History Is Written By Who?

histwriter

History being written. From “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” (EMI Films, 1975)

A curious thought crossed my mind. The Left plays the long game. As LBJ once observed when passing his Great Society policies “I’ll have those [not-so-nice-word for African Americans] voting Democrat for the next 200 years”. And so it has come

histbj

Fun fact: LBJ supposedly did not watch the moon landing. image from wikimedia commons

to pass, blacks always vote overwhelmingly Democrat even when the GOP candidate is black and the Democrat is white (I love this source, it’s a white history teacher telling blacks how to think and which party hates them!). Notice the gradual rewriting of history too- they say on their website that they were at the forefront of civil rights for two hundred years. How do I interpret that anyway? Are they saying their support for slavery equaled civil rights? Are they saying that George Wallace was a civil rights icon? Or are they pretending none of that ever happened, just like the blacks who vote for them? (In the case of George Wallace, they are.) We are told that all such Democrats are just Republicans in disguise, or if we examine closer we are told that the parties shifted and today’s Democrats are what the Republicans were at the time of Lincoln and during the Civil Rights movement. Except, of course, no such changeover took place. But that’s what we believe as a country.

 

It’s not just history that the Left is changing though, as we see right now the news media is making every move Trump makes- even ones Hillary herself said she would have done- into deplorable acts of evil that will destroy the world, kill American citizens, etc. The leftwing media operation is enormous. It’s not just the big three networks and major newspapers and CNN. It’s right down to your local newspaper. The internet (and its subunit social media) is full of lefties, probably more so since the tech-oriented youth with their popular blogs and webcomics tend to be liberal (just look at the darn things! Plus, this usage report indicates that liberals find plenty to… well, use.), so the conservative voice there is a whisper. Even more of one given how twitter, facebook, google, and youtube tend to censor conservative thought, not just on their services but in their companies too. (Speaking of re-writing history, my search for material, aside from showing forums asking these questions where every two out of three responses was an insult at conservatives, turned up this 2010 laugh riot here about how Republicans want “commanding leadership”, want to enforce speech codes, and stifle debate! HA!)

And My Point Is…?

Where am I going with this bleak portrait of conservatism’s inferior messaging ability? To the dustbin of history, like the rest of you. Think about it- what do historians use when trying to write everything from theses to textbooks? Contemporary reporting. Newspapers as well as TV and radio depending on what existed at the time. Literature, music, radio shows, movies, and TV programs are analyzed to determine what people thought was important. And what’s the one common thread today between all of the aforementioned institutions? They’re far Left and evidently in a race to see how much farther they can go.

In a hundred years, who’s going to think to look at Fox News or National Review? Will there even be records of their broadcasts or online publications? The Wall Street Journal with its preserved hardcopies might get a mention, but for every positive article, they do you can find negative counterpoints in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and Washington Post. In the future, historians will see all this negative information about conservatism compared to one or two positive footnotes from the few rightwing outlets out there, and those historians will make the assumption that conservatives were wrong about everything and hated, and doubtless many research papers and theories about mass brainwashing will be developed to understand how Trump rose to power.

A Parallel Made So Often Today

Actually, this reminds me of how the history of Hitler coming to power is treated. We’re given a lot about charisma, crowd hypnosis, and mastery of groupthink and stuff like that. The assumption is made based on our current understanding of what had happened, which itself is not necessarily reflective of what really happened. Hitler was just another politician. He promised a chicken in every pot. Hope and change, in other words. So what if he seemed anti-semitic? The Left’s precious nursery of future leaders (college) is full of them today, as is the rest of the world! All those Hispanics coming in? Jew haters. Asians coming in? Maybe just the old man that rents a room in my building. The Middle East? Jew haters. Europe itself? Jew haters. The Democrat Party’s preferred base of blacks and Latinos? Jew haters. That’s TODAY, despite the Holocaust. Imagine how much worse it was back then, only thirty years removed from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion!

Anyway, my point is that Hitler was indeed a showman but historians (all are usually liberal) made him into much more, seemingly to justify the anomaly of what we now know to be a bad person being elected to run a country of what we thought were good people, because one thing the Left always assumes is that people (other than Republicans) are basically good. (Unrelated, but when trying to find more than lefties saying people are good, I found this astounding claim from 2008 that any given SJW disproves within seconds.) The same thing will happen to Trump. All the records the average historian might access would show Trump to be the root of all evil, just as most of the 1940s coverage of Hitler does thanks to World War II. Fox News will be likened to Goebbels and his propaganda network, and thus ignored except when studying the art of lying. Remember- newspapers publish (and retract) faulty statistics all the time that prove the liberal agenda. How many historians bother to look on the back page of later papers after finding the headlines they need for their research?

So… Did We Win?

histvictory

From “Cheers” (NBC,1982-1993)

Once again, the Left has us licked on the long game. They own the institutions of learning, the institutions of reporting, and the institutions that determine what is fact and what isn’t. They will see all this negative stuff about conservatism, regard it as fact and the interpretation of everyone at the time because let’s face it: the voice that yells the loudest has the longest echo through history. And so when future policymakers are learning history or studying past bills to see what works, they will see all of this negativity and assume that conservatism is hated and regarded as a failure, and the future will shift Left accordingly.

Blogs and other such things as this will only last until North Korea EMPs our power grid. Besides, most of the stuff I’ve seen referenced from the past that was outside the mainstream media in ages before blogs were enforcing the Left’s talking points. Unfortunately, like with climate science, today’s historians seem to be in pursuit of evidence backing their preconceived notions about how the Left has always been right. Guess that’s why the only jobs outside their chosen fields they can get involve mopping vomit off floors, fitting that they’d clean it up after a career of adding the equivalent to our knowledge-base.

