Final Fantasy VII (PC, June 1998) – Part Of The Clouded Computer Copies Collection

Believe it or not, those figures of (right to left) Kaworu Nagisa, Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott, and Cloud Strife are in scale with each other. And Mr. Scott was desperately needed to keep this game running, as you’ll read later.

Part I of The Clouded Computer Copies Collection – Mega Man X

“Clouded” and “Copies” become puns for this one. Even though Mega Man X was the first in this series published, this is the first one where I came up with the title. I’ll let you piece together how that could’ve happened, I hint at it in here. Fun fact: evidently I was playing the first PC port of a Final Fantasy game.

I actually wrote this all April 2021, but kept procrastinating on putting in pictures. So now, here it is just in time for the game’s 25th Anniversary… that is, 25 years after it was released… which is also like a month after I finished this post.

The Plot

So with the remake coming out, I finally dusted off my copy of the PC game that I think I bought in 2017, and then I learned exactly why they decided to do a remake right now (editor’s note: this line was written in 2020 before the election). You take the role of ex-soldier turned ecoterrorist named Cloud as he fights a corporation that controls a big city- called Midgar- which itself controls the whole world. The city’s power source is the planet’s life force, but the corporate masters don’t particularly care about killing off the planet (which I have no problem with- the planet’s life force apparently absorbs the souls of sentient beings, trapping them there forever. Creepy! They made two Star Trek books on beings like that, one of which WAS a planet. I wonder if any of these are related to The Beast With A Million Eyes?) nor the impoverished slum dwellers underneath their city- the city is held up by eight pillars, up above some slums made largely out of trash, scrap metal, and pollution.

So… we have an evil President, head of a corporation, with the alleged government official (the mayor) being just a figurehead, and a shocking depiction of income inequality and climate change. If you watched ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, or MSNBC, or read Huffington Post, Daily Beast, Salon, Washington Post, or New York Times any time during the Trump Administration you’d think they were reporting on Midgar rather than the United States. This game is like the Antifa vision of the country (and one of the characters  named “Tifa” by coincidence, with Antifa existing overseas when this game was made, and the terror cell in the game is hellbent on property damage and hurting people just like the real Antifa and think their ideals are the only correct ones so everyone else doesn’t matter just like the real Antifa. Hmmmmm…). So naturally they decide to release the remake now.

Yes, I know, it’s made in Japan, but this would not be the first time the Japanese gave us a game attacking the United States. Mega Man Zero 2 and Mega Man Zero 3 were all about attacking the Bush Administration’s war in Iraq, and even pushed the debunked “In Iraq For The Oil” narrative (which ironically their liberal counterparts here suggested be the reason we invade Libya), and the games actually went so far as to say you were an ignorant, stupid sheep if you believed  the Bush Administration’s narrative about WMD’s that the NYT even admitted was true (also ironically, the very intelligence community man they said lied about it, James Clapper, is now one of the Left’s trusted sources because he says bad things about anyone that isn’t a Democrat, but never recanted on his lie that the media said killed people (you remember their slogan- “Bush lied, people died”, yet they now implicitly trust one of those liars)). Also, keep in mind the growing trend for ALL video game companies of publishing woke content. What better remake for the 2020 election year than a beloved story about anarcho-communist ecoterrorists where the Left is unquestionably on the right side of history?

The Game

It’s an RPG. That means hours of grinding (meaning hours of fighting enemies to gain experience points to become stronger so the enemies don’t clobber you, you can’t just buy your way to super-soldier status or hope the plot gets you there). Three discs, and I was at 90 hours by the beginning of the second one, where I’d say I spent most of that time grinding away. It seemed to me that this was just hours of pressing the movement controls and the “select option” button with a cutscene giving my hands a 10 second break every couple of hours. Until the end of the second disc there is no difficulty or real strategy if you level-up sufficiently,  I found that once you get to the point where it takes you an hour to go up one level it’s usually safe to move on to the next area, and NEVER leave an area without going up at least two levels.

That was my strategy for Final Fantasy X (which I abandoned three years ago after only getting a third into it after 40 hours of playtime… one of these days I’ll get back to it, but you already know my record for that. This game almost experienced that same fate, I ditched it and this review in the middle of June 2020 because I was moving and didn’t pick it back up until the end of February this year (editor’s note: 2021)), but the venerable founder of this blog informed me that his strategy was to use magic and elemental stuff to match enemy weaknesses, so he didn’t grind like I did. That sounds complicated; just walk around and smash the “select option” button for hours on end. Also, links here and here to our venerable Founder’s previous Final Fantasy entries.

Oh yeah, you can do side quests (like five minute mini-missions that usually don’t involve battles) and I assume your dialog choices have an effect on relations with other characters and minor elements of the plot. Because I don’t know jack and have no guide, before I even finished the first disc I had botched at least two of them. I probably missed some powerful items, but that’s why I follow the aforementioned strategy of levelling my people up to be as tough as Cardassian dreadnoughts. Heck, I didn’t even know how to use magic attacks until like 1/9th into the story, and didn’t really need to know at that point.

The PC Version

I never played the PlayStation version, so I can’t and won’t be comparing it to that one, but other people have. Frankly, I don’t have another 7 days to spend on this (that is, a consecutive 168 hours, it’d take way more than 7 days to play through 168 hours). I can say based on testimony from a reliable expert witness that an issue common to both the PC and PlayStation versions is targeting and camera angles during battles. It’s the standard turn-based RPG battle system where the game highlights a character and you pick the move they’re going to use, then it moves on to another character you control, then the enemy gets their turn, except the twist is the enemy can attack you while you’re taking your time to decide what to do. The camera is beyond my control so when it’s zoomed in on a character about to do an attack, it becomes impossible to accurately target other enemies when it’s time to pick what the next character is going to do. Worse, if you’re trying to target an enemy and one of your own team pulls in close to that enemy to do a move, then you might end up targeting your own teammate by accident. It’s very easy to do, and taking your time to target isn’t really an option since like I said the enemy can attack you while you’re doing that. But there’s one battle later that gets worse than even that- the camera is positioned just so that you can’t tell which of your party you’re pointing at, and the enemy has a 1-hit kill shot, so often I kept trying to revive the still-living character rather than the knocked out one.

Anyway, setup of the game was simple enough, but I ran into some issues getting it going. One was resolved, the other was only sort of resolved. See, the game maps its controls to the number pad on your keyboard. The number pad being the numbers usually on the right with an extra “Enter” button and symbols for math equations. Well, since this game is from 1998 I am using a contemporary laptop. That laptop has no number pad. There is no option for resetting the controls until you actually start the game, but you can’t start the game unless you can press “Enter” on the main menu, and you can’t press “Enter” unless you have that second “Enter” key on the number pad because the other “Enter” key WILL NOT WORK.

