The Case for the Deep State

(*Update: Even as I wrote this article, Andrew McCabe resigned from his position at the FBI.)

 

A year ago, if you told me there was some kind of Deep State within our government I would have probably laughed at you. Even with the DNC and Media trying to influence the election, the thought that there was an internal force influencing things was just too much for me to believe. A year later however, it has become clear to me that the external forces I just mentioned act in concert with an internal force within our government that is dedicated to advancing a certain agenda. The idea that a cabal of unelected officials is making decisions with no respect to the will of the American people is a scary thought, but the evidence is there. And the scariest thing is that they are seeing an unthinkable amount of success working against our president.

How Did it Start and to Whom do They Answer?

obama_stern-face

Barack Obama Image from evil.news

Make no mistake, there is no mystery as to who the Deep State works for. The Deep State really started to form in 2009, during the first term of President Barack Obama. The very nature of the Deep State itself is that it is composed of officials appointed by Barack Obama and the people they hired within multiple government agencies. As such, there is no question that the Deep State serves the political agenda of the Democratic Party, and they are willing to go as far as undermining our Republic and committing criminal acts to make sure the ill-gotten gains of the past 8 years are not undone. This includes the dismantling of their own power structure within the government agencies. The Deep State has operated with very little opposition for the past 8 years, and so like roaches that can survive a nuclear apocalypse, they are very hard to uproot.

georgewbush

George W. Bush, 43rd president of the United States

So how can I pinpoint when the Deep State was formed with such certainty? That is quite simple, looking at the 2 previous administrations as well as the current administration, one can observe the differences in resistance to the executive office’s agenda. During the Administration of George Bush, he faced average resistance, however he was able to operate a functional government and at no time were whole agencies working against him. This is typical of a presidential administration, Bush had individuals within those agencies go rouge but never an entire agency. During Barack Obamas Presidency however he did not have any agencies work against him, however they were too cooperative and acted as his cronies to attack political opposition. This is not normal at all for a Presidential Administration and it constitutes a severe breach of ethics that borders on criminal behavior. Finally, during the Trump Administration, we see whole agencies leaking partial information designed to damage the president, engaging in wasteful and clearly partisan investigations against the president, colluding against the president, dereliction of duty, all things that are so totally abnormal.

State of Unintelligence

Deep-State-Insincere-Promises

Intelligence Agencies have done a huge amount of dirty work for the Deep State.

As I mentioned before the culprits are political appointees and those hired by them, and nowhere is the behavior more brazen and more dangerous than in the intelligence communities. This first became apparent in February when reports came out that along with agents leaking information to damage the president, Intelligence agencies like the CIA were actually withholding intelligence information from President Trump. The next scandal to arise involved the fact that intelligence agencies under the Obama Administration illegally acquired FISA warrants to wiretap the phones of Trump’s Associates, using a widely discredited dossier which was paid for by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. What is really scandalous to me is that figures like FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe who knew about this and lied under oath about it are still allowed to hold onto their positions*. Even chronically dishonest Chuck Schumer Puppet James Comey was fired for his corruption.

Deep-State-Peter-Strzok-Lisa-Page

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page had exchanged a huge volume of text messages expressing their hatred of Trump before and during their involvement in the farcical Russian Collusion investigation. -Image from breitbart.com

Another big scandal involving the Deep State ridden FBI also involves the fraudulent Russia Investigation and the inadequate Clinton Email Investigation. FBI Agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page who had both worked on Robert Mullers Russia Probe were found to have expressed a clear bias against Donald Trump in messages found on their FBI Mobile Devices. This beautiful scandal has blossomed like a Bloomin Onion at Outback Steakhouse, with missing texts which were mysteriously recovered when the heat was put on the FBI. Some choice material within those texts were not just plain anti-Trump talk but also talk of a secret society to take Trump down after the election and efforts to hamper the Clinton Email investigation. Of course, predictably the Alt-Left Media continues to poo-poo the investigations and the accusations even as it blows up in their face.

Ministry of Love

Deep-State-Derrick-Watson

Derrick Watson was appointed to the Federal Bench by Barack Obama.

In George Orwell’s masterpiece about fascism “1984”, there was a so-called “Ministry of Love” that was supposed to deal out justice but instead furthered the corrupt machinations of “Big Brother”. During his 8 years in office, Obama through a series of judicial and departmental appointments managed to turn our judicial system, including the DOJ, into the Democrats own private Ministry of Love. Even now that rot exists, especially in the corrupt 9th Circut of the federal courts which have routinely tried to prevent the Trump Administration’s agenda with a series of rulings that ignored the laws of this country and served only the politics of this countries political left. Take for example the case of judge Derrick Watson, a political appointee from the Obama Regime who ruled against the Trump Travel ban 3 times based off of cases with a flimsy pretext, and has been overruled by the Supreme Court every time an appeal made it to their desk. Even after having his ruling overturned by the Supreme Court the first time, Judge Watson tried to effectively invalidate the Supreme Courts decision by presenting an opportunistic interpretation of the language of their ruling, an interpretation which also got overturned.

Deep-State-Robert-Mueller

Robert Muller was appointed to be the supposedly impartial Special Counsel into allegations of Collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russia, however, his probe has only lead to a scandal surrounding his own actions.

Next, of course, we have the phony Russian Collusion probe headed by Robert Muller, a hardcore leftist and longtime friend of James Comey. From the start of this farce, he has shown that he never intended to perform an impartial probe, opting to appoint a cavalcade of far left anti-trump judges and lawyers to his investigation team. He has also violated normal courtesies afforded to a cooperative suspect when he ordered an early morning armed raid on Paul Manaforts home where agents manhandled him and his wife, a clear attempt at intimidation. And of course, it doesn’t help that the only indictments he has filed so far are against Trump aids and their associates for alleged crimes that have no connection to the 2016 election, prompting one of them to file a lawsuit against Mueller and the DOJ. Luckily this corrupt behavior will hopefully result not just in Mueller’s Probe being ended as well as his own prosecution, we may even see other officials who have lied or contributed to the corruption going down with Mueller.

Goebbels Wet Dream

Deep-State-Mainstream-Media-Propaganda

The Mainstream media has managed to become a running joke.

“Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own will.” When Hitler’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels said this I am sure he never dreamed it would apply so well to the American Mainstream Media. Then again, due to how ridiculous they are he may have been a bit dismayed that they have undertaken the task of being the propaganda mouthpiece of the Democratic Party in such a crude manner. After all, there is no way to effectively push propaganda when your headlines revolve around how many scoops of ice cream somebody gets. When you peddle stuff like that as well as easily debunked lies, well you just aren’t peddling effective propaganda to the masses.

journalists-wiki-tw

Most “Mainstream Media” Outlets colluded with Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Election

Of course, thanks to the WikiLeaks dump of the DNC and podesta emails, only the most willfully ignorant can pretend that they are impartial agents of truth. Thanks to the WikiLeaks dumps of the DNC and Podesta emails, we know for a fact that the DNC and Hillary colluded with the Media in an inappropriate manner. Thanks to Julian Assange, we now know who colluded with the Clintons and what networks they were a part of, but sadly we also have reason never to trust the mainstream media again. Notable outlets and publications, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Hill, The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Washington Post, CNN, these supposed trustworthy scoursed were in direct contact with the Clinton Campaign to ensure coverage of her was positive and even to coordinate stories. In addition to them were biased Alt-Left outlets like The Huffington Post, The Guardian, Vox, Buzzfeed, Vice, Now This, outlets only popular with the most radical leftists and which we never expected honesty from. The additional issue though is how unprecedented it is for a political campaign to direct the media during an election year about what to report and how to report it. Then again though, Democrats resorted to Fascism for the past 8 years, it was only a matter of time before they took a page from Goebbels playbook.

Not so Private Enterprise

Deep-State-Social-Media-Hydra

Social Media and Tech Companies have shown an extreme left-wing bias for a long time now.