Well, that was fun to write! Any non-violent solutions? Feel free to leave a comment. Just remember- the Left is good at spinning stuff. If anything bad happens to them they’ll just say we should pity them more and give more money and pass new laws.

The_Future

Fig. 1: The Future. At least it’s in widescreen…

 

Advertisements

The Cold War Heats Up!

*Not all of the opinions voiced in this article represent those of C-Gaymer. I do however support a diversity of opinion or views, however, I must clarify my positions. My official stances on Georgia and Crimea are that the South Otessan intervention was justified to prevent then-President George Saakashvili from committing genocide against the people of the breakaway region. As for Crimea, it is my view that Crimea decided to secede from Ukraine in an open and fair election, and did so in response to the coup in Kiev undertaken by Neo-Nazi groups backed by the EU and the Obama Regime. For more information about the latter, please google Pravvy Sektor, or go to youtube and search “Maidens Puppets” in Ukranian. While Russia is not by any means perfect, C-Gaymer does not hold any misconceptions about them being some tyrannical superpower, at least not any more than our own country is, in respect to their foreign policy. In the end dear reader, it is up to you to decide your own position. -C-Gaymer
russflag
From Wikimedia Commons. Yes, there is white above the blue. You can’t tell but it’s there.

“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back”, or so Obama told Mitt Romney during the 2012 election (and the DNC reaffirmed). Five years later, the USSR is suddenly back according to Obama’s party and bigger than ever. Why? Good question. Let’s take a look at what’s happened.

The Russians allegedly tried to interfere in the 2016 election. Terrible if true (though not likely), except like any good country they’ve probably been interfering in every U.S. election they could, and in the U.S. government for sure ever since the 1920s. Any election that CPUSA (not to be confused with the DNC) ran or endorsed a candidate in/for, technically that was Russian interference. And of course, we have

russted

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), gold medalist from the 1969 Chappaquiddick Triathlon. image from Wikimedia Commons.

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D) asking the Soviets to interfere to stop Ronald Reagan from being re-elected. None of that proven interference is worth a war (in fact, they deny the Soviet presence in the government in their quest to smear Sen. Joe McCarthy so that we ignore the stuff he was right about), but the Russian’s alleged interference in the 2016 election- which consists mainly of dumping Clinton Campaign emails and spreading fake news about Democrats- is apparently an act of war. Leaking hidden things about the candidate that any good journalist should have reported (if only we had any in America) is an act of war. Interference by a foreign power wasn’t serious when Bill Clinton gave ICBM technology and other goodies to the Chinese to please donors (Chinese ones too maybe), it wasn’t serious in the past two years when a Chinese billionaire was caught-up with Democrats, but it is serious now that the Democrats claim the Russians spread some real and misinformation about their candidate. Curious.

Frenemies?

For those who might be tempted during Hate Week to believe Democrats were always hard on the Russians, your bubble is about to burst. In retaliation for invading Georgia, the Obama team and Secretary of State Clinton took the hardline stance that… America was at fault for bad relations with Russia and a novelty red reset button was needed. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State under Obama took the very anti-Russian stance of… saying that we needed to create a new Silicon Valley in Russia, and saying that “our goal is to help strengthen Russia”. Barack Obama, when confronted in 2012 about American efforts for missile defense in Europe, told the Russians in no uncertain terms that… he would have more flexibility to negotiate our backing down after he was re-elected. After Russia invaded Crimea, Obama read the Budapest Memorandum which called for us to defend Ukraine from invasion and… enacted a sanction or two and had John Kerry say stuff. And then, of course, there’s Uranium One where Obama’s DOJ threatened an informant who wanted to spill the beans about a corrupt deal that benefited the Russians, but the Left outright doesn’t believe that happened so what can I say?

All of that of course was turned on its head in 2016. The official line became that the Russians committed the mortal sin of opposing the Democrats, even though the official line also indicated the Russians had spread fake news about/tried to hack the Republicans. It didn’t matter, the Russians and Liberals (Democrats, it’s interchangeable) always had a sort of understanding, and the Left was told their Russian buddies just betrayed them. How seriously do they take this? Democrats are now criticizing Obama and his policies!

Bear in mind also that during the election, the Obama Admin believed that this alleged Russian hacking was just something to be glossed over because Hillary would win, at least according to official policy. But then Hillary lost. Democrat opinion leaders, politicians, and voters felt hurt and betrayed by the American public. They did and still are desperately grasping at straws to explain why their candidate who was perfect on everything and even had the gender card to play could lose. Then they remembered all that talk from Hillary’s campaign about the Russians. Those traitors were to blame! Benedict Arnoldovitches! Well, them and the American people, half of whom are deplorables according to the candidate Democrats wanted to win thus must have agreed with on such matters.

Just Pick One Already!

So as a way to save face, we’re told that the Russians “hacked” the election. It implies they actually altered the vote counts, which (regardless of who actually tried to hack us) isn’t the case. All they managed to do was spread some info like I said above, which didn’t really affect the outcome (common sense tells us this- Hillary and Trump were close before Hillary’s emails leaked, yet a month later Hillary did better and won the popular vote! If anything, data shows the hacking improved her numbers). With that narrative not getting much traction (to me, even though it

russdem

Stubborn bunch, aren’t they. Stubborn as a… oh I get it now! image from Wikimedia Commons

wasn’t seriously about the Russians changing the votes, it seemed the narrative faded out after that was debunked in sworn testimony, so take that for what it’s worth on their motives), we were told that Trump colluded with the Russians somehow, either to hack the election or leak info on Hillary or spread lies or whatever-else-because-everyone-tells-you-something-different. With no evidence of Trump colluding, but evidence that showed the collusion seemed to be between the Clinton campaign, the DNC, Fusion GPS, and the Russians, the new narrative that’s being clung to as of this writing is this idea that Trump is guilty of “obstruction of justice” for something unrelated to the election itself.