Cloud re-enacting a scene from “The Towering Inferno”

There’s an easy way and a hard way to get around this. The hard way is to go into the game’s program files and change one of them. The easy way is to set your controller to have no predetermined button functions so that the game tells the controller what to do. P.S.- make sure your controller has 10 buttons plus the directional controls. The game requires 10 buttons aside from the directional controls. I only had 9, so I guess the 10th one isn’t all that important.

The other issue was that when I first load the game after booting up the laptop, it would not load the backgrounds and the way menu text displayed was such that it looked like none of the options could be used. Quitting the game and restarting it solved that, but every time I played the game after turning the computer on this would happen. I doubt this problem is unique to my laptop as I have played other games with similar problems that cross multiple computers (“Star Trek: Armada” comes to mind).

It’s a beautiful day in Dallas and the [Shinra] President’s motorcade is now passing the book depository building.

I encountered a few glitches during the game, sometimes graphical (like one of the enemies seeming to be missing its stomach graphic), sometimes sound (the waterfall sound in the Chocobo race played at the wrong time), sometimes annoying (in an area with wind barriers, the visuals for the wind and their physical effect went out of sync so I could not pass by them because when you pass at the wrong time you’re blown away, but this was resolved just by leaving the room and coming back) and sometimes game breaking like when I beat the final boss of disc 2 and the game froze when it told me to insert disc 3. It does not save at that point, so I had to repeat the boss battle and a little of the lead-up to it. I also encountered a million-in-one error in the Ft. Condor battle where I guess a dialog box was supposed to pop up but I entered the command to dismiss it prematurely, so the game was waiting for the box that never came.

Also, during some battles you’re fighting the camera angle as much as you’re fighting the enemy, because the camera angle can sometimes make it very hard to tell who the cursor is pointing at, so you can easily end up healing the wrong character.

My Opinion

If you want to lose 7 days of your life hitting the same button over and over on autopilot while you level-up for like half an hour of story that you can hear in any half hour on MSNBC, go for it. Half an hour of story where socialism and communists and climate nutcases are the heroes and businessmen plus their hired scientists (I think that’s a jab at folks like Koch-brothers funded anti-global-warming scientists) are the villains. Buy some CDs and blast away to Gidea Park and the Beach Boys or find a good podcast, lest you go insane from the same battle music and battle sounds repeating for 7 days. (Hmmm… well, if it takes roughly 7 days and leaves you so bored you’re wishing for death at the end, maybe you should start playing the moment you get a certain phone call.) 

The big irony is that the company telling you in this game to hate companies made millions off telling you to hate companies, and will make millions more this year telling you to hate companies, and furthermore it required in 1997 and still requires today extreme amounts of pollution to develop, advertise, distribute to millions of people, and for millions of people to play this game that spreads a radical environmentalist anti-technology message. An anti-technology message in a video game.

Oh, and let’s not forget the irony of their income inequality message! When released on the PlayStation in 1997, it cost $80.49 in 2020 dollars. Part ONE of the three part HD re-release in 2020 costs $59.99 for the BASIC release, so we can imagine all three parts cost the same, totaling $179.97 plus tax (with the inevitable special compilation re-re-release for $100). So to receive this blessed anti-income-inequality New Testament from our corporate betters, in 1997 we had to pay out more than a week’s worth of groceries for one person, and to get all three parts in 2020 we have to pay out a week’s worth of groceries for a family of three!

Are these liberals cluelessly spreading a message, or are they conservative capitalists laughing their butts off at the people buying this highly-praised leftwing Epic who are ironically fueling the very things their beloved game speaks out against? If the developers are the latter, taking advantage of ignorant leftwingers, then they are my heroes.

It says “Midnight Express” on the big TV? What kind of outlaw mudshow bullshit is this?

Spirit Of The Gun

New and improved post, now with 400% more links to videos with Bee Gees songs.

It’s Saturday night and I’m finally finalizing this week’s post. No, the delay is not because I had a fever (as a rebuttal to the Bee Gees’ assertion: I should NOT be dancing, yeah). You must think I’m lazy and have no life. Yes to both, but the biggest reasons for this delay have been A: processing my reaction to this week’s news and B: assisting the venerable founder of this blog with some external activities.

Jumping right into it, I have to ask the 2020 Democratic Presidential nominees: why do they think saying 40-60% of the country is racist and likely to murder three or more people with a gun is a winning strategy (They’re saying whites are racist, this country is racist, Trump supporters are racist, and the shootings come from that racism, they even blamed the Dayton shooting on white extremism, thus they’re saying whites are likely to commit mass shootings. CNN seems to believe that’s where ratings come from, while MSNBC goes so far as to badly photoshop some lies together and say whites are evil simply for their skin color (though I wonder if according to this speaker Muslims will have to be set free from what their fellows in the Middle East are up to, or if blacks like the person speaking need to be set free from what blacks are doing worldwide from Africa to Chicago))? Why do they think singling-out whites as the most violent race in history, the only violent race apparently (contradicted by the fact that statistically speaking a black male is twice as likely to be a mass shooter as a white male- African Americans do about 25% of the mass shootings which is twice their share of the population while whites do 50-60% of mass shootings which is on par with their share of the population. So far in 2019, 51% of mass shootings were done by African Americans and only 29% by whites, meaning that African Americans this year are FOUR times more likely to be a mass shooter than a white person), will let them win against Trump?

For that matter, why do liberals believe hating one particular race and telling them they are evil for even being born is the path to ending mass shootings? The Left loves to say about inner-city youth (black kids) that they shoot each other and generally engage in higher rates of criminal activity than the rest of the population because we are racist towards them; they decide that there must just be something wrong with being a non-white. They see this and feel angry inside, and vent that anger in negative ways since they have no other recourse.

Anyone else see the problem with this ragtag group of politicians saying all whites are racists? Image from CNN

So what does the media think happens when a white guy sees Presidential hopefuls Joe Biden and perpetual spellcheck error Pete Buttigieg declare that all whites are racists (and sexists according to Biden, because the context of his remarks kinda revealed he was saying whites are the only race in history who ever treated women unfairly… so I guess he thinks various women deserved acid in their faces and thinks FGM is perfectly fine. And ignores statistics showing Black and Hispanic men two or three times more likely than white men to be violent towards women, and ignores rap music in general), that they should be persecuted solely by the color of their skin? Does the media believe the white person seeing this, and feeling powerless because if he dares speak out he’ll be banished from society as some combination of sexist/racist/whatever-ist monster (Ostracizing/firing/whatever has happened and been threatened), doesn’t get angry at the lies being spread and his helplessness about it? Does the Left think whites don’t have the same emotions as blacks? So, why wouldn’t a white person react the same way a black person would? Why does the Left believe that their racism towards and oppression of whites (not even allowing them jobs  (sorry that the link for “them” is to a forum discussing an article, but the article itself was taken down)) wouldn’t create anger and violence anymore than such things do in the black community?