A new social trend has been to get news from social media as these sites have convenient features that show you “trending” stories from sites tailored to your preferences. At least that is what they say, in reality, though they have demonstrated a long-term and established bias against conservative ideas and voices. Websites like Facebook routinely ban and block conservative-leaning accounts that post offensive memes.  while turning a blind eye to left-leaning accounts that promote criminal activity. Instagram banned a conservative comedy group without giving any explanation of what rules they violated if they violated any at all. And along with banning Milo Yiannopolous on a flimsy pretext, Twitter also was caught suppressing a hashtag critical of Hillary Clinton.

Deep-State-Tech-Bias

The thought that information or things like your phone can be used to try and manipulate your opinion is terrifying.

Other tech giants have been demonstrably biased, and this should really scare us as these tech giants I mention produce the software for that phone you are likely reading this on. One example is apple, in 2016 they rejected a game poking fun at Hillary Clinton despite having an overwhelming number of Anti-Trump games. Amazon’s Alexa digital assistant has been making rounds in the news lately as it was discovered the AI is programmed with a pro-leftist political agenda. What alarms me most is the behavior of Google, the worlds largest search engine was caught burying search suggestions critical of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. Google is also currently facing a lawsuit from 2 former employees for wrongful termination, in which details highlighting googles systematic discrimination against heterosexuals, whites, men, and conservatives have come to light.

Pervers de Noblesse Oblige

George-Soros-1

Billionaire and Former Nazi George Soros

Among the outlying Deep State actors are a group of extremely rich people telling poor people what is best for them cause they are their allies and other rich people are the enemies. Shady and possibly Faustian Power Broker George Soros is a prime example. Known for his funding of the criminal “Community Activism” group A.C.O.R.N. which engaged in numerous criminal acts, he has an extensive resume of trying to influence politics worldwide. Of recent interest, he has also been caught giving funding to an ANTIFA domestic terrorist group. The DOJ is now investigating this as well and hopefully, this will lead to an indictment against Soros. He was also one of the largest campaign contributors to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential run.

Deep-State-Moby

Artist Moby Lectured the Electoral College on decency. He is one to talk right?

Soros is not the only Billionaire putting his pen in the Deep State ink, a prominent sufferer of TDS Tom Steyer has dumped millions of dollars into an ad campaign calling for Trumps Impeachment. The impeachable offense he invokes is Treason, the Treasonous act of pulling out of the Paris Climate accord which asked our country to take a hit to our economy while leaving the worlds highest polluters to go on with business as usual. Speaking of TDS, remember how a bunch of celebrities who donated millions to Clinton pleaded for Republican members of the Electoral College to ignore the choice of the people they are supposed to represent? Luckily America is sick of their hypocrisy though, especially considering their seedy underworld of rapists and perverts they shelter. The damage they have done though is innumerable as for decades they have been putting their money behind corrupt politicians and acting as mouthpieces for the agenda of the American left wing. If there were ideological diversity in Hollywood this would be a different matter entirely. Sadly this is not the case, Hollywood Conservatives often face rejection and blacklisting from the “open” and “tolerant” Hollywood Left.

How do These Dots Connect?

Deep-State-Swamp-Monster

The Deep State Runs Deep within the DC Beltway

Believe it or not, while some of these are seemingly unrelated they are connected in one way or another. From top to bottom, The rich fund the politicians who appoint the officials who work against the opposition while the media ignores the scandals and the famous instruct the masses what to think and the tech companies control the flow of information. I know it sounds convoluted. To simplify it, all of these things are connected to the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is the root of the Deep State, because as you will notice all of the actions of the Deep State benefit them from the Uranium One Deal to the bogus Russian Collusion Probe.

wp-1473130401396.png

Thanks to their hypocritical bullshit along with greater awareness, younger people have begun to reject the Democratic Party which created the deep state more and more.

How do we fix the Problem? Well first would be to purge the Government agencies of Obama Era Appointees, the elements within the government are the only part of the deep state that poses an actual threat and ties it all together. But as Mr. F.L.A.G. covered in his piece about political appointee’s, this is very hard to do. Since the Democratic Party is the real problem and since they have engaged in criminal behavior with criminal elements, a Federal RICO case resulting in arrests and their dismantlement would work. This would also take care of Deep State elements in other area’s I mentioned if they are found to have knowingly contributed to criminal behavior. The best part of this is that it does not really harm our Democracy, another party like the Green Party or Libertarians can fill in that political void. But this is all a moot point as we are a long way off before any solution is possible, but the good news is that it looks like we are winning the battle.

Advertisements

What The Strzok Is Going On?

original unaltered image from wikimedia.org

For those of you not paying attention during the Obama Administration, it may come as a surprise just how politicized the government itself has become. I’m not talking about the elected folks, by the very nature of their jobs it’s a given that they will be politicized, I mean the bureaucracy itself. The un-elected masses that make the government work, appointees and employees alike.

Appointees are of course going to be political, but they are in a separate class from Congressmen and Presidents and members of a President’s cabinet. All of those guys have a chance to be ousted every 2-4 years. Appointees though? Forget it! Unless they are fired (which is very hard because the Supreme Court ruled that government jobs were actually private property, belonging to the people that hold them1), die, quit, or maybe for some reach a mandatory retirement age, we’re stuck with them long after the voters have determined that they hate the Administration that put them there. This contrasts with government employees, who are basically like appointees except they advance through skill or nepotism rather than the whims of the President and Congress.

Judicial Use Of Force

     What happens when all of these people become entrenched in our system? Well, let’s focus on the Judicial Branch to see (there is a 33% chance that you have no idea what I’m talking about when I say “Judicial Branch”, based on a recent Annenburg Public Policy Center poll, so stop here and look it up or just keep nodding as though you understand). Remember earlier this year all of that hubbub over President Trump’s travel ban? Amidst legal challenges, the Supreme Court declared it Constitutional. However, the judges challenging it were all leftwing appointees. The law states clearly that Trump had the authority to do what he did, SCOTUS upheld that in a 7-2 vote, yet these judges were out there saying what Trump did was illegal.

Executive Decision

     Already you can see that the law is up for grabs because of judges that are political appointees unless you have enough money and time to take it to the Supreme Court (yes it works for both sides of the aisle, but after the Obamacare rulings11,11A it seems liberals

Supreme_Court_US_2010

Why is Ginsberg on the far right? Maybe this is a colored Daguerreotype. -image from wikimedia.org

keep winning, and liberals are a bit looser with the rules anyway10, plus there’s a lot more of them9), but now let’s cross over into the Executive Branch and see how law enforcement itself is affected. I could cite the soft takeover, as seen in Baltimore. Ever since the Freddy Gray case, police have been noticeably reticent to do their jobs, and so the murder rate shot through the roof5,5A. This is part of the so-called Ferguson Effect5A, where police are hesitant to do their jobs around minorities because of zealous prosecutors and a judgmental public, fueled by negative media coverage of the police giving their local actions national attention. I call it a ‘soft takeover’ because it matches the Left’s doctrine of giving privileged status to select minority groups, in this case by pressuring police to stop enforcing the law around them. Don’t believe me? Explain why white people need to shut up12. Explain sanctuary cities, which are blatantly in violation of the law, and how it’s always characterized as benefiting the Latino community and used for gaining Latino votes.

But that’s the more subtle takeover, let’s get to the big headliner today: the FBI. The one group that’s supposed to be above reproach. Local police might be bigoted or incompetent, as AG Eric Holder thought when he ordered the investigation of the Ferguson Police Department, but certainly not the FBI. If you’ll recall, the Left was arguing that nationalizing the police was the best way to deal with bias8. So what would that nationalized police force look like?

The First Thing We Do, Let’s Bias All The Lawyers

     It would look like Special Counsel Mueller’s investigative team, of course. Politifact6, often biased to the Left, tells us that Of the 9 prosecutors on Mueller’s team who have donated to campaigns, there’s a 15-1 ratio in favor of Democrats as to whom the donations went. Of course, Politifact isn’t a very good source, they counted 15 prosecutors when at that point there would’ve been 16 to consider7. A steadfast Democrat donor who defended Obama’s immigration action in 2014 was brought onboard. Plus, several other folks on it had ties to the Clintons too, though Politifact is quite nebulous as to how the spread looks or if those involved with the Clintons had not donated, thus bringing the bias figure from 10 to possibly 12, out of 16.