Meanwhile, a few Democrats still are pushing the collusion idea despite several prominent ones in the know claiming there is no evidence for it. Anyone remember Benghazi and the IRS scandal, when Dems said no evidence means those matters should be put to rest? Didn’t think so.

Greener Pastures

russstein

Fig. 1: A Typical Soviet Spy. Image from Wikimedia Commons

Oh yeah, let’s not forget Jill Stein, the green party candidate. The Special Counsel that at first was investigating whether or not Trump or anyone on Trump’s staff colluded with Russia but has now gone to checking if Trump obstructed justice is now investigating if Jill Stein colluded with the Russians. Jill Stein’s only crime was opposing Hillary Clinton and maybe diverting a few needed votes from her. Good enough for the Special Counsel, remember: FISA warrants for the FBI to monitor communications between Trump officials were probably generated based on the debunked Fusion GPS Trump dossier, which the Clinton Camp/DNC (no difference) funded.

Why can’t Republicans get this clever?

Let’s say the RNC funded a bogus research paper on their opponent, worked with the Russians to generate that research paper obliquely through the research firm they were paying, had the FBI use that paper to obtain surveillance permits on their Democrat opponents, and then said that the Democrats were the ones colluding and cheating in the election. Nixon was probably the last Republican that would’ve pulled a stunt like that. George H.W. COULD have, he was director of the CIA, but he doesn’t seem like the type.

As an aside for those of you about to jump in by saying George W. lied about Iraq, let me remind you that A: it was clear we were invading months in advance so Saddam had plenty of time to remove the WMDs which B: we actually did find according to none other than the New York Slimes  (as Mark Levine calls it). There is of course C- your favorite philanderer and rapist ol’ Bubba Clinton fired missiles into Iraq for pretty much the same reasons that George W. invaded. And instead of funding the rebuilding effort with oil money we… lost a bunch of it to bad locals and general mismanagement, were looking at legislation to make sure Iraqis were equally receiving revenues from its sales and saying we needed to stop dumping our money in there- not oil money, OUR money- according to liberal icon Rep. DWS who’s statements about our money were supported by Democrat Reps. Meeks and Tim Ryan, and oil prices were rising after the war despite its alleged aims, so there goes that American-Imperialism-Iraq-for-Oil narrative that’s made its way into movies, anime, and video games of all places.

Sorry, sore point. Where was I? Oh yeah, the USSR wanted Trump to win so that he could make the West part of Russia or something like that. Democrats never did adequately explain the end game to this alleged collusion. Putin gets a puppet in the White House, they say. A puppet who lobbed missiles at Putin’s buddy in Syria exactly as the tough anti-Putin Hillary said she would’ve done if she were President (but which the Left still criticized Trump for doing anyway), a puppet who is taking a harsh stance towards Putin’s acquaintances in North Korea and China. And of course, a puppet that thinks maybe a nuclear war over Hillary losing is a bad idea. Maybe Democrats want us to hate Russia to the point of war because they think Hillary losing is the end of the world, so they want to make that particular outcome happen. Consider that when you vote for the impeachment party in 2018, I guess.

But wait, there’s more!

I’d conclude there, but I do what to point out just how pervasive this Russian bogeyman has become. In the Virginia governors race, the guy who won- Ralph Northam- had run on his behalf a really terrible ad that basically said all Republicans wanted to kill minority children. The ad depicted a truck owned by a Gillespie supporter running down minority children and concluded with a message that this will happen if the Republicans win. First of all, quite the opposite happens when Republicans win (and sometimes liberals try to dismiss or justify it by attacking the victims). Second of all and most relevantly: the Left blamed the online backlash on Russian bots. And the only reason weasily little Northam won despite that stunt and his lame excuses is that Democrats restructured Virginia’s population by importing voters. The Left is also claiming Russia was interfering to help Republican Roy Moore become a senator. I suspect Dems will take note of this as part of a winning strategy for 2018 so it will be interesting seeing the diplomatic crisis Democrats will cause by blaming the Russians for everything.

russr

До свидания, товарищ. image from wikimedia commons

Why Democrats hate the Electoral College (Or any system to ensure Electoral Integrity)

Since my piece on the Electoral College has been such a smashing success I have decided to do this fun follow up, expanding upon my criticisms of efforts to undermine our electoral system and specifically targeting the people who try. And those people are of course the members of the Democratic Party. Now it is true that sometimes Republicans screw up the system too, and I will be sure to point out what crimes they are both guilty of, but Democrats are by far the worst offenders. From calling common sense policies racist to outright fraud, Democrats have waged an all-out war on the integrity of elections to keep themselves in power and to maintain their fiefdoms. And of course all the while they deny there is any problem with our electoral system, well except the parts that are actually working. So let’s explore the cheap tricks and assaults on our freedom by the Democrats.

Night of the Living Dead (Voters)

democrats-fraud-voter-ID-dead-voting

Dead Voting has been a long-standing tradition for the Democratic Party

A time-honored tradition by Democrats has been to practice Necromancy on Election Days. By that, I mean there is a long-standing tradition of a type of Voter Fraud where Democrats cast Votes under the names of dead people who are still on the Voter Rolls. It has lead to the results of elections being overturned in municipalities as big as a whole state or as small as a city. Of course, this is something Democrats vehemently downplay the significance of as usual. This is extremely disgusting, not just because it undermines our democracy but also because it causes pain to the families of the deceased like the families involved in the Colorado investigation into Dead Voting.

