In The News – How ABC News Presented Tyre Nichols, Paul Pelosi, and Palestinian Mass Shooters

Sometimes when I visit some folks I know they watch ABC Evening News. They don’t believe much of what they hear and recognize the slant, but they still watch it. So what did I see the night of January 27, 2023?

Prologue

They preview what stories they will cover. Tonight for the first segment they were discussing the then-impending release of police bodycam footage of Tyre Nichols’ death. Segment 2 was discussing bodycam footage of the attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband. They tried to make the two sound equal. Segment 3 was about a Palestinian mass shooter who chose Holocaust Remembrance Day for his killing spree in Israel.

Segment 1 – Riot But Don’t Riot

ABC News was sure to play footage of people saying don’t riot (then they interrupted Jeopardy! to show footage of Tyre Nichols being pepper-sprayed and screaming for his mother), followed by a sermon from the civil rights equivalent of an ambulance chaser Ben Crump rallying the crowd to irrational action against the police.

I’m thinking Ben Crump just heard that a black adult was killed by 5 police officers and assumed that they were white, because he made sure to make race a part of his message. Upon learning they were Black, he probably slightly modified rehearsed speeches when insisting that systemic racism was what led to this, saying that Tyre Nichols would have been killed no matter what the color of the officers’ skins was (all five were black) because our system is designed to kill blacks (so all police are evil, this “racism” idea was repeated by CNN). Again, that’s not true. There is no racial disparity in police shootings (except when it comes to media coverage because dead Blacks are more profitable for the media and its civil rights allies like BLM), it is true that more blacks have interactions with police, but it’s not true they are dying unjustly by the hundreds or thousands as Democrats believe. And to say all police are evil because of these few officers we saw is like saying all Blacks are evil because for decades they’ve commited murder more than any other race, so much so even Obama spoke out about it. I will acknowledge that after seeing the video, the only possible justification for what the police did is if Tyre Nichols somehow raped one of their relatives or something horrific like that and this was street justice, but even if that was the case the officers were rightly fired, and if there is no extreme justification like that then the officers are simply evil people.

As to the “culture” that Ben Crump mentioned, that’s called being human. Any enforcers of power can become abusive (literally they just took a bunch of random people for these two experiments and found the heights humans would go to when allowed or asked. Random people, Check here for some other relevant experiments… plus some other ones that aren’t related.). So what is it that Ben Crump, BLM, and Democrats want? More power of course, and more people in power. Abolish the police, but we saw in 2020 they plan to replace the police with roving armed mobs of murderous (and vaguely segregationist) Brown Shirts. Their little experiment in Seattle was the perfect microcosm of what their world would be. Then again, as noted in the second sentence we’ve seen experiments in liberal havens (I suppose some smartass in the comments will try to say that colleges aren’t liberal, in total contradiction to every liberal out there who proudly touts their college degree and insist college causes people to become liberal (yes, even liberals say college makes you liberal, they claim it’s because you are educated and exposed to more cultures)). Part 2 of the equation is that, it is a fact, Black neighborhoods tend to be higher crime areas so that is where police will be. Police go where the crime is. Regardless of why, the police are there to respond to what happened today, not over generations (or as Joe Biden put it, “It doesn’t matter whether or not they are victims of society… So I don’t want to ask, ‘What made them do this?’ They must be taken off the streets!”). Politicians like Joe Biden who gave us that quote are supposed to be working on systems to handle what led to the crime problem. Something made people grab a gun and start shooting, grab a knife and start stabbing, and at that point the only reason you’d demand to abolish police and send in psychologists is if you have the stomach for a high body count. Though, when the Left has its anarchy, they beat people the way Tyre Nichols was beaten by armed thugs (and while they want to ban you from having guns, they are happy to use them. While they demand gun control, they violate laws by handing guns to people who legally should not have them and then Democrat politicians praise them after they violate gun control laws those Democrats demanded). So you’d think they’d be the FIRST to scapegoat humanity’s immaturity when it comes to being in power.

(another note- ABC’s supplemental coverage that they interrupted Jeopardy! for was sure to point out that EVERY police officer was evil. So they say that all cops are bad, even have an expert who agrees that police will be seen as “occupiers” rather than legitimate law enforcement, but please don’t riot.)