If we are to take the Left’s claim of intelligence at face value, then the logical conclusion is they know damn well that whites feel the same way as any other race. This is a deliberate ploy at dividing America. While black communities are in shambles, they are success stories as far as Democrats are concerned. Just look at their reaction to Trump’s Baltimore tweets as an example- they think crime-ridden Baltimore is a success I guess because it has high amounts of welfare recipients and has consistently voted Democrat for 50 years. Since they know their model of hating blacks into submission worked in the 20th century, and since whites have cost them elections in the past, they appear to be working on hating whites into submission for the 21st century. Bonus points for making sure each race hates the other so that they’ll never unite against the Democrats dividing them. Naturally Democrats will ignore their own words and claim Republicans are the real dividers, and their vast propaganda arms turn an impossibly weak deflection into a rock-hard defense.

By bringing up their propaganda arm I accidentally swerved my opening into some stuff I had written earlier in the week, so I shall take advantage of that situation and present ir to you.

If Trump actually said X, it would be a different story. You’d be reading about a crazed overweight dude charging into Area 51 through a hail of bullets to steal an android. Image from MMKB

Scenario A: Trump says x. The Left decides he meant y. The Left says he is racist for saying y. The Left says he is supporting people who believe in y. Someone who really does believe in y feels emboldened by what the Left is saying about Trump and goes to shoot people based on y. The media blames the shooting on Trump, who never said y to begin with.

Scenario B: A liberal says x. The Left decides they meant x. The Left says they are wonderful for believing x. The Left says they are supporting people who believe in x. Someone who really does believe in x feels emboldened by what the Left is saying about x and goes to shoot people based on x. The media blames the shooting on Republicans and Trump and whites, and the Left says you are despicable for daring to say their rhetoric about x was even remotely related to the shooting… and then says more people needed to die and one of the people already shot deserved it.

When both scenarios kind of (El Paso wasn’t entirely a white nationalist thing, barely at all actually if you bother to read the manifesto as examined later) happen in the same weekend, the Left focuses on Scenario A and ignores Scenario B and even seems to ignore the victims of Scenario B. In fact, according to Karl Rove they seem to triple-down on Scenario A.

So let me ask you liberal who says Trump wants mass shootings to happen: who was out fundraising after the Dayton and El Paso shootings? Not Trump. Who, according to your own narrative about the El Paso shooter’s motives which he and I both dispute (as examined later), lied about what Trump has said until someone believed you and launched a hate crime? Not Trump. Which 2020 candidate was fundraising off of a massacre that her own supporter caused? Not Trump. Seems a lot like the Democrats are the ones enjoying the shootings.

This Was A Mess

I have A LOT I want to say. A lot of it, the stuff about Democrats, would get me into legal trouble. Basically, this past week I’ve been seeing different statements and reading different articles and typing out rebuttals of each because I was so furious after seeing them I couldn’t really do much else. That naturally led to a bit of a mess- now I have a bunch of rants that say the same thing but they debunk different sources and different people. So what do I do? I’m out of time this week to sort through them all, compress them, etc. So I’ll just do the lazy ol’ bulletpoint format that I used in the Google search posts.

To get the ball rolling, have some headlines about mass shootings in general.

• “Why are white men carrying out more mass shootings?” -UK’s Sky News
• “Mass Shootings: Guns, White Men, And Mental Health” – Medium
• “Opinion | We Have a White Nationalist Terrorist Problem” – New York Times
• “#WhiteSupremacistTerrorism: Hashtag Takes Over Twitter After Latest Pair of Mass Shootings” – The Root
• “We Have a Gun Problem, and We Have a White Supremacist Terrorism Problem” – Washington Monthly
• “Gun Culture Has Always Been About White Supremacy” – New Republic (I wonder what they think of rap music and blacks in Chicago shooting each other…)
• “Our Country Isn’t Fixing The Gun Problem Because It’s White Men Who Love Guns” – Bustle (maybe they and New Republic should get together and take a look at the latest rap hits and Chicago shootings)
• “White Men Have Committed More Mass Shootings than Any Other Group” – Newsweek
• “Majority of mass shootings carried out by white men” – Philadelphia Tribune

Notice a pattern? How they blame whites for it all? How they make it look like only white people do mass shootings? I also noticed when hunting for these headlines that early reporting on the Dayton shooting also said that the socialist anti-gun Warren supporter was a white nationalist.

Here’s the thing- whites aren’t actually doing ALL the mass shootings as the headlines would have you believe. It is mostly male, true. But when it comes to race, as you saw way earlier in this post whites do about 50-60% as would be consistent with the white share of this country’s population. Blacks on the other hand do 25%, which is TWICE what their share of the population is. So basically- a black man is TWICE as likely to be a mass shooter as a white man. The media wants to judge it all on race, very well, do so but do it fairly. That’s not going to happen though- how could it when 32% of Democrats think you’re a racist if you are white and criticize a non-white politician even if said politician is doing something wrong?

I mean, he IS half white, and he did use attack dogs like police during Civil Rights protests. Image from evil.news

Democrats say that Trump is behind El Paso. Actually, if you read the guy’s manifesto, you’d find he was an anti-corporate anti-immigrant ecoterrorist pseudo-socialist. Do you know what his reasoning was for murdering Hispanics? It sounded exactly like what PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA warned about in his Grammy-winning audiobook “Audacity of Hope”. He was worried that the incoming Hispanics were reducing wages and straining our social safety nets, just like Obama warned. And liberals gave Obama a GRAMMY for saying that. So liberals gave Obama a GRAMMY for white nationalist rhetoric that led to a mass shooting. Cory Booker said the shooter had written a “white supremacist manifesto” which means, according to Booker, Obama was spreading white nationalist talking points. Cool. Also of note, the shooter said he was worried the media would blame Trump for his views. Notably, he also said that some Democratic Presidential candidates might be blamed for his views. Footnote here I guess, but some of the other items in the manifesto sounded like Joe Biden might’ve said them. Might as well also say here, according to Sen. Cory Booker, Obama really is a white nationalist. (Yes, the guy had some stuff about not wanting to mix white and non-white populations for reasons of biodiversity, but A: isn’t diversity a good thing? and B: you give Spike Lee awards for glaring at mixed race couples).