Omar Mateen Registration

This is the Voter Registration of deceased terrorist responsible for the Pulse Nightclub Shooting.

Dead Voting even happens in surefire states for Democrats. Investigations began in southern California after a local CBS affiliate uncovered deceased individuals still on the active voting rolls in Los Angeles County. On the other side of the county in Virginia, a more contentious state for Democrats, a bigger scandal unfolded involving a college student working for an organization affiliated with the Democratic Party. A JMU student by the name of Andrew Spieles was found guilty by a Virginia District Court on 18 counts of Fabricating Voter Forms. He is now facing at least 100 days in prison, however, such a short prison term is not an actual deterrent in my opinion and makes me question how serious Virginia is about combatting voter fraud in any form.

Government ID is Racist……

voter-id-things-ID-needed-voter-fraudDemocrats have always fought tooth and nail against laws to require a form of ID be shown at polling places to prevent fraud. Their usual tired out response as repeated here in this piece by longtime political rabble rousers and fake new fabricator Mother Jones, the tired old claim that Black people are too poor and stupid to get an ID. Let’s examine this statement now, shall we? What sounds more racist to you dear reader, asking for a form of ID that every legal citizen has equal access to which proves they have a legal right to vote thus protecting the significance of their vote no matter their skin color or that voter ID laws are wrong because blacks are too poor and stupid to find their local DMV and pay $20 or less to get a form of identification or drivers license? Luckily this 4-minute video by Ami Horowitz shows just how asinine and racist that claim is, of course, if you ask a Democrat they will just tell you that “The sneaky Kike just tricked those Negros into disagreeing with us”.

Illegal Voting isn’t a Problem (For Us Anyway)

illegal-alien-i-vote-democrat

Democrats have been caught encouraging Illegal Immigrants to vote in our elections

In 2016 Hillary Clinton won the Popular Vote (But Lost the Electoral College) by at least 3 million votes. Coincidentally, studies now show there are nearly 2 million illegal residents also illegally registered to vote in our country. These are not unconnected phenomena either, Democrats have been caught time and time again not only covering up voting by illegal immigrants but even encouraging it. Former Dictator Barack Obama even gave veiled encouragement to illegal immigrants to vote in 2016. Of course, a person could be called ridiculous for implying Democrats call for amnesty for illegal immigrants and open borders specifically because they want these undocumented individuals to vote Democrat. Ridiculous like a Fox.

I Voted……. Twice

democrats-voted-twice

Opelousas Mayor Don Cravins Sr. encouraged voters to commit fraud to elect a left-wing senator.

Back in 2014, a shocking video surfaced of Democratic Mayor Don Cravins. In this video, he is shown encouraging voters at an event to vote twice for Senator Landrieu, adding that “tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice.” And of course, this isn’t isolated. Fox News reported last year on the voter fraud issue, most shockingly that 194 instances of double voting had been uncovered in 3 counties around the San Fransisco Bay Area. It is apparently so easy, it is as simple for them as requesting an absentee ballot, sending it in, and then going into a physical polling place and voting again. There have also been incidents of double voting where an individual is registered to vote in 2 states. This actually happened in my state with hilarious results in my opinion.

Eat’in Ain’t Cheatin (And Other Bought Votes)

catherine-pugh-mayor-baltimore-democrat

Former State Delegate and current Mayor Catherine Pugh.

Here is a fun/infuriating story. In Baltimore’s 2016 Democratic Party Mayoral primaries, an extremely bizarre incident happened that falls into the category of bought votes. In an effort to recruit campaign workers as well as voters, the Pugh Campaign was apparently giving the workers Chicken Boxes with French Fries and other assorted junk foods. They were then piled onto buses where there were bags of more junk food on the seats, and they were then taken to the early voting locations. This lovely article forgets to mention some key facts, luckily I came across these word of mouth from people working on other campaigns in those primaries. Apparently, on one of the buses used to transport voters to the polls, the potential voters found chicken boxes on their seats and they were told by a Pugh campaign worker, “Now we are going to go vote for Catherine Pugh.” Besides being a criminal act which should have resulted in Catherine Pugh being disqualified under Maryland Election Laws, in a city with a majority African American population this stunt of buying votes with chicken boxes just smacks of Racism.

hudson-hallum-democrat-arkansas-convicted-fraud

Hudson Hallum was an Arkansas State rep found guilty of voter fraud in 2012

Usually, these incidents aren’t so bizarre and racially charged though, most often Democrats buy their votes with crisp green bills. Just ask young little Hudson Hallum, who in 2011 cheated his way into a special election win against John Geelan (R) and D’James Rodgers (I). Here is the funny set up, this special election was being held for the seat of Rep Fred Smith (D) who had been removed from office for Theft. Not to be outdone by his predecessor though, little Hudson here decided to undertake a long campaign of voter fraud with the help of his father and 2 campaign workers, including “helping” absentee voters fill out their ballots and buying votes with food and money. Little Hudson only got to benefit from his fraud for a year though as he was forced to plead guilty to voter fraud in 2012 and resign the seat he bought.

Ballot-a Crap

ballot-fraud-destroy-ballots-democrats

Ballot Fraud is exceedingly common, it has also become easier with the introduction of absentee ballots.