I guess they got tired of people talking about Biden’s classified documents so they created the Atlanta Antifa riots, and some of their sister riots within which a Democrat leader’s son got arrested for assaulting police. Spread hate for the police so everyone will agree with the Antifa cause- overthrowing democracy (y’know, that stuff they accuse Republicans of). Or maybe this is to distract from Project Veritas revealing that Pfizer thought about creating new COVID variants so they can make new vaccines while acknowledging COVID will be profitable for years… and while assaulting Project Veritas journalists (but as you know from the Omicron variant, the vaccines Pfizer makes for their variants would only really work on their own variants, so they would be useless and unprofitable… and Pfizer doesn’t do anything that isn’t profitable).

Segment 2 – Is It Really The Same?

They went out of their way to try and build the Pelosi attack video as being the same as the Tyre Nichols video. Getting hit with a hammer and being beaten to death by five armed people are very different. I don’t know what kind of sick mind would try to equate the two (they said both videos were equally as disturbing).

Speaking of Paulie, this video was the fakest thing I have ever seen. I have been in fights and struggles over objects, this was not one of those. It was like Paul and the attacker were just standing around waiting for police to show up. Paul clearly wasn’t struggling, had a free hand the whole time while the attacker had two hands on the hammer, so why didn’t Paul grab an object and wallop the attacker? And the story behind it? Bogus. The attacker spent several minutes trying to beat their way into the house before body slamming their way through the glass. No neighbors heard this, Paul didn’t hear it. Have YOU ever heard glass being pounded on or shattering? It is LOUD. And look at where they say the guy broke-in: if it happened as alleged, why does it look like it was blown outward? Why is the hole too small for someone to fit through and too distant from the door to be of any use except to Reed Richards? And then the guy catches Paul in his bed, but lets Paul get out of bed, grab his phone, and lock himself in the bathroom? What kind of idiot is this attacker? Oh but it gets better- Paul decides to leave the safety of his bathroom after calling police. He didn’t call the security for the gated community who’d have a faster response time; he called the police. Then left the bathroom. We know Paul isn’t that dumb, as he keeps making stock trades at the exact right moment as if he had the inside track, but that would be illegal so Paul must just be smart and quick-witted.

The story concludes with what we see on the bodycamera footage. Paulie and his buddy made their way to the front door, where they were just kind of chillin’ with the hammer limply dangling between them, with Paul grabbing casually with one hand while the intruder had both hands on it, with the attacker laconically letting Paul open the door for police and Paul nonchalantly welcoming the police. Then when police say put the hammer down, now that the attacker is on camera and the item has been identified he attacks. Let me remind you that this man is half of Paul’s age, Paul is not particularly in-shape, yet we are supposed to believe that he singlehandedly (literally, as he only used one hand) kept the attacker from using his hammer until the police were there to witness events.

Did I mention the attacker is described by those who know him as a leftwinger living with a BLM supporter, and that the alleged blogs he maintained that showed him as a rightwinger only existed the day he was arrested (keep in mind he was arrested in the morning).

This phony, fabricated, staged sideshow that makes amateur actors on public television acting out a child’s script look believable is what ABC News says is equal to the brutal death of Tyre Nichols.

Segment 3- Whose Fault?

They started presenting this story as neutral, told everything relevant to it, but then they shoehorned in a reference to how Israel has “its most rightwing government in history” (that is either exactly what the anchor said or almost exactly what they said, I did not write it down as I was eating at the time) in such a way that it seemed to be their attempt to justify the shooting.

Conclusion

Out of this (and other) randomly selected news broadcasts from ABC, there’s huge bias to their reporting. Too much to just be coincidence, and it taints how the public sees the story. Fox News or Newsmax or somebody needs to get on these broadcast stations. As more and more people cut their cords and switch back to antennas, this is a growing market and should be entered.

Leftwing “Peaceful Protests” vs Rightwing “Full Anarchy”

The police killed an unarmed demonstrator at the Capitol Hill riot, which police were shooting non-lethal weapons at even when it was still a peaceful protest. The dead veteran was not threatening police or Congress members. There will be no police cars torched in protest, no communities destroyed. No liberal mayors saying that it’s ok for people to be angry and burn things down and occupy a police building and try to burn people alive and setup their own country where rape and murder flourished while mobs roamed around attacking people. Kamala Harris never personally told her she was a hero, the media won’t say what happened is outrageous. Yes liberal, she should not have been there because her presence was illegal. But Jacob Blake should not have been at his victim’s house when police shot him too (he was not legally allowed near it), and he should not have been fighting the police and trying to run. You protested for one, and thought the other got what they deserved– death (which you seem to believe should happen to all opposed to you). See the problem? No. Of course you don’t. That’s why the Right feels the need to do this (not the pipe bombs though, no one yet knows where they came from… before you say it’s obvious who planted pipe bombs at the RNC, liberal, I remind you of A. which of us has a record of damaging RNC buildings and B. that you tried to pass the Berkley riot off as a false flag by the Right. In fact, a KNOWN Leftwinger was part of the charge into the Capitol building while he was pretending to be on the Right and Antifa members were spotted infiltrating the protest).