Drawing The Lines

Lost in this dense patch of anger below is my true position. I don’t personally believe Biden or Obama or Trump or Cortez are really to blame for what the crazies do. I agree with Fmr. DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazille (I’m starting to like her lately, or maybe that’s just because she seems like a moderate compared to the insanity that is the Dems’ Presidential race and The Squad). But then we get the weight of the Democratic Party pushing this narrative that it’s all the Right’s or Trump’s fault because they say things

Does anyone else think “Culpability” would be an awesome name for a biography of Robert Culp? Image from TheConsumateCulp

Democrats disagree with. So, I end up spending this post showing how Democratic rhetoric played the major part in the El Paso shooting, and how the Dayton shooter was entirely the Democrats’ fault. Because I learned when I was three years old that if a bully comes at you, you don’t run or cower in fear and surrender, you knock them on their ass. What better way than by showing Democrats that by their own standards of culpability, they’re responsible for both the Dayton and El Paso mass shootings.

 

---

Now that I’m at the part where I just have disconnected rapid-responses to things that annoyed me, I figured for the sake of organization I’d go with these nifty horizontal lines. Because I tried the bulletpoint thing and it looked awful.

---

As the Left screams for gun control, a story this past week shows how a good guy with a gun stopped a mass shooting. This is actually very horrifying though: El Paso and Dayton were the ones we heard the most about because El Paso was clearly tied to Trump, but there was one in California that the media ignored I guess because like with Chicago shootings just don’t happen in liberal places (or maybe because the guy was targeting  BOTH political parties). Then there was this attempted shooting that was thwarted in Missouri that I led with, but then there was ANOTHER shooting in Texas that was thwarted! That means we almost had FIVE mass shootings in 10 days!

---

I mentioned above in my screed that the El Paso shooter was kind of a Lefty. So was the Giffords shooter, who the Left keeps saying was a rightwing fanatic.

---

NYT got mad that Trump said the beliefs of one of the mass shooters needed to be addressed, after spending time attacking the beliefs of the other mass shooter. Because the Dayton shooter was a hardcore NYT-style Leftist and the El Paso shooter had a couple of beliefs in common with what we’ve heard from President Trump.

---

I mentioned before how early coverage said the Dayton shooter was a white nationalist. Before anything was known about the Dayton shooter, Buttgeek (it’s quicker to type, and actually started not as a homophobic slur nor an insult against someone who I’m scared of because he has a funny name as Obama might’ve assumed if Mayor Buttigieg weren’t white, but simply because I was mentally mispronouncing his name and misspelling his name all over the place when trying to read and remember it) was out saying that he was a white nationalist. He was dead opposite of that, unless Buttgeek thinks Warren is a white nationalist. I personally don’t think so, white nationalists generally don’t lie being Native American blood. It’s like saying a Sicilian has African blood.

---

Instead of linking to his book as reference for good communists disappearing, I thought I’d put a picture of the back cover here instead.

Democrats are going after Fox News’ Tucker Carlson for supposedly making white supremacy mainstream. Tucker Carlson has yet to do that. But he does say a lot of stuff Democrats don’t like. So that’s why they want to call it white supremacist, because that means it is hate speech, and the Left wants hate speech outlawed. Ending the First Amendment would make things rather easy for them: anytime you say something they don’t like, they call you a racist and then send you to Alaska (closest we have to Siberia). The public would never miss a racist. Of course, you folks on the Left need to be careful because a lot of good communists disappeared too under that other government you love who did that.

Along that same line, Francis Ethelbert (points to whoever catches what that play on Robert’s name references) O’Rourke says that his lie (at the upcoming link) about Trump “can’t be open for debate.” Now why would that be if his statement was factually correct? Well, liberals do say they’re smarter than us, so he knows his statement is a lie and doesn’t want to be humiliated for spreading it.

CNN outright said you are killing people if you don’t say what Democrats want you to say. NYT wants things like the El Paso shooting to fall under the veil of terrorism, which would mean anyone spouting rhetoric like in Obama’s Audacity of Hope could be labelled by the Left as a terrorist, as if calling people who aren’t Democrats now racists/sexists/bigots isn’t bad enough.

Finally for this section, Washington Post said “There is no excuse for supporting this president” in a headline, even though the one shooter is a socialist and the other could have been quoting Obama and Biden in his manifesto. I didn’t click on the article, but maybe there was an arrow pointing to a picture of Obama from the headline.

---

Dem Presidential Hopeful Castro said that the El Paso’s shooter could’ve been written by one of Trump’s speechwriters. Actually Castro, his manifesto could’ve been done by your former boss Barack Obama. So doesn’t that make you a white supremacist for working under Obama?

---

As the Left runs with gun control here and demands we end the 2nd Amendment (glad they’re out doing it, they used to say you were crazy if you said they were trying to repeal it), we see protesters in Hong Kong wishing that they had a 2nd Amendment to protect themselves from a ruthless government. Meanwhile, a CNN host was yammering on about how Venezuela with its severely oppressed citizens couldn’t understand why we’d want guns to defend against such a thing.

So now we’ve had in the wake of the weekend shootings assaults by the Left on our First and Second Amendment rights, and yet they’re baffled by why we’d want to keep guns. Even though liberals themselves decided to exercise their Second Amendment rights out of fear of President Trump. I’m beginning to understand a little bit of the liberal mind I think- between all these conflicting positions there just isn’t ROOM in their heads for reality.

---

Amidst the calls for gun control, 4 are dead in a California stabbing spree. Now, liberals define a mass shooting as 3 or more people killed. 4 died from this knife, so now that mass stabbings are a thing will we have knife control like in England?

---

Image of a big nope from WWE.com… come to think of it, I’d better get some sleep if I’m going to be awake for their PPV in less than 12 hours.

Remember how I took the time earlier to outline how whites have overall done about 54% of the mass shootings in the U.S., how certain other groups have done a totally disproportionate number, and how this year whites have done just over half the mass shootings this other group did? Well, this actress here said that she is ashamed to have been born white because of the white people shootings. Which begs the question- does she believe that blacks, who for this year are four times more likely to be a mass shooter than whites, should be ashamed for being born black? Whoops. Personally, I would be ashamed to have the last name “Arquette” after David was  given the WCW World Heavyweight Championship.

