane far left politics of the Democratic Party.

For sure there is, though I am not going to lie to you, it is fainter every day. Europe may be totally lost to use and the EU has effectively indoctrinated the youth over there. I may actually write a piece about that at a later time. In the US there is some hope though. Most likely because of the failed policies of the Obama Regime, Generation Z is poised to be the most conservative generation before the Baby Boomers. They are Fiscally Conservative, Slightly more Liberal socially, but hold things like marriage and religious faith with higher importance than other generations. That in itself is heartwarming, a few years back I had an honest fear that democracy might need to die before Millenials are allowed to hold power as they would destroy the country or even the world. Now, that fear has long since passed with these reassuring developments.

We still have a long way to go. We cannot get lax, we need to make sure that youth stay more informed and teach them the downfalls to emotional thinking. We need to actively reach out hard to Gen Z and invest in them and new ideas they might bring. Our future really is in the youth of this country and teaching them the hypocrisy and evil behaviour of the American Left. The bottom line though is, we need to strike while the Iron is hot and win by overwhelming the enemy, the American Left.

How Did The Political World Become So Childish?

Don’t get me wrong, by no means is Trump the adult in the room. Honestly, he is more like the edgy teenage babysitter, but that is a stark contrast to the rest of the political world. Liberals and even some Conservatives have begun acting like petty children, name calling and virtue signaling and telling half-truths or outright lies to further their own agendas. This is a cliff-like decline of human quality that separates us from the founding fathers, who themselves had their own arguments and called names, but at the end of the day picked public service, not for their own agenda’s but because they had a genuine desire to serve the people. But today it is just personal agenda’s from men and women who are less concerned with serving every day American’s and more with serving their parties political interests at the citizen’s expense. There are still good men like Rand Paul who serve for the right reasons, but they are vastly outnumbered by odious individuals like John McCain, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi. How did we let things get to this point?

The flash point, where the bubble burst so to say, was November 8th, 2008. Establishment liberals were not emboldened by electing the first non-white president but by the method they used. This sickness had been festering a long time before the bubble broke though. When did the festering really start? When did all this plotting and hatred and planning start? The answer is 8 years earlier.

November 8th, 2000: It Begins

georgewbush

George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States

Well maybe November 8th exactly is a bit of a stretch, the Democrats made claims of voter fraud and fought tooth and nail to hand the election to Gore. They hadn’t truly accepted their loss till January 20th, 2001 when the Bush presidency became a done deal. Back then too they were sure Gore would win, after all despite policies that resulted in the mass incarceration of black people and the insult of calling them super predators, and for having stopped Bush Sr. from getting a second term, Clinton got a 2nd term for himself and the Democrats felt unstoppable. Back then the media was still slightly objective and didn’t try as hard to hide scandals for the left, but they still won despite their bad behavior. That, however, only lasted till 2000, when their bad behavior caught up to them and cost them the election because of the infidelity of Bill Clinton. At this point, the plotting really began.

There was initially not a lot they could do for the first 7 months of the Bush Presidency, but then the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 changed the world. While the media was still honest, the internet was still a largely overlooked technology which was only then becoming more prevalent with the rise in ownership of PCs. It was here the Democrats windfall originated, soon after the attacks the internet became filled with conspiracy theories blaming the attack on the administration and claiming it was just a pretext for war. Between this and the carnage in the 2 years following the attacks, an anti-war sentiment arose which the Democrats took advantage of. Members of the media and in Hollywood were becoming more polarized, and personalities like Michael Moore produced their own brand of propaganda that was tailor fit to influence people into believing the war was about profit. They then tied this to the entire Republican Party and tried to paint them as some elitist old men who were more concerned with lining their own pockets rather than making the nation a better place. With this, they set their eyes on the 2004 Elections with the hope of repeating their upset in 1992.

Seeding The Youth

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry pauses during a Reuters Newsmaker event on the nuclear agreement with Iran, in New York

John Kerry ran against George Bush Jr. in 2004

Needless to say, they failed miserably, by nominating John Kerry they alienated just enough voters to lose. His weak discourse and constant flip-flopping did not put a lot of confidence in voters who saw Bush as a better choice since we were still at war. I was 14 back then so I couldn’t vote, but I do remember not being able to take the Democrats seriously since they put this joker up against Bush. At this point, Millenials only now had begun to reach voting age, and a lot of Gen X’ers and Baby Boomers who made up the lions share of the voting public were not impressed. So their anti-war gambit hadn’t worked to get them the 2004 Election, but they had planted an important seed for them that would sprout in 4 years.