Tweet linked here in case it disappears.

In DC if you riot over a rapist being shot you get a street named after you and nothing but support from everyone, but if you protest an extreme violation of everyone’s rights the police shoot you. Got it.

Meanwhile, President Trump calls for the violent folks to stop and the protest to disband because it became violent, but Democrats censored his message for peace, claiming it was for the sake of “public safety” that they censored him (meanwhile I guess also for the sake of public safety they continue showing video of Antifa threatening one of the Left’s political enemies). But the real reason is that violence is what they want. Democrats pushed and pushed until finally something snapped, and they’re blaming the victims when really this is what Democrats wanted. The incoming Democrat Congress and Democrat Presidency will use this as an excuse to make the public demand speech be censored and their political enemies be banned. I went over their plans before the election, they might’ve done it anyway, but it’s even better if you convince the public they want it. And a bunch of tired and angry Trump supporters (possibly goaded by Antifa infiltrators) let the heat of the moment get the better of them and delivered. This was inevitable, Democrats weren’t going to stop until it happened (even if this time their paid henchmen helped the matter, it still was going to happen if not today then later). Just look at what happened immediately before this event: Democrats cheated in exactly the same brazen way. Removed votes live on TV from the Republican candidates, shutdown the counting to print new ballots, banned GOP poll watchers. They kept pushing. And now that they found the breaking point, they’ll exploit it and make the public hate Republicans. Convince the public that they want to mass censorship to stop this, and Big Tech will be justified in what it’s been doing all along.

Remember when the media fellated Democrat celebrities for having sitins and stuff at the Capitol Building to protest the Right? Well, now that Trump supporters are in there doing the same thing we learn how liberals really feel about it. Or rather, re-learn how they feel because folks with memories will recall that the Obama Administration labelled protesters as terrorists (an egregious example where people were labelled as terrorists for hanging a banner is outlined here). Yup, liberals don’t seem to like it when the protests are against them. They’ve characterized the pro-Trump protesters as a murderous mob even though the most they’ve done is trespassing, clashing with police, and breaking some glass in the Capitol Building. That’s pretty far removed from the Left’s heroes of the revolution, like Obama’s mentor who was part of a bombing spree, the cop-killing heroes of BLM and their Democrat supporters, or the heroes who murdered Trump supporters, murdered Blacks, and burned a man alive.

You will note the distinction between this not-BLM-scale-riot and liberal peaceful protesters is that unlike with liberal peaceful protestors the only smoke at the Capitol Building is from tear gas. By now, liberal protesters would have torched at least one car and be starting on their first building- without checking if anyone was inside as you may have read if you follow the links here. But hey, liberals call this “full anarchy” while referring to their anarchist CHOP Zones full of rape and murder as “the summer of love”, so I guess they would believe that peaceful protesters burn people alive. I mean, all they’ve done so far is break glass, bypass police barriers, and punch a few cops. What’s that compared to destroying cities?

Question Of Ethics

We are too corrupt to even have Soviet-style elections (the candidate the corporatists want will always get the vote because you the voters have been replaced by printing presses in China- and it’s no wonder China would help given how much the establishment politicians love them, and how bad Trump has been for their business of corrupting our political system).

Well, what exactly DO you do if you see evidence that the election was stolen but then are told it doesn’t exist and you are insane? I will explain, liberal, why this is different from your fantasy in 2016. That was the system working as it did, and the notion that Russia altered the vote tally was refuted by your leaders. There was no evidence for it, but there was evidence it was fabricated. But what we have here is hard evidence that Democrats rigged this election as you’ve seen in my coverage. Vote tallies were altered, live on TV. Votes just disappeared from the Republican. NO DEMOCRAT LOST VOTES ON ELECTION NIGHT, ONLY REPUBLICANS HAD THEIR VOTE TOTALS DECREASED. Then you have the proven vulnerabilities to fraud which were totally ignored, despite Democrats even complaining. Then to top it all off it all happens in Georgia all over again last night. What do you do? All summer we saw how violent rioting is how to get what you want. Killing people and torching buildings led to police being defunded, as the violent people demanded.