Democrats don’t just commit voter fraud against Republicans, Bernie Sanders supporters learned this the hard way in 2016 when hundreds of thousands of ballots that were suspected to be for Bernie Sanders were destroyed in a covert and Illegal shredding operation at the San Diego Registrars Office. According to some experts, the destroyed could have possibly swayed the California Results in Sanders favor. But that isn’t the only case or type of Ballot Fraud in 2016 that occurred in California, a San Pedro man checked his mail to find 80 Absentee ballots addressed to his 89-Year-Old neighbor, none of which had her name. The Elderly woman who is hard of sight and hearing was clearly a patsy for some voter fraud attempt. Meanwhile on the other side of the country in Florida’s Broward County, Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes and her employees were caught stuffing Ballot Boxes, Destroying Ballots for President Trump, and filling Absentee Ballots for Clinton. Unfortunately, after initially filing a complaint The Florida GOP dropped it after a Judge proposed a compromise where both campaign members would have a representative present to observe the handling of ballots. Despite committing a heinous act of fraud days before the election, Miss Snipes served no jail time and kept her job.

Who Benefits and How Much?

 

acorn-voter-fraud-map

This Map shows instances of voter fraud committed by A.C.O.R.N. between 2007 – 2008

Does anybody remember A.C.O.R.N.? Well besides pimping, they also had their hands wrist deep in voter fraud through their voter registration drives. This interactive map here shows locations where A.C.O.R.N. committed their acts of fraud along with articles covering the details of the crimes. Notice anything relevant here about where these are located? Seattle, Miami, Denver, Detroit, St. Louis, these are all Liberal Strongholds that determined the outcome of governors elections, members of the state legislature, Judges. If we didnt have the Electoral College, they could have even influenced the results of presidential elections, though they may have considering the timing. What should really shock you is every one of those dots is just what is reported. There are probably thousands more unreported or uninvestigated incidents in the strongholds of the party that claims voter fraud is a myth.

 

So the answer to the question “Who does it benefit?” comes with the obvious answer, it benefits Democrats. Even if there wasn’t all of this evidence, you still have to ask yourself why. Why would they so vehemently deny that it happens? Why do they so aggressively fight investigations into it if they are so sure it doesn’t happen? I think you know the answer. So then we are faced with a bigger question now. How do we stop this criminal enterprise without hurting voters or trust in our Democracy?

 

What The Strzok Is Going On?

original unaltered image from wikimedia.org

For those of you not paying attention during the Obama Administration, it may come as a surprise just how politicized the government itself has become. I’m not talking about the elected folks, by the very nature of their jobs it’s a given that they will be politicized, I mean the bureaucracy itself. The un-elected masses that make the government work, appointees and employees alike.

Appointees are of course going to be political, but they are in a separate class from Congressmen and Presidents and members of a President’s cabinet. All of those guys have a chance to be ousted every 2-4 years. Appointees though? Forget it! Unless they are fired (which is very hard because the Supreme Court ruled that government jobs were actually private property, belonging to the people that hold them1), die, quit, or maybe for some reach a mandatory retirement age, we’re stuck with them long after the voters have determined that they hate the Administration that put them there. This contrasts with government employees, who are basically like appointees except they advance through skill or nepotism rather than the whims of the President and Congress.

Judicial Use Of Force

     What happens when all of these people become entrenched in our system? Well, let’s focus on the Judicial Branch to see (there is a 33% chance that you have no idea what I’m talking about when I say “Judicial Branch”, based on a recent Annenburg Public Policy Center poll, so stop here and look it up or just keep nodding as though you understand). Remember earlier this year all of that hubbub over President Trump’s travel ban? Amidst legal challenges, the Supreme Court declared it Constitutional. However, the judges challenging it were all leftwing appointees. The law states clearly that Trump had the authority to do what he did, SCOTUS upheld that in a 7-2 vote, yet these judges were out there saying what Trump did was illegal.

Executive Decision

     Already you can see that the law is up for grabs because of judges that are political appointees unless you have enough money and time to take it to the Supreme Court (yes it works for both sides of the aisle, but after the Obamacare rulings11,11A it seems liberals

Supreme_Court_US_2010

Why is Ginsberg on the far right? Maybe this is a colored Daguerreotype. -image from wikimedia.org

keep winning, and liberals are a bit looser with the rules anyway10, plus there’s a lot more of them9), but now let’s cross over into the Executive Branch and see how law enforcement itself is affected. I could cite the soft takeover, as seen in Baltimore. Ever since the Freddy Gray case, police have been noticeably reticent to do their jobs, and so the murder rate shot through the roof5,5A. This is part of the so-called Ferguson Effect5A, where police are hesitant to do their jobs around minorities because of zealous prosecutors and a judgmental public, fueled by negative media coverage of the police giving their local actions national attention. I call it a ‘soft takeover’ because it matches the Left’s doctrine of giving privileged status to select minority groups, in this case by pressuring police to stop enforcing the law around them. Don’t believe me? Explain why white people need to shut up12. Explain sanctuary cities, which are blatantly in violation of the law, and how it’s always characterized as benefiting the Latino community and used for gaining Latino votes.

But that’s the more subtle takeover, let’s get to the big headliner today: the FBI. The one group that’s supposed to be above reproach. Local police might be bigoted or incompetent, as AG Eric Holder thought when he ordered the investigation of the Ferguson Police Department, but certainly not the FBI. If you’ll recall, the Left was arguing that nationalizing the police was the best way to deal with bias8. So what would that nationalized police force look like?