---

A CNN contributor/TV personality decided to advocate murdering more than 40% of the United States’ population. One of their contributors, a board member of the National Iranian American Council, someone who was given an award by Harvard and ate a human brain, decided that the best solution to the Left’s woes was a Final one. That link between Trump and white nationalism that liberals like him lied to create (Trump denounced white nationalists during his campaign, in his Charlottesville remarks as you saw above, and after the El Paso shooting, and probably some other times I’m not remembering too), he decided to take it further and say anyone supporting Trump is a white nationalist terrorist who deserves to die. I suppose he’d know about terrorists, he often lies to cover for Islamic ones. So glad CNN has him on its crack team of advisers. Genocidal maniacs, because he is directing this at white people, are welcome in Don Lemon’s safe space, at least based on what Don Lemon has said in the past.

Anyone else tired of all this jive talkin’; feedin’ us lies?

Again, part of the problem we have here is what the Left actually believes white supremacism is. They say Trump’s mention that some illegal immigrants are criminals is racist. It’s correct, below I cite data on it, but it’s racist to say I guess. And Cory Booker in a section quoted somewhere in here (the one where he speaks with “moral clarity” about Trump, even though Booker has less moral clarity than Goebbels because A: Booker supports Hitler-lovin’ Farrakhan and B: Goebbels probably knew that he was lying while I doubt Booker is smart enough to know even that much) notes that Trump allegedly referring to lousy countries as “shithole” countries (that remark was never actually proven to have taken place, it just became part of the lore, like the father of modern Progressivism’s praise for KKK thriller “Birth of a Nation”) makes him a racist.

Even if Trump said it, he’s right. Liberals spent years telling us that the “women and children” swarming our border are fleeing shitholes. They just didn’t use that word. But when Trump did, suddenly according to the Left it became racist to say that the people at the border were fleeing bad places. That totally undermines asylum claims too, because Democrats are saying it’s so wrong to claim that Central and South American nations are in bad shape that it’s racist to do so, so how are we to believe people when they come here requesting asylum? Our laws don’t allow you to request asylum from paradise.

---

Congressman Gutierrez said to Trump “stop calling people like me breeders”. At least when liberals distorted the Charlottesville thing they still used something Trump said. Gutierrez is just making up random stuff now.

As to his hypocritical outrage, I will say this: you don’t care either Gutierrez otherwise you wouldn’t be part of the party demanding money that could help stop that violence goes to people who look like you. You want to call Trump a racist, but here you are supporting a party that will take money from those blacks shooting each other that you mention and send it to help people like you enter the country to strain our welfare programs that the inner-city Chicago blacks rely on, as Obama said.

---

Playing right into the hands of the white supremacist groups feeding off the anger and fear whites are feeling (as I started this post off describing), MSNBC confirms that whites are the only race who have ever done a bad thing in the history of the world. All other races are divine gods living in peace. They believe that being white means being evil. Meanwhile, MSNBC says Trump is the one trying to divide the races against each other.

---

Some guy from The Atlantic told CNN that Fox News gets its ratings by “making white people scared and angry”. I don’t watch Fox News. I’m too cheap to pay for it. For my job and this blog I watch you a lot though. And I do get scared and angry when I listen to people like him. Remember that long rant I went into where I applied Leftwing justifications for urban youth violence to white people? I didn’t ONCE say Fox News was where they were getting their info. I said they were listening to liberals like that guy from The Atlantic. People like him and CNN and MSNBC as noted just above saying whites are evil. They are doing more for white nationalists than Fox News ever could.

For a network that attacks white people so much, they sure do love white women. Image from an MSNBC tweet, criticism from the Left.

It’s easy to say the Left hates whites as a generalization, but hard to prove if no one on the Left says anything. But EVERYONE on the Left is saying it; they’re providing the evidence; THEY’RE providing the grounds for the fearmongering! Serwer might as well have said “Discovery Channel’s shark week gets ratings by making people scared of sharks”. We are perfectly justified in fearing our predators. And by the way, with all the times CNN and MSNBC say whites are evil, it sure seems like they get their ratings by making non-whites scared and angry. Even if Fox News did do that for whites, why is it wrong when that happens but right when CNN and MSNBC and I guess you too do it? What do you call MSNBC claiming that Trump wants to “exterminate Latinos” (I watched the clip- that wasn’t an accident, and she knows that a lot fewer people are going to see that off-air apology than saw the on-air remarks)?

---

Francis was out saying that mass shootings and immigrant children in cages don’t happen unless the President is out “giving people permission”. So… O’Rourke said Obama gave permission for Sandy Hook and Pulse Nightclub and Gabby Giffords, and Obama is responsible for putting kids in cages. Well, if he thought for a moment about his gaffe he’d realize that’s what he was saying. By the way Beto, wasn’t some of this going on in your home state while you were in Congress? What did you do about it? The El Paso shooter said he had his views long before Trump came around, which happens to be around the same time you were a Congressman. So were you giving him permission? By your own logic, you must have been.

---

Chris Rock instagrammed out a kind of darkly humorous image about the shootings, basically saying that everyone understands all mass shooters are white. I’m not going to attack Chris Rock over that. While 25% of mass shootings are done by people who look like Chris Rock, which is really about 10% of the population, and 51% of the mass shootings this year were done by people who look like Chris Rock, the liberal media only mentions race for white people. Also, Chris Rock likely did not see a picture of the Virginia Beach mass shooter from two and a half months ago. He was a black dude.

---

This next little spiel is tangential to the shootings. Saying Trump is a racist for claiming that illegal immigrants include criminals in their midst opened the door for this line of examination. But let me head this off right here- I’m NOT saying all Hispanics are criminals nor that the victims of El Paso deserved it, because I know how this works liberal. I will make the next assertion and you’ll decide I said something completely different no matter what I say, even if you have to lie about it, just like you did with Trump at Charlottesville. You’re an idiot.

Bobby’s white face annoys me. It drips with sanctimonious hypocrisy. He just LOOKS like a stupid rich white twit pretending to be relatable, his face says it all. Plus it vaguely reminds me of a loser frat boy I was forced to room with, who probably makes four times as much money as I do because that’s how the world works. So instead have a picture from Slick Hare used in an earlier post showing why guns are not appropriate at all venues.

Anyway, Robert Francis O’Rourke decided to repeat the claim that “immigrants” (don’t know if he meant illegal or legal or all, but probably illegal) are more law abiding than U.S. citizens. The Left says they’re DREAMers, the Left says they deserve billions of dollars and free healthcare, liberals like Elijah Cummings complain about their treatment. And what of our OWN citizens? The Left does not care. Cummings is out advocating on behalf of illegals while members of his own district are in his own words walking around zombie-like because of the drugs they’re strung out on. The Left wants to import more and more despite Obama telling us only 13 years ago that this will destroy the black community. The Left says of American citizens that they’re more likely to be criminals while illegals are morally upstanding citizens (libertarians say that as well, but the facts show that illegal immigrants are much more dangerous than the average American). MS-13 consists of divine beings according to Pelosi.