The precedent has been set by the Left that this was acceptable, trouble is that they only meant it was acceptable when they do it (or when it’s done in their name, since it appears the Left has its hands in today’s incident). So what will happen after this: while the election challenges drag out in court, government will continue as if Democrats legitimately won. Legislation on “hate speech” in the name of “public safety” will be passed which will ban anyone from challenging the election results. News sites that covered the fraud and their vast archives of what happened will be wiped from the internet. This blog will probably be disappeared too and yours truly arrested for hate speech (if anyone ever reads this darn thing). And with all evidence of fraud destroyed and the “experts” telling you it never happened, how do you convince people it did? Especially if it’s so taboo a thing you get arrested for it and banned from society by the Social Justice folks.

I’m not condoning the rioters here (whereas you spent last year saying that rioting, looting, destruction, and death were legitimate), I’m not supporting violence, I’m just posing the same question faced by Blacks who bought into the BLM narrative that there was a genocide against them: what do you do? We’ve reached a point where the system is so corrupt that it seems civil behavior no longer works, that regression is the only thing left for our society.

Feeling Betrayed?


So what do we know about today, January 6…

  • Early on in the day promising news came about someone testifying in Italy under oath that they changed the vote count for the U.S. elections
  • A massive planned protest in DC took place, protesting the election theft that happened right before our eyes both in the 2020 election and the Georgia runoff.
  • Police agitated the protesters
  • Protesters, possibly led by Antifa elements in disguise, struggled with police
  • Protesters, possibly led by Antifa, stormed the Capitol Building
  • Capitol police shot an unarmed Air Force veteran who was not threatening anyone, indeed was behind a locked door when police opened fire. 3 others died for “medical reasons”, though someone was seen being carted away during police attacks on the crowd.
  • Republican establishment folks immediately condemned the riots and bragged about the vicious police, with one stalwart going so far as to say that the victim of the police (whom he thought was a 16 year old) deserved to die.
  • Republican establishment folks distanced themselves from challenging election results
  • Republican establishment folks blame Trump for the whole incident, as does the media
  • Republican traitors in his own cabinet are working against him, with backing from the establishment.
  • Republican establishment folks praise Biden’s handling of the riot (giving a quick speech before disappearing) while attacking Trump (who condemned the riot in a speech that was censored by the corporatists)
  • Now the story went from a confession to voter fraud to a story about how, as Democrats and Republican elites view it, “terrorists were bravely repelled by Capitol police and their radical ideology lets them believe the election was stolen, so YOU are a terrorist if you believe that”

So yes, I would say that any moves to censor folks claiming the election was stolen would easily pass the House and Senate, as would impeachment of Trump if he did succeed in his lawsuit. In fact, it looks very much like a setup for just that. Trump seems on the verge of exposing it with the witness from Italy and the other stuff he’s up to, and we see the true colors and who really is on the people’s side. We see some bipartisanship in this attack on the country, you, your rights, and the President.

Since I don’t trust our leadership anymore, I will note that it is suspicious that politicians were told to hide under their chairs when a mob stormed in. Those chairs are not bulletproof. I am kind of surprised there aren’t emergency exits or anything like that. Afterall, the media is calling these people terrorists, surely if a mob of suicide bombers such as these swarmed the building you would think more drastic protections would be in place for our beloved politicians. Surely if they really felt endangered enough to open fire on unarmed protesters, Congressmen would’ve been told to do more than duck and cover. Now… if they worked things out in advance on how the mobs should proceed, it would look like this.

As you may recall from the riots over the summer, which also involved much violence and the RIOTERS murdering people, Democrats and Republicans alike united in their love for the rioters. So you have to wonder- why the disparate treatment, especially from the GOP establishment. You will note that while Democrats and GOP establishment folks praise the Democrats’ murderous mobs, the GOP threw under the bus their own mob which actually suffered a fatality.

This is why the GOP is finished (though to maintain the façade of “democracy” it is doubtless the corporatists will fund them as they always have, and doctor elections as needed). Their people are hurting and desperate, but now that the election is over their first action is to throw them under the bus. When they needed to condemn fraud and show their voters they were supported and favored fair elections, instead they condemn the thought of unfairness despite the evidence that is literally before their eyes and even justified the murder of a protester.

You wonder why Democrats were so brazen with their voter fraud. This is why. They knew only Trump and his supporters would ever challenge it. And they knew that in the entire American political class Trump was a man alone.

What you saw here was the final nail in the coffin of our democracy, and our rights. Wantonly murdering a protester is only the beginning. And we’ve seen that it really doesn’t matter which party is in control, both intend to take your rights from you.