Agents Of Change

     It’s more than just the lawyers though! We also have FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who has come to symbolize the bias on the team as of late. Mueller kicked him out, though I agree with Rep. Jim Jordan2 in wondering why, since so many others on the team were clearly biased too. But Strzok is a special case. In 2016, he edited then-FBI Director Comey’s exoneration statement about Hillary Clinton- specifically, he changed the wording from “Grossly negligent” (which the law says is a crime) to “extremely careless”2. Quite a change indeed, basically going from admitting that Clinton behaved illegally to saying she did the equivalent of crossing the street without looking both ways first. Strzok’s bias was in favor of Hillary, in case it wasn’t obvious. He set up the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton so that other people involved in the alleged crime were in the room with her, an unprecedented arrangement2 which obviously shows Strzok favored her.

ap_525971738662.jpg

WaPo alleges that Strzok was using an untraceable phone merely to hide his office romance, an explanation that is clearly fake news because Strzok’s true love is not known for using secure devices. – Image from Associated Press

Now we come to his text messages, sent using an allegedly untraceable FBI phone or some such (according to the texts themselves13). Strzok mentions in them a meeting where an “insurance policy” was discussed, in case Trump won13. He also mentioned that “we”, at least meaning himself and someone else at the FBI, could not take the risk of Trump getting elected3. And shortly thereafter, in the same month, the FBI starts its investigation into Trump-Russia collusion3. What a coincidence! Strzok, by the way, at the time was deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI2.

With Liberty And Justice For… The Left

     Even under Trump, it’s clear that the Left still can do plenty of damage- biased court decisions, biased legal teams, biased FBI agents in powerful positions. The Left would love nothing more than to make opposition to it illegal. We see this incubating on college campuses right now, and those snowflakes will be the avalanche that sweeps away our government in the future. But it’s not just them, this bit of typing called to mind Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issuing a terror threat assessment that declared rightwing extremists can include returning military veterans, pro-life, and anti-illegal immigration people4. Meaning like half the country at least are potential rightwing extremist terrorists and should be watched. That was in 2009; we had 7 more years of Obama bringing in people that think like that. Mueller’s team and Peter Strzok, in particular, aren’t even the tip of the iceberg, they’re the carbon molecule that came to rest on top of it!

Sources

  1. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2002/07/what_are_civil_service_protections.html                  1A. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1978/12/24/when-a-job-becomes-property-its-hard-to-fire-a-civil-servant/d503e8c9-cdfd-4d2f-a594-c2e1912bac1a/?utm_term=.9c188944eba6
  2. https://www.c-span.org/video/?438042-1/fbi-director-responds-president-trumps-attacks-agency
  3. https://www.c-span.org/video/?438282-1/deputy-attorney-general-good-fire-special-counsel
  4. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/                    4A. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dhs-domestic-terror-warning-angers-gop/
  5. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-baltimore-police-hiring-insight/baltimore-saw-steep-fall-in-police-numbers-as-murder-rate-soared-idUSKCN0ZN0BF                                                5A. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/11/ferguson-effect-study-72-us-cops-reluctant-make-stops/96446504/
  6. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2017/nov/03/sean-duffy/how-many-democrat-campaign-donors-special-counsel-/
  7. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/16/another-obama-clinton-donor-joins-muellers-legal-team-investigating-trump-campaign.html
  8. http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/a-nationalized-police-force-would-be-a-logistical-tactical-and-ethical-nightmare
  9. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-obama/obamas-judges-leave-liberal-imprint-on-u-s-law-idUSKCN1110BC
  10. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-judiciary/344468-liberal-disregard-of-judicial-deference-undermines-faith-in
  11. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/25/john-roberts-supreme-court-obamacare-editorials-debates/29301349/                                                                                                    11A. https://cei.org/blog/supreme-court-rewrites-obamacare-again
  12. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/24/dnc_chair_candidate_my_job_is_to_tell_white_people_when_to_shut_their_mouths.html
  13. http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/senate-judiciary-chair-grassley-demands-answers-insurance-policy-trump-victory-fbi-brass-using-secret-phones-cant-traced-talk-hillary/

 

Removing Their Fangs: A Thought Exercise on how Conservatives can Turn the Tide of the Culture Wars

wp-1473130401396.png

A Typical “Tolerant” Democrat teaching us about what real bigotry looks like.

Ironically this article was inspired by a smug article from a liberal rag called The Atlantic, which I sadly have no link to. The article basically made the argument that liberals should stop resorting to using the term bigot or any or its variations cause they are winning the culture war and they are always right, and using these terms only alienates us woefully left behind conservatives and prevents us from reaching their supposed pinnacle of excellence. In short, it was a delusional piece meant to both strokes their own ego while simultaneously trying to stop the damage caused by one of their more moronic tactics. Moronic and delusional as it was though, there were some hard truths in it that one could reflect upon. The major one being that even though we have facts and rationality on our side, Liberals are winning the cultural war.

brendan-eich-firefox

Brendan Eich was CEO of Mozilla till he was ousted for donating to a charity that supports traditional marriage.

Shocking Right? Some of you will argue with me that Trump in the Whitehouse is evidence that we are turning things around, our win last November though is important but also empty. We now control the government, but liberals control our media, our schools and colleges, our corporate culture, and have too huge an influence in our courts and in the UN. We are still losing the culture war so long as even an accusation of bigotry for having a viewpoint liberals don’t approve of can cost you your career, as long as Left Wing nutjobs can cherry pick the news and spin events to fit their narrative, so long as renegade judges can halt bills and presidential orders by issuing injunctions motivated by their political views and not the interests of the law, and so long as they can tell our children any lie they want and frame it as an essential fact. In 50 years, they have drilled their roots so deep that it will be exceedingly hard, though not impossible, to cut down their poison tree.

Identifying the Problem.

Screenshot_2017-04-28-21-17-27

Liberals use emotional Ad Hominem arguments to silence people they don’t agree with.

The biggest problem we face is a disparity in tactics. Liberals have no decency, have no tact, and resort to emotional arguments rather than logic. The number one problem we face is their go-to tactic, whenever they are on the losing side of an argument they will resort to ad hominem attacks such as calling their opponent bigoted or some variation thereof. Now, this is partially losing its steam, however, there is an observable tendency of conservatives to be less open about their political beliefs for fear of facing reprisals and/or being called racist. Why is this a problem though? I mean “Sticks and Stones” right? Well as I pointed out earlier, liberals have managed to weasel their way into dominating Higher Education and Corporate Culture through lies and money, so simply being labelled one of these things even arbitrarily can result in being fired or being failed by a teacher.

Lindsey-Graham

Lindsey Graham is one of the Sanctimonious “Never Trump”ers who would rather see the country and the Republican Party go to ruin than respect the President and support his agenda.

Another problem is the moral righteousness and timidity of conservatives. Now I use moral righteousness as a pretty relative term, what I mean by this is that conservatives are so intent on maintaining the perceived moral high ground and do not practice the same cognitive dissonance that allows liberals to call themselves tolerant and yet act in a bigoted manner towards people with differing views. A clear example of this contrast is attitudes about their values. If you discuss the 2nd Amendment with a conservative, he will support 2nd Amendment rights for anybody regardless of their political beliefs or race. If you have a similar discussion with a Liberal about the 1st Amendment they will at one moment tout its importance and in the next moment claim it should not apply to Christian Business owners or to people who voice opinions they view as hateful, and it is this very appeal to the least virtuous qualities of human nature that give them an edge. Additionally, Conservatives are timider, they have a respect for authority and are less likely to vocally and aggressively stand up for themselves. Liberals, by contrast, have no respect for any authority that does not fit their exact views, they are more likely to loudly stand up for themselves, resort to violence, and even go as far as harassing anybody committing a perceived injustice.

How did it get this bad?

severed head

A major problem Republicans need to get over is that acting with decency towards an indecent opponent will end in defeat for the Conservative Movement.