The Left also says American citizens are lazy drug addicts who need the illegals to do our jobs because we’re just too stupid and incompetent. You heard that Senator’s remarks? He basically said we should just abandon the American people and now only represent illegal immigrants! And as you saw with Cummings and Pelosi, and anyone who wants open borders despite Obama’s warnings, it’s now the Democrats’ party line that the average American is to be abandoned in favor of illegals.

Oh, one more thing, about that Senator- he was Biden’s buddy Senator from Delaware when Biden was in the Senate.

---

Something interesting I ran into, might as well note it here. The El Paso shooter was kind of a Leftist, the Dayton and Bernie Bro shooters were totally leftists, and while some victims statistically may have been Trump supporters the media never reported on a Trump supporter being killed by a liberal. Even though that actually did happen.

The story apparently is one of neighbors provoking each other. However, key to this is  the murderous liberal’s defense. Part of the defense is that the Republican neighbor was provoking him by placing pro-Trump signs in his yard (the killer had anti-Trump signs in his). So basically, having a pro-Trump sign can be used as justification for murdering someone, or at least that’s part of what they were going for. If a liberal is sufficiently triggered by a pro-Trump sign, then you should give them a lesser sentence if they murder the guy who put the sign up to deliberately provoke the killer. Blaming the victim. Now yes, the Republican guy may have been an asshole, but the liberal shot him, waited a few seconds standing over the motionless body, then shot him again. Then tried to claim all that was self-defense spurred by years of provocation, such as having a pro-Trump sign in the yard.

Meanwhile, the Associated Press, alleged purveyors of unbiased reporting, found that there was no political motive whatsoever in the shooting and dismissed any statements to the contrary as just being from some rightwing nuts. So I guess the killer himself was a rightwing nut, despite his anti-Trump signs and pro-liberal positions and all that. He must have been, Associated Press said so!

---

That’s It For Now

Saturday Night became Sunday Morning. 7am. And this post is looking pretty dern long, so I’ll just bow-out here and pick up the other hunk for Wednesday.

Senator Warren gives a white power signal after her white supremacist supporter in Dayton kills a bunch of people causing her and her allies to make a bunch of money. Image actually from Vox and taken months ago, and signal would more likely be the black power gesture.

Why we Need The Electoral College

A Map of the Electoral College distribution of votes. Image from printableworldmap.net

Ever since the Electoral College fulfilled their duty in December there have been calls from sore loser Democrats to abolish it and pathetic arguments based on selective reasoning, like the Electoral College is somehow Racist. Keep in mind this tantrum came after they begged and pleaded with the members of the Electoral College to ignore their duty. This is the most childish behavior coming from childish minds. They didn’t have a problem when the Electoral College worked in their favor and put Obama into office twice of course. Sadly back then it was Republicans decrying it, though in more rational and level headed tones.

Barack Obama. He was put into office twice by the Electoral College. Image from evil.news

I too at one time was critical of the Electoral College as are many Americans. The problem was that I didn’t know enough about it and how it benefits the fair election of our President. Interestingly, a popular vote would be the least effective and least democratic way to handle our elections and would result in nearly no voter participation. The Electoral College is not in any way obsolete and can barely be improved, in fact, the final version of the Electoral College as outlined in the Twelfth Amendment is needed more than ever. There are plenty of old problems that make it essential as well as new ones which further it’s usefulness.

And The Republic For Which It Stands

First off you have to realize, America is NOT a democracy. For those of you who don’t remember the Orwellian practice of chanting the pledge of allegiance from your elementary school days, the United States is a Republic. To be exact it is a Constitutional Republic. In reality, an actual Democracy ensures there is no freedom, if we were a Democracy then slavery might still be legal and Native American’s might have been wiped out a long time ago because we would be following the directive of the majority which is seldom right. By dividing power between different branches of a government and requiring that we elect representatives this ensures that the voice of the people is heard while at the same time ensuring that the majority does not have the power to trample over the rights of individuals at will.

Now you may ask what any of this has to do with the Electoral College. Well, the Electoral College divides the responsibility of electing the President and Vice-President between 50 States rather than just between a small handful of states. Does that make sense to you?  Another way of explaining it would be like dividing a pack of M&Ms for a bunch of kids. You can leave the decision on how to divide them to the older and bigger kids and hope they will be fair (which Human Nature states they will not be), or you can open the pack and divide them up between the group making sure even the smallest kids get at least 1 or 2 pieces.

A political cartoon about the Electoral College. It illustrates that without it, presidential candidates would only pay attention to 4 states and that the votes from the 46 other states would be worth practically nothing. Image from michaelpramirez.com

This is how the US would look to a Presidential Candidate if we went by the popular vote. Knowing that those 4 states would put them into office, they would focus on the needs of those states leaving the rest of the nation neglected. There is an argument that the Electoral College gives Disproportionate power to smaller states however that is totally untrue. In fact, it levels the playing field and makes sure the smaller states have their voice heard by the nation. In reality, the popular vote is the unfair system since it would put all of the power into the hands of larger states which would effectively overlook the concerns and needs of the smaller states in the same way the older kids would overlook the desires of the younger kids to have an M&M or 2 in my hypothetical scenario.

Tyranny of The Majority

What I just described would be disastrous for the country. Of course, it is wrong to leave the fate of the entire nation in the hands of a few states, or in reality a few cities. To understand the issues with a popular vote you need look no further than my home State of Maryland. Maryland has only gone Republican 2 times in the last 10 General Elections. What keeps Maryland a blue state is the dense populations of Baltimore City and Prince Georges County. This has enabled a Democrat Majority in Maryland’s Legislature which has also led to the state being heavily gerrymandered. Now there is only 1 Republican Electoral District in Maryland existing on the Eastern Shore and Harford County, even though the far west of the state is heavily Republican.

Because of this, and even before the gerrymandering for that matter, the legislature in Annapolis has been effectively able to ignore the needs and concerns of the people living in the mountains. This has led to a sad decline in those areas. The most drastic display of that is the City of Cumberland, Maryland; once called the Queen City for being the second largest in the State, it is now essentially only a Train Depot or another exit along Interstate 68. Once a city of heavy industry, due to heavy regulations out of Annapolis and their neglect in helping to replace those industries that disappeared the area slowly declined and the city has barely any new infrastructure even though it is the center of Allegheny County. They do not even try to repave and reorient the Interstate 68 Offramp, even it has a heavy volume of traffic incidents. Because of this and many other reasons the people of Garrett, Allegany, Washington, Frederick, and Carroll Counties have begun a movement to secede from Maryland and form an entirely new state which has gained momentum after Brexit. Don’t confuse this with Calexit though. Unlike crybaby California whose only grievance is that their candidate lost an election, the people of Western Maryland are really and truly suffering because they are going unheard.