The First Thing We Do, Let’s Bias All The Lawyers

     It would look like Special Counsel Mueller’s investigative team, of course. Politifact6, often biased to the Left, tells us that Of the 9 prosecutors on Mueller’s team who have donated to campaigns, there’s a 15-1 ratio in favor of Democrats as to whom the donations went. Of course, Politifact isn’t a very good source, they counted 15 prosecutors when at that point there would’ve been 16 to consider7. A steadfast Democrat donor who defended Obama’s immigration action in 2014 was brought onboard. Plus, several other folks on it had ties to the Clintons too, though Politifact is quite nebulous as to how the spread looks or if those involved with the Clintons had not donated, thus bringing the bias figure from 10 to possibly 12, out of 16.

Agents Of Change

     It’s more than just the lawyers though! We also have FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who has come to symbolize the bias on the team as of late. Mueller kicked him out, though I agree with Rep. Jim Jordan2 in wondering why, since so many others on the team were clearly biased too. But Strzok is a special case. In 2016, he edited then-FBI Director Comey’s exoneration statement about Hillary Clinton- specifically, he changed the wording from “Grossly negligent” (which the law says is a crime) to “extremely careless”2. Quite a change indeed, basically going from admitting that Clinton behaved illegally to saying she did the equivalent of crossing the street without looking both ways first. Strzok’s bias was in favor of Hillary, in case it wasn’t obvious. He set up the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton so that other people involved in the alleged crime were in the room with her, an unprecedented arrangement2 which obviously shows Strzok favored her.

ap_525971738662.jpg

WaPo alleges that Strzok was using an untraceable phone merely to hide his office romance, an explanation that is clearly fake news because Strzok’s true love is not known for using secure devices. – Image from Associated Press

Now we come to his text messages, sent using an allegedly untraceable FBI phone or some such (according to the texts themselves13). Strzok mentions in them a meeting where an “insurance policy” was discussed, in case Trump won13. He also mentioned that “we”, at least meaning himself and someone else at the FBI, could not take the risk of Trump getting elected3. And shortly thereafter, in the same month, the FBI starts its investigation into Trump-Russia collusion3. What a coincidence! Strzok, by the way, at the time was deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI2.

With Liberty And Justice For… The Left

     Even under Trump, it’s clear that the Left still can do plenty of damage- biased court decisions, biased legal teams, biased FBI agents in powerful positions. The Left would love nothing more than to make opposition to it illegal. We see this incubating on college campuses right now, and those snowflakes will be the avalanche that sweeps away our government in the future. But it’s not just them, this bit of typing called to mind Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issuing a terror threat assessment that declared rightwing extremists can include returning military veterans, pro-life, and anti-illegal immigration people4. Meaning like half the country at least are potential rightwing extremist terrorists and should be watched. That was in 2009; we had 7 more years of Obama bringing in people that think like that. Mueller’s team and Peter Strzok, in particular, aren’t even the tip of the iceberg, they’re the carbon molecule that came to rest on top of it!

Sources

  1. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2002/07/what_are_civil_service_protections.html                  1A. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1978/12/24/when-a-job-becomes-property-its-hard-to-fire-a-civil-servant/d503e8c9-cdfd-4d2f-a594-c2e1912bac1a/?utm_term=.9c188944eba6
  2. https://www.c-span.org/video/?438042-1/fbi-director-responds-president-trumps-attacks-agency
  3. https://www.c-span.org/video/?438282-1/deputy-attorney-general-good-fire-special-counsel
  4. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/                    4A. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dhs-domestic-terror-warning-angers-gop/
  5. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-baltimore-police-hiring-insight/baltimore-saw-steep-fall-in-police-numbers-as-murder-rate-soared-idUSKCN0ZN0BF                                                5A. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/11/ferguson-effect-study-72-us-cops-reluctant-make-stops/96446504/
  6. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2017/nov/03/sean-duffy/how-many-democrat-campaign-donors-special-counsel-/
  7. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/16/another-obama-clinton-donor-joins-muellers-legal-team-investigating-trump-campaign.html
  8. http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/a-nationalized-police-force-would-be-a-logistical-tactical-and-ethical-nightmare
  9. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-obama/obamas-judges-leave-liberal-imprint-on-u-s-law-idUSKCN1110BC
  10. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-judiciary/344468-liberal-disregard-of-judicial-deference-undermines-faith-in
  11. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/25/john-roberts-supreme-court-obamacare-editorials-debates/29301349/                                                                                                    11A. https://cei.org/blog/supreme-court-rewrites-obamacare-again
  12. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/24/dnc_chair_candidate_my_job_is_to_tell_white_people_when_to_shut_their_mouths.html
  13. http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/senate-judiciary-chair-grassley-demands-answers-insurance-policy-trump-victory-fbi-brass-using-secret-phones-cant-traced-talk-hillary/

 

Removing Their Fangs: A Thought Exercise on how Conservatives can Turn the Tide of the Culture Wars

wp-1473130401396.png

A Typical “Tolerant” Democrat teaching us about what real bigotry looks like.

Ironically this article was inspired by a smug article from a liberal rag called The Atlantic, which I sadly have no link to. The article basically made the argument that liberals should stop resorting to using the term bigot or any or its variations cause they are winning the culture war and they are always right, and using these terms only alienates us woefully left behind conservatives and prevents us from reaching their supposed pinnacle of excellence. In short, it was a delusional piece meant to both strokes their own ego while simultaneously trying to stop the damage caused by one of their more moronic tactics. Moronic and delusional as it was though, there were some hard truths in it that one could reflect upon. The major one being that even though we have facts and rationality on our side, Liberals are winning the cultural war.

brendan-eich-firefox

Brendan Eich was CEO of Mozilla till he was ousted for donating to a charity that supports traditional marriage.