As stated above, the problem is essential that conservatives are more proper and honest, while liberals are the anything-goes type. People sadly gravitate towards anything-goes. Over the past 50 years, Liberals have been on a no holds barred attack on conservatives and their achievements, most notably fabricating a falsehood attributing the achievements of the conservatives to themselves while diverting responsibility for their malicious actions onto conservatives. In that 50 Years, conservatives have been largely on the defensive, relying on the confidence invested in them during the Cold War and staying honest and decent. The “honest” is fine, the problem is the “decent”. By no means am I suggesting we sink anywhere near their level, but at the same time it is staying on so high a horse that has led to our utter defeat.

Clinton_signing_AWB

In the past, we have signed away key rights by trying to compromise with Democrats, such as the 1994 Assault Weapon ban we see here being signed by Bill Clinton.

Another problem that contributed to this is compromise. Usually, compromise is a good thing, but conservatives should have never ever tried to compromise with liberals. The reason is simple, if you compromise with someone who wants all or nothing, they will take away your everything before you know it. Our current state of gun regulation is evidence of this, some of it is essential but many of the things we compromised on such as automatic weapons and clip capacities have opened the door for more demands and even irrational policies like the 1994 Federal Assult Weapons Ban. For those of you unfamiliar with the act, it deemed many cosmetic features of certain firearms to constitute an assault weapon based on the perceptions of senators and activists rather than any fact-based assessment by experts.

How do we Fight em?

The solution to combatting all this is simple, all of us conservatives need to collectively get off of our High Horses!! There are many ways to fight them back that are so simple and are not objectively immoral. Many of these are impolite, but it is a far cry better than letting the impolite and inscrutable run society. These are some of the simple steps I suggest:

  • Be Brutally Honest

    Brutal-Honesty

    At this point, humiliating Liberals is the only way to save our country.

    Conventional Right Wing orthodoxy promotes the idea of certain manners, like “if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all.” In the past, some conservatives have been selective about when to apply this and for all the wrong reasons. We need to throw this orthodoxy out of the window entirely for the right reasons!! LEAVE NOTHING UNCHALLENGED! Any lie, any fallacy, any point of ignorance, call them out on it. Make it loud and observable. Cite facts. Crush them and overwhelm them with the Truth!!

 

  • Do Not Back Down
    The power liberals have always held is the power of irreverence outrage. Anytime they don’t get their way there are protests, lawsuits, tirades. They used it to push their evil agenda, we can use it for good though. Don’t just silently back down next time your liberal teacher shows bias in the classroom! Make a stink, sue the school. If your boss tries to fire you because he doesn’t like your opinion, sue him for everything he has got! Get a conservative advocacy group on your side and take away the most essential thing, his business holdings. When a company or celebrity makes an ignorant remark about conservatives or tells a lie to further a left-wing agenda, Boycott them or their product! And don’t stop after an apology, let them know an empty apology is not enough. And I cannot stress enough, only do these things when there is a Legitimate reason. We don’t want to become snowflakes like the left, the entire reason to do this is to make a singular effort to remove liberals influence.

 

  • Turn their Game Against them

    wp-1481405718801.jpg

    When Ben Carson ran for President as a Republican, he was called so many different names and racial slurs by the left.

    Liberals like to call people racist to shut others down because they know it works. It can be even more effective against them. Call them and their beliefs Bigoted, Racist, Sexist, and back it up with facts. When they try to lie or make excuses based off of lies, call them out on it and repeat the accusation. Why can we get away with this? Review my initial remark, “Back it up with facts.” In short, only do this if you can factually prove there is some bigoted aspect of their remark or belief. An easy example, if they brag about being a Democrat you call them racist. Back it up with the facts surrounding the Democratic Parties Racist History. They will try to throw the Party Switch lie at you. Don’t let it stand, lay down more facts disproving the lie and use the lie as confirmation of their racism. This serves a 3-fold purpose. The first aspect is that it drives them more insane and huts them with an unimaginable emotional agony, which will likely leave them speechless or provoke them into a further display of their ignorance. The next aspect is that by using facts, you turn people against them, and it is especially important to turn people against them with the truth. Last but most important, the effect it has to chill conservative speech will apply to liberals as well. By chilling their speech, we cut out their ignorant charisma that makes them popular with impressionable people

 

  • Make Yourself Present

    young-conservative-activists

    With Liberals using Universities as centres for indoctrination, it is now more important than ever for us to have College Republican groups to push back against the intellectual Hegemony

    Many conservatives are rethinking the value of Colleges. DON’T! If anything we need MORE Conservative students in College. We need more Conservatives in the teaching profession and on school boards. We need to run for every political seat that comes up and be loud. We definitely need more Conservative Advocacy groups like F.I.R.E. The point is that liberals have stuck their noses everywhere from schools to media, to even comic books. We need to spread out everywhere, be loud, and take it back from them.

 

  • Reach out to the Youth
    Liberals are indoctrinating them as young as possible, hell apparently in New York they teach the Party Switch to lie in school as if it were a fact. And that is creepy since we are letting them shape our kid’s minds considering the left wing propensity to being sexual predators. We need to get in there and start teaching as soon as middle school. And I do not simply mean as school teachers. School Assemblies, After School Programs, both educational and fun. Yes, even a sports team is good. We need to not only teach them what we believe, we need to defy the left wing boogeyman stories and show them what kind of people we are.

 

  • Don’t Close Any Doors

    wp-1481405724063.jpg

    Many “Traditional” Conservatives reject Milo Yiannopoulos. Some say it is because of his Firebrand behaviour, however, it is quite likely they reject him for being Homosexual.

    This last one should not need to be said, but sadly it is. There is a problem in the Conservative Community, consciously or unconsciously we exclude groups of people, especially the ones the Democrats exploit. Don’t get me wrong, by no means should we change our stances just to gain votes. When I talk about exclusion problems, I refer to the fact that we exclude conservatives who are already on board for who they are or because they have new ideas. I have felt many times that my thoughts have been brushed off by my states GOP because I am a gay conservative, and even though there are plenty of Black Conservatives we do not see as many as we should even at the local governmental level. Black, Gay, Straight, White, Latino, as long as they are conservatives and legal citizens we should let them in, hear their ideas, and if they obviously qualified for it, encourage them to run for office. Left Wingers claim they are tokens, that is just proof of their bigotry and possibly an attempt to discourage you to run us. But there are a lot of us out there, and as long as we share actual conservative policy beliefs then we should be welcomed. This also serves to help us turn their game against them.

Is there any hope at this point?

Gen-Z-Conservative

Gen-Z may be the Saving Grace of the nation as well as the Republican Party. Politically, Gen-Z can most closely be aligned with Moderate Republicans, rejecting the insane far left politics of the Democratic Party.

For sure there is, though I am not going to lie to you, it is fainter every day. Europe may be totally lost to use and the EU has effectively indoctrinated the youth over there. I may actually write a piece about that at a later time. In the US there is some hope though. Most likely because of the failed policies of the Obama Regime, Generation Z is poised to be the most conservative generation before the Baby Boomers. They are Fiscally Conservative, Slightly more Liberal socially, but hold things like marriage and religious faith with higher importance than other generations. That in itself is heartwarming, a few years back I had an honest fear that democracy might need to die before Millenials are allowed to hold power as they would destroy the country or even the world. Now, that fear has long since passed with these reassuring developments.

We still have a long way to go. We cannot get lax, we need to make sure that youth stay more informed and teach them the downfalls to emotional thinking. We need to actively reach out hard to Gen Z and invest in them and new ideas they might bring. Our future really is in the youth of this country and teaching them the hypocrisy and evil behaviour of the American Left. The bottom line though is, we need to strike while the Iron is hot and win by overwhelming the enemy, the American Left.

How Did The Political World Become So Childish?