Everybody Gets a Voice And More

The reason I decided to highlight this was to demonstrate how pure Democracy that has gone out of control damages lives. Western Maryland is hurt because the cities in the east decide the Governor and the Governor then decides to reduce the influence of the west of the state because that is what the eastern cities want. That is the danger of a popular vote presidency, while the presidents cannot reduce the voice of the midwest he can still ignore their concerns and appoint officials that will do the same or pass regulations that go against their best interests to placate those who dwell in the cities. The cities have no right to decide what is best for the rest of the nation, they do not know or care about the needs of the midwest and this is a good reason they do not have any right to be the sole deciders of the fate of the nation. This is what the Electoral College protects us from, it makes sure everyone has an equal voice and protects the citizens from “the tyranny of the majority”.

A satirical map of the Electoral College. Not only does this show the bigoted attitude the Left has towards Middle America, it is another good example of why we need the Electoral College. Image from kym-cdn.com

All that said, those are the extreme examples for the reasons behind the institution. Rember, the Electoral college vote has reflected the national vote all but 5 times since the system was put into place. And that too is a good thing for the most part since it shows harmony with the choices of the people. It gives everyone an equal voice even though, in essence, 6 states have a disproportionate amount of Electors and are largely the deciding factors of the Presidential Elections. But it still requires the candidates to make an effort to connect with other states since even if one candidate won all 6 of those states (which is totally impossible because of their wildly different social make-ups), they would still have to court many others as well to reach the 270 Minimum Electoral Votes to claim the presidential seat.

However, that is not the end of the protections it provides. Electoral Voting helps avoid Run-Off Elections. While it is also true that it is nearly impossible for there to be a tie in the popular vote, it is equally impossible with the Electoral Vote. In fact, it has never happened. If however, it did then the vote would revert to the House. I somehow doubt that there would be a solution as easy as that in the case of the Popular Vote since the same complaints would arise that are now currently being directed at the Electoral College.

It also ensures the certainty of the vote. If there were a small margin of error in a Popular Vote Election then a Candidate could claim foul and call for recounts in states he or she thinks they may gain a sufficient amount of votes. This could go on back and forth for weeks or months even, leaving the presidential seat up in the air. From what I have seen after the 2016 elections I believe this could lead to massive civil unrest with mentally unstable people going wild one week because their candidate lost and gloating the next because they think they have won, then getting even more violent the next time they think they are losing. This obviously isn’t at all acceptable.

Additionally, in the last century, the Electoral College has become a protection against another new threat, Voter Fraud. Despite recent bogus claims by Democrats that there is no voter fraud, not only is evidence accumulating that there is indeed widespread voter fraud, it shows that Democrats are the ones committing it and profiting from it. First, there was the fraud unveiled during the Wisconsin and Michigan recounts. Trump gained 131 Votes in Wisconsin while in Michigan they found that Detroit counted more votes than the actual number voters, of course in Hillary’s favor. Also, a recent study found that around 2 Million non-citizen Hispanics are illegally registered to vote. Between these and other factors it has been hypothesized that Hillary Supporters cry baby claims she won the popular votes are extremely false, with some calculations claiming she lost by 22,000 votes.

 

Failed Presidential Spinster Hillary Clinton.

 

Had we decided the presidency by a Popular vote, Hillary Clinton would have won and been rewarded for the criminal action of herself and her supporters. That would completely have undermined the legitimacy of the election and thus the legitimacy of the government. Luckily the final result is determined by the electors who are voted for by their states. Even by committing voter fraud, Hillary could only have succeeded in a limited number of states or districts. It would be virtually impossible for her to commit fraud in rural areas where she is likely to meet more resistance from Republican Election Judges than cooperation and the same would apply if it had been the other way around; if a Republican committed fraud he would face resistance rather than cooperation in areas that are heavily Democrat. Committing fraud in enough counties and in enough states to sway an Electoral Vote is pretty much impossible because of this country’s bi-partisan nature. So yet again, the Electoral College saves the day.

Can It Be Made Better?

Does that mean that the system cannot be improved? To be honest I think it can in a couple of ways. One way would be to legally bind an elector to his vote, making it a criminal offense to break with their vote except in extreme cases. One problem now is that Electors do not face sufficient punishment for doing this. At the most, they face a fine in some states. That to me is not a real deterrent. Just look at last November when liberals were begging and threatening the Electors because they wanted them to vote against Trump, at that time some of them were offering to pay any fines or legal fees that would arise from breaking their oath which to me is tantamount to a bribe.

Another concept that could be improved is how states award their electoral votes. With the exception of Nebraska and Maine, every state awards all of their votes by popular vote. This is one reason I believe voter turnout is low especially in big states since even if you vote you will not even be able to get even one Elector for your Candidate. Because of this, I believe that for states with 4 or more electoral votes should award their votes according to the percentage of votes each Candidate got in that state. A simple example would go something like this. Using Idaho which has exactly 4 electoral votes as an example, let’s imagine that the percentage of Idaho’s Population that voted for Trump was 75% and The percentage that voted for Hillary was 25%. So under this new guideline, Trump would get 3 Electors and Hillary would get 1 rather than Trump getting all 4 electors. Trump still gets more but the 25% feels represented.

Of course, there is no real easy answer. What is easy to answer is why each party criticizes it when they lose. They feel cheated. But this time Democrats are also criticizing the institution out of hatred for Middle America. They blame Hillary’s loss on, “Whitelash”, as they call it. I mean, of course, it has to be racism!! It couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the midwest feeling neglected by the last administration, or how dishonest Hillary was, or the blatant contempt hardcore liberals show the Midwest which does not share any of their values.

Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States
                  Image from wikimedia.org

Donald Trump is President now. He won fairly through the Electoral College, possibly the best system for selecting a leader this world currently has. Liberals not accepting the results of the election decided by the electoral college is a direct threat to democracy. Well not really, because there is nothing whining liberals can do to change the results. They can kick and scream and cry all they want but the electoral college will not go away, just remember it is them kicking and screaming and acting like children that contributed to the electoral college being charged with voting the way it did. So actually, let’s hope they keep it up cause we are just going to ignore them and vote for Trump again. And don’t forget to thank them in advance for handing us victory again in 4 years whenever you possibly can.

Has the Election Really Been Rigged Against Trump?