In the Millenials they had planted a seed of thought they had also successfully put in the minds of Gen X’ers, associating war and all the other bad things that were facing our country with the Republican Party. It was extremely effective on those who were more easily impressionable. I remember in this time in middle school, after Hurricane Katrina, a kid from a lesser grade claimed at lunch one day that Bush had caused Katrina on purpose. When I asked him how after pointing out it is impossible to control storms, he responded by claiming that Bush had a button under his desk that could create hurricanes. They had successfully created a larger than life boogy man, and in the 2008 Election between race-baiting, promises of change to a country weary of war, a tech savvy campaign using utilizing the developing social media, and a generation of voters who have come of age after 2004 and who spent their time hearing about how evil Republicans were responsible for all of the world’s woes, Barak Obama became the 44th President.

The Boil Bursts

obama_stern-face

Barack Obama Image from evil.news

A good analogy for this arc of development from 2000 till right this moment (2017) is that of a person with a boil who doesn’t see a doctor about. In the years of the Bush Administration the boil was festering, and by 2014 it had become fully infected because of the open wound. It was in the year 2009 that the Boil Burst. Republicans themselves were too late in trying their own propaganda by claiming Obama wasn’t born in America and such other strawmen (and it’s sickening they thought they had to). The left-wing became emboldened by their successful gambit, propaganda had worked for them and they had successfully made their enemies a Boogeyman the nation wanted to defeat.

After this, they continued their success by blaming the sudden economic depression on Republicans while trying to make it seem less serious by calling it a Recession. That gambit worked well for them as their followers blindly followed it along did the people of the Midwest who Elected him again in 2012. The Democrats largely controlled the media and had a substantial presence on social media which helped them win the last election. At this point, they thought they never had to put hard work into anything again, as now they could totally lie and do illegal things and there would be virtually no media voice to contradict them and which would smear or blame their accusers of some wrongdoing. They also had begun cultivating their foot soldiers on college campuses.

Screenshot_2017-04-28-21-17-27

This is an art collage that reflects what College Campuses became after 2012 or 2013 for students with conservative ideas.

Sadly I had to drop out of college in 2011 for financial reasons, but at the same time, I am glad I did because, after Obama’s 2nd Term colleges descended into a pit of ignorance and regression. Professors, especially those teaching the humanities (social justice, feminism, ECT.), began acting as propagandists by indoctrinating their students with a far left ideology that included loose justifications to discredit any views they did not like. Soon the very students at the school themselves became an effective thought police who even were able to intimidate professors who offended them by making them fear the loss of their job, all for simply saying something they did not like or agree with. Using a flawed and ignorant theory of thought called Intersectionality, they were able to create a fascist “Us or Them” mentality, where they can equate even words to violence and paint anybody who doesn’t 100% agree with them as a vicious mortal enemy. This, in turn, enhanced their roles as campus thought police, whose cries of “bigotry” to the administrators could get subjects they didn’t like banned, student groups they didn’t like shut down, speakers they did not like disinvited, and professors who actually taught fired. After all, to the intersectional social justice warriors, everyone who agreed with them was a saint and anybody who disagreed with them in the least big belonged to the enemy and could be labeled any sort of “ist”. To a generation who grew up getting participation trophies and were told they were special no matter what, to the point they perceived any contradiction or criticism about what they believe as violence, this new campus order suited them all too well.

That pervasive mentality, in turn, became adopted by liberal politicians and in turn by some of their Republican counter parts trying to keep ahead of the trends and hold on to their own power. Combined with the Democrats epiphany that they could tell any lie and be believed, this became a destructive combination that made discourse worse than ever. For example, during the 2013 shut down when Republicans had enough to filibuster over Obamacare, Obama blamed the shutdown on the Republicans rather than taking responsibility for not trying to negotiate a solution with them, and then proceeded to shut down DC monuments for dramatic effect to scare Republicans into acquiescing to his absolute authority lest they be called obstructionist or racist. They also impeded the Benghazi Investigations with accusations of sexism as well as “misplacing” documents, and when Obama started a coup in Ukraine (I suspect because he was pissed with Russia getting 1st place in Sochi and wanted to hit them back by interrupting their ability to supply gas to Europe), he accused Putin of interfering in Ukraine’s politics (what irony) and called politicians who opposed the demands of the rioters “Russian Sympathizers”, and later called the rebels against the coup imposed government “Pro-Russian Rebels” who wanted to split Ukraine. Trends like this where lies were told and names were called to polarize people and discourage them from examining facts continued all through Obama’s “Lame Duck” term as a response to problems in both domestic and foreign policy.