Don’t get me wrong, by no means is Trump the adult in the room. Honestly, he is more like the edgy teenage babysitter, but that is a stark contrast to the rest of the political world. Liberals and even some Conservatives have begun acting like petty children, name calling and virtue signaling and telling half-truths or outright lies to further their own agendas. This is a cliff-like decline of human quality that separates us from the founding fathers, who themselves had their own arguments and called names, but at the end of the day picked public service, not for their own agenda’s but because they had a genuine desire to serve the people. But today it is just personal agenda’s from men and women who are less concerned with serving every day American’s and more with serving their parties political interests at the citizen’s expense. There are still good men like Rand Paul who serve for the right reasons, but they are vastly outnumbered by odious individuals like John McCain, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi. How did we let things get to this point?

The flash point, where the bubble burst so to say, was November 8th, 2008. Establishment liberals were not emboldened by electing the first non-white president but by the method they used. This sickness had been festering a long time before the bubble broke though. When did the festering really start? When did all this plotting and hatred and planning start? The answer is 8 years earlier.

November 8th, 2000: It Begins

georgewbush

George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States

Well maybe November 8th exactly is a bit of a stretch, the Democrats made claims of voter fraud and fought tooth and nail to hand the election to Gore. They hadn’t truly accepted their loss till January 20th, 2001 when the Bush presidency became a done deal. Back then too they were sure Gore would win, after all despite policies that resulted in the mass incarceration of black people and the insult of calling them super predators, and for having stopped Bush Sr. from getting a second term, Clinton got a 2nd term for himself and the Democrats felt unstoppable. Back then the media was still slightly objective and didn’t try as hard to hide scandals for the left, but they still won despite their bad behavior. That, however, only lasted till 2000, when their bad behavior caught up to them and cost them the election because of the infidelity of Bill Clinton. At this point, the plotting really began.

There was initially not a lot they could do for the first 7 months of the Bush Presidency, but then the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 changed the world. While the media was still honest, the internet was still a largely overlooked technology which was only then becoming more prevalent with the rise in ownership of PCs. It was here the Democrats windfall originated, soon after the attacks the internet became filled with conspiracy theories blaming the attack on the administration and claiming it was just a pretext for war. Between this and the carnage in the 2 years following the attacks, an anti-war sentiment arose which the Democrats took advantage of. Members of the media and in Hollywood were becoming more polarized, and personalities like Michael Moore produced their own brand of propaganda that was tailor fit to influence people into believing the war was about profit. They then tied this to the entire Republican Party and tried to paint them as some elitist old men who were more concerned with lining their own pockets rather than making the nation a better place. With this, they set their eyes on the 2004 Elections with the hope of repeating their upset in 1992.

Seeding The Youth

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry pauses during a Reuters Newsmaker event on the nuclear agreement with Iran, in New York

John Kerry ran against George Bush Jr. in 2004

Needless to say, they failed miserably, by nominating John Kerry they alienated just enough voters to lose. His weak discourse and constant flip-flopping did not put a lot of confidence in voters who saw Bush as a better choice since we were still at war. I was 14 back then so I couldn’t vote, but I do remember not being able to take the Democrats seriously since they put this joker up against Bush. At this point, Millenials only now had begun to reach voting age, and a lot of Gen X’ers and Baby Boomers who made up the lions share of the voting public were not impressed. So their anti-war gambit hadn’t worked to get them the 2004 Election, but they had planted an important seed for them that would sprout in 4 years.

In the Millenials they had planted a seed of thought they had also successfully put in the minds of Gen X’ers, associating war and all the other bad things that were facing our country with the Republican Party. It was extremely effective on those who were more easily impressionable. I remember in this time in middle school, after Hurricane Katrina, a kid from a lesser grade claimed at lunch one day that Bush had caused Katrina on purpose. When I asked him how after pointing out it is impossible to control storms, he responded by claiming that Bush had a button under his desk that could create hurricanes. They had successfully created a larger than life boogy man, and in the 2008 Election between race-baiting, promises of change to a country weary of war, a tech savvy campaign using utilizing the developing social media, and a generation of voters who have come of age after 2004 and who spent their time hearing about how evil Republicans were responsible for all of the world’s woes, Barak Obama became the 44th President.

The Boil Bursts

obama_stern-face

Barack Obama Image from evil.news

A good analogy for this arc of development from 2000 till right this moment (2017) is that of a person with a boil who doesn’t see a doctor about. In the years of the Bush Administration the boil was festering, and by 2014 it had become fully infected because of the open wound. It was in the year 2009 that the Boil Burst. Republicans themselves were too late in trying their own propaganda by claiming Obama wasn’t born in America and such other strawmen (and it’s sickening they thought they had to). The left-wing became emboldened by their successful gambit, propaganda had worked for them and they had successfully made their enemies a Boogeyman the nation wanted to defeat.

After this, they continued their success by blaming the sudden economic depression on Republicans while trying to make it seem less serious by calling it a Recession. That gambit worked well for them as their followers blindly followed it along did the people of the Midwest who Elected him again in 2012. The Democrats largely controlled the media and had a substantial presence on social media which helped them win the last election. At this point, they thought they never had to put hard work into anything again, as now they could totally lie and do illegal things and there would be virtually no media voice to contradict them and which would smear or blame their accusers of some wrongdoing. They also had begun cultivating their foot soldiers on college campuses.

Screenshot_2017-04-28-21-17-27

This is an art collage that reflects what College Campuses became after 2012 or 2013 for students with conservative ideas.

Sadly I had to drop out of college in 2011 for financial reasons, but at the same time, I am glad I did because, after Obama’s 2nd Term colleges descended into a pit of ignorance and regression. Professors, especially those teaching the humanities (social justice, feminism, ECT.), began acting as propagandists by indoctrinating their students with a far left ideology that included loose justifications to discredit any views they did not like. Soon the very students at the school themselves became an effective thought police who even were able to intimidate professors who offended them by making them fear the loss of their job, all for simply saying something they did not like or agree with. Using a flawed and ignorant theory of thought called Intersectionality, they were able to create a fascist “Us or Them” mentality, where they can equate even words to violence and paint anybody who doesn’t 100% agree with them as a vicious mortal enemy. This, in turn, enhanced their roles as campus thought police, whose cries of “bigotry” to the administrators could get subjects they didn’t like banned, student groups they didn’t like shut down, speakers they did not like disinvited, and professors who actually taught fired. After all, to the intersectional social justice warriors, everyone who agreed with them was a saint and anybody who disagreed with them in the least big belonged to the enemy and could be labeled any sort of “ist”. To a generation who grew up getting participation trophies and were told they were special no matter what, to the point they perceived any contradiction or criticism about what they believe as violence, this new campus order suited them all too well.

That pervasive mentality, in turn, became adopted by liberal politicians and in turn by some of their Republican counter parts trying to keep ahead of the trends and hold on to their own power. Combined with the Democrats epiphany that they could tell any lie and be believed, this became a destructive combination that made discourse worse than ever. For example, during the 2013 shut down when Republicans had enough to filibuster over Obamacare, Obama blamed the shutdown on the Republicans rather than taking responsibility for not trying to negotiate a solution with them, and then proceeded to shut down DC monuments for dramatic effect to scare Republicans into acquiescing to his absolute authority lest they be called obstructionist or racist. They also impeded the Benghazi Investigations with accusations of sexism as well as “misplacing” documents, and when Obama started a coup in Ukraine (I suspect because he was pissed with Russia getting 1st place in Sochi and wanted to hit them back by interrupting their ability to supply gas to Europe), he accused Putin of interfering in Ukraine’s politics (what irony) and called politicians who opposed the demands of the rioters “Russian Sympathizers”, and later called the rebels against the coup imposed government “Pro-Russian Rebels” who wanted to split Ukraine. Trends like this where lies were told and names were called to polarize people and discourage them from examining facts continued all through Obama’s “Lame Duck” term as a response to problems in both domestic and foreign policy.