So recently Donald Trump came under heavy fire for his assertions that the election has been rigged against him. And to some degree, that’s the right reaction because it is not as rigged as he seems to think it is. But don’t forget the time-honored adage, “Just because you are crazy doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you.” Indeed to some degree, there is a bit of rigging against Trump that has taken place both on a private and an official level. Can Trump overcome it? Maybe but first we have to understand what he is up against.

This article is a list of ways the race has been rigged against Trump with video evidence. Maybe you’ll see what even I myself reluctantly see and must admit.

 

#1: Debate Bias

So maybe not the best example video but it has been asserted that Lester Holt Colluded with the Hillary Campaign to rig the debate in Clinton’s Favor. Honestly, I am iffy about the hand signals but a Poker Expert has claimed that he believes Hillary was signaling Holt. However, while I am iffy on the use of hand signals I am 100% sure the debate was rigged to be extremely biased against Trump and favorable towards Hillary.

The first Prime Example was the fact that Holt hammered Trump with slanderous accusations and biased questions and neglected to ask Hillary a single question about any of her scandals unless they were brought up. Seriously though, any sane person watching this video can see that Holt has it out for Trump. Not only was he slamming Trump’s Tax plans and misrepresenting them, he then attempted to slander Trump by asserting that Trump supported the Iraq War. Meanwhile, Hillary smiles and grins like she knew this was going to happen. The only time Holt directed a remotely critical question at Hillary is when Trump brought up her emails, and even then the question was worded in a way that allowed her to be totally dismissive of the issue without looking like she was trying to avoid the question.

It has also come to light that Hillary was provided questions from the CNN debate before the actual event by DNC chair Donna Brazile. In an Email Exchange posted on Wikileaks between Brazile and Members of Hillary’s Campaign entitled “From time to time I get the questions in advance”, she outlined a question that was to be asked at the CNN debate. This brings up many questions. The biggest is “Why is CNN providing these questions to the chair of either party in the first place?” But I think we all know the answers to that.

Of course being that this is CNN the buck doesn’t stop there. Backstage the Focus Group of “Undecided Ohio Voters” were asked leading questions. The person asking the questions also made an effort to clearly avoid any questions compelling the focus group to speak their honest opinion about Hillary. In no stretch of the objective mind was the CNN debate in any way Balanced and Unbiased. Looking objectively, this debate was meant as a gauntlet in which Lester Holt and CNN were to take shots at Trump and make efforts to paint Hillary in a favorable light. It was totally unethical behavior and I hope the Republican Candidate’s in 2020 make a point out of refusing to cooperate in any CNN moderated debates.

#2 Political / Legal Bias

Oh, we all Remember that. People call it the Hillary defense, “I was grossly incompetent and broke the law but I didn’t mean anything by it so make me president.” Let’s see though, how did the rest of the FBI and the justice department react to that? Yeah, Comey better hope the crook Hillary wins or else he may see the inside of a federal prison. Or not. I mean only the Clinton’s and their friends seem to be above the law after all only Clinton’s can meet with the Attorney General while their spouse is currently under criminal investigation for illegal actions they took while in office. They are american royalty after all, if a Clinton and a Bush get married we can just cancel all the elections and disband Congress and the Supreme Court!!

Oh but it doesn’t stop there. The email scandal is just the tip of the Iceberg. There is also the Clinton Pay to Play Scandal, evidence now shows that during her time in the State Department members and donors to the Clinton Foundation were given special treatment and provided special access to diplomats and the like. Oh and lets not forget how Hillary is accepting money from the Saudi Government. You know the Saudi’s right? The ones who execute gays? But we all know how Hillary feels about gays.

And in the meanwhile the Trump University Lawsuit is still going through the Civil Courts. I hope the hypocrisy isn’t lost on you here. Oh I am not defending Trump at all though people. But here is a novel idea, maybe the outcome of civil or criminal legal action should depend on whether or not a person is guilty or innocent. You know, as opposed to their last name or the size of their bank account or their political affiliation?

#3 Reporting Bias

I can’t even find a that sums up all this to make the header to this section. So let’s jump right in. The media is extremely biased as they focus on every one of Trump’s Scandals. Now while we all know about how Trump mocked the disabled since the media howled about it for weeks, but not a peep was mentioned about Hillary calling a black servant the “N” word. Oh that’s not the end of it though, while they commented on Trump being endorsed by a member of the KKK (an endorsement he didn’t ask for) the fact that Hillary Clinton’s mentor and close friend Robert Byrd was a high-ranking member of the KKK and that she gave him a loving tribute in 2010 was never mentioned. Perhaps most upsetting is that they covered Trump’s 2005 comments about “grabbing her by her pu**y” they either ignore or try to justify Hillary’s 1975 defense of a pedophile in which she blamed the 12-year-old victim and the interview in the 80’s where she laughed about the case. I have a 2-year-old sister so that last one really pisses me off so much. I mean if Trump grabbed my sister I would beat him black and blue, but if my sister had been the victim in that 1975 case and I heard Hillary Rodham accuse my sister of asking for it and claiming she fantasizes about older men I would have killed Hillary in the courtroom without caring about the consequences.

Sadly we can’t hold the Media Legally accountable. The 1st amendment protects propaganda and courts have held up that compelled speech is as illegal as attempts to censor speech. So The media can act as Hillary’s goons without any fear of consequences. Honestly you need to sift through the internet to get the whole story or any story. After all when you try to tell the truth on CNN and stuff it just doesn’t fly with them.

 

Closing thoughts:

So you have to ask yourself why if Hillary has all of these more outrageous scandals that we don’t hear about them? Why if she has committed these illegal acts she is not in jail? Could it be because the Media wants Hillary in the white house at any cost? Could it be because the current administration doesn’t want to lose control? What we all need to remember is that the mainstream media exists to pander to and lie for the Democrats. Propaganda is alive and well. Trump is no prized pig but this election has been rigged against him as much as the Democrats possibly can. They will not stuff ballot boxes or hack voting systems or anything outright illegal, but they will be sure to withhold the truth and withhold justice to make sure the person they picked gets into the Whitehouse. And we NEED to stop that because if nothing else it sends the message to the Democrats that we can be controlled and they can control elections. And if that happens, the end result will be the loss of our 2 party system and the realization of the Democrats dream of a fascist 1 party system.

Update: It is unsual for me to update before an article comes out but this is breaking news and I do not have time to incorporate it seamlessly into this article. Voting machines in Texas had a “malfunction” where the machines were recording Republican votes as Democrat votes. In short, the machines recorded a vote for Hillary when voters tried to vote for Trump. Hopefully an investigation will be started soon and quickly. If it comes to light the DNC or Hillary’s campaign were involved then I feel she should be removed from the ballot in all 50 States and a Criminal investigation should be started for election fraud.