And Now For The Real #Resistance

Unsurprisingly some Republicans, who were trying to cling to power like Smeagol clung to the one true ring, picked up this behavior too, but I’ll talk more about that in a second. First, let’s bridge the gap between 2013 and 2016. With a ton of apathetic or self-assured liberal voters and an energized conservative base, the Democrats had severe losses in the 2016 election, including their loss in the Gubernatorial race in MD to Republican Larry Hogan. This, however, did not really do much to phase the emboldened Democrats. Obama vetoed a Obamacare repeal bill that passed the House and Senate despite the systems increasing failure and the dissatisfaction over broken promises as well as many lawsuits, and in MD the Democrats passed a law to take the power of the Governor to nominate an attorney general in the event of a vacancy (giving the power to themselves instead as they were afraid since 2 Republicans had been elected Governor in less than 15 years). They were all but assured they could continue to do whatever they wanted. 2015 began to raise an alarm though when the energized and now youth filled conservative base became louder on social media than they ever had before.

Establishment Republicans too became threatened that their old order was going to crumble, as these energized and youthful Republicans began to rally around outsiders like Donald Trump and Ben Carson. They were also concerned over new voices, like the gay conservative Milo Yinnopoulos. They wanted business as usual, Jeb Bush as the nominee and the same old 90’s and 00’s era politicians, and so they felt threatened by these new faces and attacked them with claims that they were disqualified or not real conservatives. It did not work well however as Republicans young and old were sick of the business as usual. A revolution was on that was going to crush the Democrats and shake up the order of the Republican Party.

th

Example of Meme Magic

Younger conservative internet users began to spread information or jokes all over social media via memes. Attacks on Trumps campaign promises were met with positive meme jokes whose wit outclassed their left-wing counterparts. They call it Meme Magic and users from 4-Chans /pol/ were the innovators who drove it to the stars and helped win the election with humor and information (and Clinton scandals XD). This alarmed the establishment Republicans, many of whom said they would rather see Hillary win than Trump, and enraged the left-wing who saw their ability to control people slipping. They had however already become accustomed to lying and name-calling to get their way and this was not going to change.

ap_525971738662.jpg

There is more evidence that Hillary Clinton and her campaign tried to influence the election than any other groups. – Image from the Associated Press

Almost immediately after the election, the media and Democrats began spreading the lie that Russians had hacked the election to help Trump win and they called Trump a traitor. Despite a lack of evidence and even as the narrative has started falling apart, they still continue to push this falsehood in the media and pursue fruitless investigations against Trump and his associates. Their interest is of course not to investigate whether or not the election was influenced. If it was, they should be investigating the Democrats as there is a larger abundance of evidence that suggests they manipulated government agencies and colluded with the media to protect Hillary Clinton’s image while smearing Trump’s. Despite the failure of both establishment factions of the two major parties and the nearly non-existent trust for Democrats, they are pushing forward with their pervasive lies and agendas.

That’s Great, But What Does All This Mean?

Well, that is just the set up to how we got here. This is political discourse today, they can be utter fucking retards and lie their asses off because a good chunk of the population believes whatever the media tells them. Politicians and the media lie and keep telling the lie as if it will somehow become true. And it goes beyond that too, it is not just enough to be able to lie without impunity. The left feels so threatened by their loss that they have begun a dangerous and harmful tantrum.

Screenshot_2017-03-01-22-56-46

This meme wittily expresses the unchanging attitude of the Democratic Party

Why should they work on themselves and change their approach to something worthwhile to get them elected when they can just wage war on the people and things that ensured their loss? Their first victim has been free speech, taking advantage of their well-cultivated army of mentally ill social justice warriors that their campus propaganda created, they have wound them up with hysterics thus creating the Antifa thugs the sick on anybody who expresses an evidence based idea different from or contradicting their own Nazi’s. Meanwhile, they have their goons in the media ignore those incidents, wait till conservatives defend themselves, and then claim it is right-wing violence. And of course, they also claim all of this is Trump’s fault as well as the fact their Russian Collusion lie is falling apart, so they pass unconstitutional bills to reduce his power or articles of impeachment that will never pass but still get the Democrats much-needed attention. Meanwhile, as Democrats and RINOs (Ugh, never thought I would be using that term) obstruct the president’s agenda and appointments, the establishment’s trolls lurking in the white house selectively leaking information and trying to replace Trump’s advisors with loyal establishment picks who will prevent him from pursuing the policies he promised to the American people.

Trump may seem childish at times for sure. But he is generally pretty sincere about his thoughts and outrage. But right now his opponents though act like screaming pissants children who need their nappies changed. The real adults in the room are individuals like Rand, they are hopefully what we will see more of going forward. For now, though, Trump is a marked improvement over US political dynasties and manipulative monsters. I am hoping 2018 will wipe away some of their squabbling children and hopefully, Trump will be able to strip power from those in his own administration who wish to enact a Coup against Trump. If it doesn’t though, this type of discourse will lead to war and it will not be pretty for anyone, especially not the Democrats.