Shocking Right? Some of you will argue with me that Trump in the Whitehouse is evidence that we are turning things around, our win last November though is important but also empty. We now control the government, but liberals control our media, our schools and colleges, our corporate culture, and have too huge an influence in our courts and in the UN. We are still losing the culture war so long as even an accusation of bigotry for having a viewpoint liberals don’t approve of can cost you your career, as long as Left Wing nutjobs can cherry pick the news and spin events to fit their narrative, so long as renegade judges can halt bills and presidential orders by issuing injunctions motivated by their political views and not the interests of the law, and so long as they can tell our children any lie they want and frame it as an essential fact. In 50 years, they have drilled their roots so deep that it will be exceedingly hard, though not impossible, to cut down their poison tree.

Identifying the Problem.

Screenshot_2017-04-28-21-17-27

Liberals use emotional Ad Hominem arguments to silence people they don’t agree with.

The biggest problem we face is a disparity in tactics. Liberals have no decency, have no tact, and resort to emotional arguments rather than logic. The number one problem we face is their go-to tactic, whenever they are on the losing side of an argument they will resort to ad hominem attacks such as calling their opponent bigoted or some variation thereof. Now, this is partially losing its steam, however, there is an observable tendency of conservatives to be less open about their political beliefs for fear of facing reprisals and/or being called racist. Why is this a problem though? I mean “Sticks and Stones” right? Well as I pointed out earlier, liberals have managed to weasel their way into dominating Higher Education and Corporate Culture through lies and money, so simply being labelled one of these things even arbitrarily can result in being fired or being failed by a teacher.

Lindsey-Graham

Lindsey Graham is one of the Sanctimonious “Never Trump”ers who would rather see the country and the Republican Party go to ruin than respect the President and support his agenda.

Another problem is the moral righteousness and timidity of conservatives. Now I use moral righteousness as a pretty relative term, what I mean by this is that conservatives are so intent on maintaining the perceived moral high ground and do not practice the same cognitive dissonance that allows liberals to call themselves tolerant and yet act in a bigoted manner towards people with differing views. A clear example of this contrast is attitudes about their values. If you discuss the 2nd Amendment with a conservative, he will support 2nd Amendment rights for anybody regardless of their political beliefs or race. If you have a similar discussion with a Liberal about the 1st Amendment they will at one moment tout its importance and in the next moment claim it should not apply to Christian Business owners or to people who voice opinions they view as hateful, and it is this very appeal to the least virtuous qualities of human nature that give them an edge. Additionally, Conservatives are timider, they have a respect for authority and are less likely to vocally and aggressively stand up for themselves. Liberals, by contrast, have no respect for any authority that does not fit their exact views, they are more likely to loudly stand up for themselves, resort to violence, and even go as far as harassing anybody committing a perceived injustice.

How did it get this bad?

severed head

A major problem Republicans need to get over is that acting with decency towards an indecent opponent will end in defeat for the Conservative Movement.

As stated above, the problem is essential that conservatives are more proper and honest, while liberals are the anything-goes type. People sadly gravitate towards anything-goes. Over the past 50 years, Liberals have been on a no holds barred attack on conservatives and their achievements, most notably fabricating a falsehood attributing the achievements of the conservatives to themselves while diverting responsibility for their malicious actions onto conservatives. In that 50 Years, conservatives have been largely on the defensive, relying on the confidence invested in them during the Cold War and staying honest and decent. The “honest” is fine, the problem is the “decent”. By no means am I suggesting we sink anywhere near their level, but at the same time it is staying on so high a horse that has led to our utter defeat.

Clinton_signing_AWB

In the past, we have signed away key rights by trying to compromise with Democrats, such as the 1994 Assault Weapon ban we see here being signed by Bill Clinton.

Another problem that contributed to this is compromise. Usually, compromise is a good thing, but conservatives should have never ever tried to compromise with liberals. The reason is simple, if you compromise with someone who wants all or nothing, they will take away your everything before you know it. Our current state of gun regulation is evidence of this, some of it is essential but many of the things we compromised on such as automatic weapons and clip capacities have opened the door for more demands and even irrational policies like the 1994 Federal Assult Weapons Ban. For those of you unfamiliar with the act, it deemed many cosmetic features of certain firearms to constitute an assault weapon based on the perceptions of senators and activists rather than any fact-based assessment by experts.

How do we Fight em?

The solution to combatting all this is simple, all of us conservatives need to collectively get off of our High Horses!! There are many ways to fight them back that are so simple and are not objectively immoral. Many of these are impolite, but it is a far cry better than letting the impolite and inscrutable run society. These are some of the simple steps I suggest:

  • Be Brutally Honest

    Brutal-Honesty

    At this point, humiliating Liberals is the only way to save our country.

    Conventional Right Wing orthodoxy promotes the idea of certain manners, like “if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all.” In the past, some conservatives have been selective about when to apply this and for all the wrong reasons. We need to throw this orthodoxy out of the window entirely for the right reasons!! LEAVE NOTHING UNCHALLENGED! Any lie, any fallacy, any point of ignorance, call them out on it. Make it loud and observable. Cite facts. Crush them and overwhelm them with the Truth!!