And Now For The Real #Resistance

Unsurprisingly some Republicans, who were trying to cling to power like Smeagol clung to the one true ring, picked up this behavior too, but I’ll talk more about that in a second. First, let’s bridge the gap between 2013 and 2016. With a ton of apathetic or self-assured liberal voters and an energized conservative base, the Democrats had severe losses in the 2016 election, including their loss in the Gubernatorial race in MD to Republican Larry Hogan. This, however, did not really do much to phase the emboldened Democrats. Obama vetoed a Obamacare repeal bill that passed the House and Senate despite the systems increasing failure and the dissatisfaction over broken promises as well as many lawsuits, and in MD the Democrats passed a law to take the power of the Governor to nominate an attorney general in the event of a vacancy (giving the power to themselves instead as they were afraid since 2 Republicans had been elected Governor in less than 15 years). They were all but assured they could continue to do whatever they wanted. 2015 began to raise an alarm though when the energized and now youth filled conservative base became louder on social media than they ever had before.

Establishment Republicans too became threatened that their old order was going to crumble, as these energized and youthful Republicans began to rally around outsiders like Donald Trump and Ben Carson. They were also concerned over new voices, like the gay conservative Milo Yinnopoulos. They wanted business as usual, Jeb Bush as the nominee and the same old 90’s and 00’s era politicians, and so they felt threatened by these new faces and attacked them with claims that they were disqualified or not real conservatives. It did not work well however as Republicans young and old were sick of the business as usual. A revolution was on that was going to crush the Democrats and shake up the order of the Republican Party.

th

Example of Meme Magic

Younger conservative internet users began to spread information or jokes all over social media via memes. Attacks on Trumps campaign promises were met with positive meme jokes whose wit outclassed their left-wing counterparts. They call it Meme Magic and users from 4-Chans /pol/ were the innovators who drove it to the stars and helped win the election with humor and information (and Clinton scandals XD). This alarmed the establishment Republicans, many of whom said they would rather see Hillary win than Trump, and enraged the left-wing who saw their ability to control people slipping. They had however already become accustomed to lying and name-calling to get their way and this was not going to change.

ap_525971738662.jpg

There is more evidence that Hillary Clinton and her campaign tried to influence the election than any other groups. – Image from the Associated Press

Almost immediately after the election, the media and Democrats began spreading the lie that Russians had hacked the election to help Trump win and they called Trump a traitor. Despite a lack of evidence and even as the narrative has started falling apart, they still continue to push this falsehood in the media and pursue fruitless investigations against Trump and his associates. Their interest is of course not to investigate whether or not the election was influenced. If it was, they should be investigating the Democrats as there is a larger abundance of evidence that suggests they manipulated government agencies and colluded with the media to protect Hillary Clinton’s image while smearing Trump’s. Despite the failure of both establishment factions of the two major parties and the nearly non-existent trust for Democrats, they are pushing forward with their pervasive lies and agendas.

That’s Great, But What Does All This Mean?

Well, that is just the set up to how we got here. This is political discourse today, they can be utter fucking retards and lie their asses off because a good chunk of the population believes whatever the media tells them. Politicians and the media lie and keep telling the lie as if it will somehow become true. And it goes beyond that too, it is not just enough to be able to lie without impunity. The left feels so threatened by their loss that they have begun a dangerous and harmful tantrum.

Screenshot_2017-03-01-22-56-46

This meme wittily expresses the unchanging attitude of the Democratic Party

Why should they work on themselves and change their approach to something worthwhile to get them elected when they can just wage war on the people and things that ensured their loss? Their first victim has been free speech, taking advantage of their well-cultivated army of mentally ill social justice warriors that their campus propaganda created, they have wound them up with hysterics thus creating the Antifa thugs the sick on anybody who expresses an evidence based idea different from or contradicting their own Nazi’s. Meanwhile, they have their goons in the media ignore those incidents, wait till conservatives defend themselves, and then claim it is right-wing violence. And of course, they also claim all of this is Trump’s fault as well as the fact their Russian Collusion lie is falling apart, so they pass unconstitutional bills to reduce his power or articles of impeachment that will never pass but still get the Democrats much-needed attention. Meanwhile, as Democrats and RINOs (Ugh, never thought I would be using that term) obstruct the president’s agenda and appointments, the establishment’s trolls lurking in the white house selectively leaking information and trying to replace Trump’s advisors with loyal establishment picks who will prevent him from pursuing the policies he promised to the American people.

Trump may seem childish at times for sure. But he is generally pretty sincere about his thoughts and outrage. But right now his opponents though act like screaming pissants children who need their nappies changed. The real adults in the room are individuals like Rand, they are hopefully what we will see more of going forward. For now, though, Trump is a marked improvement over US political dynasties and manipulative monsters. I am hoping 2018 will wipe away some of their squabbling children and hopefully, Trump will be able to strip power from those in his own administration who wish to enact a Coup against Trump. If it doesn’t though, this type of discourse will lead to war and it will not be pretty for anyone, especially not the Democrats.

Why I Can’t Condemn The Alt-Right, And Neither Should You. (Disclaimer Inside)

(Disclaimer: Read this all the way through before making dumb statements about my alleged bigotry. I abhor any sort of claims of any racial supremacy in any form with any subject. None of the arguments within this article should be construed as a defense of the ideals of any group mentioned herein. This is Analysis. I judge groups by their actions more than their ideas. Anybody is entitled to their odious opinion and to voice it publicly, nobody is entitled to resort to violence. As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said in Whitney v. California (1927) “If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”)

Now that we have that out-of-the-way, yes, I cannot defend the Alt-Right. Some of you are of course shocked and are now swearing & spitting in a rage about how I’m just some dumb faggot who knows nothing. If that’s the case you’re probably a far left Democrat whose conservative Uncle sent this with you to rub it in your face about how reactionary and juvenile you are. The rest of you are just Libertarians, Normal Conservatives, and those very rare but much valued Moderate Democrats, and you are all scratching your head and saying, “How do ya figure there sports fan?” Well, I cannot condemn the Alt-Right because it is not very clear what the Alt-Right actually is.

Existence of An Enigma

Unlike the Alt-Left which is a title given to far left groups like Antifa which they themselves do not identify themselves by, the people who label themselves as or are labeled as Alt-Right are not an organized political movement or organization. There are so many groups or individuals claiming this label or being lumped under the label that hold wildly contradicting views. It is very similar to Gamergate which has itself been labeled Alt-Right by the left, despite the fact that on close examination most people who identify themselves as part of Gamergate were extremely leftist. That leads to huge confusion as to the nature of the term. Is it a movement or a slur?

Originally I characterized Alt-Right by the people identifying themselves by the label such as Milo Yinnopoulos and Lauren Southern, with ideas just outside the conservative mainstream. These people are generally reasonable though at times very abrasive. Now, however, they are calling themselves Alt-lite as the term has become more charged. This makes one question why they are lumped in with an extremist set of people who are being called Alt-Right since as I mentioned before the ideas and people are polar opposites. After all, Milo is gay and a Jew (that is not a dirty word, don’t pretend it is) which are 2 things that people the media has additionally labeled as Alt-Right vehemently hate.

There is also a difference in attitude. /pol/*, for example, has been referred to as a breeding ground for the Alt-Right. However, despite the media characterization of Alt-Right as a political movement, /pol/ seems to have no concern for actual politics. I am actually fond of /pol/, they are mostly geared towards making offensive memes or trolling arrogant people like Shia LeBeouf. Even their support of Trump seemed to be more based on Trumps ability to offend snowflakes than his own politics. To them, everything that is happening in the world is one big joke. This is why I find comparing the Gen X attitude of /pol/ to the intense racial hatred of groups like the KKK to be an extremely implausible stretch.

Ha, Ha, You’re a Cootie-Face

In my opinion, too there is a distinct possibility that the Lying Mainstream Media is using this as a label to discredit all conservatives by trying to associate them with bigots. This very year we have seen how labels can be turned against their creators, such as how conservatives successfully turned the term “Fake News” against the Washington Post by pointing out that they are Fake News. In fact, it seems like only in the last few months that we have seen groups like the KKK or Neo Nazi’s identified as Alt-Right. On top of that, now anything like a free speech protest or conservative gathering that is intended to protest far left tyranny gets called a gathering of White Supremacists or Alt-Right, almost as if they intend to discredit these groups not with an actual argument against their message but with an inaccurate association with largely and rightfully hated groups. It benefits them to put all of their opponents under one broad label so that they can insinuate anything they believe is associated with certain evils.

It is true as I stated earlier that this year some people identified as Alt-Right. These people were charismatic, intelligent, and were gaining popularity. In short, they were a threat to the left and the media who were already suffering from a huge image issue. It stands to reason then that the media would gain from blurring these lines and thus discrediting their opposition. After all, unlike the term Alt-Left we use for violent and criminally dangerous/unhinged liberals, some people identified themselves by this label willingly. So it makes it easy for the Media and the Left to turn it into a childish insult

Muh Nazi’s

Where do the KKK and Neo Nazis fall into this? Many Alt-Right events have attracted these types. It could be because of the message of the Alt-Right condemning Anti-White Racism. They may also come because of the shared nationalistic views. Or maybe the Alt-Right gets those views from Neo Nazism.

Why were there people at the start of this though that these groups clearly hate? I return your attention to Milo, a Gay man who practices Judaism. He is literally the antithesis of what those groups stand for but identified himself as Alt-Right for a short while. Even now though the media calls him Alt-Right despite him distancing himself from that label. So is it that the Alt-Right are Nazi’s that hate Milo or is Milo the Alt-Right that Nazi’s hate? They certainly are not part of the same group though. This is what muddies the waters.

Richard Spencer has also been part of the Alt-Right from the start and is known for Neo Nazi views. He was instrumental in coining the term Alt-Right. It is interesting to note that while he is against gay marriage, he banned people with anti homosexual views from a conference he organized, however that is the only aberration as to the rest of his Nazi Ideology. He leads a group of people who hold blatantly fascist views and has called for what can only be described as “soft ethnic cleansing”. These ideas are certainly dangerous.

Actions Paint A Larger Picture Than Words

Now the behavior of the proclaimed Alt-Right is curious. They have been largely peaceful unless provoked. This is behavior I would not expect from the groups the left-wing describes as Alt-Right. Indeed the behavior is more in pace with the more benevolent view of the Alt-Right as simply being libertarian leaning activists against left wing fascism. But there has been violence even if most of it was provoked.

Twice in Berkeley, there have been incidents of conflict provoked by the terrorist Antifa group against free speech advocates which are labeled Alt-Right. The second time it erupted into street warfare that resulted in the free speech side beating and driving back the Antifa several blocks. There was also an incident in Huntingdon Beach where Antifa tried to block a group of pro-Trump marchers by forming a human chain. This ended in the pro-Trump group chasing down and unmasking Antifa who were then apprehended by the police while the pro-Trump side continued their march. However recently in Charlottesville, a man identified as Neo Nazi and part of a demonstration there plowed his car into a crowd of Antifa. He killed at least one person and if he is convicted it is truly a huge red flag about Alt-Right. But then again, things seem suspicious and a few plausible alternate accounts of what happened place the blame not just on the Neo Nazis, but on the Antifa attacking the rally as well as the Mayor of Charlottesville:

Here is one of the alternate accounts, one that implicates the Mayor, Michael Singer, in criminal behavior including depraved indifference murder:

  • Constitutionalists organized a peaceful assembly in Charlottesville called Unite the Right

  • The organizers lawfully obtained a permit to host this event

– Wes Bellamy, the Vice-Mayor of Charlottesville, illegally revoked the permit for this event.

– The ACLU successfully sued Charlottesville for violating the First Amendment, and a Federal judge ruled that the permit must be reinstated and the right to assemble honored

– Unite the Right was scheduled to take place at 12:00 pm for an organized, peaceful gathering with scheduled speakers.

– At 11:30 am, a heavily militarized police force illegally shut down the event, physically assaulting peaceful protesters with batons and tear gas. Several people were illegally arrested.

– Right at noon, who shows up but the KKK, BLM, and Antifa.

– While evacuating, many protesters were illegally assaulted by counter-protesters from Antifa and Black Lives Matter as the police stood by and did nothing.

– Antifa and BLM members were recorded throwing bricks at people, using pepper spray, throwing Molotov cocktails, water balloons (filled with chemicals, urine, and feces).

– The Constitutionalists were physically trapped between the Antifa terrorists and the police. The Constitutionalists pleaded to the police for their assistance. The police responded that they were given orders by the Mayor to stand down. Not only that but because the police were shutting down the event, the Constitutionalists were told that unless they were residents of Charlottesville, they would be arrested if they did not leave immediately. However, the police were told not to allow the Constitutionalists past them, which meant they were FORCED to walk through the BLM and Antifa protesters. This sounds pretty well orchestrated.

– A terrorist associated with the KKK drove his car straight in to a crowd of people, killing at least one, nearly killing 5 (they are in ICU) and injuring 12 others.

– The state of Virginia declared a state of emergency with the National Guard on standby, and Charlottesville became the #1 news story in the world.

– The lying media intentionally portrayed this all in a way to make it appear that 1) the peaceful protesters were white supremacists 2) Constitutionalists were the perpetrators of the violence, rather than the victims, despite heavy video evidence to the contrary.

– This was an enormous breach of trust by the mainstream media, an enormous breach of the Constitutionalists’ First Amendment rights, an enormous breach by our men in blue who became part of a violent police-state suppression of free speech that is now being hidden by the lying media.

Conclusion:

– Given the testimony from the Constitutionalists, this was a WELL PLANNED AMBUSH on law-abiding Americans

Eyes of The Public

An interesting way to measure what they are is people’s perception. We know the far leftist impression of “Alt-Right”. How about normal people though? For this, I decided to ask random people on Facebook, namely friends or pages I follow. This is the full transcript of what impressions I got.

A.L.B.:
I think the Alt Right is just about white identity.
That is the focal point

J.R.C.:
In my mind, there are two different sections. One is where we use memes and alternative media to defeat our enemies. And backing grassroots candidates that are not country club elite.
The other section is white Nationalist Nazi’s that wave the flag, hate the Jews, and ultimately see no place for minorities in the country. They also want socialist policies that tie in with their Nationalism.

A.H.:
I honestly dk its so loosely used its hard to shift through all the definitions

C-Gaymer:
thats good enough. dunno is a good reaction too, im just trying to get any honest viewpoints on this and thats honest.

A.H.:
Well it is most people say nazi but they were socialists and different ideologies
But even thats not really definitive so yeah dk lol

P.B.:
people who aren’t represented by our terrible two-party system. But it’s a mix of traditionalists, patriots and others who despise seeing the negative effects of race baiting, hatred towards whites, the gender revolution, destruction of the family, globalism.. etc.

kind of the opposite of cultural marxism
This last one is really lengthy. (Some Pun intended):

C.O.:
Well it has been muddled by ignorant racists (there is a distinction)
But I see it as people who are fed up with neo con keysian bullshit and liberals who have gone from social reform of Kennedy or fdr to anarcho communism rallies for spoiled brats and retarded idealists who can only think with emotion
If they only even noticed that their beliefs are contradictory as well as insulting/crippling to the people they keep claiming to be for

C-Gaymer:
That’s goodC.O.:
By treating minorities like kids you are essentially crippling them, and telling them that they are incapable of making decisions or accomplishing things on their own.
With social policies at current there is no incentive to do better and in fact it is worse for you if you do.
If you work 1 hour over limit even at minimum wage it is like a 300 dollar difference in SNAP
Thusly in order to offset this you’d have to do nearly impossible economic changes considering being a student is also a disqualification for benefits

C-Gaymer:
How does this tie into your views about the Alt-Right?C.O.:
Because the whines of these millennial cunts is obnoxious, pedantic, and literally mental illnessSelf preservation is out the window and all logic or organization is too
Fucking retarded cuck fags (never use as a homophobic slur)have no concept of economic development, sociology, geopolitics, history, reality
Etc.
Tumblr and social media in general has raised a generation of kids who think that their opinions are meaningful and important. The internet has allowed for people to have a cursory glance at the world without actually experiencing it or leaving safety.
The dead Kennedys (ironically always a favorite band of theirs)have a great song, holiday in Cambodia:So you’ve been to school for a year or two And you know you’ve seen it all In daddy’s car thinkin’ you’ll go far Back east your type don’t crawl Play ethnicky jazz to parade your snazz On your five grand stereo Braggin’ that you know how the niggers feel cold And the slums got so much soul

C-Gaymer:
okay, but how does this tie into your view of what you think the Alt-Right IS?