 

  • Do Not Back Down
    The power liberals have always held is the power of irreverence outrage. Anytime they don’t get their way there are protests, lawsuits, tirades. They used it to push their evil agenda, we can use it for good though. Don’t just silently back down next time your liberal teacher shows bias in the classroom! Make a stink, sue the school. If your boss tries to fire you because he doesn’t like your opinion, sue him for everything he has got! Get a conservative advocacy group on your side and take away the most essential thing, his business holdings. When a company or celebrity makes an ignorant remark about conservatives or tells a lie to further a left-wing agenda, Boycott them or their product! And don’t stop after an apology, let them know an empty apology is not enough. And I cannot stress enough, only do these things when there is a Legitimate reason. We don’t want to become snowflakes like the left, the entire reason to do this is to make a singular effort to remove liberals influence.

 

  • Turn their Game Against them

    wp-1481405718801.jpg

    When Ben Carson ran for President as a Republican, he was called so many different names and racial slurs by the left.

    Liberals like to call people racist to shut others down because they know it works. It can be even more effective against them. Call them and their beliefs Bigoted, Racist, Sexist, and back it up with facts. When they try to lie or make excuses based off of lies, call them out on it and repeat the accusation. Why can we get away with this? Review my initial remark, “Back it up with facts.” In short, only do this if you can factually prove there is some bigoted aspect of their remark or belief. An easy example, if they brag about being a Democrat you call them racist. Back it up with the facts surrounding the Democratic Parties Racist History. They will try to throw the Party Switch lie at you. Don’t let it stand, lay down more facts disproving the lie and use the lie as confirmation of their racism. This serves a 3-fold purpose. The first aspect is that it drives them more insane and huts them with an unimaginable emotional agony, which will likely leave them speechless or provoke them into a further display of their ignorance. The next aspect is that by using facts, you turn people against them, and it is especially important to turn people against them with the truth. Last but most important, the effect it has to chill conservative speech will apply to liberals as well. By chilling their speech, we cut out their ignorant charisma that makes them popular with impressionable people

 

  • Make Yourself Present

    young-conservative-activists

    With Liberals using Universities as centres for indoctrination, it is now more important than ever for us to have College Republican groups to push back against the intellectual Hegemony

    Many conservatives are rethinking the value of Colleges. DON’T! If anything we need MORE Conservative students in College. We need more Conservatives in the teaching profession and on school boards. We need to run for every political seat that comes up and be loud. We definitely need more Conservative Advocacy groups like F.I.R.E. The point is that liberals have stuck their noses everywhere from schools to media, to even comic books. We need to spread out everywhere, be loud, and take it back from them.

 

  • Reach out to the Youth
    Liberals are indoctrinating them as young as possible, hell apparently in New York they teach the Party Switch to lie in school as if it were a fact. And that is creepy since we are letting them shape our kid’s minds considering the left wing propensity to being sexual predators. We need to get in there and start teaching as soon as middle school. And I do not simply mean as school teachers. School Assemblies, After School Programs, both educational and fun. Yes, even a sports team is good. We need to not only teach them what we believe, we need to defy the left wing boogeyman stories and show them what kind of people we are.

 

  • Don’t Close Any Doors

    wp-1481405724063.jpg

    Many “Traditional” Conservatives reject Milo Yiannopoulos. Some say it is because of his Firebrand behaviour, however, it is quite likely they reject him for being Homosexual.

    This last one should not need to be said, but sadly it is. There is a problem in the Conservative Community, consciously or unconsciously we exclude groups of people, especially the ones the Democrats exploit. Don’t get me wrong, by no means should we change our stances just to gain votes. When I talk about exclusion problems, I refer to the fact that we exclude conservatives who are already on board for who they are or because they have new ideas. I have felt many times that my thoughts have been brushed off by my states GOP because I am a gay conservative, and even though there are plenty of Black Conservatives we do not see as many as we should even at the local governmental level. Black, Gay, Straight, White, Latino, as long as they are conservatives and legal citizens we should let them in, hear their ideas, and if they obviously qualified for it, encourage them to run for office. Left Wingers claim they are tokens, that is just proof of their bigotry and possibly an attempt to discourage you to run us. But there are a lot of us out there, and as long as we share actual conservative policy beliefs then we should be welcomed. This also serves to help us turn their game against them.

Is there any hope at this point?

Gen-Z-Conservative

Gen-Z may be the Saving Grace of the nation as well as the Republican Party. Politically, Gen-Z can most closely be aligned with Moderate Republicans, rejecting the insane far left politics of the Democratic Party.

For sure there is, though I am not going to lie to you, it is fainter every day. Europe may be totally lost to use and the EU has effectively indoctrinated the youth over there. I may actually write a piece about that at a later time. In the US there is some hope though. Most likely because of the failed policies of the Obama Regime, Generation Z is poised to be the most conservative generation before the Baby Boomers. They are Fiscally Conservative, Slightly more Liberal socially, but hold things like marriage and religious faith with higher importance than other generations. That in itself is heartwarming, a few years back I had an honest fear that democracy might need to die before Millenials are allowed to hold power as they would destroy the country or even the world. Now, that fear has long since passed with these reassuring developments.

We still have a long way to go. We cannot get lax, we need to make sure that youth stay more informed and teach them the downfalls to emotional thinking. We need to actively reach out hard to Gen Z and invest in them and new ideas they might bring. Our future really is in the youth of this country and teaching them the hypocrisy and evil behaviour of the American Left. The bottom line though is, we need to strike while the Iron is hot and win by overwhelming the enemy, the American Left.

C-Gaymer Podcast Episode 6: Illegal Immigration

C-Gaymer Podcast Episode 6: Illegal Immigration from C-Gaymer on Vimeo.

Today we will talk about a huge issue facing the country, Illegal Immigration. Crime, Voter Fraud, Welfare Fraud, why doesn’t Congress act to build the wall? Who benefits from it? Mr. F.L.A.G. and I explore all of this.