C.O.:
I think it is the last hope for true conservative values
But like I originally said I think many people muddle it with white nationalism and homophobia or religious intolerance

As you can see people’s views are across the board. Some associate it with Neo Nazis. Others associate it as fed up patriots. Some believe Nazi’s have only hijacked the term. The left is convinced (or is trying to convince people) that it was a Neo Nazi term from the start. It is really all over the place. So how can you define a term that invokes so many meanings?

We Just Don’t Know

At this point with all the chaos and such, we just don’t know. Because of that we really can’t criticize the Alt-Right because it is uncertain. We could be condemning actual bigots, that is a possibility. But it is also possible we are condemning real Lincoln Style conservatives and this is playing into the left’s hands. We already have issues in our own party with traitorous disgraces like John McCain. If we need to call out hateful elements trying to falsely claim the banner of conservatism then it is best we call them out by their specific names, KKK, Neo Nazi, rather than use an easily manipulated blanket term. The last thing we need is to reject young people who actually hold the conservative ideals of freedom and equal rights for all people and are just combatting the threat to it from the left in ways only our generation can, all just to avoid the image attacks of a dying radical left that is losing the culture war regardless of their lies.

The Left Wing Has Gone Off It’s Rocker

So since last year after Trumps Election Victory and the successful leave vote in the Brexit Referendum, something fishy has been in the air. Certain groups that call themselves peaceful and tolerant have been smashing property and making death threats. And it isn’t over something outrageous like the rise of a dictator (certainly they installed one in 2008 so that makes them hypocrites), but something as petty as the majority of society disagreeing with them. I’m going to stop beating around the bush because I am sure you already guessed it by virtue of the title alone, I am talking about Liberals. But honestly, was their loss last year what unhinged them or are we just now noticing how utterly insane they are?

Well, let’s be clear here, this has been a long time coming. Liberal delusion is nothing new, it has existed since they began spreading the lie that the parties switched, a lie which has been proven wholly wrong based on the facts but which they still push over and over again regardless to cover up their extreme racism. It has always been present with their belief that they know what’s best, especially for the Midwest which commonly votes against them, a delusion so pervasive they recently have even encouraged millennials to move to the Midwest to vote in an attempt to weaken the conservative hold on those Senate seats. This article from Townhall sums up a lot of what I plan to cover here, namely that the liberal ideology is based on absolute narcissism that separates them from reality. It is this pretty delusion they have pushed on young middle-class kids from the 90’s that lead to the full on deranged mania triggered by the lefts absolutely humiliating loss in November.

Now everything we have seen since November has always been present in liberalism, the hypocrisy, the violent tendencies, the lying, and inability to accept reality. 2016 was the year that triggered them all, to the point where it has been brought into the public eye of everyone but the farthest left liberals incapable of self-awareness. Since then the evidence of their deep seated mental illness has snowballed into a near-daily cycle of violence and falsehood and sensationalism. The media which has been outed as fake news has been daily churning out falsehoods and conspiracy theories and framing them as fact. This sadly has inspired delusional acts of violence, and that is where I am going to start.

Violence from the American left started early last year when Leftists began attacking Trump supporters at rallies. Since then their hypocritical hysteria over a so-called alt right movement has devolved into violence and a wave of crimes intended to be blamed on the American right. Their wave of violence is indeed so bad, a new study shows Americans are 13 times more likely to be killed by a left wing terrorist than by a right wing terrorist. And this is not coming from rank and file liberals, liberal politicians are leading the charge with delusional tirades ending in implied threats of presidential assassination while their celebrity counterparts engage in their own threats as well. And in case you are wondering, there is no isolated incident of terrorist threats from left-wing politicians or celebrities. This really makes the case for locking the whole lot of them behind bars at this point.

Now before I move on I wanna peddle back just a little bit to one very interesting issue I brought up that also kind of relates to my next point. It is about the fabricated hate crimes after the election. The fake hijab attack was not an isolated incident as there were many other fake hate crimes before this and after. In fact, a new trend among the far left has been to fabricate hate crimes. More startling is that there is an actual hate crime epidemic gripping the nation, an epidemic of hate crimes against Trump Supporters!!

FB_IMG_1498949812783

Ironically one of the farthest left states in the US also is the worst for mental health.

The violence, of course, is accompanied by a level of hysteria and delusion that it has been referred to as T.A.R.D. or also as Trump Derangement Syndrome. The Media, as well as left wing politicians and hard-line activists, seem to be hit hardest by derangement. Take for example the hysteria on Kansas’s public university campuses earlier this month when a provision passed in 2013 came into effect after a 4 year grace period, requiring local municipalities and public buildings to either provide adequate security or allow concealed carry within their properties. That’s right, despite the fact that they had 4 years to comply with the law by arranging adequate security which they did not do, and despite the fact that concealed carry on college campuses is legal in 10 and has been for over 13 years without any violent incidents, a small group of college professors and activists have cried, shrieked, and complained about an imaginary epidemic of violence that is going to break out on campuses in Kansas and 5 professors (out of 5800 statewide) have tendered their resignation. Not enough for you? Apparently now according to the left, Free Speech isn’t only racist and silences minorities (leave it to the left to fail to comprehend the idea of freedom), it now also causes PTSD and Smoking when people hear opinions they do not like. That last one is almost as bad as their hysteria over Russia, extra funny since there is more evidence proving the Democrats colluded with Ukraine.

Screenshot_2017-01-24-05-39-34

A wonderful message I once received from a “Tolerant” liberal.

And of course, there is Cognitive Dissonance, a trait the American Democrats share with the similarly deranged Labour Party. It is far more than the rudimentary liberal tendency to say one thing and do another, like when liberals claim to be pro gay and send messages like this to my inbox before blocking me. Ignoring the results of elections they lose and booing democracy is a new page out of their book. Let’s not forget how Hillary once said that if Trump did not accept the results of the Presidential Election it would be a threat to democracy, only to quietly contest the results themselves after she lost. A clear sign they themselves were not going to accept a loss in the event of it happening (which it did). Labour too has their own issues with acceptance, even though they got nowhere near a parliamentary majority like the Tory party, Labourite Corbynista’s all over Britain claim they won, that it was a vote against Brexit, and want Jeremy Corbyn forcibly installed as PM. It’s so bad that had to be curtly reminded that Labour did not come anywhere close to winning or even forming a successful coalition. This suprises me because I honestly thought de Nile ran through Egypt, not the heart of London.

I am gonna close though with the worst, most despicable behavior that shows the true Depravity of Liberals. I am speaking of course on how they monopolize on tragedy for their own political gain. A most recent example, The Labour party has monopolized on the Grenfell Tower Fire as another way to criticize the Tories and demand May resign her seat. They are doing this of course despite the families of victims asking them not to hijack their grief. And I can’t even count on one hand how many times Presidential Disgrace Barack Obama tried to use the tragedy of a mass shooting to push an anti-gun agenda. Some would call this behavior anti social, in fact, this and everything else I have described could be called a mental illness. But that is what it is, modern liberalism is a mental illness that we need to eliminate now before it can take root in further generations.

C-Gaymers New Podcast!! Episode 1: Gamergate

Hey guys, so this has been my secret project months in the making.  Every other Monday you can look forward to a dose of conservative politics thrown at you with my svelte and sexy voice over your morning cup of joe. Two Mondays a month I will be uploading my new C-Gaymer Podcast, with my co-host Mr. F.L.A.G. and we will tackle pressing political issues, gaming, and tech news, or just basically dick around on air and waste 30 minutes of your time leaving you with a euphoric smile. Tune in twice a month, Monday at 7 AM.

Anyway, this week we tackle the hard hitting issues surrounding gamergate and get to the bottom of the movement. Spoiler alert, if you have been told they were right wing extremists you have horribly been lied to.